LA protests: Trump tests limits of presidential authority by sending in the troops
By calling on troops to suppress
protests in Los Angeles
on Sunday,
Donald Trump
has shown he is willing to put the country on a war footing – and test the boundaries of executive power – to achieve his goals.
For the first time in decades, the National Guard was deployed against citizens on domestic soil against the wishes of a state's governor, using a rarely invoked law designed to help the US fight off a foreign invasion. A US president last deployed a state's National Guard without being asked by its governor in 1965, when Lyndon Johnson sent troops to protect civil rights demonstrators in Selma, Alabama.
Pete Hegseth
, defence secretary, even threatened to send in the marines to quell the unrest over raids against suspected illegal migrants. That would require invoking the Insurrection Act, which last happened 30 years ago during the riots that erupted in Los Angeles after the police officers who beat Rodney King were acquitted.
The deployment of the National Guard in the second-largest US city, one that is largely liberal, was 'clearly done as an authoritarian show of strength', said Ryan Enos, a professor of government at Harvard University.
READ MORE
'There is no policy reason [why the administration] should be targeting places in Los Angeles as opposed to places in red states.'
Tear gas fills Los Angeles streets as protesters clash with police after a raid was conducted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Video: Reuters
The deployment is the latest effort by the Trump administration to test the limits of presidential authority and force Democrat-run states to follow federal edicts. Some scholars warn these efforts are increasingly in open defiance of political convention and the US constitution.
In the space of a few days, Trump has ordered an investigation into his former presidential rival
Joe Biden
and officials in the previous administration, and threatened to stop federal funds flowing to California.
The president floated the idea of cancelling government contracts held by businesses belonging to his former ally
Elon Musk
, and warned there would be 'very serious consequences' if the billionaire used his war chest to back Democratic candidates.
Trump's most eager lieutenants have issued similar threats. Vice-president JD Vance suggested the spectacle of 'foreign nationals with no legal right to be in the country waving foreign flags and assaulting law enforcement' could be legally defined as an invasion.
Stephen Miller, the architect of the White House's immigration policy, said the choice before the country was to 'deport the invaders, or surrender to insurrection'. He endorsed a post that called for mass deportations no matter 'what it costs', and which concluded: 'Nothing else matters if this isn't handled.'
An injured protester is carried away from clashes in Los Angeles. Photograph:On Fox News, border tsar Tom Homan suggested the department of justice investigate Democratic lawmakers – including House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries – who called for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents not to conceal their faces behind masks when conducting raids.
Justifying the deployment of troops in Los Angeles, homeland security secretary Kristi Noem claimed that Ice agents were merely going after the 'worst of the worst' – criminal aliens embedded in otherwise law-abiding communities. But rounding up day labourers who gathered at Home Depot looking for work, as Ice agents did in Los Angeles on Friday, would appear to suggest otherwise.
A report by the conservative-leaning Washington Examiner last week claimed Miller had castigated Ice's high command for merely pursuing criminals, and exhorted them to round up all undocumented migrants. Ice has denied this.
The broad scope and haphazard nature of the sweeps by Ice agents over the past few days was highlighted by the mistaken arrest of a US marshal in Arizona, who officials admitted had merely 'fit the general description of a subject being sought by Ice'.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
A damaged police vehicle sits on the 101 freeway in downtown Los Angeles. Photograph:On Saturday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt defended the operations as 'essential to halting and reversing the invasion of illegal criminals into the United States'.
Critics of the administration's immigration crackdown say raids are indiscriminate by design.
'Obviously, they know that mass deportations are going to be incredibly disruptive to these cities that have so many immigrants living in them,' said David Bier, director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think-tank.
'They were fully expecting and hoping for this type of reaction,' he added, 'because it's good politics for them, and . . . further justifies both mass deportation and other power grabs.'
Andrew Weinstein, a lawyer who served as the public delegate to the UN under president Biden, said the escalation was part of a broader strategy.
'Whether it's the unprecedented politicisation of the military, [the Trump administration's] assault on higher education under the guise of combating the very real problem of rising anti-Semitism, or the expedited deportation of non-citizens without due process, it's all a pretext to further an authoritarian agenda,' he said of recent moves by the White House.
'Each of these actions cracks the foundation of our democracy just a little bit more.'
For now, public support for Trump's immigration crackdown appears to be holding up. A YouGov poll for CBS, conducted before the Los Angeles protests, found that 54 per cent of the country was in favour of the scheme. That figure dropped though when people were asked if they supported going after those who are not dangerous criminals.
In contrast to Trump's first term, when then defence secretary Mark Esper refused to send the military to quash Black Lives Matter protests, there has been no real opposition to the military deployment from members of the administration, or from Republicans in Congress.
For his part, Trump on Sunday did not see any reason to de-escalate. 'We're going to have troops everywhere,' he told reporters. 'We're not going to let this happen to our country. We're not going to let our country be torn apart like it was under Biden.'
– Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Watch: Police car ablaze, journalist hit by rubber bullet in LA protests
National Guard troops were deployed to the streets of Los Angeles on Sunday (June 8) to help quell a third day of protests over President Donald Trump's immigration enforcement. Los Angeles police declared several rallies to be "unlawful assemblies" alleging that some protesters threw concrete, bottles and other objects at police. Video footage captured the moment a Australian journalist was struck by a rubber bullet on Sunday whilst reporting live during the Los Angeles protests. 9News reporter, Lauren Tomasi, had just delivered a piece to camera for viewers in Australia when an armed police officer in riot gear behind her shot her with a rubber bullet.
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
'Bring in the troops', says Trump as LA anti-ICE protests spread to San Francisco
Police have declared all of downtown Los Angeles to be an unlawful assembly area and ordered protesters to go home after a third day of violence hit demonstrations against President Donald Trump's immigration policy. National Guard troops - deployed by Mr Trump at the weekend to help quell the protests in a move that California Governor Gavin Newsom called unlawful - guarded federal government buildings yesterday. The unrest in Los Angeles has become a major flashpoint in Mr Trump's signature effort to clamp down on illegal immigration. About 60 people were also arrested in San Francisco, police said, after demonstrators in the northern Californian city gathered to protest against the immigration raids. San Francisco police "declared an unlawful assembly," they said on social media platform X. "Approximately 60 people were arrested, including juveniles." The Republican president has pledged to deport record numbers of people who are in the country illegally and to lockdown the US-Mexico border, setting the border enforcement agency ICE a daily goal of arresting at least 3,000 migrants. California state and local officials, mainly Democrats, accuse Mr Trump of inflaming initially small-scale protests by mounting a federal response. He calls the protesters insurrectionists. Several self-driving cars from Alphabet's Waymo were set ablaze on a downtown street yesterday evening. Los Angeles police said some protesters had thrown concrete projectiles, bottles and other items at police. Police declared several rallies to be unlawful assemblies and later extended that to include the whole downtown area. Police on horseback tried to control the crowds. Demonstrators shouted "Shame on you!" at police and some appeared to throw objects, video images showed. One group blocked the 101 Freeway, a major downtown thoroughfare. City Police Chief Jim McDonnell told a media briefing that people had a right to protest peacefully but the violence he had seen by some was "disgusting" and the protests were getting out of control. I have formally requested the Trump Administration rescind their unlawful deployment of troops in Los Angeles county and return them to my command. We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved. This is a serious breach of state sovereignty — inflaming tensions while… — Governor Gavin Newsom (@CAgovernor) June 8, 2025 Police said they had arrested 10 people last night and 29 the previous night, adding arrests were continuing. California Governor Newsom, a Democrat, said he requested the Trump administration to withdraw its order to deploy 2,000 National Guard troops in Los Angeles County, calling it unlawful. Mr Newsom said in an interview with MSNBC he planned to sue the administration over the deployment, adding that Mr Trump "has created the conditions" around the protests. He accused the president of trying to manufacture a crisis and of violating California's state sovereignty. Asked if the National Guard was needed, Chief McDonnell said police would not "go to that right away," but added, "Looking at the violence tonight, I think we've got to make a reassessment". In a social media post, Mr Trump called on Chief McDonnell to do so. "Looking really bad in LA, bring in the troops," Mr Trump said. "He should, right now!!!" Mr Trump added. "Don't let these thugs get away with this. Make America great again!!!" The White House disputed Mr Newsom's characterisation, saying in a statement, "Everyone saw the chaos, violence and lawlessness." Earlier yesterday, about a dozen National Guard members, along with Department of Homeland Security personnel, pushed back a group of demonstrators outside a federal building in downtown Los Angeles, video showed. The US Northern Command said 300 members of the California National Guard had been deployed to three spots in the Los Angeles area. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said that the National Guard would provide safety around buildings to people engaged in peaceful protest and to law enforcement. In a social media post, Mr Trump called the demonstrators "violent, insurrectionist mobs" and said he was directing his cabinet officers "to take all such action necessary" to stop what he called riots. Despite Mr Trump's language, he has not invoked the Insurrection Act, an 1807 law that empowers a president to deploy the US military to suppress events like civil disorder. Asked whether he was considering doing so, he said, "It depends on whether or not there's an insurrection." Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on Saturday the Pentagon is prepared to mobilise active-duty troops "if violence continues" in Los Angeles, saying marines at nearby Camp Pendleton were on high alert. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass blamed the Trump administration for inciting tension by sending in the National Guard. She also condemned protesters who became violent. "I don't want people to fall into the chaos that I believe is being created by the administration completely unnecessarily," she told a press conference. Vanessa Cardenas, head of the immigration advocacy group America's Voice, accused the Trump administration of "trumping up an excuse to abuse power, and deliberately stoke and force confrontations around immigration."
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Business leaders converge on Washington to halt Trump's foreign investment tax
Dozens of executives from some of the world's biggest companies will travel to Washington this week to push back against a plan to raise taxes on foreign investments in the US, warning it may hit millions of American jobs. The lobbying drive is targeting a provision in Donald Trump 's budget bill, which if approved by Congress would allow the US to impose additional taxes on companies and investors from countries that it deems to have punitive tax policies. Investors, US companies with foreign owners and international firms with American operations, could all be affected by Section 899 of the bill, which executives fear could cause a drop in corporate investment and a retreat from US assets. Jonathan Samford, president of the Global Business Alliance, told the Financial Times that representatives from about 70 companies would meet members of Congress this week and Section 899 would be 'a central topic'. READ MORE The threat of higher taxes has unsettled the lobby group's almost 200 foreign-owned companies in the US, which include most of the big pharma and medical device companies that have significant operations in Ireland as well as CRH, Guinness parent Diageo, Jameson parent Pernod Ricard and Kerry Group. Many of them fear a hit to the 8.4 million jobs they provide in America. 'I think there is growing momentum to get rid of this provision in the Senate,' said Mr Samford. 'Senators recognise that it's counterproductive to the economic vision for the administration, which has made a big point about trying to get more investment to the US.' A leading financial trade association is also planning for its members to travel to Washington this week to meet treasury officials and Republican members of the Senate banking committee to argue against Section 899. Beth Zorc, chief executive of the Institute of International Bankers (IIB), said: 'As passed by the US House of Representatives, Section 899 will stifle foreign direct investment, risk financial market disruptions and endanger American jobs in states and communities across the country.' The US operations of foreign banks underwrite more than 70 per cent of debt issuance for foreign companies in the US, representing almost a third of total dollar-denominated debt issuance, the IIB said. The foreign banks said they lent more than $1.3 trillion (€1.14 trillion) to US companies in 2023 and their financing of international companies supported $5.4 trillion of foreign direct investment in the US by foreign headquartered companies, generating $270 billion of revenue. The IIB, which represents some of the world's biggest banks including HSBC, BNP Paribas, Royal Bank of Canada, UBS, Bank of China and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial, as well as AIB and Bank of Ireland, is expected to push for a one-year delay to the tax rises and for a reduction in the scope of the measure. 'We encourage the Senate to address concerns about this provision and to consider modifications that will help preserve international investment in American jobs and businesses,' Ms Zorc told the FT. The measure targets countries with what the US calls 'unfair foreign taxes'. Most EU countries, the UK, Australia, Canada and others around the world would be affected, according to law firm Davis Polk. For foreign investors, Section 899 would increase taxes on dividends and interest on US stocks and some corporate bonds by five percentage points every year for four years. It would also impose taxes on the American portfolio holdings of sovereign wealth funds, which are at present exempt. Republicans in Congress have searched for ways to keep the cost of Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax bill down; Section 899 would raise $116 billion over the next decade, according to the non-partisan joint committee on taxation. Still, the overall bill would add $2.4 trillion to the US debt by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Jason Smith, the chairman of the tax-writing House ways and means committee, said recently that he hoped Section 899 was not imposed because other countries would change their laws in response. 'A big concern is that foreign governments, based on agreements entered by the Biden administration, are trying to suck away billions of dollars from US companies,' said Mr Smith. 'This is a way to help put them in check so that they understand that if they do that to US businesses, there will be consequences for their actions. Hopefully it'll never take effect.' – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
