Labour MPs poised to rebel over planning bill amid concerns for nature
Labour MPs are planning to rebel over the planning and infrastructure bill after constituents raised concern that it threatens protected habitats and wildlife.
The Guardian understands that about two dozen Labour MPs are calling for ministers to force developers to build more than a million homes for which they already have planning permission before pushing through legislation that rolls back environmental protections for the most protected habitats in England.
Ministers are understood to be drawing up amendments to the most controversial part of the bill, part three, in an apparent scramble to head off a rebellion and quell the anger of respected wildlife groups, whose membership is many millions strong.
Sources close to the discussions said there were red lines that could not be crossed to make sure nature was protected.
Alexa Culver, an environmental lawyer with RSK Wilding, said ministers were expected soon to present 'appeasement' amendments on part three so they could claim the legislation was not regressive.
She said: 'We should assume that ministers won't have sought the advice of the Office for Environmental Protection (OEP) on these amendments. I urge us all to call for a further legal opinion from the OEP so that misleading ministerial statements aren't allowed to stay in circulation for too long.'
The Guardian revealed on Tuesday that three separate legal opinions – including the OEP's – say the bill rolls back environmental protections, including for more than 5,000 of the most sensitive, rare and protected habitats in England, leaving them vulnerable to destruction. Wildlife charities are calling on the government to scrap part three and redraw the bill when it returns to parliament on Monday.
Beccy Speight, the chief executive of the RSPB, said: 'The government must stop portraying this planning bill as a win-win for nature and economic growth. It is not. A thriving natural world is essential to underpin both growth and a resilient future. It's not too late for the government to address the issues with part three of the bill, and put forward legislation that can actually deliver economic growth and restore nature at scale.'
Property developers have yet to build 1.4m homes for which they have planning permission. In a tactic known as landbanking, developers hold land with planning permission to secure higher values, according to recent research by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR).
Chris Hinchliff, the Labour MP for North East Hertfordshire, said that rather than pushing through a bill that allowed developers to pay to sidestep environmental protections, ministers should force developers to start building the homes they already had permission for.
Hinchliff has submitted a number of amendments to the bill aiming to strengthen protections for nature. He said: 'This legislation strips back environmental protections and local democracy but does nothing to stop developers drip-feeding developments to inflate prices. The planning system consistently approves more homes than get built. The bottleneck isn't simply process, it's profit.'
The rebel backbenchers are working with the Green party and the Liberal Democrats to form a large group that hopes to scupper part three of the bill, which they say is the most damaging, when the legislation comes to parliament next week.
Part three allows developers to sidestep environmental obligations by paying into a nature restoration fund, for environmental improvements elsewhere at a later date.
The planning and infrastructure bill is central to the government's growth strategy, with a target to build 1.5m homes by the end of this parliament to address the UK's housing affordability crisis and drive economic growth.
Ministers announced recently that they were consulting on a range of measures to get developers building, including considering a use-it-or-lose-it policy, which was recommended by the IPPR in its report in February.
IPPR research shows that planning rules have been loosened over the past two decades but building rates have decreased during that time.
Hinchliff said there should a fresh approach to deal with underperforming developers. 'I've proposed financial penalties for developers who don't build as promised, and new powers for councils to block developments from firms which repeatedly land bank,' he said.
Terry Jermy, the Labour MP for South West Norfolk, said: 'Ensuring that homes with planning permission get built in a timely manner is part of the solution to our housing needs. There's a housing shortage in the country, which is costing local councils and the government huge sums of money in emergency and temporary accommodation, and the dream of home ownership remains out of reach for many. Tackling landbanking needs to form part of the government's focus to bring about the change needed.'
Dr Maya Singer Hobbs, a senior research fellow at IPPR, said: 'Developers are not deliberately building slowly to stymie housebuilding, but they are not going to build at a rate that will reduce house prices – it's not in their interest to do this, and indeed they have legal obligations to shareholders that would prevent this. There might be a case to explore whether giving local authorities the power to apply a 'use it or lose it' approach to planning permission would speed up delivery.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
16 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Miliband: I'll force solar panels onto ‘vast majority' of new homes
Developers will be forced to install solar panels on the 'vast majority' of new homes, Ed Miliband has said. The Energy Secretary said plans for a massive increase in rooftop solar power were 'just common sense' and should become 'almost universal' across the country. Four in five new-builds will reportedly be required to have solar panels covering 40 per cent of their ground area under new proposals, while 19 per cent would be allowed to have slightly fewer because of exemptions such as those relating to roof pitch. Mr Miliband claimed the move could save a typical homeowner £500 a year with their energy bills – despite industry fears it will add thousands of pounds to developers' costs. It comes days after he defeated a separate attempt by the Chancellor Rachel Reeves to slash funding for the warm homes scheme, a £13.2 billion project to upgrade housing insulation and install other energy saving measures. Warning that the current proportion of new build homes with solar panels, at 40 per cent, was not high enough, he said: 'It's got to be much, much higher than that. 'It's got to be almost universal. There will be rare exceptions where solar panels won't be on, if they simply will make no difference. 'But for the vast, vast majority of homes, homes will be built, the solar panels will be there – saving something like £500 for the typical homeowner. 'It's just common sense.' Mr Miliband's comments, in a BBC interview, come a month after Downing Street confirmed the panels should be installed on as many new properties as possible, amid speculation that ministers will make them a mandatory requirement for developers by 2027. Changes to regulations will be laid out in the Future Homes Standard, due to be published this autumn. The previous Conservative government considered a proposal that would have mandated rooftop solar panels to cover 40 per cent of a building's ground area or equivalent. Mr Miliband said: 'The problem about the previous system was that it said you would have to have a certain percentage of coverage of solar panels, but if you couldn't achieve that percentage, you didn't have to do anything at all. 'Under our plans, we are not going to say that. We are going to say even if you can't hit 40 per cent you will still have to have some solar panels, except in rare, exceptional cases.' The policy is expected to add between £3,000 and £4,000 to the cost of construction, but supporters claim it would save owners more than £1,000 on their annual energy bills. Labour's manifesto included a pledge to build 1.5 million new homes over the course of the Parliament. It comes after Miliband called for car parks across Britain to be turned into solar farms. However, there have been a number of high profile fires recently that have been attributed to the panels. Last month, a faulty solar panel was blamed for a fire at a maternity hospital which led pregnant women and babies to be evacuated from the building in Bristol. They were also said to have probably been the cause of a fire that severely damaged a £1.5 million home in Dorset during the same month.
Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
European shares steady ahead of key US jobs data
June 6 (Reuters) - European shares were stable on Friday, as investors refrained from placing major bets ahead of crucial U.S. jobs data, with persistent trade tensions adding to the uncertainty. The pan-European STOXX 600 (.STOXX), opens new tab held its ground at 551.95 points, as of 0809 GMT, and remained on track for a second consecutive weekly gain, if momentum holds. A monthly reading of U.S. non-farm payrolls will set the tone for the day, helping investors gauge the impact of U.S. President Donald Trump's trade policies on the labor market and how the Federal Reserve might navigate this uncertain trade environment. "As the Fed is looking for hard data on the impact of tariffs on the labour markets, a print above consensus could reinforce the Fed's cautious stance and serve as a bearish impetus," Commerzbank analysts said. Trump doubled tariffs on steel and aluminium imports earlier this week, intensifying trade tensions. However, investors remained optimistic on signs of a potential easing of U.S.-China tariff tensions following Trump's phone call with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday. Also on Thursday, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said that Germany and the U.S. aim to strengthen trade ties, without offering any details. Meanwhile, the ECB's anticipated interest rate cut was largely overshadowed by President Christine Lagarde's signals that the central bank is approaching the end of its easing cycle, prompting investors to scale back expectations for further cuts. Investor focus will be on whether a public feud between Trump and Tesla top boss Elon Musk could have wider consequences for markets. "Comments from Musk yesterday about Trump tariffs, putting the U.S. in recession in the second half of this year combined with weak data this week is causing investors to sit out for the time-being," said Fiona Cincotta, senior market analyst at City Index. In the market, heavyweight healthcare (.SXDP), opens new tab and energy (.SXEP), opens new tab shares countered declines in industrial goods and services (.SXNP), opens new tab and miners (.SXPP), opens new tab. Among stocks, sportswear retailers Adidas ( opens new tab and Puma ( opens new tab slipped 0.6% and 1.4%, respectively, after U.S. peer Lululemon Athletica (LULU.O), opens new tab cut its annual profit forecast. Dassault Systemes ( opens new tab fell 1.5% after the French software company extended the target period of its medium-term earnings per share forecast by one year. Renk ( opens new tab slipped about 5%, among the worst performers on the STOXX 600, after Exane BNP Paribas downgraded the stock to "underperform" from "neutral". On the data front, German exports and industrial output appeared to fall more than expected in April, as demand from the U.S. decreased following months of strong purchases in anticipation of U.S. tariffs. In May, British house prices dropped by a larger margin than expected.
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Anti-austerity protest against Labour welfare cuts and defence spending expected to draw thousands
A significant demonstration is planned for Saturday in London to protest government spending cuts and welfare reforms. Organised by The People's Assembly, the group says they anticipate a large turnout, with trade unionists, campaigners, and activists expected to converge in central London to voice their opposition. The group has criticised the government, arguing that recent cost-cutting measures are likely to disproportionately affect the most vulnerable members of society. A spokesperson said: 'The adherence to 'fiscal rules' traps us in a public service funding crisis, increasing poverty, worsening mental health and freezing public sector pay. 'Scrapping winter fuel payments, keeping the Tory two-child benefit cap, abandoning Waspi women, cutting £5 billion of welfare by limiting PIP and universal credit eligibility, and slashing UK foreign aid from 0.5% to 0.3% of GDP, while increasing defence spending to 2.5% of GDP, are presented as 'tough choices.' 'Real tough choices would be for a Labour government to tax the rich and their hidden wealth, to fund public services, fair pay, investment in communities and the NHS.' Under the banner "No to Austerity 2.0," the demonstration will unite various groups, including trade unionists, health advocates, disability rights campaigners, housing activists, and welfare organisations, alongside community groups. The event will feature a march from central London to Whitehall, culminating in a rally. Speakers from diverse backgrounds, such as trade union leaders, politicians, disability rights activists, and anti-poverty campaigners, will address the crowd. Additionally, groups advocating for increased investment in the NHS and other public services will participate, aiming to send a clear message to the Government. The spokesperson added: 'We face a growing threat from the far right, fuelled by racism, division, and failed politics. We need to see people's lives improve, we need to see the vulnerable cared for and an end to child poverty. 'On June 7, we march for education, for our NHS, for welfare, for refugees, against hate, and for a society in which our children can flourish.' The event has been backed by former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, who now sits as an independent MP following his expulsion from the party in 2024. Urging people to attend the demonstration on social media, the MP for Islington North said: 'We have a government in office that is now cutting benefits to the most vulnerable people in our society' and 'taking away the winter fuel payment for people who desperately need it.' 'I'm going to be there, we're all going to be there. It's going to be a march of hope, to bring about real change.'
