What's happening in LA? Trump's controversial immigration crackdown explained
By Elissa Steedman for ABC News
Police and protesters face off on the streets of LA.
Photo:
ETIENNE LAURENT
US President Donald Trump deployed 2000 California National Guard troops to Los Angeles streets on Saturday night.
The extraordinary measure is the latest escalation in a tense immigration debate the nation has been grappling with since before the election.
Here's a look at what's happening in Los Angeles and what led to the protests.
Photo:
ETIENNE LAURENT
In short, protests are continuing in Los Angeles for a third straight day. You might have heard them being referred to as ICE protests on social media.
They began on Friday after immigration agents from ICE made dozens of arrests across the city over alleged immigration violations.
On Sunday, 300 national guard troops were also deployed to guard a federal detention centre in downtown Los Angeles where those arrested were being held.
Photo:
AFP / Frederic J Brown
ICE, which stands for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, is a law enforcement agency under the Department of Homeland Security.
It is responsible for enforcing the country's immigration laws.
Photo:
ETIENNE LAURENT
It is not uncommon for ICE to arrest people it believes are in the US illegally.
But this spate of arrests comes as part of the Trump administration's controversial immigration crackdown.
Trump has vowed to deport record numbers of illegal immigrants during his second term, and the White House has set ICE a goal to arrest at least 3000 migrants each day.
Because of that pressure, people who were legally living in the US have been caught up in ICE raids.
One of the more notable cases was the arrest of 238 men accused of being Venezuelan gang members, who were not given a day in court before they were deported to a mega-prison in El Salvador.
The arrest raids were also carried out in a public manner, which Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said would "sow terror" in the community.
They occurred at a hardware store, where street vendors and day labourers were swept up, a garment factory and a warehouse.
"I am deeply angered by what has taken place," Bass said in a statement.
"These tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city.
"We will not stand for this."
Photo:
ROBYN BECK
Securing the border was one of Trump's key election promises.
During the presidential campaign, he argued illegal immigrants were responsible for a crime wave and described people who cross illegally into the US as "animals" who are "poisoning the blood" of the nation.
While he was able to point to a handful of high-profile crimes allegedly committed by illegal immigrants, there was no data publicly available to verify the claim.
Data from Texas, the only state that tracks crimes by immigration status, shows considerably lower felony arrest rates among people in the US illegally, compared to legal immigrants or citizens.
But a perceived crime wave is not the only argument in favour of an immigration crackdown.
The US is grappling with cost-of-living and housing crises, too, which many citizens say is only worsened by a mass influx of illegal immigrants competing for the same resources.
Brenda Lee, a resident of Brooklyn, New York, told Foreign Correspondent last year she would vote for Trump because of his hardline immigration policies.
"There's people that are having a hard time, you know, making ends meet," she said.
"The rents are so high, we have a housing crisis, we have so many issues.
"So it's like, we come first because we pay taxes."
Photo:
FREDERIC J. BROWN
Since Trump returned to office this year, ICE agents have been particularly active in California, New York and Illinois, according to analysis published by Axios last week.
These states are considered "blue" because they reliably vote in favour of the Democratic Party in presidential elections.
California is home to the country's largest immigrant population.
About 10.6 million of its residents were born overseas, which makes up 22 per cent of the nation's foreign-born population.
According to the Pew Research Center, 1.8 million immigrants in California, or about 17 percent of the total number, were undocumented in 2022.
In a post on Truth Social, Trump said Los Angeles had been "invaded" by "illegal aliens and criminals".
Photo:
FREDERIC J. BROWN
It's a section of the military that can be used as reserves for the army and air force.
Each state has its own unit, which answers to the relevant state governor and the president.
While the national guard has assisted with crowd control in the past, Trump's call to deploy the California National Guard is considered a rather historic move.
That is because he did so without the governor's approval - something no president has done since 1965 when President Lyndon B Johnson sent troops to protect a civil rights march in Alabama.
California Governor Gavin Newsom has formally requested the Trump administration withdraw the troops, arguing their presence is "inflaming tensions".
"Indeed, the decision to deploy the National Guard, without appropriate training or orders, risks seriously escalating the situation," his office wrote to Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.
- ABC
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
As it happened: National Guard on ground at Los Angeles immigration protests
California National Guard arrived in Los Angeles on Sunday (US time), deployed by President Donald Trump after two days of protests by hundreds of demonstrators against immigration raids carried out as part of Trump's hardline policy. It's the first time 55 years that a president has deployed a National Guard without a request by a state governor. Look back at what happened during the day with RNZ's liveblog: Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
We're In The Eye Of The Storm, As Tailwinds Become Headwinds
Last week was very much a US story. To be fair, these day's that's become the norm. But between friendship fallouts, and a number of slowing US indicators, there was plenty to digest. We've seen a front loading of activity in anticipation of tariffs. And we may now be seeing the start of the unwind. Both of which cloud what's happening to the actual trend growth beneath. There has been a shock to sentiment, and conditions are deteriorating. Our COTW takes a look at the slowdown in US output, but rise in inflationary pressure. Here's our take on current events We're officially one month away from the end of the 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs. And so far, we've had one deal. One. It's with the UK, and it's with loose ends. We would have expected many more by now. And still hope for many more to come between now and July 9th. But if the current track record is anything to go by, it's painfully slow. We remain in limbo. And President Donald Trump's attention seems to be elsewhere, with his very public breakup with Elon Musk. Beyond the playground drama, the US economy is starting to pay the price of the tariff turmoil environment. We've been waiting and watching, trying to gauge the tariff impacts. And it feels like we're in the eye of the storm. We know, mostly anecdotally, that there has been a lot of front-loading. Car sales for example, surged in March, only to fall off a cliff in April. And we've seen a further pullback in Chinese sourced goods over the month of May. The front loading of activity, and growth, is common sense. We saw similar reactions when GST was introduced. If you know a tax hike (GST or tariff) is coming, you buy now, not after. The inflation gauge spikes, temporarily, and then returns to levels seen before the tax hike. So, what we saw in the first half of the year, was a confused front loading. And what we'll see over the second half, is an unwind. In fact, we're possibly already seeing that unwind now. Monthly trade data out of the US last week showed signs that the recent front loading of imports into the US may be coming to an end. The US trade deficit over April narrowed 55.5% - the most on record- led by a record 16.3% decline in imports. And the value of US imports from China fell to its lowest level since the early months of pandemic when borders were physically shut. Nevertheless, as economists, it's difficult to strip out the likely front loading from the actual trend growth beneath. And it's equally difficult to strip out the unwind. So, growth may be rosy for now, and bleak a little later. So, what do you do? Well, we turn to sentiment indicators. And there has been a shock to sentiment, as you'd expect given all the uncertainty. Last week we saw a fall across US PMI surveys indicating a contraction in activity. See our COTW for more, but essentially the surveys can be summed up simply as firms are facing weaker activity but persistent inflation pressures. That's painful. Everything that happens in an economy washes out in the labour market. If we're growing, businesses hire. If we're stalling, businesses retrench. The US payrolls report is the 'glamour stat'. The red carpet gets rolled out on the first Friday of every month, and camera crews fight for a glimpse into the labour market. Well last month's report was released on Friday, and the labour market is bending, not breaking. Payrolls have softened but not dramatically, with 139k for month of May (with consensus 120k). The unemployment rate was unchanged at 4.2%, while the level of underemployment held steady. That's good. And wages posted a solid gain of 3.9%. Again, that's good. But we're sitting here knowing it's still way too early to see the full impacts of the tariffs. And there are some questions around the strength of the payrolls report, with the ADP (a pre-payrolls payrolls report) declining noticeably this year, to just 37k last month. Conditions have weakened… but we're in the eye of the storm. We felt some tailwinds to start, with pre-loading, and face headwinds ahead, as the full force of the tariffs come through. This week we get the US inflation report for May. We haven't seen impact of tariffs in the data yet. But we're watching. US surveys show higher, or elevated, inflation is expected, but it is not yet in the hard data. Chart of the Week: US firms are feeling the heat. Cracks in the US economy are starting to form. The recent flow of high-frequency data isn't looking too good. The ISM surveys for the month of May were especially disappointing. The manufacturing PMI fell from 48.7 to 48.5, the lowest in six months. And majority of its components also signalled contraction (a reading below 50). The new export orders fell 3pts, while production contracted for the third straight month and remains well below pre-covid levels. At the same time, the prices paid sub-index expanded for the fourth straight month, and the supplier deliveries sub-index rose 2pts suggesting a hoarding of inputs ahead of tariff escalation. The services PMI posted a deeper slide in May. Economic activity in the sector contracted for the first time since June 2024, with the index plunging 1.7pts and slipping into contractionary territory. The drop in the headline index reflected a plunge in the new orders component, down 5.9pts. And the prices paid sub-index increased to the highest level in 30months. Across both surveys, it's clear that output is beginning to slow, while inflationary pressures are heating up.
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
'Act Responsibly For Humankind' - Palau President On Deep Sea Mining Order
Palau's president says the US order to fast-track deep sea mining is not a good idea. Deep sea mining frontrunner The Metals Company (TMC) has since confirmed it will not apply for a mining license through the International Seabed Authority (ISA), instead opting to apply through US regulations. Surangel Whipps Jr. said the high seas belongs to the entire world so everyone must exercise caution. "We should be responsible, and what we've asked for is a moratorium, or a temporary pause ....until you have the right information to make the most important informed decision," Whipps told RNZ Pacific. Whipps said it's important for those with concerns to have an opportunity to speak to US President Donald Trump. "Because it's about partnership. And I think a lot of times it's the lack of information and lack of sharing information. "It's our job now as the Pacific to stand up and say, this direction could be detrimental to all of us that depend on the Pacific ocean and the ocean and we ask that you act responsibly for humankind and for the Pacific." Trump's executive order states: "It is the policy of the US to advance United States leadership in seabed mineral development." The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) was directed to, within 60 days, "expedite the process for reviewing and issuing seabed mineral exploration licenses and commercial recovery permits in areas beyond national jurisdiction under the Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Resources Act". It directs the US science and environmental agency to expedite permits for companies to mine the ocean floor in the US and international waters. The Metals Company has praised the US deepsea mining licencing pathway. In a press release, its chief executive Gerard Barron made direct reference to Trump's order, titled 'Unleashing America's Offshore Critical Minerals and Resources'. He said he was heartened by its call "for a joint assessment of a seabed benefit-sharing mechanism" and was certain that "big ocean states" like Nauru would continue to play a leading role in the deep sea mining industry. There are divergent views on deep sea exploration and mining in the Pacific, with many nations, civil society groups, and even some governments advocating for a moratorium or outright ban. However, Tonga, Nauru, Kiribati and the Cook Islands have exploration contracts with mining representatives. Vanuatu's Climate Minister Ralph Regenvanu told RNZ Pacific in 2023 that Vanuatu's position is for no deep sea mining at any point. "We have a lot to think about in the Pacific. We are the region that is spearheading for seabed minerals," he said. The Cook Islands has sought China's expertise in seabed mining through "high-level" discussions on Prime Minister Mark Brown's February 2025 trip to China. Whipps said "you have to give [The Metals Company] credit" that they have been able to get in there and convince Donald Trump that this is a good direction to go. But as the president of a nation with close ties to the US and Taiwan, and the host of the PIF Ocean's Commissioner, he has concerns. "We don't know the impacts to the rest of what we have in the Pacific - which is for us in the Pacific, it's tuna [which] is our biggest resource," Whipps said. "How is that going to impact the food chain and all of that? "Because we're talking about bringing, first of all, impacting the largest carbon sink that we have, which is the oceans, right? So we say our islands are sinking, but now we want to go and do something that helps our islands sink. "That's not a good idea."
