Iran's divided opposition senses its moment but activists remain wary of protests
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks in a televised message following the Israeli strikes, in Tehran, Iran, June 18, 2025. Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/WANA (West Asia News Agency)/Handout via REUTERS ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS PICTURE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY.
A man holds an image of Reza Pahlavi, as people protest against the Iranian regime, following the death of Mahsa Amini, outside Iran's consulate, in London, Britain, October 9, 2022. REUTERS/Henry Nicholls/File Photo
DUBAI -Iran's fragmented opposition groups think their moment may be close at hand, but activists involved in previous bouts of protest say they are unwilling to unleash mass unrest, even against a system they hate, with their nation under attack.
Exiled opponents of the Islamic Republic, themselves deeply divided, are urging street protests. In the borderlands, Kurdish and Baluchi separatist groups look poised to rise up, with Israeli strikes pummelling Iran's security apparatus.
While the Islamic Republic looks weaker than at nearly any point since soon after the 1979 revolution, any direct challenge to its 46-year rule would likely require some form of popular uprising.
Whether such an uprising is likely - or imminent - is a matter of debate.
The late shah's son, U.S.-based Raze Pahlavi, said in media interviews this week he wants to lead a political transition, proclaiming it the best chance to topple the Islamic Republic in four decades and saying "this is our moment in history".
Triggering regime change is certainly one war goal for Israel, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressing Iranians to say "we are also clearing the path for you to achieve your freedom".
Within a ruling system long adept at quashing public displays of dissent, there are signs it is readying for protests.
Mohammad Amin, a member of the Basij militia that is often deployed against protesters, said his unit in Qom had been put on alert to root out Israeli spies and protect the Islamic Republic.
However, while the strikes have targeted a security hierarchy that crushed previous bouts of protest, they have also caused great fear and disruption for ordinary people - and anger at both Iranian authorities and Israel, the activists said.
"How are people supposed to pour into the streets? In such horrifying circumstances, people are solely focused on saving themselves, their families, their compatriots, and even their pets," said Atena Daemi, a prominent activist who spent six years in prison before leaving Iran.
MASS PROTESTS
Daemi's concerns were also voiced by Iran's most prominent activist, Nobel Peace Prize winner Narges Mohammadi, in a social media post. Responding to an Israeli demand for people to evacuate parts of Tehran, she posted: "Do not destroy my city."
Two other activists Reuters spoke to in Iran, who were among the hundreds of thousands involved in mass protests two years ago after the death in custody of Mahsa Amini, said they also had no plans to demonstrate yet.
"After the strikes end we will raise our voices because this regime is responsible for the war," said one, a university student in Shiraz, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of reprisals.
Another, who had lost her university place and been jailed for five months after the 2022 protests and who also requested anonymity, said she believed in regime change in Iran but that it was not time to take to the streets.
She and her friends were not planning to stage or join rallies, she said, and dismissed calls from abroad for protests. "Israel and those so-called opposition leaders abroad only think about their own benefits," she said.
Apart from Pahlavi's monarchists, the main opposition faction outside Iran is the People's Mujahideen Organisation, also known as the MEK or MKO. A revolutionary faction in the 1970s, it lost a power struggle after the shah was toppled.
Many Iranians have not forgiven it for then siding with Iraq during the stalemated war of 1980-88 and rights groups have accused it of abuses at its camps and of cult-like behaviour, both of which it denies.
The Mujahideen are the main force behind the National Council of Resistance of Iran, which like Pahlavi has cultivated close ties with some Western politicians. At a Paris forum this week, the council's leader Maryam Rajavi reiterated her opposition to any return of the monarchy, saying "neither the shah nor the mullahs".
How far opposition groups outside Iran enjoy any support inside the country is uncertain. While there is fond nostalgia among some Iranians for the period before the revolution, it is an era that most are too young to remember.
Within Iran, the successive rounds of national protests have also focused around differing issues. In 2009, demonstrators flooded the streets over what they saw as a stolen presidential election. In 2017, protests focused on falling living standards. And in 2022 women's rights were the trigger.
Mir-Hossein Mousavi, the election candidate protesters said had been cheated in 2009, has been under house arrest for years and is now 83. His policy was to reform the Islamic Republic rather than replace it - the goal of many protesters in later movements.
For opponents of the Islamic Republic inside Iran, those unanswered questions of whether or when to stage protests, what agenda to pursue, or which leader to follow are only likely to grow more pressing as Israel's airstrikes continue. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
29 minutes ago
- Straits Times
British lawmakers to vote on landmark assisted dying law
FILE PHOTO: Kim Leadbeater reacts during an interview about the Assisted Dying Bill in Westminster, London, Britain, October 15, 2024. REUTERS/Jaimi Joy/File Photo FILE PHOTO: A protestor holds a placard as they gather outside the parliament as British lawmakers debate the assisted dying law, in London, Britain, November 29, 2024. REUTERS/Mina Kim/File Photo LONDON - British lawmakers will vote on Friday on whether to proceed with a bill to legalise assisted dying for terminally ill people, in what would be the biggest social reform in the country for a generation. Last November, lawmakers voted 330 to 275 in favour of the principle of allowing assisted dying, paving the way for Britain to follow Australia, Canada and other countries, as well as some U.S. states. Now, after months of scrutiny, amendment and emotional debate, the bill must clear another stage of voting to keep it on the road to legalisation, a process that could still take months. A vote against would stop it in its tracks. The Labour lawmaker who has proposed the new law, Kim Leadbeater, said there could be a reduction in the number of members of parliament who support the bill on Friday, but she was confident it would still be approved. One member of parliament who supports the legislation said there were about a dozen votes between those in favour and against, with a number yet to declare their position. Dozens of lawmakers earlier in June signed a letter to the leader of the House of Commons saying that there had not been enough time to debate the details of such a consequential law change. Leadbeater said her biggest fear was that if the legislation was voted down, then it could be another decade before the issue returns to parliament. The issue was last considered in 2015 when lawmakers voted against it. "It works and it is safe, and it provides dignity to terminally ill people," she told reporters before the vote. "This is not an either or when it comes to palliative care or assisted dying. It is about choice for people." PUBLIC SUPPORT Opinion polls show that a majority of Britons back assisted dying, and supporters say the law needs to catch up with public opinion. But, since the initial vote, some lawmakers say they are worried the bill's protections against the coercion of vulnerable people have been weakened. Under the proposed law, mentally competent, terminally ill adults in England and Wales with six months or fewer to live would be given the right to end their lives with medical help. In the original plan, an assisted death would have required court approval. That has been replaced by a requirement for a judgement by a panel including a social worker, a senior legal figure and a psychiatrist. Lawmakers have also raised questions about the impact of assisted dying on the finances and resources of Britain's state-run National Health Service and the need to improve palliative care. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour government is neutral on the bill, meaning politicians can vote according to their conscience rather than along party lines. Lawmakers will hold a final debate on the legislation on Friday morning before a likely vote in the afternoon. If it passes, the legislation will be sent to the House of Lords, parliament's upper chamber, for further scrutiny. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
42 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Why US bunker-busting bombs are key to Israel's Iran goals
Smoke rises following an Israeli attack in Tehran, Iran, on June 18, 2025. PHOTO: WANA VIA REUTERS Why US bunker-busting bombs are key to Israel's Iran goals In launching their military offensive against Iran, Israeli officials have said their goal is to neutralise the country's ability to develop nuclear weapons. It's widely thought that to truly cripple Iran's capacity to produce fuel for such weapons, Israel would require the help of its chief ally, the US. That's because the US has something Israel does not: A so-called bunker-busting bomb potentially powerful enough to destroy Iran's most fortified uranium enrichment facility, the Fordow plant. What's the Fordow plant? At the heart of Iran's nuclear programme are two main facilities for producing enriched uranium, which can be used to fuel a nuclear bomb when processed to contain a high percentage of uranium-235 isotopes to support a fission chain reaction. Both facilities, Natanz and Fordow, were designed to have at least some resilience to military attacks. The biggest site, Natanz, located in the centre of the country, is a mix of assets above and below ground. The subterranean portion was constructed more than 40m beneath the surface with a steel and concrete shell that researchers estimated is 8m thick. Following Israeli strikes, the International Atomic Energy Agency said that the enrichment hall above ground at Natanz had been destroyed, and that satellite imagery indicated the plant underground had suffered 'direct impacts'. But Fordow – which lies outside the city of Qom, south of Tehran – hadn't seen significant damage as of June 18, according to IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi. Fordow is a more heavily fortified site, built into the side of a mountain and believed to be buried about 60m to 90m below the surface. That puts it beyond the reach of Israel's known airborne munitions. Iran has been enriching uranium to 60 per cent at both Fordow and Natanz, a level of purity the IAEA says is technically indistinguishable from weapons-grade fuel. What's special about the US bunker-bursting bomb? The term 'bunker buster' refers to a bomb that's able to penetrate deep into the ground or through heavy fortifications before exploding. Israel has smaller bunker-busting bombs but not the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or MOP, developed by the Americans. Weighing 30,000 pounds and measuring 6m long, the MOP is the world's largest precision-guided weapon and is explicitly designed to destroy 'weapons of mass destruction located in well protected facilities,' according to a US Air Force fact sheet. The MOP has never been used in combat before. It's capable of penetrating as deep as 61m before exploding, according to the Air Force. Parts of Fordow are buried further underground. However, MOPs can be delivered one on top of another, meaning they could drill down even more with each successive blast. How could the bunker busters be delivered? Israel would have to rely on the US not just for the bombs but for their delivery. MOPs can only be deployed on the US Air Force's B-2 stealth bomber, which can carry two of them. The aircraft has a range of 11,000km, which can be extended to 19,000km with a mid-air refueling, according to its manufacturer, Northrop Grumman. That means one of the planes could be flown all the way from the B-2 operational base, Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri, to deliver the MOPs. Could Israel destroy Fordow without US assistance? Israeli forces could bomb the entry and exit tunnels to seal off Fordow. But unless they're willing to maintain a longer-term campaign that includes follow-up strikes, 'efforts to dig down to the facilities to re-establish access and supplies would likely begin almost immediately', Ms Darya Dolzikova and Professor Justin Bronk, senior research fellows at the UK-based Royal United Services Institute, wrote in a commentary. A riskier approach would be to deploy Israeli forces on the ground with a mission to breach the facility and destroy it from within. Such an operation would pose significant logistical challenges and would raise the possibility of engagement with well-armed Iranian forces. Israel, which is widely believed to possess nuclear weapons, could potentially use them to destroy Fordow. However, the use of such arms would be an extraordinary escalation. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
China unleashes hackers against its friend Russia, seeking war secrets
The hacking campaign shows that, despite this partnership and years of promises not to hack each other, China sees Russia as a vulnerable target. PHOTO: REUTERS Since the beginning of the war in Ukraine, groups linked to the Chinese government have repeatedly hacked Russian companies and government agencies in an apparent search for military secrets, according to cyber analysts. The intrusions started accelerating in May 2022, just months after Moscow's full-scale invasion. And they have continued steadily, with Chinese groups worming into Russian systems even as President Vladimir Putin of Russia and President Xi Jinping of China publicly professed a momentous era of collaboration and friendship. The hacking campaign shows that, despite this partnership and years of promises not to hack each other, China sees Russia as a vulnerable target. In 2023, one group, known as Sanyo, impersonated the e-mail addresses of a major Russian engineering firm in the hunt for information on nuclear submarines, according to TeamT5, a Taiwan-based cybersecurity research firm that discovered the attack in 2024 and linked it to the Chinese government. China is far wealthier than Russia and has plenty of homegrown scientific and military expertise, but Chinese military experts often lament that Chinese troops lack battlefield experience. Experts say that China sees the war in Ukraine as a chance to collect information about modern warfare tactics, Western weaponry and what works against them. 'China likely seeks to gather intelligence on Russia's activities, including on its military operation in Ukraine, defense developments and other geopolitical maneuvers,' said Mr Che Chang, a researcher with TeamT5. It is unclear how successful these attempts have been, partly because Russian officials have never publicly acknowledged these intrusions. But a classified counterintelligence document from Russia's domestic security agency, known as the FSB, makes clear that intelligence officials are concerned. The document, obtained by The New York Times, says that China is seeking Russian defence expertise and technology and is trying to learn from Russia's military experience in Ukraine. The document refers to China as an 'enemy'. With Mr Putin largely cut off from the West, his country has come to rely on China to buy its oil and sell it technology that is essential to its war effort. Moscow and Beijing have formed a bloc against Washington and its allies, alarming Western leaders. The FSB document presents a more complicated relationship than the 'no-limits' partnership that Mr Xi and Mr Putin describe. Allies have been known to spy on one another, but the extent of China's hacking activities against Russia suggests both a higher level of mutual distrust and a reluctance by the Kremlin to share all that it is learning on the battlefield in Ukraine. Drone warfare and software are of particular interest to China, the document says. 'The war in Ukraine fundamentally shifted intelligence priorities for both countries,' said Mr Itay Cohen, a senior researcher with cybersecurity firm Palo Alto Networks who has followed Chinese hacking groups for years. Experts say, and the document indicates, that China wants to learn from Russia's war experience to bolster its own preparedness for potential future conflicts. Taiwan, in particular, is a major potential flashpoint with the West. One Chinese government-funded group has targeted Rostec, the powerful Russian state-owned defense conglomerate, seeking information on satellite communications, radar and electronic warfare, according to Palo Alto Networks. Others have used malicious files, intended to exploit vulnerabilities in Microsoft Word, to penetrate Russian aviation industry targets and state bodies. Messages seeking comment were left with the Kremlin and the Chinese Embassy in Moscow. Not all Chinese hacking groups operate at the behest of the government. But security experts have seen evidence of government ties. Russian cybersecurity firm Positive Technologies, for example, said in 2023 that cyberattacks had been mounted on several Russian targets, including in the aerospace, private security and defense sectors. The attackers used a tool known as Deed RAT, which is widely deployed by Chinese state-sponsored hackers. Cybersecurity experts say Deed RAT is considered 'proprietary' among these groups and is not available for purchase on the dark web like other malware tools. That has enabled state-backed hacking groups in China to use it more widely because it is tough for their adversaries to find a way to combat the malware. Chinese state-sponsored hacking groups have often targeted international companies and government institutions, including in the United States and Europe. But hacking groups appear to have become more interested in Russian targets after the country's February 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Mr Chang said he and his colleagues tracked several Chinese hacking groups targeting Russia. Among them was one of the country's most active hacking groups, known as Mustang Panda. Little is known about Mustang Panda's origins or where it operates inside China, according to researchers who have studied the group. Its activities often accompanied China's Belt and Road economic development initiative, according to Mr Rafe Pilling, director of threat intelligence at security firm Sophos. As China invested in development projects in West Africa and Southeast Asia, he said, hacking soon followed. That is most likely because China invests in countries where it has political and economic interests, which motivates state-sponsored hackers, Mr Pilling said. After Russia invaded Ukraine, TeamT5 said that Mustang Panda expanded its scope to target governmental organizations in Russia and the European Union. Mr Pilling, who has been monitoring Mustang Panda's activities for several years, says he suspects that the group is backed by China's Ministry of State Security, its main intelligence body. The ministry supports threat groups that attack targets around the world, he said. In 2022, Mustang Panda targeted Russian military officials and border guard units near the Siberian border with China. 'The targeting we've observed tends to be political and military intelligence-gathering,' Mr Pilling said. That is true of all Chinese hacking groups targeting Russia, he said. 'I think of them as being one of the main tools that the Chinese state has for gathering political and economic intelligence.' NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
