ON 97, diesel prices in Peninsular Malaysia down by 3 sen
KUALA LUMPUR: The retail price of RON97 petrol in Peninsular Malaysia will be reduced by three sen to RM3.07 per litre from June 5 to 11, 2025, in line with the drop in global oil market prices, according to the Ministry of Finance (MOF).
In a statement today, MOF also announced that the retail price of diesel in Peninsular Malaysia will similarly be reduced by three sen to RM2.74 per litre for the same period, while the price of RON95 petrol remains unchanged at RM2.05 per litre.
'The retail price of diesel in Sabah, Sarawak and Labuan will also remain at RM2.15 per litre,' said the ministry.
The weekly pricing of petroleum products is determined using the Automatic Pricing Mechanism (APM) formula, taking into account current global crude oil market trends.
The statement also noted that the government will continue to take appropriate measures to ensure the welfare and well-being of the people are safeguarded.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Focus Malaysia
8 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
PAS demands transparency on PETRONAS' operations after purported sale of Canadian subsidiary
'PETRONAS does not belong to Putrajaya; it belongs to the rakyat.' News that the national oil corporation is seeking potential buyers for the sale of its Canadian subsidiary – Progress Energy Resources Corp – has certainly not gone down well with some quarters. On Tuesday (June 3), Bloomberg reported that PETRONAS is exploring options for a full or partial sale for the company. However, PETRONAS has dismissed this report suggesting a potential exit from Canada by reiterating its commitment to long-term investments in the country's energy sector. 'Any reports that claim PETRONAS is leaving Canada are inaccurate,' the global energy outfit with interests across the entire oil and gas (O&G) value chain in over 100 countries pointed out in a brief statement yesterday (June 4). This denial though has not stopped the opposition from demanding answers. PAS Information chief Fadhli Shaari had raised the issue in a Facebook post stating that any proposed sale needed a detailed explanation from the Prime Minister in Parliament. Highlighting that the Canadian company had been bought for US$5.3 bil in 2012, a proposed sale for US$6 bil-IS$7 bil represented scant returns given the duration of the asset's ownership. The Pasir Mas MP also berated Putrajaya for the drop in PETRONAS' nett earnings which he claimed saw a 30% dip last year. Having cancelled the subsidy on liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and mulling a similar move on RON95 petrol, the PAS lawmaker argued that PETRONAS was not just a corporate entity with an eye on the bottom line but a corporation with national responsibilities. The 44-year-old Fadli believes the scenario is bleak with falling global crude oil prices having contributed towards PETRONAS shedding jobs. He demanded that there be a full report on the investment and returns on Progress Energy as well as a commitment by Putrajaya that PETRONAS will not sell its share in LNG Canada. As it is, PETRONAS is a major equity partner in LNG Canada — the US$40 bil (RM169.7 bil) liquefied natural gas (LNG) facility nearing completion in Kitimat, British Columbia. Above all else, the Perikatan Nasional (PN) MP is also seeking a moratorium on the sale of GLC (government-linked company)-owned assets abroad. Following the exposure on his FB page, there were presumably many pro-opposition netizens who took Fadhli's side on the matter with comments insinuating that the Madani administration was 'impoverishing the nation'. However, there were more than a few dissenting voices. One netizen made the sarcastic observation about the Islamist party's own wastefulness by stating that if PAS were running PETRONAS, there would be decrees on buying luxury cars for its advisers/board members as well as paying them in US dollars. Another commenter reasoned that no matter what the Madani government did with PETRONAS, it would be criticised by the opposition. It's a no-win scenario. While PETRONAS has issued a statement on the matter, it is commendable that the opposition sought clarification. Highlighting check-and-balance topics such as this is certainly preferable to playing up 3R (race, religion and royalty) issues. Who knows if this may even lead to grown-up and civilised discourse online on pertinent issues of national interest. As it is often said, 'hope springs eternal'. – June 5, 2025
New Straits Times
10 hours ago
- New Straits Times
IRB makes stamping of job contracts mandatory from 2026
PUTRAJAYA: The Inland Revenue Board (IRB) has announced that all employment contracts between employers and employees must be stamped from Jan 1, 2026. This directive follows the phased implementation of the Stamp Duty Self-Assessment System (STSDS), as outlined in the 2025 Budget. In a statement today, the IRB said it had begun comprehensive stamp duty audit activities nationwide since January, following the issuance of the Stamp Duty Audit Framework (RKADS). "Through these audit activities and compliance operations, one of the key findings is that many employment contracts have not been stamped as required under Item 4, First Schedule of the Stamp Act 1949, which stipulates a stamp duty of RM10," the IRB said. To ease the burden on employers, the Ministry of Finance has agreed to exempt employment contracts executed before Jan 1, 2025, from stamp duty. This exemption is granted under the powers of the Finance Minister in subsection 80(1A) of the Stamp Act 1949, while the authority to remit late-stamping penalties falls under subsection 47A(2), which empowers the Collector of Stamp Duty. Employment contracts finalised between Jan 1 and Dec 31, 2025, will still be subject to stamp duty. However, the IRB will grant a remission of late-stamping penalties, provided the contracts are stamped by Dec 31, 2025. From Jan 1, 2026, all employment contracts must be stamped promptly, as any delays will result in penalties. In light of these developments, the IRB has urged employers to review and update existing and upcoming contracts to ensure full compliance with the Stamp Act 1949.
Malay Mail
16 hours ago
- Malay Mail
IRB announces compulsory stamping for employment contracts from 2026, penalties for late compliance
PUTRAJAYA, June 6 — The Inland Revenue Board (IRB) has announced that all employment contracts between employers and employees must be stamped starting January 1, 2026. This directive is in line with the phased implementation of the Stamp Duty Self-Assessment System (STSDS) as outlined in the 2025 Budget. In a statement today, the IRB said it has already begun comprehensive stamp duty audit activities nationwide since January this year, following the issuance of the Stamp Duty Audit Framework (RKADS). 'Through the audit activities and compliance operations, one of the key findings has been that many employment contract documents between employers and employees have not been stamped as required under Item 4, First Schedule of the Stamp Act 1949, where the stamp duty is set at RM10,' according to the statement. It said to ease the burden on employers, the Ministry of Finance has agreed to exempt employment contracts executed before January 1, 2025, from stamp duty obligations. This requirement is enforced based on the powers granted to the Minister of Finance under subsection 80(1A) of the Stamp Act 1949 and the authority to remit late stamping penalties provided to the Collector of Stamp Duty under subsection 47A(2) of the Stamp Act 1949. In addition, employment contracts finalised from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025, will be subject to stamp duty. However, a remission of late stamping penalties will be granted, provided that the employment contracts are stamped on or before December 31, 2025. This relief is exercised under the powers of the Collector of Stamp Duty under subsection 47A(2) of the Stamp Act 1949. According to the IRB, starting January 1, 2026, employment contracts finalised from that date onwards will be subject to stamp duty, and any delays in stamping will result in penalties being imposed. In light of these developments, the IRB urges all employers to review and update existing and upcoming employment contracts to ensure full compliance with stamping requirements as stipulated under the Stamp Act 1949. — Bernama
