Salman Rushdie's stabber sentenced to 25 years in prison
AP FILE - Author Salman Rushdie appears at a press conference at the Book Fair in Frankfurt, Germany on Oct. 20, 2023.
The man convicted of stabbing Salman Rushdie on a New York lecture stage in 2022, leaving the prizewinning author blind in one eye, was sentenced Friday to serve 25 years in prison.
A jury found Hadi Matar, 27, guilty of attempted murder and assault in February.
Rushdie did not return to court to the western New York courtroom for his assailant's sentencing but submitted a victim impact statement. During the trial, the 77-year-old author was the key witness, describing how he believed he was dying when a masked attacker plunged a knife into his head and body more than a dozen times as he was being introduced at the Chautauqua Institution to speak about writer safety. Before being sentenced, Matar stood and made a statement about freedom of speech in which he called Rushdie a hypocrite. Matar received the maximum 25-year sentence for the attempted murder of Rushdie and seven years for wounding a man who was on stage with him. The sentences must run concurrently because both victims were injured in the same event, District Attorney Jason Schmidt said.
In requesting the maximum sentence, Chautauqua County District Attorney Jason Schmidt told the judge that Matar "chose this. He designed this attack so that he could inflict the most amount of damage, not just upon Mr. Rushdie, but upon this community, upon the 1,400 people who were there to watch it." Public defender Nathaniel Barone pointed out that Matar had a otherwise clean criminal record and disputed that the people in the audience should be considered victims, suggesting that a sentence of 12 years would be appropriate. Rushdie spent 17 days at a Pennsylvania hospital and more than three weeks at a New York City rehabilitation center. The author of "Midnight's Children," "The Moor's Last Sigh" and "Victory City" detailed his recovery in his 2024 memoir, "Knife."
Matar next faces a federal trial on terrorism-related charges. While the first trial focused mostly on the details of the knife attack itself, the next one is expected to delve into the more complicated issue of motive.
Authorities said Matar, a U.S. citizen, was attempting to carry out a decades-old fatwa, or edict, calling for Rushdie's death when he traveled from his home in Fairview, New Jersey, to target Rushdie at the summer retreat about 70 miles (112.6 kilometers) southwest of Buffalo.
Matar believed the fatwa, first issued in 1989, was backed by the Lebanon-based militant group Hezbollah and endorsed in a 2006 speech by the group's secretary-general, Hassan Nasrallah, according to federal prosecutors. Iranian leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini issued the fatwa after publication of Rushdie's novel, "The Satanic Verses," which some Muslims consider blasphemous. Rushdie spent years in hiding, but after Iran announced it would not enforce the decree he traveled freely over the past quarter century. Matar pleaded not guilty to a three-count indictment charging him with providing material to terrorists, attempting to provide material support to Hezbollah and engaging in terrorism transcending national boundaries. Video of the assault, captured by the venue's cameras and played at trial, show Matar approaching the seated Rushdie from behind and reaching around him to stab at his torso with a knife. As the audience gasps and screams, Rushdie is seen raising his arms and rising from his seat, walking and stumbling for a few steps with Matar hanging on, swinging and stabbing until they both fall and are surrounded by onlookers who rush in to separate them. Jurors in Matar's first trial delivered their verdict after less than two hours of deliberation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
11 hours ago
- Time of India
Man mistakenly deported to El Salvador coming back to US; faces federal charges on return: Report
Kilmar Abrego Garcia (Photo: AP) Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador in March, will return to the United States to face federal criminal charges, according to sources quoted by CNN and ABC News. Following extensive diplomatic negotiations between El Salvador's government and the Trump administration, Abrego Garcia is returning to the United States but he will confront his legal charges in the US, according to the sources. The legal representative of Abrego Garcia, in a statement to ABC News, stated his commitment to continue pursuing a fair trial for his client. "From the beginning, this case has made one thing painfully clear: The government had the power to bring him back at any time. Instead, they chose to play games with the court and with a man's life," said attorney Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg. "We're not just fighting for Kilmar -- we're fighting to ensure due process rights are protected for everyone. Because tomorrow, this could be any one of us -- if we let power go unchecked, if we ignore our Constitution." This development comes over two months following the Trump administration's acknowledgement that they erroneously deported him to El Salvador, his country of origin, from his residence in Maryland. The federal judiciary and Trump administration have been engaged in a prolonged dispute over court directives requiring the government to "facilitate" Abrego Garcia's return from El Salvador following his incorrect deportation in mid-March. One federal judge cautioned this situation could create an "incipient crisis" between the governmental branches. In the Middle District of Tennessee, Abrego Garcia faces two criminal charges: conspiracy to unlawfully transport illegal aliens for financial gain and the actual transportation of illegal aliens for financial gain. According to the indictment revealed on Friday afternoon, Abrego Garcia and his associates are accused of facilitating the entry of thousands of undocumented immigrants from various Central American nations into the US in recent years, "many of whom were MS-13 members and associates." The administration's approach and legal positions have consistently troubled judges across the political spectrum, who expressed concern about officials' apparent disregard for due process rights, particularly given their casual response to the deportation, which various administration solicitors termed an "administrative error" they could not address. Whilst Abrego Garcia's imminent return is confirmed, his long-term residence in the US remains uncertain. His deportation to a high-security prison in El Salvador violated a 2019 judicial order prohibiting his removal to his native country due to potential gang violence risks. However, this ruling did not prevent his removal to another nation. Abrego Garcia, who hails from El Salvador, entered the United States without documentation sometime around 2011. Immigration authorities apprehended him in Maryland in 2019. Subsequently, a judicial ruling permitted his continued stay in the country, citing safety concerns if he were to return to his homeland; still he was deported. His spouse, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, who holds US citizenship, has criticised both the Trump and Bukele governments, stating they are engaging in "political games" at the expense of her husband's wellbeing. Neither in the United States nor in El Salvador does García have any criminal history, and he has never faced accusations of gang-affiliated activities. The administration has previously indicated that upon his return to the US, they might consider deportation to a different country or attempt to nullify the 2019 order. US District Judge Paula Xinis has permitted an investigative process to determine the government's compliance with her instruction to return Abrego Garcia to the US. Recently, the case has received less public attention as this discovery process continues largely away from public scrutiny.
Mint
11 hours ago
- Mint
Judge denies Harvey Weinstein's bid for mistrial after juror complains
NEW YORK (AP) — A juror in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes trial asked to be removed from the case Friday because he felt his fellow jurors were treating a member of their panel in an 'unfair and unjust' way, but the judge told him he had to keep deliberating. Judge Curtis Farber later denied a defense request for a mistrial, saying he believed the juror was simply expressing discomfort in the deliberation process, noting that he's the youngest on the 12-person panel. 'This is nothing other than normal tensions during heated deliberations,' Farber told the lawyers after the juror rejoined his peers. 'Perhaps his youth makes him uncomfortable with conflict.' The juror said he wanted to be excused from the trial because he was uncomfortable with how some jurors were acting toward another juror. But Farber denied the request, saying there were no more alternate jurors to replace him and, in any case, his concerns did not warrant being dismissed. The juror insisted, calling the treatment 'unfair and unjust' even as he described the tension as 'playground stuff' with jurors shunning another juror and talking behind their back. Weinstein's lawyer Arthur Aidala argued that the jury should be told to stop deliberating while the court found out more about the concerns. He criticized the judge's questions to the concerned juror as 'anemic at best.' 'You didn't ask him one follow-up question,' Aidala said. Manhattan prosecutor Nicole Blumberg said the judge acted appropriately by reminding jurors about the expectations for them — including that they not speak to anyone about the case unless all members of the jury are deliberating. Whatever the dispute is, she added, it does not appear to be hindering the jury's work, as the panel requested an additional readout of testimony, this time from the third accuser in the case. The Manhattan jury ended its first day of deliberations Thursday without reaching a verdict. Sexual misconduct allegations against Weinstein propelled the #MeToo movement in 2017. The panel has reheard some testimony and viewed medical records and emails. The jury of seven women and five men is considering two counts of criminal sex act and one count of rape against the 73-year-old Oscar-winning movie producer, with the criminal sex act charges the higher-degree felonies. Weinstein has pleaded not guilty. Weinstein was convicted of sex crimes in New York and California, but the New York conviction was overturned last year, leading to the retrial before a new jury and a different judge. Jurors heard more than five weeks of testimony, including lengthy testimony from three accusers. Follow Philip Marcelo at
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
12 hours ago
- First Post
Suspect in anti-Zionist molotov attack to appear in federal court on hate crime charge
Mohamed Sabry Soliman, 45, is accused in Sunday's attack on the weekly event in Boulder, which investigators say he planned for a year read more A man affixes a bouquet of flowers to a makeshift memorial for victims of an attack outside of the Boulder County, Colo., courthouse, in Boulder, Colo. AP The man who tossed Molotov cocktails at protesters bringing attention to Israeli captives, telling police that his motivation was to 'kill all Zionist people,' is scheduled to appear in federal court for the first time on Friday to face a hate crime charge. Mohamed Sabry Soliman, 45, is accused in Sunday's attack on the weekly event in Boulder, which investigators say he planned for a year. The federal case is being adjudicated in Denver, but Soliman was also charged in state court in Boulder Thursday with attempted murder and assault counts as well as counts related to the 18 Molotov cocktails police say he carried to the demonstration. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Soliman, an Egyptian native, has been unlawfully residing in the United States, according to federal investigators. Soliman is represented by state and federal public defenders, who do not comment on their cases to the media. Investigators say Soliman told them he had intended to kill all of the roughly 20 participants at the weekly demonstration on Boulder's popular Pearl Street pedestrian mall, but he threw just two of his 18 Molotov cocktails while yelling 'Free Palestine.' Soliman told investigators he tried to buy a gun but was not able to because he was not a 'legal citizen.' Soliman did not carry out his full plan 'because he got scared and had never hurt anyone before,' police wrote in an arrest affidavit. State prosecutors say 15 people and a dog were victims of the attack. Not all were physically injured, and some are considered victims for the legal case because they were in the area and could potentially have been hurt, 20th Judicial District Michael Dougherty said Thursday. The dog was among the injured, which resulted in an animal cruelty charge being filed against Soliman, Dougherty said. Three victims remained in the hospital Friday, U C Health University of Colorado Hospital spokesperson Dan Weaver said. Soliman told investigators that he waited until after his daughter graduated from school before launching the attack, according to court documents. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Federal authorities want to deport Soliman's wife and their five children, who range from 4 to 17 years old, but a judge issued an order Wednesday halting deportation proceeding until a lawsuit challenging their deportation can be considered. U.S. immigration officials took Soliman's wife and children into custody on Tuesday. They are being held at a family immigration detention center in Texas.
