logo
Rural communities brace for Medicaid cuts in Republicans' big bill

Rural communities brace for Medicaid cuts in Republicans' big bill

NBC News10 hours ago

HERMANN, Mo. — Like many Americans, Cierra Matthews doesn't have time to pay close attention to the flood of policy changes and announcements coming out of Washington, D.C. So when the single mom of two boys heard that her Medicaid benefits could be impacted because Republicans are proposing changes to the social safety net program, she was shocked.
Members of Congress, Matthews said, are 'covered no matter what, so they don't have to worry about it. So how is that fair to just take it away from somebody that does have to worry about it because of finances or because of a job?'
'I don't think it's fair that they don't care enough to think about that, and that they get to live in that happy little bubble of theirs,' she told NBC News in an interview on Friday.
Matthews lives in a rural community 90 minutes west of St. Louis, where she works in the public school system and falls below the poverty line. She is one of 72 million Americans that relies on Medicaid for her health care, and before Missouri voted to expand Medicaid access in 2020, she was uninsured.
She said that Medicaid saved her life: Matthews received a mental health diagnosis and is on medication that her sons said transformed their mom into a different person.
Provider tax crackdown
As part of a sweeping domestic policy bill, Republicans proposed adding work requirements for 'able-bodied' adults aged 19-64 with exceptions, including for those with dependents under 14, like Matthews.
But GOP lawmakers have also included provisions in their so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill' to crackdown on the health care provider tax that states charge health care providers to help fund Medicaid, particularly in rural areas. Under the new proposal, the federal government would limit reimbursement to states, with some conservatives citing 'abuse' of the program by undocumented migrants in blue states.
A cap or freeze on that fee would cost rural hospitals, like the Hermann Area District Hospital, billions of dollars in funding, according to providers, physicians, hospital associations and even some Republican lawmakers. That includes Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., who argued the provision would 'defund' rural hospitals.
Dr. Michael Rothermich, the chief of staff at the Hermann hospital, said they are already treading water with current funding levels.
'We've had to make a lot of tough choices, a lot of cutbacks. We've had to freeze salaries. The saddest for me was that we had to let go of our home health agency,' a service that helped rehabilitate people in the remote area, Rothermich told NBC News.
With the steeper cuts proposed by Republicans, Rothermich said there is no more room to trim.
'There's no magic money that pops up from someplace else or falls out of the sky to help us do our job. … We provide services to patients and we need to be reimbursed for those services so that we can take care of the next patient and we can buy the next medicine and we can buy the next piece of equipment,' said Rothermich.
The hospital has just three full-time physicians on staff to service patients in two counties, where one in four rely on Medicaid.
'There are fewer and fewer people to take care of it, and fewer and fewer resources to try and do what we need to do to take care of people,' Rothermich said.
In southern Missouri, Karen White, the administrator for Missouri Highlands Health Care, said the new provisions could mean they need to prioritize which patients to care for.
'I think we will see loss of life, maybe not immediate, but if chronic conditions go untreated for an extended period of time, it does result in lower quality of life, less people working,' White said. 'We've lost three hospitals in the last 10 years in our region, and that has left Missouri Highlands as the only form of health care.'
Missouri Highlands is a federally qualified health center, or FQHC — a community-based health care provider that relies on federal funding to operate. White said 46% of the population there is on Medicaid, and Missouri Highlands is the only health care provider in a 3-4 hour radius.
Republicans pitch a rural hospital fund
To help address the shortfall that Republicans are creating as part of their bill to fund President Donald Trump's campaign promises, Senate leaders are working on a separate fund that would go directly to rural hospitals. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., told NBC News on Tuesday that in response to 'a number of concerns our colleagues had mentioned' about their rural constituents, they are 'making good headway' on a solution.
One such proposal landed on Wednesday from members of the Senate Finance Committee, the panel with jurisdiction over Medicaid, to funnel $15 billion to rural health care providers. But multiple Republican senators, including Sens. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Susan Collins of Maine and Hawley, feared it wasn't enough.
'I don't think that solves the entire problem,' Collins told reporters on Wednesday. 'Any money is helpful, but no, it is not adequate.'
The American Hospital Association, a group that lobbies on behalf of the industry, estimates that rural hospitals would lose $50 billion over the next decade if the GOP's crackdown of the provider tax went into effect. And an analysis from the Urban Institute found that hospitals overall could lose upwards of $300 billion as a result of the provision.
Tillis circulated a document to his Senate colleagues on Monday that illustrates the potential impact to rural healthcare providers in Republican states. In North Carolina, Tillis argued 600,000 people could lose access to health care as a result of Republicans' changes to Medicaid, and warned the party they could face losses in the 2026 midterm elections reminiscent of Democrats' defeats in 2014 after a rocky Obamacare rollout.
Matthews told NBC News that because of this issue, she partially regrets her vote in the 2024 presidential election, especially given the administration's push to realize these cuts.
'Why does somebody else get to make those choices for you? Why is somebody else in charge of [Medicaid]? For you? I don't think it's fair,' she said.
And White said she doesn't understand why Republicans are committing 'political suicide' by including these provisions in their signature piece of legislation.
'It does seem a little odd that the folks that elected [Republicans] will be the ones that are impacted the most with these cuts,' White said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' has a big public opinion problem
Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' has a big public opinion problem

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' has a big public opinion problem

Fewer than 30% of voters support the bill in three recent polls by Pew, Quinnipiac and the Washington Post-Ipsos. Republicans are advancing a legislative package that includes tax cuts and reduced spending on social safety net programs to help pay for them, particularly the Medicaid health insurance program for the poor. Trump is pitching the legislation as an economic booster that will ignite growth, but Democrats are spotlighting concerns it could hurt lower-income Americans to rally public opposition. Protesters have descended on the Capitol in recent days to complain about the Medicaid cuts, which have become a big point of contention for GOP lawmakers. A group of 16 Republican House members sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune complaining that the Senate's version of the bill goes too far in cutting Medicaid. Some Republican senators also are raising concerns, particularly about how rural hospitals could be impacted by the proposed Medicaid changes. "I think shutting down rural hospitals would be a big mistake," Sen Josh Hawley, R-Missouri, told USA TODAY in discussing potential political blowback to the bill. Other Republicans say the bill doesn't go far enough to reduce spending and are pushing for deeper cuts, putting their party's leadership in a bind. The House-passed legislation would add at least $2.4 trillion over the next 10 years. "I think the big blowback is if we don't do something to reduce the deficit we'll be seen as hypocrites," Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, told USA TODAY. The GOP wrangling over the legislation, which Senate leaders are positioning for a vote in the next few days, comes amid a string of polls showing it is deeply unpopular. A Fox News survey released June 18 found that 59% of registered voters opposed the bill and 38% support it. The majority of Republicans (73%) back the measure, but most Independents and Democrats are opposed. The survey found that 49% of voters believe the bill will hurt their family, 23% think it will help and 26% don't think it will make a difference. The Washington Post-Ipsos survey found nearly twice as many voters oppose the legislation than support it. An analysis of the House legislation released this month by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found that the poorest households would lose about $1,600 a year under the legislation, largely because of cuts to Medicaid and food aid. The wealthiest households would gain about $12,000 a year, according to the CBO. "What this bill represents is the biggest transfer of wealth from the poor and the middle class to the rich in the history of the country," Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Connecticut, said June 25 during a rally against the legislation at the Capitol. Murphy predicted that if Republicans don't listen to concerns about the bill "they'll be sent back home." "All the data shows that the public's against it two to one," said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. It's not just Democrats saying the legislation could be a drag on the GOP. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-North Carolina, told his GOP colleagues at a closed-door meeting June 24 that deep Medicaid cuts could result in disaster for Republicans in the midterms, according to media reports. Major legislation has blown up on the party in power in the past. Democrats suffered big loses in 2010 after pushing through the Affordable Care Act, former President Barack Obama's signature legislative achievement. Tillis invoked the Affordable Care Act to warn about blowback to the Senate's Medicaid language, according to reports. Sen. Tim Sheehy, R-Montana, said 2026 could be a tough midterm year for Republicans - but that wouldn't be the fault of Trump's bill. "Whatever party's in control historically has a challenge in the midterms," he told USA TODAY. "I don't think it has anything to do with the big, beautiful bill. I think that just has to do with the dynamics of politics." Sheehy said the bill doesn't poll well because it has "been maligned so much." Rep. Randy Fine, R-Florida, noted that the bill contains tax cuts that help some lower-income individuals, including eliminating taxes on tipped wages, overtime and Society Security, in arguing it has been mischaracterized by Democrats. "I'm sure that when Americans see the impact of the bill they're going to be excited," Fine said. "I'm just focused on putting points on the board and helping the president get his agenda done." Contributing: Riley Beggin

See a timeline of 70 years of history that led to U.S. bombing Iran
See a timeline of 70 years of history that led to U.S. bombing Iran

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

See a timeline of 70 years of history that led to U.S. bombing Iran

At the center of it all is the state of Israel, the United States' key ally in the region -- one that consistently finds itself at war with Iran or with the Islamic extremist groups that are proxies for Iran's interests. Some key moments in the relationship between the U.S. and Iran. Can't see the above timeline? Click here to reload the page. 1953: Coup d'etat | The United States and United Kingdom back a coup d'etat in what is then called the Imperial State of Iran. The aim is to stop the Iranian parliament's attempt to nationalize the country's lucrative oil industry. The prime minister is replaced, and the autocratic monarch Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, known as the shah, increases his power. 1957: Atoms for Peace | U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower and Iran sign an agreement allowing the developing country to participate in the "Atoms for Peace" program. The United States provided materials and training to Iran, and essentially kicked off its modern nuclear program. 1978-1979: Iranian Revolution | After Pahlavi attempts to remove Ruhollah Khomeini, a high-ranking religious leader known as an ayatollah, Iranians grow fed up with the shah's massive power. The people stage a revolution to end the same monarchy that the United States had strengthened. A constitution for the Islamic Republic of Iran is established, and Khomeini becomes Supreme Leader a religious-political position more powerful than the role of president. The new regime is markedly anti-Israel, a stance that contributes to 50 years of tense United States-Iran relations. 1979-1981: Iran hostage crisis | Pahlavi is in exile, but U.S. President Jimmy Carter allows him to come to New York for cancer treatment. As retaliation, Iranian militants take over the U.S. embassy in Tehran and take hostages. Carter issues a series of sanctions that freeze billions of dollars in Iranian government assets and block trade between the two countries. More than 50 people are held for more than 400 days and finally released just after Carter leaves office. 1980-88: Iran-Iraq War | Iraq invades Iran, and the United States, under President Ronald Reagan, eventually sides with Iraq and its leader Saddam Hussein. The war lasts for eight years, and hundreds of thousands of people die. More than a decade after the war ends, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright will call the United States' policies "regrettably shortsighted." 1984: State sponsor of terrorism | The U.S. Department of State declares Iran a state sponsor of terrorism and imposes new sanctions. The designation continues until this day. 1989: A new supreme leader | Ali Khamenei succeeds Khomeini as supreme leader of Iran. Now in his 80s, Khamenei has stayed in the position for nearly 36 years. 1992-1997: More sanctions | Congress passes laws and President Bill Clinton signs executive orders that sanction Iran. The policies begin with attempts to stop the country from getting chemical or nuclear weapons, crippling its oil industry, and harming its general economy. They culminate with a near-embargo on goods and services traded between the United States and Iran. 2002: Axis of Evil | U.S. President George W. Bush, in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, identifies three countries -- Iran, Iraq and North Korea -- as an "Axis of Evil" that threaten American security. "Iran aggressively pursues these weapons and exports terror, while an unelected few repress the Iranian people's hope for freedom," Bush says. Later that year, the world learns that Iran has been enriching uranium, a key step toward building a nuclear bomb. 2007-2010: Stuxnet | The Bush administration deploys a cyber weapon called Stuxnet that sabotages the computers Iran uses in its nuclear program while making users believe everything is running as usual. The public learns about the program, built in conjunction with Israel, in 2010, after U.S. President Barack Obama's administration also uses it. 2011-2013: Obama-era sanctions | U.S. President Barack Obama issues a series of sanctions designed to harm Iran's ability to move money around the international banking system and profit off its oil industry. 2013: Preliminary nuclear deal | Obama announces a temporary deal between U.S., its allies, and Iran. The deal requires Iran to limit its nuclear program for six months in exchange for reducing sanctions that have been harming the country's economy. 2015: Final nuclear deal | Obama -- along with leaders of China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the European Union -- reaches a deal with Iran to put significant restrictions on its nuclear program. The terms include limits on enriched uranium, and inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency. While defending the deal from critics, Obama says the only other alternative is war. 2016: Sanctions end | Obama signs an executive order revoking sanctions against Iran that were originally designed as consequences for its nuclear weapons program. The order says there has been a "fundamental shift in circumstances with respect to Iran's nuclear program." 2017: Axis of Evil 2.0 | Fifteen years after Bush, President Donald Trump identifies a new "Axis of Evil" that includes Iran, North Korea, and Venezuela.2018: Trump reverses course | Trump withdraws the United States from the Iran nuclear deal and instead renews sanctions on Iran. The administration says the campaign, called "maximum pressure," devastates Iran's economy and oil revenue. 2020: Soleimani assassination | Trump orders a drone strike in Iraq that assassinates Qasem Soleimani, an influential Iranian military leader. Iran threatens revenge, and international experts and policymakers warn that the United States may have started an unwinnable war. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praises Trump for "acting swiftly, forcefully, decisively," and says Israel stands with the United States in its "just struggle for peace, security and self-defense." 2022: Jerusalem Declaration | U.S. President Joe Biden and Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid meet in Jerusalem to sign a declaration reaffirming the "unshakeable" alliance between the two countries. "The United States stresses that integral to this pledge is the commitment never to allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon, and that it is prepared to use all elements of its national power to ensure that outcome," the pledge says. 2023-2024: Tensions rise | Israel goes to war in Gaza, following a brutal terrorist attack by Hamas that galvanizes the nation. The Iran-backed militant Houthis in Yemen attack ships in the Red Sea. The conflict expands when Israel conducts a first-of-its-kind attack on Iran-backed Hezbollah, detonating explosives hidden inside their handheld communication devices. The following month, Iran fires nearly 200 missiles at Israel, which intercepts most of them, but promises revenge. March 2025: U.S. takes on Houthi rebels | In March, the United States bombs the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen, a now-notorious attack that officials discussed it on Signal. June 2025: Israel-Iran war | Israel launches airstrikes on Iran, killing top military leaders and damaging nuclear technology. Iran counters with its own missile attacks on Israel. The United States bombs Iran's nuclear facilities days later. The Western intervention escalates the war and stokes fears of a wider global conflict. Contributing: Shawn J. Sullivan More visual stories explaining the Iran conflict: Current conflict timeline: From Israeli attack to Iran's retaliation, US bombing and ceasefire How Operation Midnight Hammer unfolded: Details of US bombing in Iran How does a bunker-buster bomb work? A closer look at the GBU-57 Iran fires missiles at U.S. base in Qatar. Where else could it strike? Live updates: Ceasefire in place, but Iran nuclear program may have survived

Unsure when Trump's big bill will move forward? So are the senators
Unsure when Trump's big bill will move forward? So are the senators

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Unsure when Trump's big bill will move forward? So are the senators

Members of the upper chamber are divided on a handful of provisions, including reforms to Medicaid, along with the legislation's trillion-dollar price tag. As Senate Republican leadership tries to settle disputes and get everybody on board, there is a lack of consensus as to when a vote will even happen - and a fast-approaching and self-imposed July 4 deadline that suggests everyone could be working this weekend. Big Beautiful Bill 101: What you need to know about Trump's tax bill "We've got a lot of work to do," Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisconsin, told reporters on June 25. Johnson has been a public critic of the president's "big, beautiful bill," citing concerns about how much it would add to the federal deficit. Asked whether disagreements might be ironed out by the end of the week, Johnson said, "I can't imagine it would be." Some of his colleagues are more optimistic they can get those t's crossed in the coming days. Some are saying they can cross the t's before the end of the week in Washington. "We're going to get the bill across the finish line by Saturday," Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, said, adding that his prediction is, "Saturday at 3 o'clock!" Saturday, 3 p.m., he clarified, as the Senate is not a stranger to twilight votes. Trump and members of his administration have said they want the bill on the president's desk come Independence Day. But there are more steps than just Senate approval needed between now and July 4. If and when the Senate passes their version of the spending bill, the legislation must be reconciled with the House - where lawmakers narrowly approved the first version. Questions remain as to whether, once the Senate does their part, House Speaker Mike Johnson can once again herd his conservative-heavy crew to get this bill out of Congress. Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kansas, said he thinks lower chamber Republicans would struggle to say no - and as a result, disappoint the president. "There's so many great things in this bill," he told reporters, "I think it's going to be hard for the House to vote against it."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store