New Zealand PM to meet Xi Jinping as former leaders warn against becoming an ‘adversary' of China
New Zealand's prime minister will meet Xi Jinping on a formal visit to China next week, his office has confirmed, a week after an open letter signed by some of his predecessors warned against positioning New Zealand as an 'adversary' of its biggest trading partner.
Christopher Luxon is scheduled to travel to Shanghai and Beijing, before going to Europe. His office said he will meet Xi and China's premier, Li Qiang, for a visit focused on trade, but which would also discuss 'the comprehensive bilateral relationship and key regional and global issues'.
'The challenging global outlook makes it vital that we are sharing perspectives and engaging China on issues that matter to New Zealand,' Luxon said.
It will be Luxon's his first visit to China since he was elected in October 2023.
The announcement of the visit comes a week after an open letter signed by former New Zealand political leaders, including former prime ministers Helen Clark and Sir Geoffrey Palmer, urged Luxon to use his visit 'to make it clear at the highest level that New Zealand retains its bipartisan commitment to its strategic partnership with China'.
The letter said recent government statements appeared to be 'positioning New Zealand alongside the United States as an adversary of China'.
'We see considerable disadvantage to New Zealand in becoming part of defence arrangements, including the associated prospective Aukus Pillar Two, which are explicitly aimed at China,' they wrote.
'We do believe that a military relationship with the United States directed against China has many risks for New Zealand.'
'It would not be surprising if China were to come to the conclusion that the special relationship which New Zealand has had with it since becoming the first developed country to have a free trade agreement with it in 2008 is no longer so valued by New Zealand,' the letter said.
Foreign minister Winston Peters has dismissed the letter, saying there was 'no value in indulging the tired arguments of various former politicians/officials who appear to be suffering from relevance deprivation syndrome'.
In May, Peters told the Guardian the Pacific must be protected from becoming a military zone amid China's growing push for influence in the region.
New Zealand's relationship with China has been subject to debate, as the US-Beijing rivalry heightens tensions in the region, and Beijing's behaviour grows more expansionist. In February, China's military held live-fire drills in the Tasman Sea, with little to no notice given, prompting rebuke from both Wellington and Canberra.
Speaking to the Guardian at the Shangri-la dialogue in Singapore earlier this month, prior to the letter and Luxon's announcement, New Zealand's defence minister, Judith Collins, defended the government's hawkish turn, which includes almost doubling its defence spending, saying it was 'about time'.
'The Pacific will become an area of strategic tension and competition. And the best way to prepare for that is to do our bit to defend ourselves, but also to work with Australia and like-minded partners as much as possible,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
Chinese firms in talks to join group to buy Li Ka-shing's ports, Bloomberg News reports
June 12 (Reuters) - Chinese ports operator China Cosco Shipping Corporation is among the firms in talks to participate in a global consortium seeking to buy 43 ports from billionaire Li Ka-shing-owned CK Hutchison ( opens new tab, Bloomberg News reported on Thursday. CK Hutchison said last month that Mediterranean Shipping Company, run by the family of Italian billionaire Gianluigi Aponte, was the main investor in a group seeking the portfolio of ports, which includes two near the Panama Canal, for $22.8 billion. Negotiation for the deal that covers 43 ports in 23 countries is on an exclusive basis between CK Hutchison and the consortium for 145 days until July 27. Adding Chinese investors to the consortium emerged as one of the options after high-level talks in Switzerland last month between Chinese and U.S. officials, the Bloomberg report said. China Cosco Shipping Corp is among the state-backed companies in talks with the consortium run by the Aponte family, the report said. CK Hutchison and China Cosco Shipping didn't immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. The deal has been through weeks of global scrutiny and criticism in China and the U.S. over CK Hutchison's plan to sell the ports to a consortium, previously led by U.S. investment firm BlackRock (BLK.N), opens new tab. BlackRock remains part of the group.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Israel's blitz was years in the planning: Mossad agents smuggled drones into Iran desert, army chiefs and nuclear scientists were killed and Tehran's radar and missile bases eliminated in most devastating attack on Iranian soil for nearly half a century
Months, if not years in the planning, it was the most devastating attack on Iranian soil for nearly half a century. A perfect fusion of high-grade conventional capabilities, human ingenuity and the latest advances in military technologies. Outcome: Iran 's nuclear-enrichment programme set back, dozens of air-defence systems wiped out and leading nuclear scientists and military commanders killed. Israel 's primary aim was to degrade Iran's nuclear-enrichment capabilities. But a political agenda was also emerging yesterday, as regime change in Tehran appeared a distinct possibility. At around 1am UK time about 200 Israeli military aircraft took off from bases inside the country. But by then much of the painstaking work had already been done, entirely in secret. The ground had been laid some time ago by Mossad agents and Israeli special forces who infiltrated Iran, smuggled weapons into the country and prepared drones ahead of what Israel named Operation Rising Lion. With only hours to go, the Israeli government informed the White House that the mission was going ahead, despite US and Iranian officials having arranged to hold talks on Sunday about descaling Iran's nuclear-enrichment programme. This warning allowed US diplomats and their families posted to the region to take additional security precautions. Donald Trump had previously indicated that while he was not prepared to assist Israel militarily, he would not stand in the country's way either. Israel's hand was also strengthened by the announcement, only days earlier, by the United Nations' nuclear watchdog that, for the first time in two decades, Iran was refusing to work with inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency. Iran's dismissive response to their pronouncement was to indicate it would establish a third nuclear-enrichment site and install more advanced centrifuges – a move which appeared to have sealed the country's fate. First reports of Israeli airstrikes emerged in northern Tehran: an explosion in the residential area of Nobonyad. Details remained scant yesterday, but some reports indicated this may have been where some of the country's leading nuclear scientists lived. Subsequently, the Iranian government confirmed the deaths of a number of academics: Fereydoun Abbasi, former head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation, Dr Mohammed Mehdi Tehranchi, president of the Islamic Azad University of Tehran, and Abdolhamid Minouchehr, Ahmad Zolfaghari and Amirhossein Feqhi, from Tehran's Shahid Behesti University. Meanwhile, deep in the deserts of central and western Iran, Israeli special forces troops released swarms of drones which targeted radar facilities and surface-to-air missile capabilities – the military hardware an Iranian response to Israel's attacks would rely on. Israel is expert in such clandestine operations. Even so, the methodology represented a 'hat-tip' to Ukraine, which is understood to secretly exchange 'tactics, techniques and procedures' (TTPs), in military vernacular, with Israel. The rationale for that cooperation from Israel's perspective is it supports Ukraine – though it does not publicise that support – because Iran supplies Russia with thousands of drones. With so many layers of Iran's defences destroyed, Israeli jets focused on their main target, the centrepiece of Iran's nuclear-enrichment programme, the Natanz atomic facility in Ishfahan province, 140 miles south of Tehran. The IDF (Israel Defence Forces) and the International Atomic Energy Authority confirmed damage to the multi-storey enrichment hall where the nuclear centrifuges are housed. Natanz has tens of thousands of centrifuges and significantly contributes towards Iran's highly enriched uranium stockpile. The IDF also targeted infrastructure at the site which, in its words, 'enables the continuous functioning and the continued advancement of the Iranian regime's project to obtain nuclear weapons'. IDF spokesman Effie Defrin said its forces had 'significantly harmed' the site, which he added was used by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) to 'advance their military nuclear programme'. Crucially, the Bushehr nuclear power plant was left unscathed. This ensured there was no increase in radiation levels. This was by no means the first Israeli strike on Natanz. It was the target of a major cyber attack in 2010 and a guerrilla-warfare style attack in 2020, when explosives were hidden inside one of the buildings. As many as ten strikes were reported at Tabriz airport and a nearby oil refinery in north-west Iran. A long column of black smoke was seen rising from the airport. Three people were reported dead in the city itself. Israel also struck dozens of radar installations in western Iran, probably by means of special forces troops approaching the sites on foot, assembling miniature kamikaze drones and setting them off towards these military facilities. Operating at such short range, these drones evaded Iran's limited surveillance capabilities. Explosions were also reported at the Nojeh airbase in Hamedan, western Iran. A number of senior Iranian military officers were also said to have been killed when they convened for what they thought was a secret meeting to plan pre-emptive strikes on Israel. The venue was chosen for its protection, a bunker deep underground. But, according to reports, the bunker was not deep enough, as an Israeli warhead penetrated the basement. A damaged high-rise building that was hit by Israeli air strikes, north of Tehran, Iran, 13 June 2025 HOSSEIN SALAMI Salami was commander-in-chief of Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards Corps, or IRGC. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei appointed Salami, who was born in 1960, in 2019. MOHAMMAD BAGHERI A former IRGC commander, Major General Bagheri was chief of staff of Iran's armed forces from 2016. Born in 1960, he joined the Guards during the Iran-Iraq war that raged in the 1980s. AMIR ALI HAJIZADEH Hajizadeh was head of the Revolutionary Guards' aerospace force. Israel named him as the central figure in directing aerial attacks against it. In 2020, he accepted responsibility for the downing of a Ukrainian passenger jet, which occurred shortly after Iran launched missile strikes on U.S. targets in Iraq to retaliate for a U.S. drone strike that killed top Iranian commander Qassem Soleimani. GHOLAM ALI RASHID Major General Rashid was head of the IRGC's Khatem-al-Anbiya HQ. He previously served as deputy chief of staff of the Iranian Armed Forces. FEREYDOUN ABBASI Abbasi, a nuclear scientist, was head of Iran's atomic energy organization from 2011 to 2013. A hardliner, he was a member of parliament from 2020 to 2024. MOHAMMAD MEHDI TEHRANCHI Nuclear scientist was head of Tehran's Islamic Azad University. OTHER SCIENTISTS Abdolhamid Minouchehr, Ahmad Reza Zolfaghari, Amirhossein Feqhi and Motalibizadeh. Iran later confirmed the deaths of Major General Gholam Ali Rashid, Major General Hossein Salami, commander of the IRGC, Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the commander of the UAV (unmanned aerial vehicles) force, aerial commander Davoud Shaykhian and Mohammad Bagheri, the Iranian Army's Chief of Staff. As precautionary measures, Israel closed its airspace and its diplomatic missions overseas. It also suspended gas production at sites in the Mediterranean. Meanwhile its attacks across Iran lasted for at least five hours – possibly much longer as reports last night suggested that, having secured aerial supremacy, Israeli jets were returning to some of the targets to inflict further damage. By way of response, Iran is said to have launched at least 100 drones towards Israel. Its officials also declared the attacks 'declaration of war'. Iranian drones were found on the ground in Syria after being intercepted by the Israelis. The IDF also released footage of the country's navy shooting down an Iranian drone using Barak-8 surface-to-air missile. That no Iranian ordnance seemingly struck any Israeli targets may have convinced its state news agency Fars to deny it had launched any drones at all, claiming Iran's revenge will 'take place in the near future'. Iranian media also reported at least 78 deaths and 329 casualties from the Israeli attacks, including women and children. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Israel should 'anticipate a severe punishment', adding the country's armed forces would defend Iran's sovereignty. To the surprise of Western observers, Iran's most loyal proxy group in the region, Hezbollah, which is based in Lebanon and armed and financed by Iran, said it would not respond. Iran halted all domestic and international flights from its airspace. US Secretary of State Mark Rubio suggested Israel's actions were 'unilateral'. While the US did not take part in the military action it was fully aware of Israel's intention. Sir Keir Starmer, sidelined by Israel after condemnation of its continuing campaign in Gaza, called for de-escalation. A No 10 spokesman said: 'Our priority is to prevent further escalation in the Middle East, that's in no one's interest... we're working closely with all our allies to press for that diplomatic solution'. Russia, which recently signed a military cooperation pact with Iran, condemned Israel's 'unprovoked attack on a sovereign state'. While China expressed 'concern'. So did Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu was last night due to speak to Vladimir Putin. UN secretary general Antonio Guterres asked both sides to 'show maximum restraint, avoiding at all costs a deeper conflict'. Mr Trump advised Iran to 'make a deal' while it still has the opportunity. He described Israel's attack as 'excellent'. Israel has claimed it was 'just the beginning'. The UN Security Council was meeting yesterday to discuss the continuing crisis. Mr Netanyahu was expected to speak to Sir Keir. The Prime Minister has also discussed the Middle East security crisis with German chancellor Friedrich Merz and French president Emmanuel Macron.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Israel's enemies are Britain's enemies
Having sown the wind, Iran is reaping the whirlwind. A day after the International Atomic Energy Agency warned that the rogue state has enough enriched uranium to make nine nuclear bombs, Israel struck at the head of its military command and the heart of its weapons programme. In a stunning series of air strikes, its forces attacked nuclear facilities and missile sites. They also took out three of Iran's most senior security chiefs and several of its top atomic scientists. It was swift and it was surgical – a triumph of intelligence and planning, as well as sheer military power. And it is far from over. The Israeli Defence Forces made it clear yesterday there was nothing they will not do to prevent Tehran developing the bomb. And who can blame them? Iran is dedicated to Israel's destruction. Over many decades it has backed the Jewish state's sworn enemies, from Hezbollah to Hamas. Supreme Leader the Ayatollah Khomeini believes there can be no Middle East solution without 'the annihilation of the Zionist state'. This is hardly the basis for measured negotiation. We should not forget either that Tehran's mullahs also loathe Western liberal values and scorn democracy, so if they managed to acquire nuclear weapons, the whole world would be at risk. In that regard, Israel's enemy is our enemy. No one wants to see an escalation in hostilities in this already benighted region, but Israel believes it has no option but to act pre-emptively. We should acknowledge and support it in that. This is a people who suffered the Holocaust. Why should they stand idly by while a new generation of anti-Semites plots their extermination? And what is our own great leader Sir Keir Starmer's response to this unfolding crisis? As usual, a load of flannel – calling for calm… engaging partners to de-escalate … committed to diplomacy. The Israeli Defence Forces made it clear yesterday there was nothing they will not do to prevent Tehran developing the bomb Isn't it a bit late for that? Hostilities are well under way. So, whose side is he on? Does he back an oppressive theocracy that hates the West, spies on Britain and has had a malign hand in every Middle Eastern conflict of the modern era, or a parliamentary democracy engaged in a fight for survival? Having professed 'ironclad' support for Israel immediately after the October 7 massacre when still in opposition, he and his ministers have been rowing back ever since – not least because many Labour MPs and voters are rabidly anti-Zionist. The Government has scaled back arms supplies, criticised operations in Gaza and Israeli politicians, and there are signs Sir Keir is about to recognise Palestine as a state. The Left constantly bangs on about a 'two-state solution' but how would it be achieved? Who would draw the boundaries? Israel rightly sees the UN as a bad actor in this drama and will not be bound by its prejudices. And it certainly wouldn't co-operate with the international courts, which it views as similarly pro-Palestinian. Who would live where? And how could the two states live in harmony when one is committed to the obliteration of the other? Hamas and Iran don't want a two-state solution for the Holy Land, they want a one-state solution – without Jews. Sir Keir fancies himself as a statesman as he parades around the world gladhanding leaders and looking earnest. But statesmanship is more than photo-opportunities. It sometimes requires hard choices. When it comes to choosing between backing Iran or Israel, there should be no hesitation.
