How a mother's campaign after the murder of her autistic son could change law
Fiona Laskaris has been fighting for years for a change in law she believes could have saved her autistic son Christopher, as Romilly Weeks reports
Health secretary Wes Streeting has said he is considering 'very carefully' a law change that a mother believes could have saved her autistic son, who was murdered.
As the Mental Health Bill returned to the House of Commons on Monday evening, cross-party MPs urged the government to back a change in law that would allow families to request mental capacity assessments for vulnerable loved ones.
It comes following years of campaigning by Fiona Laskaris, whose 24-year-old son Christopher was exploited and ultimately murdered by a convicted criminal in his own home in 2016.
She was repeatedly dismissed for years when she tried to get Christopher a mental capacity assessment, which establishes whether someone has the ability to make decisions about their own safety and wellbeing, and helps determine what support they may need. She believes that if her concerns had been listened to, he would still be alive today.
Since ITV News aired Fiona's story and the prime minister's subsequent pledge in the Commons to 'look into' the law change, we have been contacted by other families who are also battling to get mental capacity assessments.
One father told of the 'horrific' experience he had trying to help his autistic daughter out of a coercive and controlling relationship with a man, who exploited her and 'drained' her finances.
Now, Fiona is determined to stop other families from going through the same pain that her family has endured.
And in what is the strongest indication yet that Fiona's pleas may be answered by the government, the health secretary pledged in the Commons that he would work to improve the law.
As the mother watched from the gallery, Streeting told MPs: 'We are considering very carefully the arguments that have been raised and looking at what we can do within this bill to advance things in the way that Fiona, and others like her, would like to see.
'We'll continue that engagement throughout the passage of the bill and see if there is a workable way in which we can improve this bill to make sure that others do not have to go through the unimaginable heartbreak that Fiona is living with every day.'
The health secretary also thanked the mother for her 'campaigning work in completely unimaginable circumstances for those who haven't walked in her shoes and experienced the kind of grief that she is experiencing'.
Liberal Democrat MP Cris Coghlan, who is one of three cross-party MPs urging the government to back the change, paid an emotional tribute to Fiona's refusal to give up in the Commons on Monday.
'If we do succeed, it will be above all because of the voices of the broken but unbeaten parents, like Fiona, demanding change.' Watch MP Chris Coghlan's emotional speech in full:
Coghlan, who grew up in the same house where Fiona and Christopher later lived, promised her before he became an MP last year that, should he be elected, he would bring her fight to Parliament. He stayed true to his word and dedicated his maiden speech to her son – as well as his speech on Monday night.
He told MPs as he urged them to back the law change: 'Although this amendment is only a small part of the answer, it is an answer to save lives.
'If one grieving mother can change the law, then perhaps we can answer the other things too, and if we do succeed, it will be above all because of the voices of the broken but unbeaten parents, like Fiona, demanding change.
'Now it is up to us, to make Fiona a witness that in our country it is possible for the vulnerable to be heard, injustice to be overcome and to find beyond grief, hope.'
'Her finances were drained… she was forced to shave her head'
One father, who had been fighting for a mental capacity assessment for his autistic daughter with learning difficulties, told ITV News how she was placed by social services in a house with five unknown men.
Ian explained how this led to 'horrific' consequences, with her being controlled 'physically and financially' by one of those men. Despite Ian and his wife's concerns, they were shut out by social services.
'We felt we lost our daughter for over 12 months,' Ian said, recalling the ordeal. Ian told of how he battled to get a mental capacity assessment for his autistic daughter. / Credit: ITV News
'This is a 25-year-old vulnerable young lady in a house with very limited support, with five adult males,' he continued.
'Within a couple of weeks she became involved in a controlling and coercive relationship with an adult who was over twice her age… it was just horrendous.
'Her finances were drained, she was doing everything that this individual was asking her or telling her to do.
'I think the worst bit for us as parents was when she was forced to shave her head.'
His worst fears were realised when he received a call from his daughter's support worker asking Ian to provide her passport.
'It transpired that within six weeks of this controlling, coercive relationship, they were going to get married,' he said.
'I obviously wouldn't release the passport. However, the support worker was told by the social worker team that our daughter had assumed capacity, so was able to make those decisions of her own free will.'
'No capacity assessments were carried out,' he added. 'We were never asked. And they used the term 'assumed capacity'. 'Assumed' all the time.
'I was in tears. Devastating to think that that could have happened.'
After a lengthy 'battle', Ian's daughter is finally in safe and supported living accommodation and she – and the family – are in a 'much better place now'.
Speaking of the proposed law change, he added: 'The government have to act on this, it's a necessity. I'm just one of many that could tell a similar story.'
What is the Mental Capacity Act and how could the law change?
The Mental Capacity Act was introduced in 2005 in a bid to minimise the number of vulnerable adults being detained unreasonably and indefinitely, and to give them more autonomy over their own care.
It states that as a starting point, everyone should be presumed to have the capacity to make their own decisions about their own safety and wellbeing, and that assessment should be carried out if their capacity is in doubt.
However, research has found that such assessments are either not carried out enough or are not carried out effectively – in particular on autistic people, adults with learning disabilities or those with severe mental health conditions, such as bipolar and schizophrenia.
'Losing a child is the worst thing that can happen to anyone, but I think a preventable death is the very worst,' Fiona Laskaris previously told ITV News.
Watch Romilly Weeks' report:
Their insistence that they can cope is often taken at face value without considering their past history and loved ones' concerns. This means that – as in Christopher Laskaris' case – they are left without the support they need.
Fiona and three MPs – the former health secretary Jeremy Hunt (Conservatives), Chris Coghlan (Lib Dems) and Jake Richards (Labour) – are calling for an amendment to the Mental Capacity Act to ensure family members' views are taken into account when deciding if someone needs a mental capacity assessment.
They, along with the National Autistic Society, agree that the current system is failing autistic adults like Christopher, as well as other adults with learning disabilities and mental health illnesses, at times with catastrophic consequences.
They are concerned there are potentially hundreds of preventable deaths per year due to this issue, with recent research by King's College London finding The Mental Capacity Act was not followed in a quarter of the deaths of autistic people and those with learning disabilities in 2022 alone.
To hear more about Christopher's life and the Mental Capacity Act, listen below to the podcast episode titled: 'The mum fighting for a law change after her autistic son's murder'…
If you have been affected by any of the issues raised in this article, help and support is available: Samaritans is an organisation offering confidential support for people experiencing feelings of distress or despair. Phone 116 123 (a free 24-hour helpline).
The National Autistic Society offers free help and guidance for autistic people or anyone supporting someone who is autistic. Anyone who needs urgent support can find information here.
Bipolar UK offers free support to anyone affected by bipolar. If you need urgent help, phone their helpline on 0333 323 3880.
offers free support to anyone affected by bipolar. If you need urgent help, phone their helpline on 0333 323 3880. Access Social Care provides free legal advice and information for people with social care needs and helps them to achieve a better quality of life.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Welfare reform legislation to be debated next month, MPs told
Proposed legislation to reform the welfare system will be debated by MPs for the first time next month, Commons Leader Lucy Powell has announced. MPs are also expected to vote on the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill on July 1, when it receives its second reading in the Commons. The Government has faced backlash from some Labour MPs over the 'damaging disability benefit cuts', which it has said could save up to £5 billion a year. Ms Powell set the date for the Bill's second reading during business questions on Thursday. Labour MP Neil Duncan-Jordan has accused the Government of 'rushing through' the Bill, adding: 'This isn't something I'm prepared to support.' Ministers are likely to face a Commons stand-off with backbenchers over their plans, with dozens of Labour MPs last month saying the proposals were 'impossible to support'. The reforms – aimed at encouraging more people off sickness benefits and into work – are set to include the tightening of criteria for personal independence payment (Pip), which is the main disability benefit, as well as a cut to the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC) and delayed access to only those aged 22 and over. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said the legislation 'marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity'. She added: 'Our social security system is at a crossroads. Unless we reform it, more people will be denied opportunities, and it may not be there for those who need it.' In what could be seen as an attempt to head off some opposition, the legislation will give existing claimants a 13-week period of financial support. The Department for Work and Pensions said this will apply to those affected by changes to the Pip daily living component, including those who lose their eligibility to Carers Allowance and the carer's element of UC. But campaigners, including disability equality charity Scope, said the longer transition period, up from an originally expected four weeks, 'will only temporarily delay a cut and disabled people will continue to be living with extra costs when it comes to an end'. As the Bill was formally introduced to the Commons on Wednesday, and the question was asked as to what the next date for debate will be, former Labour MP John McDonnell, who now sits as an independent for Hayes and Harlington, could be heard to say 'Never'. Mr Duncan-Jordan, MP for Poole, is one of the members who has urged ministers to withdraw the cuts, which he has argued will 'make things worse' for disabled people. Speaking to the PA news agency, he said: 'It's clear the Government are rushing through this change before MPs have received all the necessary impact assessments that they need to make a decision. 'The Bill lays out how large numbers of disabled people are going to be made poorer. This isn't something I'm prepared to support.' Earlier this week, Mr Duncan-Jordan had said: 'The Government will only withdraw its damaging disability benefit cuts if Labour MPs make clear they will vote against them. 'The so-called concessions that have been suggested are nowhere near enough to undo the damage that is being proposed. The facts are undeniable: these cuts won't create jobs, they'll only push three million people deeper into hardship.' The latest data, published on Tuesday, showed that more than 3.7 million people in England and Wales are claiming Pip, with teenagers and young adults making up a growing proportion. Pip is a benefit aimed at helping with extra living costs if someone has a long-term physical or mental health condition or disability and difficulty doing certain everyday tasks or getting around because of their condition. Data for Pip claimants begins in January 2019, when the number stood at 2.05 million. An impact assessment published alongside Wednesday's Bill introduction confirmed previously published estimates that changes to Pip entitlement rules could see about 800,000 people lose out, with an average loss of £4,500 per year. Ms Kendall previously said there are 1,000 new Pip awards every day – 'the equivalent of adding a city the size of Leicester every single year'. The impact assessment also confirmed a previous estimate that some 250,000 more people, including 50,000 children, are likely to fall into relative poverty after housing costs in 2029/2030, although the Government repeated that this does not take into account the potentially positive impact of £1 billion annual funding by then for measures to support people into work. Changes to UC are expected to see an estimated 2.25 million current recipients of the health element impacted, with an average loss of £500 per year. But the Government said around 3.9 million households not on the UC health element are expected to have an average annual gain of £265 from the increase in the standard UC allowance. While all of the Bill applies to England and Wales, only the UC changes apply to Scotland. The Government said there are equivalent provisions to legislate for Northern Ireland included in the Bill.
Western Telegraph
32 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Maintenance fund to give £9bn a year to fix schools, hospitals and prisons
Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones said £6 billion a year would go to repairing hospitals, £3 billion to schools and colleges and £600 million to courts and prisons as part of Labour's plans for 'national renewal'. The maintenance fund is part of the minimum £725 billion committed to boost infrastructure in the 10-year plan, he told the Commons. The Government hopes this preventative action will break the cycle of emergency repairs in public infrastructure. It will go towards making court facilities better in a bid to reduce backlogs, and improving safety and security in prisons across England and Wales. Removing reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (Raac) will be among the measures taken to update health facilities. The Treasury minister told MPs: 'Done properly it will result in tangible improvements to the fabric of our country, our local roads and high streets renewed so communities are even better places to live. Our public transport more available and more reliable, making it easier for people to get around and access opportunities. 'Our schools and hospitals and GP surgeries fit for the future to deliver for generations to come, and a country that will be stronger and more resilient. Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones (James Manning/PA) 'Communities will see the difference as this Labour Government delivers on the promise of change and a decade of national renewal.' The strategy also includes £1 billion to fix roads, bridges and flyovers and £590 million to start work on the Lower Thames Crossing project. Some £16 billion of public investment will go towards building 500,000 new homes through a new publicly owned National Housing Bank. This is expected to unlock more than £53 billion of private investment. The strategy covers a decade but the spending review cycle every two years will provide a juncture to decide whether to go ahead with projects. A 'pipeline' of projects will be published online in mid-July and will be updated every six months. The strategy does not cover so-called megaprojects which cost more than £10 billion and take more than 10 years to deliver – currently the HS2 railway, Sizewell C nuclear plant and the Dreadnought submarine programme. Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: 'Infrastructure is crucial to unlocking growth across the country, but for too long investment has been squeezed. Crumbling public buildings are a sign of the decay that has seeped into our everyday lives because of a total failure to plan and invest. 'We're not just fixing buildings – we're enhancing public services, improving lives and creating the conditions for sustainable economic growth in communities throughout the UK. We're delivering on a decade of national renewal we promised Britain. 'This will deliver the decade of national renewal we promised Britain, and fulfil our Plan for Change goals to kickstart economic growth, and build an NHS fit for the future.'
Western Telegraph
32 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Esther Rantzen and terminally ill preacher make case for assisted dying Bill
The broadcaster made a plea to parliamentarians on the eve of Friday's vote to change what she branded a 'current, cruel, messy criminal law'. The House of Commons will have a debate and vote on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill on Friday, which will see it either progress to the House of Lords or fall completely. Dame Esther, a staunch supporter of Kim Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, has been a prominent voice in the conversation on assisted dying. Dame Esther Rantzen has been an outspoken advocate for assisted dying (Esther Rantzen/PA) Last week, Labour MP and Bill opponent, Rupa Huq, pledged to be a voice for the voiceless, noting that the Childline founder and others' views are already well-known. She added: 'We know that Esther Rantzen wants this. We know (broadcaster) Jonathan Dimbleby wants this. 'But our role is to be voice of the voiceless as well.' Dame Esther, who is terminally ill with cancer, said the 'truly voiceless' are the terminally ill who face ' an agonising death' and their relatives. Please allow us terminally ill the dignity of choice over our own deaths. A change in the law cannot come in time for me, but will transform the final days of generations in the future Dame Esther Rantzen She told the PA news agency: 'This is a crucial debate for the truly voiceless. 'They are the terminally ill adults for whom life has become unbearable and who need assistance, not to shorten their lives but to shorten an agonising death – and their loved ones who under the current law will be accused of committing a crime if they try to assist or even stay alongside to say goodbye. 'These are the truly vulnerable and voiceless who depend on our lawmakers to change our current, cruel, messy criminal law. 'All this Bill allows is choice for desperately ill adults who are dying anyway but want the confidence of knowing that they can ask for help to choose what we all hope for; a quick, pain-free death with good memories left behind as their legacy for those they love. 'Please allow us terminally ill the dignity of choice over our own deaths. A change in the law cannot come in time for me, but will transform the final days of generations in the future. Those who disagree with assisted dying under the new law will have the right to their own choice, please allow the rest of us to have the same right.' The law in this country failed my father ... the law leads people like my father to make lonely and dangerous decisions Anil Douglas Dame Esther's words came as a group of terminally ill and bereaved people shared their stories at a press briefing alongside the Labour Bill sponsor, Ms Leadbeater, on Thursday. Church of England lay preacher Pamela Fisher, who is terminally ill with cancer, made an impassioned speech against the religious arguments made by some who oppose assisted dying. She said: 'I completely reject the assumption that the sanctity of life requires terminally ill people to undergo a distressing and painful death against their will. I disagree with those that say it is God alone who decides how and when we die. 'Yes, life is a gift from God to be honoured, but it's nonsensical to say that assisted dying is wrong because suffering is part of God's plan for us.' The Catholic Archbishop of Westminster, Cardinal Vincent Nichols – who is opposed to assisted dying – has previously argued that the suffering of human beings is 'an intrinsic part of our human journey, a journey embraced by the eternal word of God, Christ Jesus himself'. Meanwhile, Anil Douglas, whose father took his own life having suffered with multiple sclerosis, recalled the trauma of finding him. He said a six-month police investigation followed, and told the press conference: 'The law in this country failed my father.' He added: 'The (current) law leads people like my father to make lonely and dangerous decisions. It does not protect against coercion. It does not offer protections or choice for dying people. 'It does not offer terminally ill, mentally competent adults with six months or less to live, the chance to choose a safe and compassionate death when even the very best palliative care is not enough. It leads to lonely, dangerous, traumatic deaths.' Bill opponents have argued it is not robust enough to protect the most vulnerable against coercion, and others who might choose assisted dying because they feel they are a burden. The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist.
