Palestine Action documentary brought forward due to ban
The online release of To Kill a War Machine was brought forward to this week after it emerged that the Home Office is going to proscribe Palestine Action after activists from the group broke into RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire and spray-painted two military planes red.
Days after the incident, the Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, said the 'disgraceful attack' was 'the latest in a long history of unacceptable criminal damage committed by Palestine Action'.
A draft of a proscription order against Palestine Action will be presented to parliament on Monday.
READ MORE: Met police drops second terror charge against Kneecap
The ban under terror laws would make it a criminal offence to belong to or support the group and would be punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
The film's directors have been scrambling to take legal advice and fear they will end up being in breach of counter-terror laws if they continue distributing their documentary, according to the Guardian.
Showings of the film have been lined up across Britain in the coming days and weeks but plans to ban the group have cast doubt over whether the screenings can go ahead.
To Kill a War Machine was made available to watch online on Tuesday and has been downloaded by people from all over the world.
However, its London-based directors, Hannan Majid and Richard York, are concerned that Britain could end up being the only place in the world where people would not be able to see the film.
'We've operated around the world and have a lot of experience of regimes telling us what we can and can't do,' Majid told the Guardian.
'We've had authorities in Bangladesh telling us we shouldn't even be editing footage of garment workers and activists advocating for their rights, and we've been followed by the police in Cambodia, but we have never encountered anything like this in Britain.'
Majid has been working with York since 2006 through their production company, Rainbow Collective, which focuses on documentaries about human rights issues and have collaborated with organisations including Amnesty International.
To Kill a War Machine took six months of work and was made independently by the filmmakers from Palestine Action.
The documentary uses real-time bodycam and phone footage that the group had put into the public domain.
In the film, activists are seen smashing and occupying weapons factories across the UK while explaining their motivation for their actions, which they view as legitimate in the face of alleged war crimes in Gaza.
(Image: @IMDmilo)
There are also interviews with two activists from Palestine Action, Sohail Sultan and Joe Irving, both of whom were acquitted of charges of causing criminal damage.
However, the move by the UK Government to proscribe Palestine Action means there are now questions looming over whether the documentary and events, including a London premiere on July 18, can be continued after the group is banned.
'We set out to make this film in a completely legitimate and legal manner, as we have done with other films. It's been certified by the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) and it is good to go but now we are being advised that the curtailing of Palestine Action could have a major knock-on effect for us as it could become not only illegal for others to voice support for them but also for us, as film-makers, to distribute this film,' said York.
Majid added: 'People are still excited and there has been a tremendous outpouring of support on social media.
'Hopefully we can still go ahead with much of our plans, but we have had to rush things forward and do the digital release this week rather than waiting for September and try to build on the awards we have already picked up.
'That all changed on Monday night and there has been a spike as soon as we put it online.'
The filmmakers are having discussions with distributors in the UK and the US about the potential risks of showing the film.
'On the basis of some of our legal advice, we may not even be able to distribute it in other countries and territories if the film is seen as being somehow in support of a group which is proscribed. We are still hoping to be able to show it in cinemas within the law,' said York.
They are also considering whether they will have to withdraw submissions for a range of international film festivals.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
ALEX BRUMMER: Labour has trapped us all in a doom loop of ever higher taxes and welfare spending. Things are bad now but, with four years to go, this is how much worse they can get
As every football fan knows, the moment the club chairman is forced to quell rumours of the manager's imminent demise by issuing a vote of confidence, the gaffer's days are numbered. And so, as Sir Keir Starmer approaches the end of his first year in power, his Chancellor Rachel Reeves looks like a dead woman walking.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE The chances of being a victim of crime in London compared to the rest of the world: Map reveals where 'lawless' capital ranks among the most dangerous cities
London can today be revealed as the 15th most dangerous city for crime in Europe as concerns continue to mount over a growing epidemic of violence, theft and robbery. The capital, which is also the 100th worst out of 385 locations around the world, is less safe than rival European cities from Athens to Brussels and Milan to Barcelona. London is also worse than major US cities such as New York, Los Angeles and Dallas as well as other global destinations from Cancun to Cairo and Bali to Bangalore. The city is however only the fifth worst UK location for crime - behind Bradford, Coventry, Birmingham and Manchester, according to Numbeo's Crime Index. The data, which is compiled from global survey responses and has been updated regularly since 2012, ranks London particularly badly for four categories out of 15. These are the capital's 'level of crime'; 'crime increasing in the past five years'; 'problem people using or dealing drugs'; and 'safety walking alone during night'. It comes amid outrage after veteran broadcaster Selina Scott, 74, revealed she was viciously attacked and robbed in broad daylight in Piccadilly earlier this month. The stalwart of British TV was leaving a Waterstones shop on June 17 when she was struck on the back of her right knee, leaving her feeling as if she had been 'stabbed'. She was set upon by a gang who attempted to grab her backpack. Fighting back, she kept hold of the bag – but one of the thieves unzipped it and took her purse before running off. Ms Scott lost her bank cards, driving licence and cash in the robbery. Click on a circle on the map above to reveal the Numbeo Crime Index ranking, and drag the map around to see other countries. A low crime index figure and a high safety index figure are good The Numbeo index also deems a series of issues in London as 'moderate' – including concerns over stealing, robbery, car theft, being attacked or facing a racist assault. But London is seen as safer than ten cities in other European countries, including seven in France – Paris, Lyon, Nantes, Marseille, Grenoble, Nice and Montpellier. The other three locations are Naples in Italy, Liege in Belgium and Malmo in Sweden. The Crime Index takes into account survey responses covering five areas: general perception of crime levels; perceived safety during daylight and nighttime; concerns about specific crimes; property crime severity; and violent crime severity. The index is seen as a respected comparative tool because government crime data in different countries can often be patchy or withheld for political or social reasons. Five of the world's eight most dangerous cities are in South Africa - comprising Durban, Pretoria, Johannesburg, Port Elizabeth and Pietermaritzburg, which is first. Also in the global top ten are Port Moresby in Papua New Guinea; Caracas in Venezuela; San Pedro Sula in Honduras; Memphis in the US and Salvador in Brazil. Five of the six safest cities are in the United Arab Emirates – comprising Sharjah, Ras al-Khaimah, Dubai, Ajman and Abu Dhabi, which is the safest place in the world. In London, the robbery and assault of Ms Scott by an organised gang is another incident raising questions about the Metropolitan Police's failure to robustly tackle such crimes amid a 24 per cent increase in similar thefts in the last year alone. Matt Goodwin, senior visiting professor of politics at the University of Buckingham, wrote in the Daily Mail last week: 'London is over. It's so over.' He cited data showing that more than 70,000 phones were stolen in London last year, and there were 90,000 shoplifting offences in the capital, up 54 per cent. Professor Goodwin added that there is now an alleged rape every hour in London – and reported sexual offences against women and girls has risen 14 per cent in five years, while homelessness and rough sleeping increased 26 per cent in one year. Meanwhile a policing expert told MailOnline that the incident involving former ITN News At Ten anchor Ms Scott showed London had become a 'crime-ridden cesspit'. Ex-New Scotland Yard detective Peter Bleksley said the force was now so stretched in the West End that private security companies were being deployed to help. He condemned the 'epidemic of crime' in London from pickpocketing to violence and fare evasion to robbery, adding that it was 'driving people away' from the capital. Mr Bleksley, known for Channel 4 reality show Hunted, told MailOnline that the 'once iconic' city was 'absolutely plagued' by crime and urged visitors to avoid getting their phones out in public and leave any expensive watches or handbags at home. A woman's phone is snatched from her hand next to the Oxford Circus junction in London He recently visited Krakow, Milan, Rome and Naples - known for its Camorra mafia and criminal underworld - and felt far safer in all four cities compared to London. Meanwhile Conservative politicians have called on Labour Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan to do more to address growing concerns about the spiralling crime rates in the capital. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp told MailOnline: 'What happened to Selina Scott is horrifying but sadly, the public have come to expect these sorts of cases in Sadiq Khan's lawless London. 'Criminal gangs are acting with impunity while the Met Police are warning they will have to lose 1,700 officers due to the Labour Government's inadequate police funding settlement. Labour are presiding over a breakdown of law and order. 'We need a zero tolerance crackdown where every single crime is investigated and prosecuted where a perpetrator can be found. This includes using facial recognition from CCTV cameras to catch suspects. 'Barely over five per cent of all crimes in London are prosecuted which is totally unacceptable. Mayor Sadiq Khan, who oversees the police in London, needs to spend less time on politically correct virtue signalling and more time catching criminals, in an urgent zero tolerance crackdown.' And Susan Hall, Conservative group leader at City Hall, told MailOnline: 'Our thoughts are with Selina and we hope she is able to make a full recovery. 'This horrific experience not only demonstrates the brazenness of London's criminals under this Mayor, it also highlights how badly Khan has let public safety and spaces degrade. 'This comes before his reckless police cuts truly start to bite - with 3,300 Met Police staff at risk - which will only exacerbate this horrendous situation. 'He needs to pull his head out of the sand and get a grip on this before more people are harmed or worse.' Ms Scott, who spends most of her time on her 200-acre estate in North Yorkshire, said she was attacked by 'around seven or eight' smartly dressed men and women, who appeared to be of East Asian origin. She told The Mail on Sunday: 'I still feel shattered after what has happened. I can't believe it happened to me. 'I'm mentally resilient and physically fit, but if they can attack me in such a brazen way they can attack anyone. You're left feeling not just traumatised but stupid that you have somehow let it happen. 'I'm also furious about the lack of police on our streets. No wonder the gang who set about me have a sense of impunity – they can do anything they want because they know no one will stop them.' She did not require medical attention but suffered severe bruising to her leg in the assault. 'I am now only too relieved it wasn't a knife they used,' she added. A Metropolitan Police spokesman said: 'While we understand that the victim in this case was frustrated that she couldn't see any police officers on the street at the time of the incident, we would like to reassure her and the wider public that a significant number of officers patrol the West End every day to target offenders, including those carrying out thefts and robberies. 'They patrol not just in uniform on foot, but also in plain clothes and in vehicles to have the best opportunity to identify and apprehend suspects. 'We would be happy to talk to the victim in this case to better understand her concerns.' Speaking about what the force is doing in relation to violent crime, a Met spokeswoman added: 'Tackling violent crime in all its forms is a key priority and we are determined to crack down on robberies, which can so often have a significant and traumatic impact on victims. 'Across London, both uniform and plain clothes officers proactively patrol robbery hotspots to identify, apprehend and deter potential offenders. We also have dedicated teams that target repeat offenders. 'Incidents of neighbourhood crime, which includes offences such as robbery, theft from a person and shoplifting, have reduced by 18.6 per cent compared to the same period last year. Over the past 15 months, we have also increased our arrests per month by ten per cent. 'Our focus on tackling these crimes will continue throughout the summer, using ward-level data and intelligence to really make a difference in key areas.' And a spokeswoman for Sir Sadiq told MailOnline: 'The previous government chronically underfunded the Met, making cuts to policing in London that were in real terms equivalent to more than £1.1billion. 'These drastic cuts resulted in the loss of thousands of officer posts and the closure of dozens of police buildings across the city as the Met tried to make ends meet. 'Since coming to office in 2016, Sadiq has done everything in his power to support our police. 'This year alone he is providing £1.16billion investment for the Met to protect neighbourhood policing in our communities, secure 935 frontline police officer posts and significantly reduce the level of cuts the Met had been planning. This is double the amount provided by his predecessor as Mayor. 'The Met will publish a new Estates Strategy this summer, setting out its plans for providing the right amount and quality of buildings needed to deliver a new Met for London. The Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime will scrutinise this carefully. 'However, the Mayor is under no illusions that there could be further difficult decisions to make and will continue to work with the new government to ensure the Met gets the sustainable funding it needs to help us to build a safer London for everyone.' The Mayor's team added that City Hall was working closely with the Met Police to 'tackle the scourge of phone thefts in London' amid his concerns that it is 'simply too easy and profitable for criminals to repurpose and sell on stolen phones'. Nearly 40 per cent of such thefts are happening in the West End and Westminster - where police patrols and plain-clothed operations have been increased, the spokesman said.
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Concessions to welfare reforms to be revealed after Labour backbench rebellion forces government retreat
Changes to welfare reforms, forced on the government by rebel Labour MPs, are being revealed today ahead of a crucial vote. The original bill restricted eligibility for the personal independence payment (pip) and cut the health-related element of universal credit (UC). The government, which insisted welfare costs were becoming unsustainable, was forced into a U-turn after 126 Labour backbenchers signed an amendment that would have halted the bill at its first Commons hurdle. While the amendment is expected to be withdrawn, after changes that appeased some Labour MPs, others are still unhappy and considering backing a similar amendment to be tabled today. 2:59 Here are the main changes to the UC and pip bill: • current pip claimants will keep their benefits; stricter eligibility requirements will only apply to new claims from November 2026 • a review of the pip assessment, which will have input from disabled people • existing recipients of the health-related element of UC will have their incomes protected in real terms Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said in a statement that the legislation now aims to deliver a "fairer, more compassionate system" ahead of the second reading and vote on Tuesday. "We must build a welfare system that provides security for those who cannot work and the right support for those who can. Too often, disabled people feel trapped, worried that if they try to work, they could lose the support they depend on. "That is why we are taking action to remove those barriers, support disabled people to live with dignity and independence, and open routes into employment for those who want to pursue it. "This is about delivering a fairer, more compassionate system as part of our Plan for Change which supports people to thrive, whatever their circumstances." On Saturday, Sir Keir Starmer said fixing the UK's welfare system was a "moral imperative". The government claimed cuts to sickness and disability benefits would shave £5bn off the welfare bill and get more people into work. The Resolution Foundation believes the concessions could cost as much as £3bn, while the Institute for Fiscal Studies warned that the changes make tax rises more likely. Health Secretary Wes Streeting told Sky News that welfare bill changes have put Labour in a much better position ahead of tomorrow's vote. On Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips, Mr Streeting said: "There were things that we didn't get right, we've put right, and there'll be a debate about future amendments and things, I'm sure, as it goes through in the usual way." On the same programme, shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately repeatedly refused to say whether the Conservatives would back the bill, but would review the proposals after the minister's statement later. "We have said that if there are more savings that actually bring the welfare bill down, if they'll get more people into work, and if they commit to using the savings to avoid tax cuts in the autumn, which looks highly unlikely at the moment, then they have our support." The Liberal Democrats plan to vote against the bill and have called for the government to speed up access-to-work decisions to help people enter the workforce.
