logo
My family is haunted by finding my 9-month-old brother dead in his cot after we put him to sleep the wrong way

My family is haunted by finding my 9-month-old brother dead in his cot after we put him to sleep the wrong way

The Sun10 hours ago

I WILL never forget the morning we found my nine-month-old brother Neil dead in his cot.
Mum had come to wake me first so we could get the baby up and dressed together.
6
6
I was three and a big girl now, with big sister responsibilities and a grown up-looking bedroom with orange flowery wallpaper - the sort interior designers now call retro.
I was already awake, and I held mum's hand as we walked to Neil's room. She let me go in first.
I peeked over the top of the cot and said: 'Neil's not there, where is he?'
Mum rushed over, pulled the blanket back and her face was frozen. It was so scary.
Did I scream or was it her? Someone screamed. And then it becomes a blur.
The shockwaves of that morning continue to affect our family, from Beckenham, London, over 40 years later.
It was February 1973, and cot deaths, as they were then referred to, were something that happened to other people, spoken about in hushed tones, and, let's be honest, often viewed with an element of suspicion.
It was also a time when the best-selling book on babies, which had pride of place on my parent's bookshelf, told mums and dads to put tots to sleep on their stomachs and wrap them up warmly.
In 2025, thank goodness, there is far more awareness of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) - the sudden and unexpected death of a baby where no cause is found - which killed my brother.
We now know the safest way is on their backs and a cool environment, with no danger of overheating, but SIDS still affects around 200 families every year in the UK, and the emotional toll of the losses remains as difficult as ever.
Beautiful' baby boy dies after mum fell asleep cuddling him into her when he woke up crying in the night
After Neil died, my mum Carol and dad Ian became advocates for the Foundation for the Study of Infant Deaths, which is now The Lullaby Trust.
Dad, a journalist, wrote a heart-wrenching story for the local newspaper, which described that terrible morning.
I even stayed up 'late' with nan and grandpa to watch him speak about it on the BBC TV show Nationwide, and there were numerous bake sales at local fetes to raise funds.
When my brother Andrew came along in 1974, I think it was this very newspaper that published an article with a photo of our family alongside an article about how it's possible to exist after losing a child.
We looked happy - but the problem was, we were falling apart.
We'd had no proper support, no room to grieve, and we still had so many questions about how and why Neil was gone.
This came to something of a halt when dad's job took us to live in Paris.
A line of some sort was drawn, except, of course, it wasn't.
We were left with the black silent hole of his absence. There was nothing that could fill the ghastliness of my son not crying
CarolNeil's mum
Mum threw herself into Paris life. She had learnt French as a teenager and had already lived there in the 60s, working as a bilingual secretary for the Ariane space project.
But she had changed. I knew it, and I could feel it more and more as I grew older.
Dad's job, now foreign correspondent, took the family to different places - Brussels, Jerusalem, Bonn.
Mum played the part of the supportive other half, but she had lost her mojo.
She'd had all sorts of ambitions - teacher training college, a master's degree, the job for Arianne - but she never really went back to work.
Over time, she stopped being sporty, when she used to play tennis, hockey and swim a lot, and she put on weight.
There was drinking, perhaps not that unusual in an expat journalist house in the 70s and 80s, but still, it was different.
Don't get me wrong, Andrew and I had a marvellous childhood, full of love, fun holidays, travel, fascinating people, and lively chats.
But as we got older, we could feel the tension growing between mum and dad.
6
6
One day, there was yet another stressful exchange between our parents, with mum flouncing off to bed.
This time, Dad, teary-eyed, said: 'She has never been the same since Neil died.'
I was stunned. I had never heard him say Neil's name before.
I must have been about 18. I'd grown up used to saying: 'Oh yes, I had a brother who died of cot death,' without really connecting the words with my memory of that morning or my understanding of what it must have done to my parents.
After that, I did ask a few more questions.
My aunt sent me that first article dad had written; my uncle agreed that mum was never the same since Neil's sudden death.
Then, in 2000, Dad died, aged just 59, of cancer. He missed meeting his first grandchild, my daughter, Izzy, by four months.
What is sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)?
Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is the sudden and unexpected death of a baby under the age of 12 months where no cause is found.
Around 89 per cent of deaths happen when the tot is under six months old.
It is relatively rare, with 182 babies dying from SIDS in the UK in 2021.
While doctors don't know exactly what triggers it, there are ways to significantly reduce the chances of SIDS occurring:
Put your baby on their back for all sleeps - day and night
Share a room with your baby for the first six months
Place your baby on their own, clear, flat sleep surface (e.g. cot or Moses basket)
Keep your baby smoke-free during pregnancy and after birth
Never sleep on a sofa or armchair
Do not co-sleep if you or anyone in the bed has been drinking alcohol, smoking, or taking drugs or medication that makes you drowsy
These things are especially important for babies who were born prematurely or of a low birth weight, as they are typically at higher risk of SIDS.
Source: The Lullaby Trust
Again, this was all played out in public, with dad writing his final article days before he left us.
He described his feelings, the ones he wouldn't talk to us about, to the readers of The Times newspaper.
In that article, he wrote: 'My pregnant daughter has a little lump inside her kicking and fighting for life.
'I have a little lump in me which is kicking and fighting for my life and it will win.'
He must have been thinking about Neil, but, again, we did not talk about it.
Dad's death catapulted mum into a deep despair.
More drink, angry moods, strange behaviour, until eventually, she moved to a home in Deal, Kent, where she left us in February 2025.
Did my mum resent me because I survived?
In her last years, mum had started talking about Neil, but our relationship was so strained by then, I didn't have the courage to ask her more.
Did she resent me because I survived? Was she worried that Andrew might feel he was here because Neil wasn't? Did she blame dad for the media coverage?
So many questions. In the end, I asked none.
Who could ever get over the death of a child? I can't imagine anything happening to my amazing three children, Alfie, Maddie and Izzy, or to my brilliant niece and nephew, currently living, as fate would have it, in Paris.
My family's experience could have turned me into an anxious mother.
But by the time Izzy arrived, there was so much good advice on how to keep babies safe when they are sleeping, I was able to build a bedtime and sleep routine quickly, and with confidence.
It's thanks to The Lullaby Trust, the charity that mum and dad were such great advocates for in its early days.
We were pleased to reconnect with them when mum died to make them the beneficiaries of all donations for her.
It was at mum's funeral that I met her friend from the local writer's club.
She asked me if I had read mum's story, written as part of their '17 minutes series', where members were given 17 minutes to write something down.
6
You have heard my story, now here is my mum's.
Carol Anne Murray, mum of three, survived by two, written in 17 minutes, 45 years after losing her son, Neil.
We talked together, Ian and I. We spoke about everything under the sun, except for the one great hole that was in our lives.
How could it have happened? We had a beautiful daughter, chatty and bubbly. We now had a son.
How wonderfully lucky, we thought, one of each. How neat.
But then, one morning, I went to his cot to get him up and there was no response.
The unbelievable had happened. Why? How? I screamed. Ian came upstairs. He was silent.
It was then that I knew he had already gone into the bedroom and found what I had found. He had gone downstairs in disbelief.
We called an ambulance, of course. We hoped desperately that something could be done.
But what could they do? They just swaddled him and took him away.
We were left with the black silent hole of his absence.
Later that day the doctor told us that it was certainly a case of SIDS.
It now had a name. But that was all. There was nothing that could fill the ghastliness of his not crying.
Neil had cried a lot. I wondered if his crying had been a warning. Had he known all along he would die?
But there was no going back, his absence was so obvious.
Our daughter's tears said it all. We would never be able to see him again.
One day, as we walked home from nursery, we passed by a dead pigeon.
'Hmmmm,' she commented. 'He's just like Neil Bruce John, he won't move again either.'
Her philosophical analysis became an acceptance.
We went on to have another son a year later.
Forty years later I still feel it, just as if it had happened yesterday.
I have never forgotten Neil Bruce John.
The ABCs of safer sleep
EXPERT help is freely available from The Lullaby Trust, which exists to keep babies safe by offering advice, and support grieving families.
By investing more than £12million in research, the charity has overseen the reduction of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) by 80 per cent, saving 30,000 babies since 1991.
It wants all families to know the ABCs of safer sleep:
A lways sleep your baby on their b ack, in a c lear cot or sleep space.
Following these rules, day and night, will help reduce the risk of SIDS.
If you are grieving, you can find support on The Lullaby Trust website, by calling the bereavement helpline on 0808 802 6868, or emailing support@lullabytrust.org.uk.
6

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer facing challenge to intervene on assisted dying vote after more than 50 Labour MPs demand Commons delay
Starmer facing challenge to intervene on assisted dying vote after more than 50 Labour MPs demand Commons delay

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

Starmer facing challenge to intervene on assisted dying vote after more than 50 Labour MPs demand Commons delay

Sir Keir Starmer is facing a major challenge for his government to intervene and delay a vote on assisted dying to go ahead on Friday this week. A group of more than 50 Labour MPs have this weekend written to the Leader of the House Lucy Powell asking her to intervene and postpone this Friday's final third reading vote on Kim Leadbeater's assisted dying bill in the Commons. Instead they are demanding that the government provides more parliamentary time to scrutinise a bill which will bring 'fundamental changes' to healthcare in England. The move marks a serious split over the issue among Labour MPs and in effect is a challenge to Sir Keir who is in favour of assisted dying. Even though the bill is a free vote as a conscience issue for MPs, it is now becoming a dividing line in the Labour parliamentary party. Sir Keir and the government have consistently insisted they are 'neutral' on the issue which has been the subject of a private members bill and have attempted to take a 'hands off' approach to it. But Labour MPs including Paul Waugh, Torcuil Crichton, Florence Eshalomi, Jess Asato, Adam Jogee, Polly Billington, Debbie Abrahams, Dawn Butler, Antonia Bance, Anna Dixon, Paul Frith, Daniel Francis and dozens of others now believe the limited private members bill procedure is not good enough for an issue which will deliver huge change. The letter to Ms Powell, seen by The Independent, says: 'On Friday, Members will debate and vote on perhaps the most consequential piece of legislation that has appeared before the House in generations. 'This is not a normal Bill. It alters the foundations of our NHS, the relationship between doctor and patient, and it strips power away from Parliament, concentrating it in the hands of future Health Secretaries. 'MPs will be arriving at Westminster on Friday morning without sight of the final version of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill.' They noted: 'The sponsor of the Bill [Ms Leadbeater] has proudly stated that it has received more time in Parliament than some Government Bills have. And yet; MPs have had the opportunity to vote on just 12 of 133 amendments tabled at Report Stage. 'Just fourteen percent of MPs have been afforded the opportunity to speak in the chamber on this Bill Several movers of amendments haven't been able to speak to the changes they have laid.' One of the amendments not voted on was a protection against people with anorexia and other eating disorders being subject to assisted dying put forward by Labour MP Naz Shah. Even though Ms Leadbeater had indicated she would agree to the late provision, despite rejecting similar amendments before, it did not come up for a vote. The letter went on: 'Despite this, the Bill has been radically changed from the one presented to MPs at Second Reading in November. As it stands today, the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill is now longer than the Government's Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill with a staggering 64 clauses and two schedules. 'The fact that such fundamental changes are being made to this Bill at the eleventh hour is not a badge of honour, it is a warning. The private member's bill process has shown itself to be a woefully inadequate vehicle for the introduction of such a foundational change to our NHS and the relationship between doctor and patient. 'New Clause 2 was added to the Bill last Friday with a sizable majority. Such a profound alteration to this Bill at the last minute reflects the discomfort uniting the House about the current format of this Bill and the desire to further amend it to protect vulnerable people.' They added: 'This is no longer about debating the abstract principle of assisted dying. The Bill before Parliament has created real concern with medical experts and charities. MPs and the Government should listen to their expertise. 'We implore you as the Leader of the House to allocate more Parliamentary time to the scrutiny of this Bill, the valid concerns that Members have about its implementation, and the consequences it could have on vulnerable populations.' However, supporters of the Bill have complained about delaying tactics used by opponents. On Friday Lib Dem MP Christine Jardine, one of the Bill's sponsors, made a point of order claiming opponents were 'hiding in the lobby toilets' during votes, to delay the Bill's progress. The Independent has approached Ms Leadbeater for comment. Other signatories to the letter include Labour MPs Antonia Bance, Florence Eshalomi, Richard Baker, Neil Coyle, Gurinder Singh Josan, Dan Francis, James Frith, Anna Dixon, Siobhan McDonagh, Katrina Murray, Julie Minns, Scott Arthur, John Grady, Richard Quigley, Debbie Abrahams, Tom Collins, Bell Ribeiro-Addy, Catherine Atkinson, Rachael Maskell, Kenneth Stevenson, David Baines, David Smith, Sarah Smith, Sean Woodcock, Kirsteen Sullivan, Laurence Turner, Polly Billington, Josh Newbury, Kate Osamor, Patricia Ferguson, Jonathan Davies, Ruth Jones, Katrina Murray, Paul Foster, Adam Jogee, Blair McDougall, Naz Shah and Valerie Vaz.

My father died in a care home and all I got was denials and excuses
My father died in a care home and all I got was denials and excuses

The Guardian

time4 hours ago

  • The Guardian

My father died in a care home and all I got was denials and excuses

The situation at The Firs care home in Nottinghamshire, which was shut down in April, is dreadful for patients, families and staff ('How did it get to this?' What happens when care in a residential home breaks down, 7 June). But the Care Quality Commission (CQC) is not the only body to blame for failings like this. It can't investigate individual complaints – this is mostly down to the local government and social care ombudsman (LGSCO), but also the parliamentary and health service ombudsman (PHSO). It depends on who funds the care; in theory the same care home could be dealing with two ombudsman staff unaware of each other. Both are equally damned on Trustpilot with overwhelmingly negative reviews. My dad died two days after he had been moved to a home for palliative care. So much went wrong on that awful day, with staff who didn't care and with no involvement with any senior staff. I complained to the manager and then the company headquarters. I received many denials and excuses, one of which was so clearly untrue that I thought I'd caught them out. I told the PHSO everything. I waited for eight months, only to have every ridiculous excuse parroted back to me as a reason for not investigating. I don't believe the LGSCO would have been any better. The care home company knew I had complained and had time to prepare for an investigation, which never came. All I did by complaining was show what it could get away with. Other homes in the same organisation have been graded as inadequate or requiring improvement, with poor staffing levels and attitudes to patients especially marked. So criticise the CQC, but don't spare either and address supplied Your article made me cry. My parents (90 and 92) have, since February, suffered deterioration in their health such that both now need full-time care. Three of the four local-authority-provided 'rehab' places have so far been utterly woeful. The home that my father is currently living in is disastrous for a person in his position. My sister and I are desperately trying to sort an alternative for him, but it takes time and every day he is there is a day too long. And as for whistleblowing, we tried that when a carer was verbally abusive to my mother. The difficulties we are having moving her because of her record of 'very difficult behaviour' are not and address supplied

Lucy Letby supporter claims neo-natal unit where baby serial killer worked was 'not fit for purpose'
Lucy Letby supporter claims neo-natal unit where baby serial killer worked was 'not fit for purpose'

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Lucy Letby supporter claims neo-natal unit where baby serial killer worked was 'not fit for purpose'

The Countess of Chester Hospital's neo-natal unit was 'not fit for purpose' before Lucy Letby started murdering babies, a former nurse who worked there has claimed. Michele Worden said redundancies led to a loss of senior staff and plumbing issues created a 'perfect storm' for care failings. The former advanced nurse practitioner left the Countess after being made redundant in 2007, four years before Letby started working and eight years before her killing spree began. She told the Nursing Times that when the unit was downgraded in around 2006 and stopped caring for very premature babies under 27 weeks, senior nurses were replaced with junior staff who were asked to care for infants 'above their capabilities [and] training.' She said: 'It wasn't just the neonatal unit that wasn't fit for purpose, the whole maternity and paediatric and gynaecology… was not fit for purpose. 'The problems with the sewage and blocked sinks were not just [on] the neonatal unit, it was on the labour ward, it was all over.' Ms Worden said she believed the situation at the Countess of Chester was 'no different' to other NHS hospitals where maternity scandals have been uncovered in recent years. 'Hopefully Lucy will be exonerated,' she said. 'Chester is no different than Shrewsbury, Nottingham, Morecambe Bay. Women and children's healthcare has never been a high priority.' Letby, 38, is serving 15 whole life terms after being convicted of the murder of seven babies and attempted murder of seven more, including one baby girl she tried to kill twice. Plumber Lorenzo Mansutti, estates manager at the Countess, was the only witness called by Letby in her defence at her Manchester Crown Court trial. He admitted drainage problems were a 'weekly' issue at the hospital's 50-year-old Women's and Children's Building and told the jury that he remembered an incident when raw sewage backed up into sinks in the intensive care nursery. But he said it was a 'one off' and insisted that at no point were staff unable to wash their hands because the hospital had 'backup' portable handwashing units on site. The problem was not logged as a formal incident, so no exact date for the incident could be found. Letby's trial heard that none of the seven babies who died collapsed due to a bacterial infection associated with poor sewage. Cheshire police are continuing to investigate the former nurse and last year confirmed they had questioned her in prison in connection with more baby deaths. But, following a presentation from 14 international experts in February, who claim none of the babies were murdered but died due to poor care, there has been a continued chorus of people questioning the safety of her convictions. Letby has twice applied and been refused leave to appeal, but her new legal team have submitted a file of evidence to the Criminal Cases Review Commission, the body that investigates potential miscarriages of justice, in a last ditch attempt to get her convictions overturned. They claim the testimony of lead prosecution expert Dewi Evans was biased and that he changed his mind over the method of murder of one of the children murdered by Letby, a boy known as Baby C. Dr Evans has denied this and the Court of Appeal has already dismissed claims he was not suitably qualified or lacked independence. Yesterday it emerged that Dr Evans, who has been subjected to intense trolling online from Letby supporters, had been involved in an online row with one of them - an anonymous statistician who Dr Evans accused of being motivated by a sexual attraction to Letby. According to the statistician, Dr Evans wrote: 'You seem very intense, and it's not unusual for men to have the hots for pretty young blonde females. A nursing uniform is a turn-on for some by all accounts. 'I would suggest you need to get out more, find yourself an available pretty young blonde female, with/without nursing credentials. But one who doesn't go to work intent on murdering her patients.' The statistician said it was 'absurd' to say he believed Letby was innocent because she was 'blonde and pretty' and insisted he had come to that view after reviewing the transcripts of the trial.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store