Trump is right on the Gaza Strip, but the details matter
Among President Trump's provocative ideas that have shocked the world since he returned to the White House, the recent proposal to 'clean' the Gaza Strip of the locals and turn it into a flourishing Mediterranean Riviera looks like the most outrageous. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt called it an example of 'outside of the box' thinking. It looks ill-grounded and premature from many points of view.
Neither Egypt nor Jordan seem ready to welcome 2 million people, many of whom their governments reasonably count as terrorists and jihadis. Also, Israel doesn't have full control over the territory it should 'hand over' to the U.S. Lastly, the U.S. isn't ready to send thousands of American troops to pacify this uneasy exclave. With only Israel expressing enthusiasm towards the plan, it is doomed to fail.
Nevertheless, I would argue that both the long history of conflicts in the area and the ongoing war — started with the cruel Oct. 7 attack from the Gaza Strip on Israel — suggest that in principle Trump is right. The population of Gaza shouldn't be awarded the privilege of sovereignty after all that's happened. Also, international humanitarian organizations, dominated by leftist and antisemitic groups, can no longer be trusted. Both Israel and other neighboring states cannot feel themselves secure with such a non-sustainable and chaotic entity nearby.
This all means that the fictious sovereignty of the Gaza Strip, used by Hamas leaders to steal humanitarian aid and prepare for new assaults, should be put out of mind. For good or for bad, it seemingly cannot be done either through an Israeli occupation or through invasion by any other state.
But there do exist legal mechanisms to push forward Trump's plan (of course, somewhat, and even significantly, modified). The judicial basis for the implementation of such a plan is in general set up by the Charter of the United Nations, precisely Chapters XII and XIII referring to the trusteeship system and the Trusteeship Council.
These days both chapters have no importance as the trust system has ended in 1994 as the United States terminated administration of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands which was put under its control by the UN back in 1947. The unique chance for applying the UN rules to the Gaza Strip and for restoring the authority of the Trusteeship Council comes from Article 78 of the UN Charter which says: 'The trusteeship system shall not apply to territories which have become Members of the United Nations, relationship among which shall be based on respect for the principle of sovereign equality.'
The Palestinian Authority, even while it has been a non-member observer state of the United Nations General Assembly since November 2012, is currently not a UN member and therefore remains one of a very small number of entities to which all provisions of Chapters XII and XIII may be applied.
The UN Charter, of course, says nothing about 'relocation' of local residents. Quite the contrary, its Article 73 states: 'Members of the United Nations which have or assume responsibilities for the administration of territories whose peoples have not yet attained a full measure of self-government recognize the principle that the interests of the inhabitants of these territories are paramount, and accept as a sacred trust the obligation to promote to the utmost, within the system of international peace and security established by the present charter.'
In other words, as the first step, the U.S. should announce it wishes to re-empower the Trusteeship Council by initiating this issue at the UN General Assembly, as required by Article 85 (2), to propose the Council's composition and to win the General Assembly vote on the issue. Then either the U.S. or other member states should bring the proposal of putting the Gaza Strip under the mandate system to the Security Council.
This would be an uneasy issue. But considering this territory's lack of strategic value and the risks it presents, many nations might support the move — including both China and Russia, which may hope the U.S. fails in this enterprise. Even if this particular effort isn't successful, the restoration of the trusteeship system as the number of chaotic and unrecognized entities is growing, would be an important move for which the Trump administration might be well praised and remembered.
The Gaza Strip case shows that there are places in the world where the most basic norms of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights are massively violated by their own rulers, and the international community has no means to intervene and to stabilize these territories. To my mind, the restoration of the Trusteeship System — already codified in the UN Charter — would be an important step in the right direction, whatever its concrete short-term consequences might be.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
24 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump says US will keep supporting Israeli air strikes
President Trump on Sunday said the United States will keep supporting Israel's air strikes on Iran amid escalating conflict between the two countries. The president was asked as he left for the Group of Seven (G-7) summit in Canada if the U.S. would continue to support Israel's defenses and replied, 'We do.' He added that he 'wouldn't say that' when asked if he had called on Israel to pause airstrikes into Iran. Additionally, when asked about how he plans to de-escalate the situation between Iran and Israel, Trump responded, 'it's time for a deal.' 'Sometimes they have to fight it out,' he added. 'We'll see what happens.' The president praised his relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The two leaders spoke on Friday. 'We get along very well and I think we have great respect for each other,' Trump said. The president had told ABC News earlier on Sunday that 'it's possible' the U.S. becomes involved in the current conflict between Iran and Israel. 'We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved,' Trump told the outlet. Israel and Iran exchanged strikes for their third day on Sunday. Iran has been facing Israeli airstrikes while some of Iran's missiles have hit buildings in Israel, making it past air defenses. Israel bombarded Iran early on Friday morning, moving forward with its largest-ever military operation against its common Middle East rival and upending a push from Trump for a nuclear deal with Iran. The U.S. attempted to quickly distance itself from the strikes, which killed some of Iran's top military leaders.
Fox News
29 minutes ago
- Fox News
LA Mayor hits back at Trump Marine deployments saying 'we don't want them here'
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass hit back at President Donald Trump's Marine and National Guard deployments in her city, telling CNN's Dana Bash "we don't want them here." "I do want to dispel the notion that the military is here. We don't want them here, they don't need to be here. Our local law enforcement has complete control of the situation," Bass said on "State of the Union" Sunday. Trump deployed an initial round of 2,000 federalized National Guard troops to the City of Angels after chaotic anti-I.C.E. protests – in which demonstrators threw rocks at federal vehicles, brandished Mexican flags, and set Waymo cars on fire – on Saturday, June 7 and subsequently deployed an additional round of 2,000 National Guard troops and 700 U.S. Marines. The Marines detained a former Army veteran, Marcos Leao, 27, who became a U.S. citizen after serving in the military, after he wandered into a restricted area on his way to the Veterans Administration office. Leao told Reuters that the Marines treated him "very fairly." "They treated me very fairly, understand, this is a whole stressful situation for everybody, and we all have a job," Leao said. Protests continued in Los Angeles over the following week, culminating in a large demonstration as part of the nationwide "No Kings" protest on Saturday. Bass downplayed the unrest in her city, saying that recent protests took place in a "small sliver of our town" and put the blame for any unrest squarely on Trump's deportation raids. Bass called Saturday's protests "overwhelmingly peaceful" and said that there were sectors of Los Angeles' economy that couldn't survive without illegal immigrant labor. "There were a lot of people out, about 30,000. Out of that big crowd five people were arrested, about 30 were given citations and there were injuries on both sides. Officers were injured and so were people that were there," Bass said. "If the raids hadn't happened, then that protest would have been a 'No Kings' protest, we know that was planned months in advance. But the disruption and the fear that has been caused by the outrage by the raids has really had a devastating effect and has been a body blow to our economy." I.C.E has made several high-profile raids in Los Angeles and across the country as part of the president's campaign promise to deliver mass-deportations. Trump promised to prioritize criminal illegal aliens, but critics allege the administration is separating families and targeting non-criminal workers. "I don't think the president understands that we have entire sectors of our economy that cannot function without immigrant labor," Bass said. The Trump administration called for a halt on deportation raids on agricultural sites, hotels and restaurants, and not to arrest "noncriminal collaterals" the New York Times reported. The move came out of fears that the sweeping raids were hurting key industries in the U.S. "Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long-time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace," Trump posted on Truth Social Thursday.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump coveted a military spectacle but his parade proved underwhelming: ‘Just kind of lame'
On Saturday, as a crowd of thousands of people near the Washington Monument listened, a loudspeaker dramatically announced the names of the US secretary of defense, vice-president and president. The final name received a modest roar that surely flushed the watching commander-in-chief with validation. With that, and with the boom of a 21-gun salute, the military parade that Donald Trump had coveted for years finally began. A protester, Nicky Sundt, kept a lonely and mostly silent vigil at the side of the road. She held a sign depicting a cartoon Trump brushing back his comb-over to reveal a swastika emblazoned on his forehead. The placard said 'Save our democracy'. Standing near her – as a 'counterprotest to the counterprotest to the protest, or something,' as one of them put it – a group of pro-Trump men held court. One was draped in an American flag. Another had a giant picture of Trump, in a crown, with the exhortation 'Trump for king'. Related: Gathering stormclouds can't wipe smile from Trump's face as long-held dream of military parade is realised For the next couple of hours, in heat and occasional drizzle, spectators watched as the US army celebrated its 250th birthday – and, although he claims it is a coincidence, Trump's 79th – with America's largest and most controversial military parade in decades. Troops marched. Tanks and armored personnel carriers rolled. Helicopters clattered. Paratroopers plunged out of the overcast sky. Yet, for all of it, the parade was somehow neither the totalitarian North Korean spectacle that critics had grimly predicted, nor the triumph of Maga nationalism that Trump's most diehard fans craved. It was just a parade – and a parade that was, for all its millions of dollars spent, controversy engendered, and exhausting security precautions, a little underwhelming. Since his first term, when he saw and was deeply impressed by a Bastille Day parade in Paris, Trump made no secret of his desire to hold a grand military review of his own. Military leaders, cognizant of the high costs and reputational issues of the idea, have in the past been resistant. Now, no longer. The event was not without problems, however. For one, the weather kept threatening to literally rain on the parade. For another, recent news developments have both distracted the world's attention from the parade and cast an ugly pall on it. In California, national guardsmen and US marines have been deployed against the will of state authorities after Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) deportation raids have sparked widespread protests. In the Middle East, Israel's attack on Iran has led to deadly retaliation. And early Saturday morning, an assassin impersonating a police officer shot two Democratic lawmakers and their families at their homes in Minnesota, killing a state representative and her husband and wounding a state senator and his wife. Trump's plans for a military parade also sparked protests in many cities, including in Washington DC, where a few hundred gathered to chant, 'Deportations, we say no / Now's the time for Trump to go / Ice Gestapo, we say no / Now's the time for Trump to go…' Armed with signs declaring 'All hail Commander Bone Spur' (Trump was medically excused from serving in the Vietnam war) and 'History is watching', they marched to the White House. Trump's attitude to the rule of law 'is scary', explained one marcher in her 20s, who asked to be identified only as Madison. 'I would like to see Donald Trump impeached and imprisoned.' As she and the other leftists marched, a young man, bare chested and wearing a bucket hat, approached a demonstration marshal. He seemed confused. He wanted to know where the protest for the opposite point of view could be found. Downtown Washington was, in fact, thronged with people representing both points of view, and they could be distinguished, much of the time, on sight – with preppy attire and the occasional Maga accessory marking Trump's fans, and Covid masks, dark clothing, and a general glower designating anti-Trumpers. The mood at the actual army parade was cordial enough, in part because the overwhelming majority of attendees seemed to be either Trump supporters, military families or mostly apolitical daytrippers who just wanted to see a parade. Yet the crowd was on the smaller side, given the magnitude of the event. Similarly, although the army's marching went smoothly, the larger public event seemed less than well-planned. The garbage cans, few and far between, were overflowing. There weren't enough exits. The only food source for thousands of people was a handful of food trucks with lines of 40 or 50 people waiting at each. Because the parade closed down blocks and blocks and there was a dearth of signs with clear directions, it was also extraordinarily difficult to find one's way in or out. A secret service officer, trying to explain the general confusion, just sighed. 'Nobody knows what's going on.' A tent managed by a beverage company handed out room-temperature bottles of an energy drink, Phorm. The flavor, called Screamin' Freedom, tasted like hard candies dissolved in water, and an advisory on the cans warned that they were not to be consumed by minors or pregnant women. Although the military has agreed to cover the estimated $25m to $45m price of the parade, including the costs of reinforcing streets to protect them against so much heavy machinery, residents of Washington have been less than thrilled. The parade's attendees seemed to be tilted toward people who had traveled from suburban Virginia or Maryland or even further afield. At one point a young girl walked by wearing a Mennonite bonnet. It wasn't quite Maga Woodstock, but it was close. Chelsea, a woman in her 30s wearing a Maga hat, came all the way from New Jersey. Asked what she thought of Trump's decision to deploy the military in LA, she said, 'You don't have leadership in that state. The [Democratic politicians there] don't seem to have a fire in them.' Trump, she argued, was taking a risk to try to help California out of a lawlessness created by the cowardice of its local politicians. This was a common sentiment. A group of women from Pennsylvania were sitting on the grass. One wore a red-white-and-blue blouse, the other a flag-printed dress. 'Trump wants to keep us safe,' she said. 'He's not Hitler.' Related: Trump's military parade taps an ancient tradition of power: from Mesopotamia to Maga 'Or a king!' one of her friends said. She defended Trump's decision to ban transgender troops from the military, and complained that Biden had subjected the military to political correctness and DEI initiatives. 'The military is not a social experiment.' A little over an hour into the parade, which was still going strong, the crowd was beginning to show some signs of restlessness. Even a few people in Maga hats appeared to be packing up their things and heading home. The first wave of hundreds of people slowly funneled through the gates, and past entrepreneurs hawking Maga gear and baseball caps with Ice written on them. A young man, asked what he thought of the parade, remarked that he was not impressed. He felt that Trump's close association with the celebration had politicized it and 'made a mockery' of the army, though it wasn't the army's fault. More to the point, he added, the event was 'just kind of … lame'.
