logo
Utah lawmakers say no to ‘preemption,' halt 2 housing bills aimed allowing smaller homes

Utah lawmakers say no to ‘preemption,' halt 2 housing bills aimed allowing smaller homes

Yahoo13-02-2025

New homes are under construction in Spanish Fork on Tuesday, July 16, 2024. (Photo by Spenser Heaps for Utah News Dispatch)
Tackling Utah's stubborn housing affordability crisis continues to be a stated top priority for state leaders — but at the same time lawmakers still resist taking broad, aggressive action to more widely allow smaller housing types.
Met with pushback from local governments fearing loss of local control, Utah lawmakers aren't opting to flex their power over cities when it comes to zoning — at least not yet.
Two bills sponsored by Rep. Ray Ward, R-Bountiful, that would have required cities to more widely allow smaller homes didn't survive their first legislative obstacle, stalling in the House Political Subdivisions Committee last week.
The bills, which have likely hit a dead end at least for the 2025 legislative session, included:
HB88, which would have required urban cities to allow accessory dwelling units — also known as ADUs, mother-in-law apartments or granny flats — in residential zones.
HB90, which would have required urban cities to allow single-family homes to be built on lot sizes as small as 6,000 square feet, making it a 'permitted use' in residential zones.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
They were short and simple bills with far-reaching impacts. To Ward, they would break down barriers for housing construction, help the state increase its lacking housing supply, and therefore help bring down the state's high housing costs.
But to the bills' critics — including those representing city governments — they would wrest control away from local officials, limit their ability to plan their communities, and risk runaway development that could jeopardize neighborhoods.
Ward's bills aren't the only pieces of legislation being considered by the 2025 Utah Legislature, but they were among the first to fail, signaling lawmakers are more interested in the same gentle approach they've been taking in recent years.
Rather than advancing legislation with sweeping implications, lawmakers appear poised to continue taking incremental bites at the housing policy apple, focused more on incentives and partnerships with local leaders and developers rather than aggressive or controversial action.
One bill, HB37, is still waiting for its first committee hearing, but it contains a slate of measures studied and supported by the Political Subdivisions Interim Committee that are more likely to find traction from the larger Legislature.
Utah lawmakers' next big housing bill is taking shape. Here's what it includes — so far
That bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Dunnigan, R-Taylorsville, would allow — not force — cities and counties to implement a 'density overlay' in a 'housing-eligible zone' of their choice. In other words, the bill would give city leaders another tool in their planning toolbelt to zone for certain, higher-density housing types in areas that are already classified for residential use.
To Ward, Utah lawmakers have a simple choice to make. Either start making moves to more widely allow smaller home types, or continue facing a housing crisis.
'In my opinion, if we want to slow the rise of the average cost of homes, there's no other solution than to allowing the building of more homes, the building of smaller homes, and as land becomes more expensive, to allow more homes to be built on smaller pieces of land,' Ward told lawmakers on the House Political Subdivisions Committee on Friday.
Though he acknowledged other lawmakers believe his approach is too heavy handed, Ward said the Utah Legislature should step in to tackle the problem despite cries of overreach over local control because 'zoning ordinances are part of the problem.'
'We have a city in our state that will not let you build a home at all, unless you build a three-car garage, or in some very limited circumstances, they will let you build a home with a two-car garage,' Ward said.
He didn't name the city, but he quoted from West Valley City's ordinance that states 'a three-car garage is required, except that a two-car garage is permissible when there is a 20-foot side yard setback adjacent to the garage and either the two-car garage is side loaded or the basement of the dwelling with at least a three-quarter basement is finished.' The ordinance also goes on to require minimum interior dimensions of 20 feet by 30 feet for a three-car garage.
'So that is to say the garage must be 600 square feet,' Ward said. 'In the 1950s, we built entire houses that were 600 square feet, and now in that city we won't let you build a house at all unless your garage is that size.'
Cox: There are 'broken incentive structures' worsening Utah's housing crisis
Ward cited a letter he said was from a retired developer who blamed rising building permit costs on 'unnecessary city requirements.'
He referenced Minneapolis as a city that's already taken action to allow smaller homes with fewer requirements, and how that can keep costs down.
Starting in 2009, Minneapolis adopted a series of policy changes that reduced then eliminated minimum parking requirements, allowed ADUs, and lowered minimum lot size requirements in residential zones, among others. According to a report from Pew Charitable Trusts, those land reforms helped pave the way for more apartments and kept rents in that city flat, even as the rest of Minnesota saw housing costs increase.
Ray also pointed to Montana, Florida, and Portland, Oregon as areas that have loosened zoning requirements and cleared the way for a variety of smaller housing types.
Ray said his bill, HB88, 'isn't tricky.' He said it would simply 'broadly allow' ADUs — whether they're internal, like basement apartments, or external — in lots in urban areas where there are existing single-family homes.
Ward said homeowners rarely have the means to build an ADU, so he argued his bill would likely only bring 'one or two per neighborhood at a time.' However, he said allowing even one ADU will benefit multiple families.
'Overall, this bill would add a small amount of smaller homes on a small footprint of land to our existing housing stock,' Ward said. 'It would be a small step toward bringing down the average cost of housing, which we need to find some ways to do that.'
Utah's new housing experiment
Utah Gov. Spencer Cox's housing adviser Steve Waldrip spoke in favor of Ward's bill, calling it a 'pretty light touch' and yet one piece of a complex puzzle lawmakers could address to deal with Utah's 'multi-faceted' housing crisis.
'Housing is extremely regulated in our society, and … we have the issue we have because of the system we've created,' Waldrip said. 'Now we've given, frankly, outsized influence to those who live in their current neighborhoods versus those who could live there. And that's a tough balance.'
Based on income-to-home price ratio, Utah ranks as the third-most expensive housing market in the country, Waldrip said.
'That's why we have to do things now to create more access,' he said, calling it a 'supply problem. … We don't have enough places for people to live, and frankly this last year we just fell another 5,000 to 7,000 units behind.'
Waldrip said he doesn't believe Ward's bill would cause 'neighborhoods to collapse or anything like that,' but rather it would help families create more affordable housing options for themselves. He also added other cities, including Farmington, have already passed similar ordinances.
'Cities are doing this already. This would just enable it to happen at a broader scale all across the state,' Waldrip said.
Ward's HB88, however, met pushback from the Utah League of Cities and Towns, an organization that represents city governments. The League's president, Draper Mayor Troy Walker, said 'we oppose this bill completely.'
'We believe in partnership and not preemption,' Walker said. 'And this bill is 100% preemption. It takes away our land use authority on the ADUs.'
Walker argued cities are, in their own ways, allowing ADUs while balancing issues like infrastructure or safety concerns specific to city needs. 'This mandate of anywhere, anyplace, preempts our land use authority and drops these units in … without consideration that neighborhoods and people expect from their local government.'
Lawmakers eye housing audit that says Utah needs 28K new homes a year to keep up with growth
Walker also argued lawmakers should focus on home ownership, not rentals, and ADUs 'don't change the ownership game. They increase rentals, which we don't need more of.'
However, Brooks Gibbs, of Bountiful, urged lawmakers to support Ward's bill. He said when he built his ADU several years ago, it was a 'lifesaver' after he was laid off. Since then, Brooks said he's helped other Utahns build ADUs on their properties, and he said he's seen how it not only serves as a housing solution, but also helps provide income for families struggling with a wide range of issues.
'Either it's aging parents, it's kids that don't have a place to go to, it's health issues,' he said, describing a friend of his who was diagnosed with breast cancer and added an ADU to house her caregiver. 'When she passed away, the home went to her son, who couldn't afford a home.'
Ultimately, however, lawmakers sitting on the House committee opted not to give Ward's bill a chance on the House floor, voting 7-1 to hold it.
Rep. Gay Lynn Bennion, D-Cottonwood Heights, was among those that voted against Ward's bill — but with a warning that if Utah doesn't begin to see progress on its housing crisis soon, more drastic measures may be needed. Specifically, Bennion said cities must address not-in-my-backyard attitudes, which often can discourage higher density housing development.
'I can see that this is hurtful to our cities, to mandate this,' she said. 'However, I want to let our cities know that we need to begin overcoming NIMBYism. I see it in my city. I see my friends who are open-minded and progressive and ready to have higher density — until it's in their backyard. And I see this over and over.'
Bennion said 'it's time' for Utah to 'get this solved within the next year.'
'I'm ready to give it one more year,' she said. 'And if we can't find a way to increase the speed of which we're developing housing, then I'm going to have to vote for a bill like this.'
Ward urged lawmakers not to let his bill stall. He said the Utah Legislature has spent years passing a whole slate of legislation chewing around the edges of the issue rather than tackling it head on.
'We have done dozens of other things instead of the one thing,' he said. 'If there's any line that allows more housing to be built on a widespread, statewide, or in this case urban-wide basis, that thing, of allowing more of it, is preemption.'
Lawmakers, he said, should decide housing is 'important enough that we're just going to allow it to be done, because the benefit from it for our communities, families and kids is important.'
If the Utah Legislature continues to err on the side of cooperation with cities rather than preemption, 'to me, I expect that we'll kind of stay on the same track that we've been on.'
The debate over Ward's HB90 — which would require cities to allow smaller lot sizes as a permitted use — had similar themes, and it failed for the same reasons.
While Ward said critics of his bill argue it would only result in more subdivision and not necessarily more affordable homes, he said to him that would still be a success because it would simply help clear the way for more houses, regardless of whether they're affordable or not. That's because, he said, Utah simply needs more supply.
'The thing that I think will solve the problem is if we allow more housing so supply and demand can come into balance,' he said. 'It will be a success if we allow more smaller housing, and it will be a success if we allow more housing to be built on smaller lots.'
Simply put, Ward said his bill could mean the difference between having one acre for one family, or one acre for seven families.
Walker also spoke against that bill, again saying it was a matter of preempting local control. He also said cities like his own, Draper, are already moving toward higher density and smaller lots.
'All we've done is get smaller, all across the board,' Walker said. 'We have apartments. We have townhomes … we are doing it.'
What cities don't want, Walker said, is 'mandates.'
'We want to do our job, be partners, not be preempted,' Walker said.
Rep. Karen Peterson, R-Clinton, motioned to hold Ward's bill, saying lawmakers have to be 'incredibly careful' not to infringe on cities' ability to plan for their own growth and maintain existing 'quality of life.' She also said it's important for city leaders to be able to manage what their cities can and can't handle infrastructure-wise, including water and sewer lines.
Ward again urged lawmakers against abandoning his bill.
'Other areas that allow broader building still do manage to build more homes and smaller homes without those other things going wrong,' he said.
Utah, Ward said, is at a crossroads. He said the state can either 'find some way to allow more homes to be built for our children if we want them to still be here' or live with the expensive consequences.
'We don't have to do anything now, or later, really,' Ward said. 'There will still be people who can afford the homes. … If we don't make there be more smaller stock, the only people who can afford the homes will be the ones that can sell a $3 million house in California (and) buy a $1 million house here, while our kids have to go somewhere else.'
Knowing his bill was about to hit a dead end, Ward said he hopes at some point his colleagues will come around to his point of view.
'I hope if not today,' he said, 'then at some point, we can find a way to make that happen.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Environment, social justice groups withdraw support for governor's key groundwater protection bill
Environment, social justice groups withdraw support for governor's key groundwater protection bill

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Environment, social justice groups withdraw support for governor's key groundwater protection bill

Gov. Tina Kotek on May 3, 2023 at the home of Ana Maria Rodriguez, a Boardman resident and Oregon Rural Action organizer, whose well water has nearly four times the safe drinking water limit for nitrate. Kotek was visiting with residents in Boardman, who are concerned that progress on the nitrate pollution in the Lower Umatilla Basin has been slow. (Alex Baumhardt/Oregon Capital Chronicle) Groups that helped champion one of Gov. Tina Kotek's key groundwater protection bills this session are withdrawing their support and asking the Legislature to let it die for now, following a last-minute amendment they say effectively neutralizes the intent of the legislation. Senate Bill 1154 as first proposed in February would provide long overdue updates to the state's Groundwater Quality Protection Act first passed in 1989, giving state agencies more authority to coordinate and to intervene early in Oregon's contaminated groundwater areas. Since 1989, three critical groundwater management areas have been identified in Oregon. They are all still considered to be in critical condition due to nitrate contamination, almost entirely from agricultural fertilizers and animal manure, and none have seen vast improvement in the last two to three decades. Groups heavily involved in addressing water contamination issues in northeast Oregon — including the nonprofits Oregon Rural Action, Center for Food Safety, Food & Water Watch of Oregon, Columbia Riverkeeper, and Friends of Family Farmers — consulted with Kotek's environmental advisers on the bill and offered testimony supporting it in recent months. But in advance of a public hearing and vote on Monday in the Senate Committee on Rules, the groups released a statement saying they could no longer support it. They wrote that a proposed 39-page amendment posted late Friday at the request of state Sen. Kayse Jama, D-Portland and committee chair, 'revealed the extent to which the Governor's office had allowed powerful industrial lobbies to influence the bill late in the session.' Lawmakers have to wrap up voting on all bills by June 29. At a news conference Monday Kotek said she was not aware of the proposed amendment. 'I think the bill is in good shape, and I know some folks would like it to be stronger, but I think it significantly strengthens what we do in the state, and I support the bill in its current state,' she said. Several environmental and social justice groups that have supported the bill continue to do so with the amendment, according to Anca Matica, a Kotek spokesperson. They include the Portland-based nonprofit Verde, Oregon Environmental Council and Beyond Toxics. The amendment strikes earlier provisions in the bill that would have required state agencies to provide regular reports to the Environmental Quality Commission, the governor and the Legislature in order to receive funding to execute their local voluntary implementation plan. It also strikes part of the original bill that would have allowed the state to modify existing permits for wastewater reuse and confined animal feed operations if doing so could curb pollution. One big change the amendment brings to the original bill, according to Kaleb Lay, policy director at Oregon Rural Action, is eliminating the requirement that the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality and the Oregon Water Resources Department work together to figure out whether new requests for groundwater permits, or requests for new uses of groundwater, might contribute to pollution. Representatives from the Oregon Farm Bureau and Water for Eastern Oregon, a nonprofit industry group representing northeast Oregon food processors and agricultural industries, said the amendment makes improvements to the bill, specifically ones that require third-party analysis of state hydrogeology and well-testing data. 'The bill has come a long way. And again, the problem is identified,' Oregon Farm Bureau Executive Director Greg Addington told lawmakers on the Senate Rules Committee. 'We want to avoid groundwater contamination. We can all understand that, and we can all get behind it.' Kristin Anderson Ostrom, executive director of Oregon Rural Action, said in the multi-group statement it would be better to abstain from voting on the bill now and to work on it for the next Legislative short session in 2026. 'Governor Kotek showed great initiative in putting this bill forward to learn the lessons of the LUBGWMA (Lower Umatilla Basin Groundwater Management Area) in eastern Oregon, but this legislation doesn't go far enough to put those lessons into practice,' she wrote. 'Polluters continue to get whatever they want, while the communities directly impacted by pollution are denied what they need and have been asking for – to enforce the law and stop the Pollution.' The Lower Umatilla Basin Groundwater Management Area, designated as critically impaired in 1990, has gotten worse under state supervision. A volunteer committee established in 1997 to tackle problems has had little to no impact. Thousands of residents in Morrow and Umatilla counties — mostly Latino and low-income — have been drinking from contaminated wells, which is dangerous because nitrates consumed over long periods can increase risks for cancer and birth defects. In September, Kotek and state agency officials released a comprehensive plan for curbing nitrate pollution in northeast Oregon that 'will take decades' to achieve. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Jim Carlin discusses 2026 campaign bid for U.S. Senate
Jim Carlin discusses 2026 campaign bid for U.S. Senate

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Jim Carlin discusses 2026 campaign bid for U.S. Senate

IOWA (KCAU) — One of the candidates running for the U.S. Senate seat that Iowa Senator Joni Ernst currently holds is speaking out. Jim Carlin is running as a Republican and was a state legislator from 2017 to 2022. He ran for U.S. Senate in 2022 but was defeated by Republican incumbent Chuck Grassley in the GOP primary. During his time in the Iowa Legislature, Carlin said he helped passed the fetal heartbeat bill and exposed abuse at the Iowa Veterans Home. The Republican candidate said as a state lawmakers, he introduced a measure to implement active shooter training in all schools in Iowa. Carlin said the reason behind this campaign run is that Senator Ernst has not lived up to her promises. He said that Iowans deserve to have a voice in Washington, D.C. 'Well, I think a lot of people right now feel like they're not being represented, particularly in government. The government's done a lot of things that I've heard people. We saw a 20% inflation last year; we have a massive deficit, but my big concern is the fact that these trends are going to be realities that our children and our grandchildren's future. That's why I ran the last time,' said Jim Carlin (R), candidate for U.S. Senate. Story continues below Top Story: 1 taken to hospital after fire at Pheasant Acres Lights & Sirens: Estherville man arrested after high-speed chase in 2 states Sports: West Sioux boys soccer wins first-ever IHSAA State title with 2-1 OT win Weather: Get the latest weather forecast here Carlin said he would be glad to debate Senator Ernst. The Republican candidate for U.S. Senate said he would bring the voice of Siouxlanders to the nation's capital in multiple ways, including calling for the red tape to be cut. 'I think the process is largely driven by big corporate interest at the expense of the people, and that's affected the agriculture sector, the pharmaceutical sector, the big tech sector, the finance sector. I mean, they're all being affected by the centralization that's kind of taken over our government well that not having a voice in the marketplace ends up hitting the political sphere. We have to be aware of that. We have to deregulate certain industries,' said Carlin. Carlin said he wants bring back some semblance of fair market capitalism into the U.S. He said the country needs to own its responsibility of the national debt, which is more than $36.2 trillion, as of June 9. The GOP candidate said there also needs to be campaign finance reforms. Carlin said he supports President Trump's America First agenda. 'Because since World War II, our economic interests have taken a back seat in almost every turn. Our manufacturing base has been shipped overseas. We have been treated very unfairly, and we footed the bill for a lot of wars, you know, overseas, the never-ending wars that we've paid for. We can't stay those courses. In limited instances, yes, but, but the never-ending wars we found ourselves in with trillions of dollars being spent, we can't do that,' said Carlin. Carlin is set to hold a family-friendly launch event for his campaign on June 12 in Cedar Rapids. There are at least 3 other candidates in the race so far. Those are Democratic candidates Iowa State Rep. J.D. Scholten and U.S. Army & Marine Corps veteran Nathan Sage. The other Republican candidate is U.S. Navy veteran Joshua Smith. Senator Ernst has yet to formally announce her re-election bid. She did hire a campaign manager for her re-election campaign on June 6. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Maine lawmakers move forward with changes to 2021 transmission line referendum
Maine lawmakers move forward with changes to 2021 transmission line referendum

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Maine lawmakers move forward with changes to 2021 transmission line referendum

A Versant Power technician energizes a line at the Tremont, Maine substation. (Photo courtesy of Versant Power) Though initially divided, lawmakers decided to move forward with a proposal to modify the law born out of a 2021 referendum question requiring the Maine Legislature to approve any new high-impact transmission lines. Although some legislators who worked on the campaign argued the proposal would clarify the law, LD 810 initially fell short of passage in the House of Representatives. After the Senate voted to pass the bill last Wednesday, the House ultimately decided to change course and passed the bill Monday by a one-vote margin. 'I'm shocked that we are being faced with this bill so soon after the historic and controversial battle,' said Rep. Elizabeth Caruso (R-Caratunk) during the House discussion last week. Caruso recounted the efforts by volunteers to gather signatures for the referendum question and the overwhelming support from roughly 60% of voters. The ballot question drew passionate grassroots support and overcame over $60 million in opposition spending fueled mostly by international energy companies. Therefore, the proposal before the Legislature to reform the law 'opposes the will of the people and the vote,' Caruso said. Approving it would send a message to voters that citizens' initiatives 'are a joke,' she added. Rep. Melanie Sachs (D-Freeport) said she was one of those Mainers who stood outside L.L. Bean to collect signatures for the campaign and was proud to vote 'Yes.' Though she still supports that referendum, Sachs also backed LD 810 because it 'is clarifying, not repealing.' Rep. Chris Kessler (D-South Portland), who sponsored LD 810, said he was also among the voters who supported the referendum, but argued his bill is meant to clean up the unintended consequences of the new law. Sen. Nicole Grohoski (D-Hancock), who worked on the referendum campaign, said while it is important to offer constituents legislative approval as a backstop on transmission lines proposed by private corporations, the current statute creates higher scrutiny for lines proposed by the Legislature than those from the private corporations. More specifically, the bill seeks to clarify that when the Legislature is seeking to develop a new transmission line, that project should not need to come back to the Legislature for approval after the Public Utilities Commission's review process. During committee hearings, the Office of Public Advocate, Maine State Chamber of Commerce and multiple environmental organizations agreed the duplicative process can deter developers, drive up costs for ratepayers and stand in the way of meeting climate goals. However, Sen. Matt Harrington (R-York) argued in favor of the current model because it gives the Legislature another opportunity to weigh in on a line after a route has been determined. This could be important because constituents could have issues with a line's route that wouldn't be known at the time of initial approval. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store