Utah lawmakers say no to ‘preemption,' halt 2 housing bills aimed allowing smaller homes
New homes are under construction in Spanish Fork on Tuesday, July 16, 2024. (Photo by Spenser Heaps for Utah News Dispatch)
Tackling Utah's stubborn housing affordability crisis continues to be a stated top priority for state leaders — but at the same time lawmakers still resist taking broad, aggressive action to more widely allow smaller housing types.
Met with pushback from local governments fearing loss of local control, Utah lawmakers aren't opting to flex their power over cities when it comes to zoning — at least not yet.
Two bills sponsored by Rep. Ray Ward, R-Bountiful, that would have required cities to more widely allow smaller homes didn't survive their first legislative obstacle, stalling in the House Political Subdivisions Committee last week.
The bills, which have likely hit a dead end at least for the 2025 legislative session, included:
HB88, which would have required urban cities to allow accessory dwelling units — also known as ADUs, mother-in-law apartments or granny flats — in residential zones.
HB90, which would have required urban cities to allow single-family homes to be built on lot sizes as small as 6,000 square feet, making it a 'permitted use' in residential zones.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
They were short and simple bills with far-reaching impacts. To Ward, they would break down barriers for housing construction, help the state increase its lacking housing supply, and therefore help bring down the state's high housing costs.
But to the bills' critics — including those representing city governments — they would wrest control away from local officials, limit their ability to plan their communities, and risk runaway development that could jeopardize neighborhoods.
Ward's bills aren't the only pieces of legislation being considered by the 2025 Utah Legislature, but they were among the first to fail, signaling lawmakers are more interested in the same gentle approach they've been taking in recent years.
Rather than advancing legislation with sweeping implications, lawmakers appear poised to continue taking incremental bites at the housing policy apple, focused more on incentives and partnerships with local leaders and developers rather than aggressive or controversial action.
One bill, HB37, is still waiting for its first committee hearing, but it contains a slate of measures studied and supported by the Political Subdivisions Interim Committee that are more likely to find traction from the larger Legislature.
Utah lawmakers' next big housing bill is taking shape. Here's what it includes — so far
That bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Dunnigan, R-Taylorsville, would allow — not force — cities and counties to implement a 'density overlay' in a 'housing-eligible zone' of their choice. In other words, the bill would give city leaders another tool in their planning toolbelt to zone for certain, higher-density housing types in areas that are already classified for residential use.
To Ward, Utah lawmakers have a simple choice to make. Either start making moves to more widely allow smaller home types, or continue facing a housing crisis.
'In my opinion, if we want to slow the rise of the average cost of homes, there's no other solution than to allowing the building of more homes, the building of smaller homes, and as land becomes more expensive, to allow more homes to be built on smaller pieces of land,' Ward told lawmakers on the House Political Subdivisions Committee on Friday.
Though he acknowledged other lawmakers believe his approach is too heavy handed, Ward said the Utah Legislature should step in to tackle the problem despite cries of overreach over local control because 'zoning ordinances are part of the problem.'
'We have a city in our state that will not let you build a home at all, unless you build a three-car garage, or in some very limited circumstances, they will let you build a home with a two-car garage,' Ward said.
He didn't name the city, but he quoted from West Valley City's ordinance that states 'a three-car garage is required, except that a two-car garage is permissible when there is a 20-foot side yard setback adjacent to the garage and either the two-car garage is side loaded or the basement of the dwelling with at least a three-quarter basement is finished.' The ordinance also goes on to require minimum interior dimensions of 20 feet by 30 feet for a three-car garage.
'So that is to say the garage must be 600 square feet,' Ward said. 'In the 1950s, we built entire houses that were 600 square feet, and now in that city we won't let you build a house at all unless your garage is that size.'
Cox: There are 'broken incentive structures' worsening Utah's housing crisis
Ward cited a letter he said was from a retired developer who blamed rising building permit costs on 'unnecessary city requirements.'
He referenced Minneapolis as a city that's already taken action to allow smaller homes with fewer requirements, and how that can keep costs down.
Starting in 2009, Minneapolis adopted a series of policy changes that reduced then eliminated minimum parking requirements, allowed ADUs, and lowered minimum lot size requirements in residential zones, among others. According to a report from Pew Charitable Trusts, those land reforms helped pave the way for more apartments and kept rents in that city flat, even as the rest of Minnesota saw housing costs increase.
Ray also pointed to Montana, Florida, and Portland, Oregon as areas that have loosened zoning requirements and cleared the way for a variety of smaller housing types.
Ray said his bill, HB88, 'isn't tricky.' He said it would simply 'broadly allow' ADUs — whether they're internal, like basement apartments, or external — in lots in urban areas where there are existing single-family homes.
Ward said homeowners rarely have the means to build an ADU, so he argued his bill would likely only bring 'one or two per neighborhood at a time.' However, he said allowing even one ADU will benefit multiple families.
'Overall, this bill would add a small amount of smaller homes on a small footprint of land to our existing housing stock,' Ward said. 'It would be a small step toward bringing down the average cost of housing, which we need to find some ways to do that.'
Utah's new housing experiment
Utah Gov. Spencer Cox's housing adviser Steve Waldrip spoke in favor of Ward's bill, calling it a 'pretty light touch' and yet one piece of a complex puzzle lawmakers could address to deal with Utah's 'multi-faceted' housing crisis.
'Housing is extremely regulated in our society, and … we have the issue we have because of the system we've created,' Waldrip said. 'Now we've given, frankly, outsized influence to those who live in their current neighborhoods versus those who could live there. And that's a tough balance.'
Based on income-to-home price ratio, Utah ranks as the third-most expensive housing market in the country, Waldrip said.
'That's why we have to do things now to create more access,' he said, calling it a 'supply problem. … We don't have enough places for people to live, and frankly this last year we just fell another 5,000 to 7,000 units behind.'
Waldrip said he doesn't believe Ward's bill would cause 'neighborhoods to collapse or anything like that,' but rather it would help families create more affordable housing options for themselves. He also added other cities, including Farmington, have already passed similar ordinances.
'Cities are doing this already. This would just enable it to happen at a broader scale all across the state,' Waldrip said.
Ward's HB88, however, met pushback from the Utah League of Cities and Towns, an organization that represents city governments. The League's president, Draper Mayor Troy Walker, said 'we oppose this bill completely.'
'We believe in partnership and not preemption,' Walker said. 'And this bill is 100% preemption. It takes away our land use authority on the ADUs.'
Walker argued cities are, in their own ways, allowing ADUs while balancing issues like infrastructure or safety concerns specific to city needs. 'This mandate of anywhere, anyplace, preempts our land use authority and drops these units in … without consideration that neighborhoods and people expect from their local government.'
Lawmakers eye housing audit that says Utah needs 28K new homes a year to keep up with growth
Walker also argued lawmakers should focus on home ownership, not rentals, and ADUs 'don't change the ownership game. They increase rentals, which we don't need more of.'
However, Brooks Gibbs, of Bountiful, urged lawmakers to support Ward's bill. He said when he built his ADU several years ago, it was a 'lifesaver' after he was laid off. Since then, Brooks said he's helped other Utahns build ADUs on their properties, and he said he's seen how it not only serves as a housing solution, but also helps provide income for families struggling with a wide range of issues.
'Either it's aging parents, it's kids that don't have a place to go to, it's health issues,' he said, describing a friend of his who was diagnosed with breast cancer and added an ADU to house her caregiver. 'When she passed away, the home went to her son, who couldn't afford a home.'
Ultimately, however, lawmakers sitting on the House committee opted not to give Ward's bill a chance on the House floor, voting 7-1 to hold it.
Rep. Gay Lynn Bennion, D-Cottonwood Heights, was among those that voted against Ward's bill — but with a warning that if Utah doesn't begin to see progress on its housing crisis soon, more drastic measures may be needed. Specifically, Bennion said cities must address not-in-my-backyard attitudes, which often can discourage higher density housing development.
'I can see that this is hurtful to our cities, to mandate this,' she said. 'However, I want to let our cities know that we need to begin overcoming NIMBYism. I see it in my city. I see my friends who are open-minded and progressive and ready to have higher density — until it's in their backyard. And I see this over and over.'
Bennion said 'it's time' for Utah to 'get this solved within the next year.'
'I'm ready to give it one more year,' she said. 'And if we can't find a way to increase the speed of which we're developing housing, then I'm going to have to vote for a bill like this.'
Ward urged lawmakers not to let his bill stall. He said the Utah Legislature has spent years passing a whole slate of legislation chewing around the edges of the issue rather than tackling it head on.
'We have done dozens of other things instead of the one thing,' he said. 'If there's any line that allows more housing to be built on a widespread, statewide, or in this case urban-wide basis, that thing, of allowing more of it, is preemption.'
Lawmakers, he said, should decide housing is 'important enough that we're just going to allow it to be done, because the benefit from it for our communities, families and kids is important.'
If the Utah Legislature continues to err on the side of cooperation with cities rather than preemption, 'to me, I expect that we'll kind of stay on the same track that we've been on.'
The debate over Ward's HB90 — which would require cities to allow smaller lot sizes as a permitted use — had similar themes, and it failed for the same reasons.
While Ward said critics of his bill argue it would only result in more subdivision and not necessarily more affordable homes, he said to him that would still be a success because it would simply help clear the way for more houses, regardless of whether they're affordable or not. That's because, he said, Utah simply needs more supply.
'The thing that I think will solve the problem is if we allow more housing so supply and demand can come into balance,' he said. 'It will be a success if we allow more smaller housing, and it will be a success if we allow more housing to be built on smaller lots.'
Simply put, Ward said his bill could mean the difference between having one acre for one family, or one acre for seven families.
Walker also spoke against that bill, again saying it was a matter of preempting local control. He also said cities like his own, Draper, are already moving toward higher density and smaller lots.
'All we've done is get smaller, all across the board,' Walker said. 'We have apartments. We have townhomes … we are doing it.'
What cities don't want, Walker said, is 'mandates.'
'We want to do our job, be partners, not be preempted,' Walker said.
Rep. Karen Peterson, R-Clinton, motioned to hold Ward's bill, saying lawmakers have to be 'incredibly careful' not to infringe on cities' ability to plan for their own growth and maintain existing 'quality of life.' She also said it's important for city leaders to be able to manage what their cities can and can't handle infrastructure-wise, including water and sewer lines.
Ward again urged lawmakers against abandoning his bill.
'Other areas that allow broader building still do manage to build more homes and smaller homes without those other things going wrong,' he said.
Utah, Ward said, is at a crossroads. He said the state can either 'find some way to allow more homes to be built for our children if we want them to still be here' or live with the expensive consequences.
'We don't have to do anything now, or later, really,' Ward said. 'There will still be people who can afford the homes. … If we don't make there be more smaller stock, the only people who can afford the homes will be the ones that can sell a $3 million house in California (and) buy a $1 million house here, while our kids have to go somewhere else.'
Knowing his bill was about to hit a dead end, Ward said he hopes at some point his colleagues will come around to his point of view.
'I hope if not today,' he said, 'then at some point, we can find a way to make that happen.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nevada Legislature Approves State's First Open Enrollment System
An education reform package recently passed in the Nevada Legislature will launch the state's first open enrollment system for public school students. The legislation is a compromise between dueling education bills, one sponsored by Democratic state Sen. Nicole Cannizzaro and the other supported by Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo. It passed unanimously in the Senate on June 1 and with a 38-4 Assembly vote June 2. Lombardo said in a June 3 statement that the Legislature 'passed historic education choice and accountability, so that every Nevada student can graduate career or college ready.' The bill was sent to his desk June 6. Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter More than 40 states allow interdistrict open enrollment, according to the nonprofit Education Commission of the States. Nevada's new system will let students transfer to schools outside their residential zone if there's room in their grade. It will also provide transportation subsidies for students trying to leave low-performing schools. Many states don't require transportation to be provided for open enrollment students, as it is for residents, according to Education Next. In New Hampshire, for example, lawmakers recently passed an open enrollment bill that places responsibility for transportation on parents. Families can drive their child to a bus stop on an existing route if they are attending a school outside their attendance zone, according to the bill. Related Multiple times a year, districts will be required to publish open enrollment data online, including school vacancy numbers and the total number of students who transferred in and out of their attendance zones. Nevada school boards will have to create a method, such as a lottery, to determine which open enrollment students are accepted into a grade that reaches capacity. Schools that deny a student's application will have to explain why. The bill prohibits districts from considering factors like disability, English learner status, athletic ability and residential address when evaluating applications. Schools will be required to create a priority lottery for students who have low academic scores. Related Students can be denied if they were expelled or suspended for 10 or more days during the previous school year. Parents can appeal a rejection to the district superintendent. The Nevada Department of Education will have to provide transportation for students who want to transfer from a low-performing school but have no way to get there. According to the bill, the department will award grant funds 'to the extent money is available' to local organizations that provide transportation. The bill will also create a statewide accountability system for districts and charter schools. The department could intervene in persistently low-performing districts by replacing leadership or assuming state control. 'We implemented open zoning so our children can attend the school that best fits their educational needs, and we provided resources to allow those children trapped in underperforming schools transportation to attend the school of their choice — regardless of their zip code,' Lombardo said in his statement. 'Simply put, we have instituted more educational accountability measures than during any legislative session in the history of Nevada.' Related
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Voter referendum of minimum wage law submitted to Michigan canvassers
A supporter signs a One Fair Wage petition in 2022. | Ken Coleman Updated at 12:25 p.m. A group seeking to upend a new minimum wage law passed in February submitted a petition for referendum to the Michigan Board of State Canvassers on Wednesday – a move that restaurant groups have called misguided. Meanwhile, supporters of the proposed referendum submitted by Voters to Stop Pay Cuts said the Michigan Supreme Court upheld 2018 voter-initiated laws to change the state's minimum wage law and that the Michigan Legislature should have let those laws go into effect without meddling with them. One Fair Wage, which helped to spearhead the movement to change the minimum wage law only to have their attempts circumvented by the Michigan Legislature – twice – in a statement said workers are now prepared to fight the law head on. 'The Michigan Supreme Court ruled that these wage increases should be implemented, yet lawmakers rolled them back before they even took effect,' said Saru Jayaraman, president of One Fair Wage, in a statement. 'We're mobilizing to ensure voters – not politicians – have the ultimate say in whether these protections are upheld.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX In proposed voter referendum language submitted to the Board of State Canvassers on Tuesday, Voters to Stop Pay Cuts said it is seeking to repeal Public Act 1 of 2025, which was born from Senate Bill 8, introduced by state Sen. Kevin Hertel Jr. The Michigan Legislature passed the bill in February and the bill was signed into law by Gov. Gretchen Whitmer shortly thereafter. The act was a compromise with tipped-wage workers and restaurants who foretold doom and gloom if Michigan phased out tipped wages and instituted a more than $12 an hour minimum wage. That was likely without action from the Legislature after the Michigan Supreme Court ruled that two voter-initiated laws passed in 2018 should have gone into law as written. The Legislature gutted the 2018 changes to minimum wage, tipped wages and paid sick time in the same session they were passed, which prevented the issues from going before the voters. It was a controversial move known as 'adopt and amend' because legislators took up the legislation, circumventing voter input, and then amending them in the same session. Organizers who supported the initiatives sued and argued the scheme was unconstitutional. The Michigan Supreme Court's liberal majority agreed and struck down the amended laws in a landmark 4-3 decision. The state's high court also determined that the Legislature had no authority to adopt voter-initiated laws and amend them in the same session. With that, the laws were set to go into effect in 2025, but a movement supported by tipped wage workers, restaurant and hospitality business owners rallied support to have the Legislature step in and amend the laws – which was now allowed because the appropriate time had passed for the Legislature to amend the laws. Whitmer signed the bill in February. The resulting Public Act 1 of 2025 set minimum wage $12.48 in 2025, $13.73 in 2026, and $15 an hour starting in 2026. The act also kept tipped wages intact and raised their percentage of hourly wage on a graduated scale up until 2030, much like it did with non-tipped workers' minimum wage. Voters to Stop Pay Cuts would like that law exorcised from statute, with referendum language arguing that Public Act 1 reduced the minimum wage for tipped workers and changed the way future inflation adjustments for minimum wage increases occurred in the future. A notice from the board notes a suggested petition summary with explanatory materials is due on June 18. Canvassers plan to meet to discuss the summary on June 27. The deadline for the board to either approve or reject the summary is July 10. The Michigan Restaurant and Lodging Association squarely opposed the effort. 'PA 1 of 2025 represents that rare outcome voters hope for from their elected officials but rarely experience – a true bipartisan solution in the midst of a polarized environment,' said MRLA President and CEO Justin Winslow in a statement. 'This particular diamond in the rough was crafted after extensive input from tens of thousands of Michigan servers, business owners, and community diners ultimately passed by both the Republican-led House and Democratic-led Senate, and signed by Governor Whitmer.' Winslow called the effort misguided and said Voters to Stop Pay Cuts was just One Fair Wage under a new name. He said suspending Public Act 1 would do nothing but slow the pace toward a $15 minimum wage. 'After six years of legal uncertainty, our industry finally has clarity and a responsible path forward. Michigan's restaurant workers and operators deserve certainty, not the chaos that would result from suspending thoughtful, bipartisan legislation,' Winslow said. 'We urge voters to decline to sign this irresponsible attempt to undermine worker-focused legislation that reflects the voices of actual Michiganders, not out-of-state interests.' This story was updated to note that the referendum petition language was submitted on Wednesday.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Worcester schools budget proposal: $586 million, no layoffs planned, uncertainty remains
WORCESTER ― The proposed Worcester Public Schools budget for the next school year is set at $586 million, an increase of $33.8 million, or 6.1% over last year. The district announced earlier this month that the proposed budget would be within striking distance of $600 million and the budget is undergoing a series of public hearings before it will ultimately be voted on by the School Committee. Unlike last year, which saw the district cut nearly 200 positions due to budget shortfalls, no layoffs are anticipated under the current proposed budget. However, in a press release the district has noted that a few outstanding items remain beyond the city's control, such as actions by the federal government, which controls 9% of the district's proposed budget, and state funding. More: Impact of school budget cuts: 86 classroom teachers, 70 support staff, 22 administrators "No layoffs are planned due to the budget next year. However, Worcester Public Schools continues to monitor actions by the federal government, which provides 9% of the district budget. Additionally, the state Legislature may make adjustments to the final amount that Worcester Public Schools receives," the district stated. From the proposed budget, $142 million will come from the city, while $381 million comes from the state, with the remaining funding coming from federal grants and other minor revenue sources. Superintendent Rachel Monárrez stated that the district is proud to be past the difficult cutting process and that resources can be used to help the highest-need students in the district. "I am grateful we can begin to move our resource allocation in the right direction to support our scholars, especially our highest-need students, even if we are doing so incrementally,' Monárrez said. 'While factors such as inflation reimbursement and health benefits pose a challenge, we are building upon a strong foundation to ensure funding is used in the most effective manner possible, now and in the future.' The proposed budget would be the first in which the district uses what it calls its equity-based budgeting practice, a formula developed by Monárrez and Deputy Superintendent and Chief Financial Officer Brian Allen that is intended to better allocate resources to schools and students that have been historically underserved. Allen, who will take over as superintendent in July, said the budget has been constructed with the intent of putting educators at the forefront. "This budget prioritizes classroom investments including common planning time and textbook and technology purchases, despite ongoing challenges," Allen stated. "Through it all, we are putting educator voice at the forefront and ensuring our budget is rooted in the district's 'Vision of a Learner' and strategic plan priorities." Part of the budget will add eight additional climate and culture coordinators in Worcester secondary schools, new positions that were created last year to help improve student behavior and encourage better outcomes for students struggling in school. More: Climate and culture team aims for reform at Worcester East Middle School Other aspects of the budget include funding to replace approximately 6,000 Chromebooks, which are given out to students across the district, the use of "late" buses at all middle and high schools to help transport students who have after-school activities, and to maintain current staffing ratios of 21 students per teacher across the district. The School Committee held public meetings on the budget May 19 and 27, and will hold additional meetings on June 5 and 18. This article originally appeared on Telegram & Gazette: Worcester Public Schools proposed budget set at $586 million