Steel and aluminum tariffs raised to 50pc as Trump highlights Nippon investment
WASHINGTON, May 31 — US President Donald Trump said yesterday that he would double steel and aluminum import tariffs to 50 per cent from next week, the latest salvo in his trade wars aimed at protecting domestic industries.
"We're going to bring it from 25 percent to 50 percent, the tariffs on steel into the United States of America," he said while addressing workers at a US Steel plant in Pennsylvania.
"Nobody's going to get around that," he added in the speech before blue-collar workers in the battleground state that helped deliver his election victory last year.
Shortly after, Trump wrote in a Truth Social post that the elevated rate would also apply to aluminum, with the new tariffs "effective Wednesday, June 4th."
Since returning to the presidency in January, Trump has imposed sweeping tariffs on allies and adversaries alike in moves that have rocked the world trade order and roiled financial markets.
He has also issued sector-specific levies that affect goods such as automobiles.
He defended his trade policies, arguing that tariffs helped protect US industry.
He added that the steel facility he was speaking in would not exist if he had not also imposed duties on metals imports during his first administration.
Devil in the details
On Friday, Trump touted a planned partnership between US Steel and Japan's Nippon Steel, but offered few new details on a deal that earlier faced bipartisan opposition.
He stressed that despite a recently announced planned partnership between the American steelmaker and Nippon Steel, "US Steel will continue to be controlled by the USA."
He added that there would be no layoffs or outsourcing of jobs by the company.
Upon returning to Washington yesterday, Trump told reporters he had yet to approve the deal.
"I have to approve the final deal with Nippon, and we haven't seen that final deal yet, but they've made a very big commitment," Trump said.
Last week, Trump said that US Steel would remain in America with its headquarters to stay in Pittsburgh, adding that the arrangement with Nippon would create at least 70,000 jobs and add US$14 billion to the US economy.
Trump in Pennsylvania said that as part of its commitment, Nippon would invest US$2.2 billion to boost steel production in the Mon Valley Works-Irvin plant where he was speaking.
Another US$7 billion would go towards modernizing steel mills, expanding ore mining and building facilities in places including Indiana and Minnesota.
A proposed US$14.9 billion sale of US Steel to Nippon Steel had previously drawn political opposition from both sides of the aisle. Former president Joe Biden blocked the deal on national security grounds shortly before leaving office.
There remain lingering concerns over the new partnership.
The United Steelworkers union (USW) which represents thousands of hourly workers at US Steel facilities said after Trump's speech that it had not participated in discussions involving Nippon Steel and the Trump administration, "nor were we consulted."
"We cannot speculate about the meaning of the 'planned partnership,'" said USW International President David McCall in a statement.
"Whatever the deal structure, our primary concern remains with the impact that this merger of US Steel into a foreign competitor will have on national security, our members and the communities where we live and work," McCall said.
"The devil is always in the details," he added.
Trump had opposed Nippon Steel's takeover plan while on the election campaign trail. But since returning to the presidency, he signaled that he would be open to some form of investment after all. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
40 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
US debt market crisis looming, JPMorgan chief warns
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon expressed concern over a potential US debt market crisis caused by Trump administration economic policies. (EPA Images pic) SAN FRANCISCO : JPMorgan Chase chief executive Jamie Dimon voiced concern Sunday at the risk of a looming US debt market crisis sparked by the Trump administration's economic policies. 'It's a big deal. It is a real problem,' Dimon told Maria Bartiromo on FOX Business Network's 'Mornings with Maria' show, according to an excerpt of the interview that will air in full Monday. 'The bond market is going to have a tough time. I don't know if it's six months or six years,' he said. Dimon cautioned that once investors become aware of the impact of rising debt levels, interest rates would skyrocket and markets would be disrupted – a dangerous scenario for the world's biggest economy. 'People vote with their feet,' he stressed. Investors 'are going to be looking at the country, the rule of law, the inflation rates, the central bank policies,' he said, warning that 'if people decide that the US dollar isn't the place to be,' financing US debt will become more expensive. Historically, the US has been able to rely on market appetite for low-interest US Treasury bonds to support its economy. Yields briefly climbed last week, amid concerns about President Donald Trump's divisive budget plan. The plan would among other things extend the gigantic tax breaks introduced during Trump's first term, spurring fears of a ballooning federal deficit. In mid-May, for the first time ever, the US lost its triple-A credit rating from Moody's. When it announced the downgrade to Aa1, the ratings agency warned that it expects US federal deficits to widen dramatically over the next decade. The White House's back-and-forth announcements of towering tariffs slapped on countries around the world are also creating considerable uncertainty and thus market volatility. Dimon already warned in April of 'considerable turbulence' facing the American economy, pointing to the impact of tariffs, trade wars, inflation and budget deficits. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent on Sunday downplayed Dimon's predictions of a debt market crisis. 'I've known Jamie a long time, and for his entire career he's made predictions like this,' Bessent said during an interview on CBS. 'Fortunately, not all of them have come true.' Bessent acknowledged that he 'was concerned about the level of debt.' But he said 'the deficit this year is going to be lower than the deficit last year, and in two years, it will be lower again.' 'We are going to bring the deficit down slowly,' Bessent added, insisting that addressing the deficit was a 'long process.' 'The goal is to bring it down over the next four years, (and to) leave the country in great shape in 2028.'
Free Malaysia Today
43 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Rubio says US ‘troubled' on Gaza, open to alternatives on aid
Famine warnings sparked growing concerns in Gaza, where Israel has cut off food and humanitarian supplies for over two months. (AP pic) WASHINGTON : US secretary of state Marco Rubio voiced openness Thursday to any new ideas to bring aid into Gaza after a US- and Israeli-backed plan was sharply criticised, expressing concern over the humanitarian situation in the territory. A new US-backed foundation on Wednesday announced a plan to begin distributing aid later this month in Gaza, where Israel has cut off food and other humanitarian supplies for more than two months. 'We're troubled by the humanitarian situation there,' Rubio told reporters after warnings of famine in war-ravaged Gaza. 'I hear criticisms of that plan. We're open to an alternative if someone has a better one,' Rubio said on a visit to Turkey. 'We are for all the aid we can get without Hamas being able to steal it from people.' Rubio also said he spoke about the situation in Gaza in a telephone call on Thursday with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, as President Donald Trump tours Arab monarchies in the Gulf region. Netanyahu has vowed a new offensive to wipe out Hamas, which sparked the war in Gaza with the deadliest attack against Israel in its history on Oct 7, 2023. Rubio said the US shared Netanyahu's desire to eliminate the Palestinian fighter group. 'I think all of us would love to see an enduring end to this conflict, which, by the way, would end immediately if Hamas were to surrender,' Rubio said. 'As long as they exist and they're around, you're not going to have peace.' Israel has imposed a blockade for over two months on Gaza, leading UN agencies and other humanitarian groups to warn of shrinking fuel and medicine supplies to the territory of 2.4 million Palestinians. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), said Wednesday it would begin distributing humanitarian aid in the Palestinian territory by the end of the month, with plans to provide nearly 300 million meals over an initial period of 90 days. However little is known about the foundation, which has been headquartered in Geneva since February. Asked Thursday whether the US was providing funding to the organisation, state department deputy spokesperson Tommy Pigott referred reporters to the foundation for further detail. Calling the initiative an 'independent plan', Pigott said the US would 'endorse this plan in the sense that we want to see creative solutions'. The United Nations meanwhile ruled out involvement in the project. 'I made it clear that we participate in aid operations if they are in accordance with our basic principles,' said UN spokesman Farhan Haq. 'As we've stated repeatedly, this particular distribution plan does not accord with our basic principles, including those of impartiality, neutrality, independence, and we will not be participating in this.' The initiative would effectively sideline the UN, which has trucks loaded with 171,000 tonnes of food waiting to enter the territory. 'The UN have a plan, an excellent plan, that is ready to be implemented as soon as we're allowed to do our work,' he said. But Danny Danon, Israel's ambassador to the UN, reiterated that his country would not allow a return to the previous aid system, which he believes had ties to Hamas. He meanwhile called on UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to 'recalculate' the body's approach to what would be a 'major' operation. He added that Israel would not fund the US-backed GHF efforts but would facilitate them.
Free Malaysia Today
43 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
The right name for the Gulf of Mexico
US president Donald Trump's executive order renaming the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America is an act of geographical chest-thumping. But imagine if he added a key word and called it the Gulf of North America. That simple tweak would trigger a meaningful shift in perspective. The gulf's current name dates to the mid-sixteenth century, coined by Spanish cartographers mapping the waters of New Spain, then a colony that encompassed much of present-day Mexico and parts of the southern US. It is, in other words, a legacy of European imperialism. True to his worldview, Trump envisions a new American imperialism, extending from Panama to Greenland. Geographically, the claim is a draw: depending on how you measure it, the US and Mexico have roughly the same amount of coastline along the gulf. What is clear is that the body of water is essentially enclosed by North America – an integral part of the Western hemisphere. Renaming it the Gulf of North America would serve as a reminder of that. It would also be a historic way for Trump to mark the first Fifa World Cup hosted by the three North American countries – Mexico, the US, and Canada – in 2026. To understand the Americas' strategic importance in the twenty-first century, we must begin with their people. By mid-century, nearly one in three US residents will trace their heritage to Latin America, just as many once traced theirs to Europe. Economically, culturally, and politically, Americans of Hispanic origin will be more oriented towards Latin America, rather than towards Europe or Asia. Nearly 60% of Latinos in the US are of Mexican descent, laying a foundation for greater cross-border integration. While Trump has issued an executive order designating English as the official language of the US, Spanish is certainly not going away. Hundreds of millions of people in countries with close ties to the US speak it – Miami, for example, is often described as Latin America's economic capital. In states like Texas, California, and Florida, Spanish-English bilingualism is often a practical necessity for business, education, and governance. Ironically, Trump has helped advance North American economic integration by accelerating the turn towards industrial policy that began with president Barack Obama's auto-industry bailout and US$90 billion investment in clean energy. To be sure, Trump's version relied on a different strategy: tariffs, tax cuts, and deregulation. His successor, Joe Biden, combined these approaches – retaining Trump's tariffs while rebuilding infrastructure and subsidising green and high-tech industries. Both Trump and Biden encouraged nearshoring in response to geopolitical rivalry with China and post-pandemic supply-chain shocks. Now, Trump is doubling down on his first-term trade and economic policies. Mexico has been a major beneficiary of this shift. In 2023, it overtook China to become the largest US trade partner, with its total goods trade reaching nearly US$800 billion. In 2024, Mexico received more than US$35 billion in foreign direct investment, part of a larger nearshoring trend in Latin America. US firms are increasingly investing in Mexico, as well as countries in Central and South America, not just due to their proximity, but also because they are young, digitally connected, and economically ambitious. Even with rising US protectionism, the region's geographic and cultural alignment makes it a better bet than Europe or Asia for companies producing goods and services for the US market. Politically, however, Trump often paints the region as a cesspool of criminality, focussing on gangs and drug trafficking. He is pressuring Mexican president Claudia Sheinbaum to stop the flow of drugs and people over the border, using his 25% tariff on Mexican auto, steel, and aluminum exports as a powerful bargaining chip. Moreover, Trump frames problems in a way that allows him to step in with 'solutions' that suit his interests and, crucially, can be easily spun into political wins. For example, by emphasising the China-Mexico fentanyl pipeline – where China supplies precursor chemicals that Mexican cartels use to manufacture the drug – Trump justifies his trade war on both countries. Likewise, Trump has focussed his ire on the relatively small number of undocumented migrants in the US who have committed crimes – a problem that he can 'address' with dramatic mass deportations of alleged Latin American gang members. Once this performative phase ends, Trump will almost certainly revive and take credit for the package of immigration reforms contained in last year's bipartisan border-security bill, which the Republicans killed at Trump's behest, so that he could continue campaigning on illegal immigration. These reforms could lay the groundwork for a US-Mexico migration agreement that would create a more fluid visa system for provisional workers. But decreasing immigration in the long term requires strengthening the Mexican economy and improving the government's ability to fight corruption and protect its citizens. Meanwhile, demographic forces will continue to do their work. American Latinos will build businesses that connect communities across the Western hemisphere. Cultural and educational exchanges will grow organically. Even as many governments implement stricter visa rules, US citizens can still travel, study, and retire in Mexico and other Latin American countries. When Chicago-born Cardinal Robert Prevost became Pope Leo XIV, US newspapers trumpeted the first American pope. But the Vatican News heralded the arrival of the 'second Roman Pontiff – after Pope Francis – from the Americas'. The point was not that Prevost had spent decades in Peru and had become a naturalised Peruvian citizen. It was that Pope Francis was from South America, and Pope Leo 'is from the northern part of the continent'. Viewing the Americas as one continent is a useful way to see the world – an outlook that will probably gain ground this century. Trump is unlikely to accept my suggestion about the Gulf of North America. But his successor might. Regardless of the name, it is the geographic and economic reality. Anne-Marie Slaughter, a former director of policy planning in the US state department, is CEO of the think tank New America and professor emerita of politics and international affairs at Princeton University. The views expressed are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.
