CalMac awarded Clyde and Hebrides ferry services contract
Transport minister Fiona Hyslop confirmed the publicly-owned CalMac would be directly awarded the contract in what she said is a 'positive change' away from commercial arrangements.
She added that CalMac will continue discussions with staff, island residents, businesses and communities to make sure it meets the needs of locals.
Confirming the decision when responding to a Parliamentary Question on Thursday, Hyslop said: 'I am pleased to announce that Scottish Ministers have confirmed that a direct award of the Clyde and Hebrides Ferry Services contract should be made to CalMac Ferries Limited.
(Image: PA)
'This direct award fundamentally changes the ethos of the service by shifting from a commercial arrangement to a model more focused on the delivery of a public service engaged on the particular needs of the communities it serves.
'I fully expect the direct award to be a catalyst for positive change across the Clyde and Hebrides network, based on a more efficient, flexible model of delivery that fully reflects community interests.
'Discussions will continue with staff, island residents, businesses and communities and trade unions on the arrangements to ensure the services can best meet local needs and wants.'
The Scottish Government said it intends to invest more than £530 million in the coming year to support and enhance ferry services across the country.
There are also plans by the Scottish Government to deliver six new vessels to serve the country's island communities from 2025.
MV Glen Sannox was the first of the new vessels planned to replace CalMac's aging fleet which came into service in January this year.
(Image: Newsquest)
Hyslop added: 'The CHFS3 arrangements include improvements, such as a new Benefits Realisation Plan, new and revised Key Performance Indicators, enhanced monitoring and reporting, greater regionalisation through dedicated Area Managers and increased stakeholder engagement.
'Ongoing collaboration with key stakeholders will be essential in supporting us to achieve a more reliable and robust service.
'Alongside our ongoing investment in infrastructure and an additional twelve new vessels for the network this will improve the overall resilience and capacity of these services, as set out in the recently published Islands Connectivity Plan.
'Transport Scotland is now working closely with CalMac Ferries Limited on the necessary arrangements for the commencement of the new contract on 1 October 2025. I will ensure that Parliament is kept up to date on progress with those new arrangements.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
36 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Calm down, Mr Sarwar - don't get too enthusiastic over Hamilton result
While the Labour win was indeed a surprise, it did not indicate a fundamentally different political environment than the one we had previously thought we were in, based on Scottish polling. As other analysts have pointed out since – including Ballot Box Scotland's Allan Faulds, who in these pages provided a sobering corrective to the wild narrative swing that took place last weekend – this was a by-election victory full of caveats. Read more I won't recount all of those caveats, but it suffices to say that going into the by-election, national polling suggested that, based on a proportional swing model, the SNP would win 33.7% of the vote, Labour 28%, and Reform UK 19.2%. The actual results were SNP on 29.4% (a 4.3-point gap), Labour on 31.6% (a 3.6-point gap), and Reform UK on 26.1% (a 6.9-point gap). As far as the SNP and Labour go, the polls had their results within the margin of error for a model of this kind. The only party that significantly outperformed their polling was Reform UK. As Dr Eoghan Kelly, a postdoctoral researcher on the Scottish Election Study team, found by extrapolating the result in Hamilton to the whole of Scotland, if the result were replicated in next year's Holyrood elections then Labour would come third, with 23 seats to Reform UK's 26 seats and the SNP's 49. There's a lot more work for Scottish Labour to do to get back into power in Scotland, and this one by-election win isn't sufficient to suggest otherwise. As we are all reminded before by-elections, and as most of us seem to forget in their aftermath, we cannot draw grand conclusions from them about national politics. But Hamilton was, nevertheless, a shot across the SNP's bow, and not least because it pointed to significant fragility in the supposed SNP leads in what will be closely contested constituencies next year – putting at risk the projected, disproportionate plurality of seats the SNP are expected to win by dint of dominating the constituency results. Let's take a few widely cited models to sketch out where we expect these three parties to end up if the polls do not change dramatically by next May (which they might). Ballot Box Scotland currently expects the SNP to win 59 seats, Labour to win 21, and Reform UK to win 15; Professor Sir John Curtice's latest projection for the Sunday Times had the SNP on 54, Labour on 20 and Reform on 18, and Dr Kelly's model (using my poll averages as inputs) suggests the SNP on 62 seats, Labour on 16, and Reform on 17. My model would have the SNP on 60 seats, Labour on 17, and Reform on 17. The Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election was called after the death of SNP MSP Christina McKelvie (Image: PA) Read more by Mark McGeoghegan: Historically, a party winning the SNP's current level of constituency and regional list support would only win around 47 seats, even short of Professor Curtice's relatively low projection of 54. The SNP's projected overperformance is entirely a result of the split unionist vote, meaning that the SNP can win as little as a third of the constituency vote nationally while sweeping the vast bulk of Scotland's 73 constituency seats. However, if they failed to win those excess constituency seats, they would not be compensated for them with regional list seats, which are allocated proportionally. So, how fragile is this constituency boost? And what does it mean if more close contests, like Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse, slip through the SNP's grasp? My model suggests that a swing of under 5% from the SNP to Labour, compared to current polling, is needed for the SNP to lose a further eight constituency seats. A further two are vulnerable to the Liberal Democrats in the same way, and six to the Conservatives. The swing from the SNP to Labour in Hamilton was, compared to the modelled result, around four points – enough to flip eleven of those 16 close seats. In other words, if the unmodelled swing away from the SNP in Hamilton is replicated elsewhere next May, the SNP would win eleven fewer seats than expected. Only a couple more would be needed to bring them down to the 47-seat mark. Why does this matter? Even with 54 seats, the SNP would likely be able to govern as a minority requiring the support of only one other party, likely the Greens or Liberal Democrats, to pass budgets and legislation. At 47 seats, they would need at least two partners unless Labour or Reform backed them, making the 2026-31 Scottish Parliament the first without a realistic two-party majority since 2011. That isn't necessarily a bad thing. Voters constantly tell us that they want politicians to work together, and establishing a more consensual style of politics has long been a lofty and distant goal of Scotland's political class. And it's an outcome our politicians should be preparing for in the background ahead of next year's elections. Of course, the respective leaders won't admit it in public, least of all John Swinney, as he pushes to secure a big enough minority to rely on the Greens and Liberal Democrats. Still, such an outcome looks much more likely today than it did two weeks ago. The Hamilton by-election result neither indicated that John Swinney's days as First Minister are numbered nor that Anas Sarwar is on track for Bute House. But it did send an obvious signal: the SNP's position is far more fragile than we thought, and little swings in local areas could dramatically change the complexion of the Scottish Parliament next year. Mark McGeoghegan is a Glasgow University researcher of nationalism and contentious politics and an Associate Member of the Centre on Constitutional Change. He can be found on BlueSky @
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Readers Letters: Believe carbon capture project support when we see it
Chancellor Rachel Reeves says financial backing for the Acorn carbon capture and storage project is coming… but when, asks reader Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... More smoke and mirrors from the Labour Party and the UK Government. From my recollection this is the third time the UK Government has proclaimed financial backing for the Acorn carbon capture and storage project (proposed 20 years ago) but there is still no money on the table. While tens of billions of pounds continue to flow into projects south of the Border, Scotland is supposed to be grateful for the UK Government now declaring financial support for the Edinburgh exascale supercomputer a year after it cancelled funding. Increased public spending commitments have been cynically hailed by Labour Party politicians without reference to projected inflation increases or different spending choices made north and south of the Border. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad To cap it all, Scottish Secretary Ian Murray now hypocritically says that the Scottish Government did not spend last year's Budget increase 'wisely' when much of it was spent on increased public sector wages, while the Scottish Government also continued to mitigate the effects of Westminster-imposed austerity. Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves leaves from 11 Downing Street on Wednesday before heading to Parliament to present her Spending Review (Picture: Henry Nicholls/AFP) Or has the 'Governor' now abandoned the last vestiges of socialist principles he presumably once held and if that is the case why are Scottish trade unions still supporting a Labour Party that in government continues to betray the poor and disadvantaged in Scotland while being complicit in the continuing slaughter and devastation in Gaza? Stan Grodynski, Longniddry, East Lothian Power play It's good that Edinburgh is to be blessed with the UK's most powerful supercomputer, but what about the considerable electricity required to support it? Is there now to be a new power station built? For surely our creaking National Grid system will either need to be upgraded or a dedicated and separately managed power station will have to be built to service it. Elizabeth Marshall, Edinburgh Privacy paramount Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Jane Lax (Letters, 12 June) says the police are recording people's sex wrongly. She writes, 'The law is the law', but her description of the law on this is incorrect. The Supreme Court was clear that its recent judgment on the meaning of trans people's sex applies only to the Equality Act. For other law, it remains the case that a gender recognition certificate changes a trans person's legal sex 'for all purposes' (to directly quote the legislation). The Court also said that discrimination against trans people continues to be unlawful under the Equality Act. For the police to ask victims, witnesses or suspects whether they are trans, as a matter of course, would very likely be unlawful indirect discrimination, undermining trans people's right to privacy. The law allows an exception on a case-by-case basis: when asking is necessary and for a legitimate reason. There will be good reason to record that a suspect or victim of crime is trans in some cases where it is relevant to the nature of the crime, or where an accused person is remanded in custody. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But for the large majority of offences with non-custodial outcomes – theft, vandalism, speeding, and many more – whether anyone involved as victim, witness or suspect is trans will be completely irrelevant to the offence, and should not be asked or recorded. Tim Hopkins, Edinburgh Driving forces Harald Tobermann (Letters, 12 June) wants even 'more buses to ensure balance and harmony on our roads'. Actually we need fewer buses driving around with few passengers in them. Far too much taxpayers' money is spent on public transport and far too little on maintaining and improving public roads. The chaotic Edinburgh tram project cost £1 billion for eight miles and because it was years late and grossly over budget there was a public inquiry into its failings, which cost £13m. Meanwhile, Edinburgh has been turned into an anti-car city with bottlenecks caused by bus lanes, lack of parking, congestion, potholes, and more patches than Windows Vista. While Newcastle has a three-lane city bypass Edinburgh has a two-lane one which is often at a standstill. Sheriffhall roundabout was supposed to be replaced by a flyover with construction beginning this year. What happened to that? The fact is that road users – commercial and private – are being robbed by central government and mostly ignored by local government in favour of subsidised buses and mass travel. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Take, for example, road fund licence, or vehicle tax as the DVLA now styles it. This is £195 for 12 months for a car with a list price under £40,000, but £620 for the first five years if it is over £40,000. A £40,000 car will trouser the government £8,000 in vat. All this largesse doesn't go back into the road system, it goes straight into Rachel Reeves's piggy bank. A new road construction programme would boost economic development, as would reducing taxes on owning and driving cars, vans and lorries. William Loneskie, Oxton, Lauder, Berwickshire Sick society? Who will win a Scotsman Health Hero award ? Despite the nice picture of him on the front of The Scotsman of 11 June, is SNP health minister Neil Gray really in the running? Our NHS is floundering in a sea of crises, the latest being the recent sharp rise in drug deaths. This is even more awful given the SNP's 'clean' drug usage programme at the Thistle in Glasgow which was meant to really help. It is rumoured that John Swinney is considering a cabinet reshuffle. If Mr Gray goes, who can possibly replace him? This is not because Mr Gray is irreplaceable, more to do with the question as to whether anyone in the SNP is able to do the job following a long line of failures, including Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf. Mr Gray ought to have been a certainty for a hero award. The likelihood he is highly unlikely to get one speaks volumes. Gerald Edwards, Glasgow Fly high Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Lt Cdr Lester May raises an interesting opinion (Letters, 10 June), but I regret to inform him that he is almost a whole century out of date (and more so in the UK context). Military aviation has become acknowledged worldwide as the primary armed force, without which a modern-day army and navy simply could not function. Postulating that a ship-borne or army-ancilliary alternative to an Air Force could ever work is, frankly, farcical. I could refer him to the many studies from the early 1930s onwards, but I think that the current UK perception as encompassed by the Chiefs of Staff Commitee is sufficient to vindicate a tri-service policy. Iain Masterton, Kirknewton, West Lothian Lines of sadness Former Makar Kathleen Jamie this week, commenting on the unveiling of her words on the Canongate wall at Holyrood, said: 'Poetry is democratic. It's available to anybody – through libraries, through memory.' How right she is. I was reminded of a beautiful poem of hers, 'Lochan', which ends with this line: 'underneath a rowan, a white boat waits'. This poem captures my sadness at the growing evidence of a crisis in democracy in Scotland. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Yes, a white boat waits for us all: possibly beside a flamingo or near a needless wind turbine. Let's hope there are some rowans left when our time comes. Mary Howley, Dunoon, Argyll Ferry tale It is somewhat ironic that EU rules put the final voyage of the Hebridean Isles ferry on hold, given the EU funded its construction (your report, 11 June). A grant from the European Regional Development Fund enabled financing of the project and a senior Director-General from the European Commission attended its launch by the Duchess of Kent at Selby on 4 July 1985. Stephen Fox, Edinburgh Lights out In all my years of attending art galleries and museums, I have never encountered such crass irresponsibility as that of Glasgow's Gallery of Modern Art, which clearly think nothing of putting visitors' safety at the height of the tourist season in jeopardy. The ground floor main gallery 'film installation' exhibition for John Akomfrah's Mimesis: African Soldier is in pitch blackness – apart from the small video screens – and near to its only entrance, hidden in perfect darkness, are two large concrete pillars, impossible to see until one literally walks painfully into them, and particularly hazardous to those coming in from the street whose eyes have had no chance to adjust so as to have the remotest chance of spotting the pillars in time. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad When I pointed this out to a staff member, their response was to shrug their shoulders and laugh. There's a twisted irony that this touchy feely, sensitivity training obsessed art gallery eschews basic common sense, never mind basic health and safety training that would never have allowed this dangerous state of affairs to have arisen, unless Glasgow Life (the city council's deniable asset Culture and Sport wing) are determined to bankrupt themselves in a litany of injury claims. Mark Boyle, Johnstone, Renfrewshire Mystery moon On Tuesday night I looked out to the south from my bedroom window and saw the moon, very full and riding high over the Pentlands, but to my amazement, it was bright red! Can anybody tell me, is this a natural phenomenon or is it a celestial forecast of impending doom? Enlightenment please. Sandy Macpherson, Edinburgh Write to The Scotsman
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
'We can't get more people into St Andrews to play golf'
New research released earlier this week has estimated that visiting golfers to St Andrews generate £317 million annually for the Scottish economy. Links Trust chief executive Neil Coulson explains why that figure is significant and what the charity, armed with this information, now hopes to achieve. Do you believe this economic impact report was overdue? I would say would accept that St Andrews is very busy in the summer with visitors, but what is the value of that? That's what initiated this report. We want to understand what the value is so we can then understand how we could grow it, potentially - the economic and social benefit. We can't do that alone. We can't get more people into St Andrews to play more golf. We're already busy and we have the local balance that we have to make sure we maintain. So what next? There's got to be some joined-up conversations about infrastructure and how people move around, and also about the experience that people get. There's lots of different sport and tourism sectors doing really good things, but it's about how do you join those up so that a distillery piece is connected to a golf piece that's connected to a heritage piece. How do you connect all those up? At the moment they are isolated, they do really good things on their own, but I think that the power of joining those up has got to be huge. Neil Coulson (Image: Gavin Craigie) You've said that the Links Trust needs to "be bigger than a golf course in St Andrews that manages visitors" - what does that mean? There's opportunity to grow more, for sure. Because we are a charity we don't have shareholders and investors, so the money we generate could be re-invested, whether it's our facilities or projects and initiatives, community projects. In terms of how aspirational you want to be, it's trying to find that right initiatives that really benefit, not just doing whimsical things, but I do think the opportunity is really significant for us to be a good driver for local communities and [nationally]. How does that work when you have a finite amount of capacity? We could say yes, we will double the number of visitors, but frankly we can only accommodate so many people. We need to maintain a balance between local and international golf on our sites. That's very important. The golf courses finish in town and start in town, so we can't just flood it with visitors and ignore that local dynamic. It's not a case of introducing more visitors. In our space it's understanding what the value of the visitors is that we have now, and then it's looking at how can we spread the benefit. It's not a case of us trying to get more. We can't grow the economic and social benefit by just getting more people into St Andrews, but we can do it by trying to collaborate and pushing some of that around Scotland. We could be a catalyst for people coming - that would be a good thing - but then help make it easy for them to get around and try and benefit other places. The Old Course is an icon for golfers around the world (Image: Mark Alexander) The Links Trust announced in January that it is in talks to take over the nearby Duke's golf course, which would help alleviate some of the pressure from the demand for tee times. How's that going? Still in discussions, still finalising, but it's looking promising so we are hopeful of getting that over the line pretty quickly. That will be our eighth golf course. Once we get that on board its opens up some new opportunities again to do something a little bit different. Do you expect that agreement to be finalised before the end of this year? I hope so. There have been some elements of cynicism about the Drive initiative to widen access to Links Trust courses by offering discounted rates - what's your response to that? From my point of view I want to open up access to the golf courses. They're a public asset, people should be able to come and play, but we do have constraints - demand is very high. If we generate a surplus, which we do now, it opens up options on the golf courses as to how you manage them. Drive is a benefit of that. Next year we are going to do it again, and we're going to try and grow it next year and for years to come. Access the entire series of Around the Greens here.
