Newly opened Din Fried Chicken draws buzz with crispy Malay-style flavours
As I pondered what to have for lunch, a Facebook post with over 300 likes caught my eye — a new stall at the hawker centre near our office, DFC (Din Fried Chicken).
Din Fried Chicken - exterior of stall
Curious, I braved the sweltering heat and speed-walked my way over to Toa Payoh Lorong 8 Market & Hawker Centre at around noon on a Wednesday. I was even lucky enough to catch the owner, Din, while the stall was empty.
Although soft-spoken, he kindly shared with me that the stall had been open for about a month, mainly selling ayam goreng, which is Indonesian-Malaysian style fried chicken. As lunch hour rolled around, more people started to queue up (call me a trendsetter or something), so I'd say business is picking up nicely for him.
Din shared that he wanted to focus on fried chicken as it is something 'easy' that many people like. You know what, fair enough. What's not to love about crispy, juicy chicken?
Their menu, displayed just below the signboard, is succinct and to the point. It features their signature fried chicken, various curry puffs, nasi lemak and mee soto.
Din Fried Chicken - overview of food
If only I had a little more cash on me, I would've ordered Din Fried Chicken's Nasi Lemak (S$4.50). Alas, as the average Gen-Z who is over-reliant on Paynow, I could only dabao a Quarter Chicken (S$3) and one Sardine Puff (S$1) back to the office.
Din Fried Chicken - quarter chicken
Please don't be fooled by the size of the chicken in this picture, as it was super meaty and substantial! The taste of the chicken meat itself was so-so, slightly dry in the way most chicken breasts are.
What stood out to me here was the skin. Albeit thin, it was packed with a well-seasoned, deliciously salty flavour that oozed out as I took a big bite into the chicken. I liked that they didn't use the skin to cover up the chicken, instead elevating it as a whole.
In the end, I couldn't finish the chicken, so I just nibbled around the surface to get as much of that oily, crisp skin.
Din Fried Chicken - sardine puff
Next up was, in my opinion, an underrated snack: the sardine puff. However, this one wasn't quite what I expected. The second it landed on my tongue, I could feel the tingling spice spreading over my mouth. Although not unwelcome, it surprised me for sure. Thankfully, the slightly sweet afternote balanced it out.
There was a mixture of onions and sardines in the filling, topped off with a slice of egg. Frankly speaking, the ratio of onion to sardine was quite off, with a lot less sardine than what one would assume a sardine puff would contain.
Din definitely knows what he's doing with his fried chicken but what about his other dishes? I guess it'll take me another trip to Din Fried Chicken to find out.
P.S. They do not accept cashless payment (at the time of writing). Please don't be like me— bring cash!
The post Newly opened Din Fried Chicken draws buzz with crispy Malay-style flavours appeared first on SETHLUI.com.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Meta plans to automate many of its product risk assessments
An AI-powered system could soon take responsibility for evaluating the potential harms and privacy risks of up to 90% of updates made to Meta apps like Instagram and WhatsApp, according to internal documents reportedly viewed by NPR. NPR says a 2012 agreement between Facebook (now Meta) and the Federal Trade Commission requires the company to conduct privacy reviews of its products, evaluating the risks of any potential updates. Until now, those reviews have been largely conducted by human evaluators. Under the new system, Meta reportedly said product teams will be asked to fill out a questionaire about their work, then will usually receive an "instant decision" with AI-identified risks, along with requirements that an update or feature must meet before it launches. This AI-centric approach would allow Meta to update its products more quickly, but one former executive told NPR it also creates 'higher risks,' as 'negative externalities of product changes are less likely to be prevented before they start causing problems in the world.' In a statement, Meta seemed to confirm that it's changing its review system, but it insisted that only 'low-risk decisions' will be automated, while 'human expertise' will still be used to examine 'novel and complex issues.' This article originally appeared on TechCrunch at Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Meta plans to automate many of its product risk assessments
An AI-powered system could soon take responsibility for evaluating the potential harms and privacy risks of up to 90% of updates made to Meta apps like Instagram and WhatsApp, according to internal documents reportedly viewed by NPR. NPR says a 2012 agreement between Facebook (now Meta) and the Federal Trade Commission requires the company to conduct privacy reviews of its products, evaluating the risks of any potential updates. Until now, those reviews have been largely conducted by human evaluators. Under the new system, Meta reportedly said product teams will be asked to fill out a questionaire about their work, then will usually receive an "instant decision" with AI-identified risks, along with requirements that an update or feature must meet before it launches. This AI-centric approach would allow Meta to update its products more quickly, but one former executive told NPR it also creates 'higher risks,' as 'negative externalities of product changes are less likely to be prevented before they start causing problems in the world.' In a statement, Meta seemed to confirm that it's changing its review system, but it insisted that only 'low-risk decisions' will be automated, while 'human expertise' will still be used to examine 'novel and complex issues.' Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump reignites feud with CBS over ‘deleted' Colbert interview - years after his claim was debunked
President Donald Trump posted a video claiming that CBS 'deleted' his 2015 interview with Stephen Colbert, resurfacing a debunked claim against one of his favorite recent rivals. Late on Friday, the president reposted a Facebook video on his Truth Social account containing heavily edited clips of his September 2015 interview on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. A message next to the video states: 'You are not supposed to see this video. CBS DELETED this entire episode from their official website. You will not find these segments on YouTube either.' However, a quick search on YouTube showed otherwise. Clips from the Trump-Colbert interview are still available to be watched on the official Late Show account. One video has 17 million views. The Independent has reached out to the White House and CBS for comment. Both the YouTube video and Trump's post include a portion of the interview in which Trump, then a candidate, touts his plans to build a wall, prompting the audience to cheer. 'Oh, listen to this, even with your crowd –' Trump begins. Colbert interjects: 'They love the wall. People love the wall.' Strangely, this isn't the first time that Trump has made this claim. The president appears to have reposted that same video in his first term in October 2018. Hours later, Colbert posted on X: 'I don't know why the president would take time on a National Day of Mourning to retweet something weird like this, but the original clips have always been online. 16 million views.' The comedian attached two links to YouTube clips from the episode in question. A CBS spokesperson at the time told the Associated Press that full episodes of The Late Show are only available to stream online 30 days after the initial airing. Trump's Friday Truth Social post marked the latest move in his feud with CBS. The president has repeatedly expressed his ire at CBS' 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris. He has sued the network for $20 million, claiming it used 'deceitful editing' to advantage the then-vice president. CBS filed a motion to dismiss the case earlier this month, arguing: 'This lawsuit is an affront to the First Amendment and is without basis in law or fact.' In response, this week Trump's lawyers claimed he suffered 'mental anguish' as a result of the interview. His legal team also accused to the network of seeking 'to wield the First Amendment as a sword, arguing that they cannot be held responsible for illegal conduct, intended to mislead the masses and undertaken in the pursuit of profit, because such conduct was the result of 'editorial judgment.''