logo
Climate Disruption in Africa Threatens Europe's Food Security

Climate Disruption in Africa Threatens Europe's Food Security

Arabian Post22-05-2025

A growing crisis in African agriculture, driven by climate change and biodiversity loss, is jeopardising Europe's access to essential food imports, including cocoa, coffee, and maize. New research indicates that over half of the European Union's imports of these staples originate from countries ill-equipped to handle escalating environmental challenges.
A report by UK-based consultancy Foresight Transitions reveals that the EU's dependence on climate-vulnerable nations for key commodities is intensifying the risk of supply chain disruptions. The study highlights that 96.5% of cocoa, a cornerstone of Europe's chocolate industry, is sourced from countries with low resilience to climate impacts, while 77% comes from regions suffering significant biodiversity degradation.
West African nations, particularly Ivory Coast and Ghana, are central to this issue. These countries supply the majority of the EU's cocoa, yet are experiencing declining yields due to erratic weather patterns, deforestation, and soil degradation. Farmers in these regions are increasingly resorting to clearing protected forests to maintain production levels, exacerbating environmental degradation and threatening long-term sustainability.
ADVERTISEMENT
Coffee production is similarly affected. Ugandan coffee growers report that unpredictable rainfall and rising temperatures are damaging crops, leading to reduced harvests and financial instability for smallholder farmers. The situation is further complicated by the limited availability of climate-resilient coffee varieties and inadequate support for adaptation measures.
Maize, another critical export from Africa to Europe, is facing challenges from prolonged droughts and increased pest infestations. These factors are contributing to lower yields and heightened food insecurity within exporting countries, raising concerns about the reliability of future exports to the EU.
The EU's own agricultural sector is not immune to climate impacts. Adverse weather conditions have led to an average annual loss of €28 billion, according to a joint report by the European Investment Bank and the European Commission. This domestic vulnerability underscores the importance of stable imports to meet the continent's food demands.
Experts warn that the current trajectory is unsustainable. Camilla Hyslop, a researcher involved in the Foresight Transitions study, emphasises that these environmental threats are already manifesting in tangible ways, affecting businesses, employment, and consumer prices across Europe.
In response, there is a growing call for the EU to invest in climate adaptation and biodiversity protection initiatives within its supply chain countries. Such efforts could include supporting sustainable farming practices, enhancing infrastructure, and providing financial assistance to smallholder farmers to build resilience against environmental shocks.
The situation also raises ethical considerations regarding the EU's role in contributing to environmental degradation in its supplier countries. Critics argue that the EU's demand for commodities like cocoa and coffee is driving deforestation and biodiversity loss in Africa, effectively exporting environmental harm while benefiting from the resources.
Addressing these challenges requires a multifaceted approach that balances the EU's food security needs with the imperative to support sustainable development in its partner countries. This includes re-evaluating trade policies, investing in climate-resilient agriculture, and fostering equitable partnerships that prioritise environmental stewardship and economic stability.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PumpFun's Revenue Redistribution Plan Sparks Debate Amid $4bn Valuation
PumpFun's Revenue Redistribution Plan Sparks Debate Amid $4bn Valuation

Arabian Post

time2 hours ago

  • Arabian Post

PumpFun's Revenue Redistribution Plan Sparks Debate Amid $4bn Valuation

PumpFun, a Solana-based memecoin launchpad, has announced plans to distribute protocol revenue to $PUMP token holders through a buyback mechanism. This move marks a significant shift from the typical speculative nature of memecoins, aiming to provide tangible value to its community. However, the platform's ambitious $4 billion valuation and a targeted $1 billion raise have raised questions about the feasibility and sustainability of its revenue model. Since its inception in January 2024, PumpFun has facilitated the creation of over 6 million memecoins, positioning itself as a central player in the Solana ecosystem's resurgence following the FTX collapse. The platform's user-friendly interface allows individuals to launch tokens with minimal effort, contributing to a surge in activity that saw Solana's Total Value Locked surpass $5 billion by mid-2025. The proposed buyback strategy involves using a portion of the platform's revenue to repurchase $PUMP tokens from the open market, thereby reducing supply and potentially increasing token value. This approach is intended to reward long-term holders and align the interests of the community with the platform's growth. However, the lack of clarity regarding the specific revenue streams and the proportion allocated for buybacks has led to skepticism among investors and analysts. ADVERTISEMENT PumpFun's revenue primarily stems from a 1% swap fee on all token trades and a 1.5 SOL fee when a token 'graduates' by reaching a market cap of $90,000. While these mechanisms have generated substantial income—estimated at over $380 million—the sustainability of such revenue in the volatile memecoin market remains uncertain. The platform's reliance on continuous user engagement and token creation raises concerns about the long-term viability of its financial model. The announcement of the $1 billion raise at a $4 billion valuation has further intensified scrutiny. Critics argue that the valuation may be inflated, given the speculative nature of the memecoin market and the platform's nascent stage. Comparisons have been drawn to other DeFi projects that have faced challenges in maintaining high valuations without robust and diversified revenue streams. Community members have expressed mixed reactions to the buyback plan. Some view it as a positive step towards creating a more sustainable and value-driven ecosystem, while others question the timing and transparency of the initiative. The absence of detailed information about the buyback schedule, funding sources, and governance mechanisms has fueled debates about the platform's commitment to accountability and investor protection. PumpFun's leadership, including founders Noah Tweedale, Alon Cohen, and Dylan Kerler, has yet to provide comprehensive details addressing these concerns. The platform's history of rapid growth and controversial features, such as the now-suspended livestreaming service that allowed for unmoderated content, adds to the apprehension surrounding its governance and operational practices. The broader context of the DeFi and memecoin markets also plays a role in shaping perceptions of PumpFun's strategy. The memecoin sector has experienced explosive growth, with market capitalizations reaching unprecedented levels. However, this growth has often been accompanied by high volatility, regulatory scrutiny, and instances of market manipulation, leading to caution among institutional investors and regulators.

How badly could Donald Trump hurt Elon Musk?
How badly could Donald Trump hurt Elon Musk?

Gulf Today

time3 hours ago

  • Gulf Today

How badly could Donald Trump hurt Elon Musk?

Io Dodds, The Independent Even for Elon Musk, this is — to use the precise technical term — bonkers. Barely one week after leaving the Trump administration with every semblance of amity, the world's richest person is going scorched earth against the leader of the world's richest nation. Insults and threats. Calls for impeachment. Sinister references to Jeffrey Epstein. Somehow, Kanye West is also involved. It's like the messiest online influencer drama you've ever seen, except the parties are two of the most powerful people on Earth. But when it comes down to brass tacks, what exactly does Musk stand to lose in this titanic celebrity divorce? If Trump were to follow through on all his threats, and use every available weapon against Musk's business empire, how badly could it hurt him? The short answer is: pretty badly. In fact, with some admittedly quick and dirty math, we can put a price tag on some of it. SpaceX and the $68bn black hole. Elon Musk's estimated $388bn fortune — already $26.6bn smaller than it was before this frank exchange of thermonuclear warheads — depends on the success of two companies which are both intertwined with the US political system. One is Tesla, which makes electric vehicles; the other is SpaceX, which builds rockets, spacecraft, and satellites. X, formerly Twitter, can be left aside for now; having bought the social network 2022 for $44bn, Musk is still struggling to recoup his investment and has almost certainly lost money overall. Let's start with Space Exploration Technologies Corp., aka SpaceX. Not many people can afford to rent a rocket, so a lot of its business comes from government contracts, and U.S. government contracts most of all. As of writing, according to federal data, the Texas-based company has been paid or promised just under $21bn by Uncle Sam since 2008. The total potential value of all SpaceX's existing contracts, however, is much higher: $89.2bn. If Trump cancelled every contract tomorrow, that would mean a theoretical maximum of $68bn in lost potential income. For context, that's more than four times SpaceX's entire forecasted revenue for 2025, and nearly 15 times its revenue from 2022. Of course, there's no way to know if those maximum payments would ever actually have been made. So we could also get a rough sense of what SpaceX stands to lose by looking at the actual cash it received from federal coffers every year. In 2022 that was $2.8bn; in 2023, $3.1bn; and in 2024, $3.8bn. On the plus side for Musk, the US government is so dependent on SpaceX that some critics have called it a monopoly in the making. SpaceX ferries our astronauts to and from the International Space Station, is heavily involved in Nasa's moon landing program, and manages an increasing share of government satellite communications as well. Still, that does not guarantee safety. Would you really, in all soberness, bet against Donald Trump doing something that hurts the country merely to punish his personal enemies? In fact, as Talking Points Memo editor-in-chief Josh Marshall argues, SpaceX's critical role might actually put it in greater danger, because it leaves the feds with few options except "expropriation or nationalisation". Tesla in regulators' crosshairs?Like SpaceX, Tesla has benefited greatly from taxpayer money, mostly in the form of emission trading payments from non-electric carmakers and tax credits or consumers buying electric vehicles. An analysis by The Washington Post put Tesla's total income from emission credits since 2007 at $11.4bn as of this February. Its gain from tax credits, which allow more people to buy its cars at higher prices, has been estimated at $3.4bn. Those emission credit schemes are run by US states, not by the federal government. Nevertheless, Trump and the Republican Party have tried to undermine such schemes by contesting states' ability to set their own emissions rules. The wider impact is difficult to calculate. In contrast to SpaceX, Tesla sells to ordinary people, who tend to have their own opinions independent of government. In reputational terms, splitting noisily with Trump could reverse some of its recent sales losses; on the other hand, it might just make Tesla hated on both sides of politics. The biggest risk may be regulatory. At the time of Trump's second inauguration, Tesla was being investigated by numerous federal agencies including the Justice Department, the National Labor Relations Board, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration — which by itself had six pending probes. During his time at DOGE, Democrats feared Musk could use his power to influence or cancel these cases. But Trump's unabashed willingness to wield state power to punish those who displease him while rewarding loyalists cuts both ways. Live by the chainsaw, die by the chainsaw. How much that costs Tesla would depend on how far Trump is willing to go, and on the outcome of any ensuing court battle. But when U.S. stock exchanges closed on Thursday its share price had crashed by nearly 12 percent, wiping $122bn off its market value. Potential deportation — or worseSo far we've only addressed Elon Musk's finances. Yet there are other, more personal ways that Trump could hurt him if the former reality TV star truly isn't here to make friends. For example, Trump's old advisor Stephen Bannon — who has previously branded Musk a "parasitic illegal immigrant" — urged the administration to investigate Musk's immigration history, and potentially deport him. Unlike some of the feverish allegations that emanate from the extended Trump-o-sphere, this one actually has some substance. An investigation by The Washington Post last year alleged that Musk had worked illegally in the US while launching his Silicon Valley career in the mid-90s. Musk has denied this, and in any case he has been a US citizen since 2002. Still, legal experts have said his citizenship could technically be revoked if he were proven to have lied to immigration authorities. And while those laws have only rarely been enforced in the past 25 years, some Trump aides and allies have said they want that to change. Nor is that anywhere close to the only alleged skeleton in Musk's closet. What is his relationship with ecstasy, Adderall, ketamine, or magic mushrooms? Has he ever been in regular contact with Vladimir Putin? Did his colleagues at DOGE rigorously follow information security laws when extracting sensitive data from federal systems? What happened to all that data after it was obtained? At least we can probably can rule out plain old assassination by government special forces. Although, to be fair, that is literally something that Trump and his lawyers have argued should be protected by presidential immunity.

China's forex reserves in May up by a less-than-expected $3.6 billion
China's forex reserves in May up by a less-than-expected $3.6 billion

Gulf Today

time8 hours ago

  • Gulf Today

China's forex reserves in May up by a less-than-expected $3.6 billion

China's foreign exchange reserves rose by a less-than-expected $3.6 billion in May, official data showed on Saturday, as the dollar continued to weaken against other major currencies. The country's foreign exchange reserves, the world's largest, rose 0.11 per cent to $3.285 trillion last month, below the Reuters forecast of $3.292 trillion. They were $3.282 trillion in April. The increase in reserves was due to 'the combined effects of factors such as exchange rate conversion and asset price changes,' China's State Administration of Foreign Exchange said in a statement. The yuan weakened 1.05 per cent against the dollar in May, while the dollar slid 0.23 per cent against a basket of other major currencies. China's foreign exchange reserves rose by a less-than-expected $3 billion in May, official data showed on Saturday, as the dollar continued to weaken against other major currencies. The country's foreign exchange reserves, the world's largest, rose to $3.285 trillion last month, below the Reuters forecast of $3.292 trillion. They were $3.282 trillion in April. The yuan weakened 1.05 per cent against the dollar in May, while the dollar slid 0.23 per cent against a basket of other major currencies. Meanwhile China's central bank added gold to its reserves in May for the seventh straight month, official data from the People's Bank of China (PBOC) showed on Saturday. Spot prices for gold, often seen as a refuge from economic and geopolitical uncertainty, were steady in May after hitting an all-time high of $3,500 per ounce in April. China's gold reserves rose to 73.83 million fine troy ounces at the end of May from 73.77 million ounces at the end of April. Its gold reserves were valued at $241.99 billion at the end of last month, down from $243.59 billion at the end of April, the PBOC said. With bullion up 27% so far this year due to tariff war fears on top of 27% growth in 2024, gold market specialists say the PBOC's readiness to continue building up gold holdings despite high prices reflects Beijing's desire to diversify its foreign currency reserves. Officials at the PBOC have not publicly said what was driving the gold purchases. In 2024, the PBOC took a six-month pause after an 18-month-long gold purchasing spree, before resuming buying gold in November, when Donald Trump won the US presidential election. The world's central banks are on track to buy 1,000 metric tonnes of gold in 2025, which would be their fourth year of massive purchases as they diversify reserves from dollar-denominated assets into bullion, consultancy Metals Focus said this week. Meanwhile China is willing to accelerate the examination and approval of rare earth exports to European Union firms and will also deliver a verdict on its trade investigation of EU brandy imports by July 5, its commerce ministry said on Saturday. Price commitment consultations between China and the EU on Chinese-made electric vehicles exported to the EU have also entered a final stage but efforts from both sides are still needed, according to a statement on the Chinese commerce ministry's website. The issues were discussed between Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao and EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic in Paris on Tuesday, according to the statement. The comments mark progress on matters that have vexed China's relationship with the European Union over the past year. Most recently, China's decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of rare earths and related magnets has upended the supply chains central to automakers, aerospace manufacturers, semiconductor companies and military contractors around the world. The ministry said China attached great importance to the EU's concerns and 'was willing to establish a green channel for qualified applications to speed up the approval process.' Commerce Minister Wang during the meeting 'expressed the hope that the EU will meet us halfway and take effective measures to facilitate, safeguard and promote compliant trade in high-tech products to China,' according to the statement. Chinese anti-dumping measures that applied duties of up to 39 per cent on imports of European brandy - with French cognac bearing the brunt - have also strained relations between Paris and Beijing. The brandy duties were enforced days after the European Union took action against Chinese-made electric vehicle imports to shield its local industry, prompting France's President Emmanuel Macron to accuse Beijing of 'pure retaliation'. The Chinese duties have dented sales of brands including LVMH's Hennessy, Pernod Ricard's Martell and Remy Cointreau. Beijing was initially meant to make a final decision on the brandy duties by January, but extended the deadline to April and then again to July 5. Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store