The latest shock turn as the Libs cling to hope – again
The NSW Liberals have been buoyed by the distribution of preferences in the nail-biter count for Bradfield, with Gisele Kapterian six votes ahead of her rival, the teal independent Nicolette Boele.
Following a week of preference distributions after Boele was declared the preliminary winner of the seat last week, Kapterian is back in front after the count at one stage was a dead heat with not a vote separating the pair.
However by Friday evening, Kapterian had overtaken Boele by just six votes. That will not be anywhere near enough to prevent a full recount but will give the Liberals renewed hope that they may be able to hold the once-safe blue-ribbon seat.
If the final margin is fewer than 100 votes after the full distribution of preferences, a recount is conducted in line with Australian Electoral Commission policy.
The last – and only – time a recount changed the result in an election was for the Victorian seat of McEwen in 2007 when, after the first count, Labor Rob Mitchell won by six votes. Following the recount, Liberal Fran Bailey won by 12. This ended up in the Court of Disputed Returns and the eventual result was a Bailey win by 31 ballots.
Boele had edged in front last week when full voting concluded on a wafer-thin lead of 41 votes, but she had slipped backwards by late Friday.
It has been a rollercoaster ride for the two candidates. The ABC and Nine called the seat for Boele on election night, only for Kapterian to leap ahead by some 200 votes as the count continued.
So confident were the Liberals, Kapterian was told to travel to Canberra to vote in the party's leadership ballot last Tuesday, which usually only includes elected MPs. Two retiring senators also voted in the ballot in which Sussan Ley become the first federal female Liberal leader.
Boele once again took the lead, causing senior Liberals to panic that they had jumped the gun and sent Kapterian to Canberra too early.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Labor left with ‘no choice' but to force super tax after weak GDP figures in March, shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien declares
Labor has been left with 'no choice' but to go after citizens' earnings with its proposed super tax as slow growth plagues the nation and hurts tax revenue, shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien has declared. Join to watch the full interview with Ted O'Brien on Business Weekend at 11am (AEST). The Albanese government's proposal to double the tax rate on funds in super balances above $3m and target unrealised gains could soon be legislated as the Greens' approval is all the bill needs to go through the Senate. It comes as recent GDP figures showed Australia was headed back towards per capita recession territory with growth slumping to just 0.2 per cent in the March quarter. The super tax proposal has faced fierce backlash from the Opposition, economists and leaders in the business community. Mr O'Brien is among those and tore into the Albanese government's fiscal management on Sky News' Business Weekend. 'The only reason they're doing it is they've lost all discipline on fiscal responsibility,' the shadow treasurer said. 'Debt (and) deficits (are) going out of control and they've got no ambition for the Australian economy.' He criticised Treasurer Jim Chalmers who lauded the 0.2 per cent growth, arguing the uncertainty from Donald Trump's trade war meant any growth was a decent outcome. 'We heard it last week from the Treasurer after the national accounts came out. What, 0.2 per cent growth in the quarter? Seriously? Lower than last time!' Mr O'Brien said. 'At a yearly basis it's running at less than half of the long-run average of growth and the Treasurer is happy about that. '(There is) no ambition for growth of the Australian economy and when you have no ambition and you overspend, you have no choice but to go after the earnings, the money of your own citizens. 'That's what this super tax does.' Labor's plan to tax unrealised capital gains has drawn backlash from Aussies concerned about small businesses, farmers and startups as many put assets in their self-managed super funds or use it as a low tax investment vehicle. Wilson Asset Management founder Geoff Wilson said by forcing Aussies to pay taxes on paper gains it will hinder investment in Australia. 'Both Anthony Albanese and Jim Chalmers - and probably most of the government - are gaslighting the Australian people by saying: 'Look, this will only impact a very small percentage of people that pay the additional tax',' Mr Wilson told Sky News. 'That's correct, but what it'll do is actually impact about how $4.2 trillion in superannuation is invested. 'We anticipate that the money will come out of self-managed super funds (SMSF), which is about $1.1 trillion, and billions of that will go into the housing market and push house prices up . ' He cautioned Aussies who use their SMSF as a low tax investment vehicle will be discouraged from funding projects and businesses in the Australian market. 'People won't want to take risk on their superannuation in the self-managed super funds,' Mr Wilson said. 'The angel investors and the startups and the small companies in Australia that find it hard to raise capital, particularly at this point in time - that tap's going to be turned off.'
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Why this Melbourne mayor's got a big crush on Sydney
NR: It was an incredibly powerful speech made off-the-cuff, but we didn't recognise the significance at the time. We had been saying for some time to the prime minister that she should call Tony Abbott out on some of his behaviour in the chamber, and not just continue with her usual stoic, dignified approach. On that particular day Abbott was needling her. And when he made the indirect reference to her father, something inside her snapped, and she unleashed. Fitz: And when you were with her back in the prime ministerial office, did she recognise it as a Gettysburg speech? NR: No, we all thought it was an incredible, heartfelt speech in the chamber. But it was also just another day of rancorous debate during a pretty tough term of parliament. Julia was always like: 'What's next? Let's move on to the next thing.' And there wasn't even much of a bump in the press gallery on the day. It was only in subsequent days when the international media picked up on it and it circulated on YouTube that the whole thing exploded. Fitz: Which, for the record, is what happened at Gettysburg. People at the time liked it, but it was only when Lincoln's words circulated via The New York Times that the whole thing truly took off! NR: Well, T he New York Times was one of many media organisations that contacted us in the days after that speech, wanting comment and interviews. It was amazing how it struck a chord around the world. Fitz: All right, so here in Sydney, we've long said that the only good thing to come out of Melbourne is the Hume Highway – boom-tish – while truly nurturing a grudging respect for the Victorian capital, and we suspect you feel the same for us. Now you've broken cover, and said some very kind things about Sydney this week, noting that we're right up there with Melbourne as one of ' the two best cities in the world '. What brought this burst of warmth for us in Sydney? NR: I feel it. I've always felt it. If I couldn't live in Melbourne, there's only one other city I would truly love to live in, and that's Sydney. And I often think that in Australia, we don't appreciate the fact that we have these two unbelievably brilliant cities … side-by-side on the east coast. 'Sydney is the movie and Melbourne is the novel.' Fitz: I love that, I think, but what do you mean, exactly? NR: Sydney is very flashy, and it's got the world's most beautiful harbour. And people who live in Sydney are obsessed by how close they can get to that harbour and what view they have of it. Melbourne has a very interesting internal life as a city. We love our bookshops, festivals, our food, our theatres, and sports. We love having conversations with ourselves, about ourselves. In Sydney, you turn up in activewear to your Mum's funeral. In Melbourne, you wear a black puffer jacket to a job interview. Fitz: All right, you also said you admired Sydney Lord Mayor Clover Moore, 'a legend who copped a bit over the years but was someone who deserves huge credit for her vision and determination'. What do you, as a new lord mayor of Melbourne, admire about our veteran lord mayor? NR: The first thing is her electoral success. The shelf life of politicians in this country seems to have gotten shorter and shorter. And there is Clover, who has totally bucked the trend winning election after election. This has allowed her to see through policy and projects which she has been a supporter of for a long time. Look at George Street, with the [light rail] and pedestrians – it's one of the best urban development projects in the world. When I was in Sydney recently, I was walking down George Street in the evening and seeing the thousands of people walking through the centre of Sydney. It's been totally transformative. Clover can take a lot of credit for that. Fitz: You were up here to see our Vivid festival, and said you had a lot to learn from it. What, particularly? NR: In Melbourne, we are looking for new ways to activate our city during the winter months. I love what Vivid has done through incredible light projections, installations, music performances, and speaking events to bring people into the city. We'll do it in a Melbourne way, but Vivid has given us some good ideas. Fitz: In Sydney, we're dealing with a housing crisis. How's your mob going on that front? NR: We do, too, though it's not as acute as Sydney's. Our median house prices are significantly lower than Sydney's, and we don't have the same geographic constraints that Sydney faces in terms of the development of new housing. But we do have huge population growth, which means we need to keep the new housing supply coming. My municipality, the City of Melbourne, was the fastest growing capital city in Australia in percentage terms last year. I'm a proud pro-development lord mayor, and a lot of that is happening in medium and high-rise residential towers. Loading Fitz: And I gather you credit Sydney for the way you do some of it? NR: Yes, when I was first elected a councillor a number of years ago, one of the first things I did was travel to Sydney, and – just like I did last week – spent a day meeting with people at the City of Sydney and in the NSW government. Getting under the bonnet and just saying, 'What's working here, guys? What can we learn from you?' One of the ideas I got from that first trip was around Clover Moore's 'Design Excellence Program'. I ripped off many of the features of that program, introducing into Melbourne things like design review panels for new development proposals, and the use of development bonuses to reward good architecture and design. Fitz: I know the answer, of course, but remind us what a design review panel is? NR: It's a group of outstanding architects, landscape architects and urban designers who can peer-review major projects when they're submitted to the city and provide feedback on the quality of the architecture and design. We are looking for buildings that give more back to the street and the city than they take. Melbourne has a distinct design identity that is highly regarded, and the panel has proven its value by ensuring major projects use materials and concepts that represent our city and tell a story about Melbourne. Fitz: You've got my vote! And what is a 'development bonus'? NR: If they get it right, you allow them to build more on the site than they otherwise would have been able to. Fitz: I also see you're credited with introducing measures like 'forcing graffiti taggers to fund clean-ups'. What does that mean? NR: While we're famous for our street art, tagging and vandalism has been a big problem in Melbourne and so we've made a huge effort to clean up the city – including making offenders accountable for their crimes. Our 'you spray, you pay' policy means our lawyers put in victim impact statements on behalf of the community and seek orders from the court to make vandals pay or clean up their own mess. We also have new cleaning vehicles, 24/7 Clean Teams, on the street. And we introduced new targets for the removal of tagging and graffiti. Any racist, antisemitic or offensive material will be removed within an hour of it being reported.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
It takes an army to make democracy work. It's time more of us enlisted
This story is part of the June 8 edition of Sunday Life. See all 14 stories. The election is done and dusted. Some people are delighted with the result, some relieved and some disappointed, as happens every cycle. But our system has worked and all of us should be happy that our democracy seems to be in good shape. The same is no longer true in many other countries. Indeed, we are starting to be talked about as a global outlier; a rare Western democracy that is not fighting off looming threats from populist right-wing parties. If watching what happens when one of those populists manages to win has taught us anything, it is that democracy is fragile. Perhaps that is why I see the increasing energy around our elections as largely a good thing. And perhaps as others have worked that out, too, that's why there is so much more buzz – both positive and negative – around them. It seems we can no longer afford to think that compulsory voting and an independent Australian Electoral Commission – important as they are – are protection enough, and that all we need to do every three years is turn up and vote. All those people in T-shirts promoting their chosen candidate, who were knocking on doors, handing out flyers, putting up corflutes and waving posters in long emu parades beside busy roads, have recognised that a functioning democracy takes work and must be protected. It takes time, energy, sunscreen and boot leather. I know getting flyers shoved under your nose outside your favourite cafe on a Saturday morning can be annoying, especially if they tout the candidate you don't support. But curb your irritation. The person doing the thrusting is doing their bit for democracy. By all means refuse their flyer, but do so politely. The volunteer is giving their time to support something they believe in: the essence of democracy. Polling day itself can feel like a frenzy. First, you need to find a park near a polling booth. Then, you must 'walk the gauntlet', as volunteers for each candidate wave their how-to-vote cards at you. It can feel overwhelming. I doubt my efforts changed a single vote, but it didn't matter. I made an effort, and that's the point. I know because I have been on both sides. The first time I handed out how-to-votes was in 1972, when I was 16 and volunteered for the ALP to try to get Gough Whitlam elected. If memory serves, it was pouring with rain and I was standing outside our local public school, soaked. Despite the ALP posters declaring 'It's Time', mine was a blue-ribbon conservative electorate and my somewhat soggy flyers were more often rejected than not. Mostly people were polite, but a few were nasty and intimidating. Perhaps this occurs more often with people who are worried their candidate is going to lose.
