Lawmakers push bill aiming to solve Tennessee's recycling problems to 2026
Tennessee lawmakers are exploring a measure that would transfer the cost of recycling from local governments to producers. ()
Tennessee lawmakers across the political spectrum echoed the same idea in a Wednesday committee meeting: Tennessee has a trash problem, and something must be done.
What that 'something' should be is a topic of debate.
But a coalition of lawmakers, manufacturing companies and recycling groups are pushing for Tennessee to be the first Republican-led state to adopt a system that transfers the financial responsibility for recycling to producers instead of local governments.
The 'Extended Producer Responsibility' (EPR) model is already in use in multiple European countries and Canada, and six states have approved EPR packaging laws. Companies that produce packaging products would pay fees into a producer responsibility organization that uses the funds for the collection, sorting and processing of recyclable packaging products.
EPR can come in many variations, but the general idea has won support from the conservative American Legislative Exchange Council and caught the attention of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The Sustainable Food Policy Alliance – which includes Nestle, Mars, Unilever and Danone – also supports the bill and EPR programs in general.
While battles loom over landfills, Middle Tennessee hurtles toward a trash crisis
It will take at least another year for the model to reach the Tennessee General Assembly for consideration. Sen. Heidi Campbell, a Nashville Democrat and sponsor of the 'Tennessee Waste to Jobs Act,' requested that the bill be deferred until January 2026 for more stakeholder engagement.
Campbell said the request stemmed from a 'productive' conversation with the Tennessee Chamber of Commerce, which has been one of the strongest opponents to EPR in Tennessee.
'We have a serious landfill crisis in Tennessee,' Campbell said during a Senate Government Operations Committee meeting Wednesday. 'Tennesseans don't want more landfills, and we need immediate action to address this challenge. Meanwhile, companies are actively seeking access to materials currently being buried in those landfills. They're asking us to pass this legislation so they can put those materials to use.'
Campbell said the bill would keep nearly 1 million tons of recyclable products out of Tennessee landfills each year. As it is currently written, it would require Montgomery, Williamson, Rutherford, Hamilton, Knox, Davidson and Shelby counties to operate under a producer responsibility organization, but allows all counties with populations under 200,000 to choose whether they want to opt in.
All told, the bill has backing from more than 12 companies in Tennessee (with combined revenue totaling $200 billion) and the state's aluminum industry, which could use more recycled aluminum to reduce dependence on importing new metal, Campbell said.
But the bill appears to be a ways away from consensus — skepticism in committees has centered on producers passing costs down to consumers and ceding some decision making to the system's private board.
Sen. Paul Rose, a West Tennessee Republican, wasn't sold on the idea.
'I recognize — I think we all do — that we have an issue … but I have issues with the bill as it was written,' Rose said Wednesday. 'We do need to address this, and hopefully we can come up with a solution that everyone can get their head wrapped around, and their pocketbooks, because it's going to cost money for sure.'
The Tennessee Waste to Jobs Coalition pitched the EPR structure as a way to bolster manufacturing businesses in the state, divert usable materials from landfills that are quickly approaching capacity and take pressure off of beleaguered local governments.
The group presented the idea alongside the Recycling Partnership and representatives from businesses that said they could use far more recycled materials than the state currently produces.
Donna Kopecky, the vice president of sustainability at Kaiser Aluminum, said she supports the effort to increase aluminum can recycling rates.
The company employs 164 workers at its plant in Jackson, Tennessee, and about 80 salaried employees at its corporate headquarters in Franklin.
The U.S. can only produce about a third of the primary ('new') aluminum supply needed to meet domestic demand, so companies must turn to Canada and other sources for the rest, she said. Recycled aluminum takes less energy to source and the metal can be infinitely recycled.
Bipartisan Tennessee bill would bring recycling to all homes, paid for by private business
Kaiser Aluminum averaged 50% recycled content in its packaging products in 2024, and could use more recycled aluminum, if the supply and cost is right. Demand for the metal is rising, she said.
'We need to capture more aluminum for recycling across the state, and this can be done by implementing recycling policy at the state level to help dramatically increase aluminum recovery and recovery of other valuable packaging materials in the state,' when paired with investment in recycling infrastructure and technology and consumer education, Kopecky said.
Florim USA, based in Clarksville, is the largest single-site producer of porcelain tile in the United States, Sustainability Manager Don Haynes said. One of the company's goals is being green, and they are seeking out recycled glass to use in place of sand. The tile industry could use every glass bottle in the state and still have to buy more, Haynes said in a video presented to lawmakers.
'I'm not an expert on EPR, I'm not an expert on recycling, but I am an expert on using the glass,' Haynes said. 'We would like the glass.'
Katie Raverty-Evans, vice president of chapter relations of the National Waste and Recycling Association, was not as enthusiastic about the EPR model.
The association represents about 70% of the private sector in the waste and recycling industry, and member businesses employ about 25,000 Tennesseans with a combined payroll of $1.4 billion, she said.
While she said the discussion of an EPR structure is 'commendable,' the association has concerns — namely, the package fees they view as 'unfair penalization of producers, especially … smaller, mid-sized companies.'
'Our point of view is, let's take a step back and look at it,' Raverty-Evans said. 'Nobody (in the U.S.) really has implemented the program yet. It's all in assessments, it's all in planning. And why push something so quickly … without seeing how it plays out within the other states?'
Tennessee will now have a year to grapple with the bill's particulars and observe other states' approaches.
Sen. Ed Jackson, a Jackson Republican and the chair of the State Government Operations Committee, said Tennessee needs to address its solid waste issue.
'I hope over this time before the next session that we can work something out that will really be productive and get the job done,' he said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Tumbles After Musk Escalates Attacks on Trump Tax Bill
(Bloomberg) -- Tesla Inc.'s shares sank as Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's simmering feud devolved into a public war of words between two of the world's most powerful people. ICE Moves to DNA-Test Families Targeted for Deportation with New Contract Next Stop: Rancho Cucamonga! US Housing Agency Vulnerable to Fraud After DOGE Cuts, Documents Warn The Global Struggle to Build Safer Cars Where Public Transit Systems Are Bouncing Back Around the World Trump on Thursday said he was 'very disappointed' by the Tesla chief executive officer's criticism of the president's signature tax policy bill. Musk fired back on social media, saying it was 'false' that the Tesla CEO knew the plan would unwind EV tax credits that benefit Tesla's business. Musk followed up with several more sharply worded posts, including saying Trump showed 'such ingratitude' for the help the billionaire entrepreneur has provided to Trump's administration. Tesla's shares fell as much 9.2% to an intraday low as the two traded barbs. The spat highlights how policies advanced by Trump and Republican lawmakers put billions of dollars at risk for Tesla. Trump's massive tax bill would largely eliminate a credit worth as much as $7,500 for buyers of some Tesla models and other electric vehicles by the end of this year, seven years ahead of schedule. That would translate to a roughly $1.2 billion hit to Tesla's full-year profit, according to JPMorgan analysts. After leaving his formal advisory role in the White House last week, Musk has been on a mission to block the president's signature tax bill that he described as a 'disgusting abomination.' The world's richest person has been lobbying Republican lawmakers — including making a direct appeal to House Speaker Mike Johnson — to preserve the valuable EV tax credits in the legislation. Separate legislation passed by the Senate attacking California's EV sales mandates poses another $2 billion headwind for Tesla's sales of regulatory credits, according to JPMorgan. Taken together, those measures threaten roughly half of the more than $6 billion in earnings before interest and taxes that Wall Street expects Tesla to post this year, analysts led by Ryan Brinkman said in a May 30 report. Tesla didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. The House-passed tax bill would aggressively phase-out tax credits for the production of clean electricity, and other sources years earlier than scheduled. It also includes stringent restrictions on the use of Chinese components and materials that analysts said would render the credits useless and limits the ability of company's to sell the tax credits to third parties. Tesla's division focused on solar systems and batteries separately criticized the Republican bill for gutting clean energy tax credits, saying that 'abruptly ending' the incentives would threaten US energy independence and the reliability of the power grid. The clean energy and EV policies under threat were largely enacted as part of former President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. The law was designed to encourage companies to build a domestic supply chain for clean energy and electric vehicles, giving companies more money if they produce more batteries and EVs in the US. Tesla has a broad domestic footprint, including car factories in Texas and California, a lithium refinery and battery plants. With those Biden-era policies in place, US EV sales rose 7.3% to a record 1.3 million vehicles last year, according to Cox Automotive data. --With assistance from Kara Carlson, Keith Laing, Josh Wingrove and Kate Sullivan. (Updates shares, adds Trump, Musk comments starting in the fourth paragraph.) Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Is Elon Musk's Political Capital Spent? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.


Axios
12 minutes ago
- Axios
Tesla stock sinks as Musk and Trump's relationship blows up
Tesla shares hit the skids Thursday as the relationship between Elon Musk and President Trump turned fully south. Why it matters: Musk and Trump were close political allies for a time, after the Tesla CEO poured hundreds of millions of dollars into Republican campaigns and led the budget-slashing Department of Government of Efficiency. The halo of that relationship was seen as a boon to Tesla's shares and the valuations of Musk's other companies like SpaceX. The big picture: Musk has repeatedly assailed Trump's "big, beautiful bill" in recent days, saying it'll unacceptably increase the national debt and wipe out DOGE's budget savings. On Thursday, Musk began reposting pre-presidency Trump tweets promoting a balanced budget and arguing against a debt ceiling increase. Trump responded in the Oval Office: " Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore." Between the lines: Tesla's stock was down more than 8% just after 1 p.m. ET Thursday. That decline would cost Musk nearly $11 billion personally. The downward trajectory suggests that investors are worried that a Musk-Trump breakup could hurt the empire of the world's richest person, which also includes xAI and Neuralink. Threat level: Tesla investors have been hoping for favorable policies from Washington, including for EVs and self-driving cars.


The Hill
13 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump and Musk's relationship flames out just as it started, intensely and publicly
WASHINGTON (AP) — The breakup between the president of the United States and the world's richest man is unfurling much like their relationship started — rapidly, intensely and very publicly. As President Donald Trump sat in the Oval Office on Thursday with Germany's leader at his side, he lamented his soured relationship with Elon Musk, his adviser-turned-social media antagonist. Trump said he was 'very disappointed' with Musk after the billionaire former backer lambasted the president's signature bill of tax cuts and spending plans. Trump suggested Musk, who left the government last month after spearheading the tumultuous Department of Government Efficiency, misses being in the White House and has 'Trump derangement syndrome.' 'He hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that will be next,' Trump said. 'But I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' Observers had long wondered if the friendship between the two brash billionaires known for lobbing insults online would flame out in spectacular fashion. It did, in less than a year. 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump said. He said that he had helped Musk a lot and brushed aside the billionaire's efforts to get him elected last year, claiming that he would have won closely contested Pennsylvania even without Musk's help, which included spending at least $250 million supporting his campaign. The Republican president's comments came as Musk has continued a storm of social media posts attacking Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' and warning it will increase the federal deficit. Musk has called Trump's big tax break bill a 'disgusting abomination.' As Trump spoke to reporters at the White House on Thursday, Musk was watching. 'False,' he fired back on his social media platform as the president continued speaking. 'This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' Trump said Musk, the CEO and founder of Tesla, 'only developed a problem' with the bill because it rolls back tax credits for electric vehicles. 'Whatever,' Musk snapped back in a post on X responding to a video clip of the moment. He went on and said Trump could keep the cuts but should 'ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.' The bill would unleash trillions of dollars in tax cuts and slash spending but also spike deficits by $2.4 trillion over a decade and leave some 10.9 million more people without health insurance, according to an analysis by the Congressional Budget Office, which for decades has served as the official scorekeeper of legislation in Congress.