&w=3840&q=100)
‘Take stance against Hinduphobia': Why Harvard University is under fire days after Pahalgam terror attack
Indian students at Harvard University in the United States objected to the visit of Pakistani delegates, including the country's Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb, for the Pakistan Conference 2025. This came just days after the Pahalgam terror attack, which killed 26 people in Jammu and Kashmir. The students urged Harvard to issue a public statement condemning the attack and reconsider allowing Pakistani officials to participate in the conference read more
Indian students at Harvard University raised objections to the visit of Pakistani delegates to the campus. Reuters/File Photo
The aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack has now reached other parts of the world.
A recent event focused on Pakistan at Harvard University's South Asia Institute has drawn strong criticism from Indian students. The conference took place shortly after the terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam.
Top Pakistani leaders like Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb and Pakistan's Ambassador to the US, Rizwan Saeed Sheikh, were part of it.
ALSO READ | Trump vs Harvard: How the fight started, where it is heading
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The Pahalgam attack is one of the deadliest attacks in Jammu and Kashmir since the 2019 Pulwama strike. After the incident, India took strict steps against Pakistan, accusing it of supporting cross-border terrorism.
In this explainer, we look at why the Harvard event has caused anger and what Indian students are saying about it.
The backlash against Harvard over Pakistan conference
Indian students at Harvard University in the United States raised objections to the visit of Pakistani delegates to the campus. They have accused the Pakistani government of backing religiously motivated attacks against Hindus in India.
Two Indian students, Surabhi Tomar and Abhishek Chaudhari, sent a letter to Harvard's management. They expressed grief over the recent terror attack in Pahalgam, saying the attackers had targeted Hindu tourists after confirming their religion.
Before the event took place, the students also wrote to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, asking him to cancel the visas of the Pakistani officials attending the Pakistan Conference 2025 at Harvard.
'These acts of violence were not indiscriminate - they were calculated attacks based solely on religious identity,' the letter read.
Indian students of @Harvard have demanded the Admin to issue a statement condemning the #PahalgamTerroristAttack where Hindu tourists were massacred by #Pakistan
& affirming support for victims of religion-based violence.@Keir_Starmer pic.twitter.com/xcaDfMNsTo — Sukhwinder Singh Parmar (@sukhparmar03) April 30, 2025
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
They also pointed out that Pakistan had made threatening statements to India after the country took steps against Islamabad following the attack.
According to the letter, while Pakistan's Foreign Ministry offered brief condolences, other officials made indirect threats to India and reaffirmed their support for Kashmiri insurgents, which they say is linked to groups like LeT.
The students said they were especially concerned that Pakistani delegates, including Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb, were scheduled to speak at the event. They stated that this came shortly after Pakistan's Senate passed a resolution supporting what it calls Kashmir's 'freedom struggle,' which, they argued, is often used to excuse violence against Indian citizens.
'Welcoming representatives of a government that not only denies accountability for, but also ideologically supports such religion-based terrorism, risks Harvard being complicit in legitimising those who enable or justify these crimes,' the letter read.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
ALSO READ | How India's decision to cancel medical visas after Pahalgam is hurting Pakistanis
The students asked Harvard to make a public statement against the attack, reconsider letting Pakistani officials take part in the conference, and offer support to students affected by the violence, CNN-News18 reported.
'We ask for the clarity, courage, and compassion for Hindu and Indian students grieving the targeted killing of members of their faith. We request you to take a stance against Hinduphobia," it read.
The letter made three specific requests to Harvard:
1. Issue a public statement condemning the Pahalgam terror attacks and supporting victims of religion-based violence.
2. Review the participation of Pakistani officials in light of their government's support for groups like LeT.
3. Provide emotional and institutional support to affected students through the Office for Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, and Belonging.
In a follow-up letter addressed to Harvard's leadership, the Indian students discussed the university's long-standing values.
It said, 'Harvard has always stood for equity, global justice, and human dignity. In recent years, the university has taken meaningful stances in support of communities affected by racism, antisemitism, Islamophobia, and other forms of hatred.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
How did the University respond?
The conference was reportedly put together by Pakistani students at Harvard. As per reports, the university's role was only to help with arrangements and coordination.
Amid the controversy, fresh debate began after it emerged that Hitesh Hathi, Executive Director of Harvard's South Asia Institute, had taken part in a panel with Pakistani-American historian Ayesha Jalal.
It is a shame that after the #Pahalgam attack, the 'Pakistan conference at Harvard' is being held with the Lakshmi Mittal and Family South Asia Institute (@MittalInstitute) being a partner.
This is quite unfortunate and must be stood against strongly!
Jai Hind pic.twitter.com/TrVwa7D0e0 — Mrittunjoy Guha Majumdar (@Zeit_MjGM) April 27, 2025
The discussion, titled 'The Enlightened Muslim: Examining the intersection of religion, modernity, and state formation in Pakistan,' was one of several listings later taken down from the institute's website. Harvard has not issued a statement about the removal of these details.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
While the event was hosted by Pakistani students at Harvard, some attendees told The Times of India that the conference also seemed intended to boost Pakistan's presence in US academic circles, which has reportedly declined in recent years.
Figures from Open Doors, which tracks the number of international students in the US, show that 10,988 students from Pakistan are currently studying in American institutions.
Meanwhile, India leads with 331,602 students, followed by China with 277,398. Notably, Pakistan has fewer students in the US than Bangladesh and Nepal, which have 17,099 and 16,742 students enrolled, respectively, the report said.
ALSO READ | Will Harvard University stop admitting foreign students?
What happened in Pahalgam?
In one of the deadliest attacks in Jammu and Kashmir, terrorists linked to Lashkar-e-Taiba opened fire on a group of tourists in Pahalgam on Tuesday, April 22.
At least 26 people, including foreign nationals, were killed, and many others were injured. The Resistance Front (TRF), believed to be an offshoot of Lashkar-e-Taiba, claimed responsibility for the attack.
Security personnel stand guard after a terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir. File image/PTI
Following the incident, India downgraded diplomatic relations with Pakistan. The Indian government announced a series of tough measures, including suspending the Indus Waters Treaty, reducing the strength of Pakistan's mission in New Delhi, and expelling its military officials. The Integrated Check Post at Attari was also shut down.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In response, Pakistan said it would withdraw from the 1972 Simla Agreement and close the Wagah border crossing with India.
Speaking in Bihar, Prime Minister Narendra Modi promised strong action against those responsible. He said India would 'pursue the terrorists to the end of the earth.'
Meanwhile, Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif warned that any move to change the flow of water or block Pakistan's rights under the Indus Waters Treaty would be treated as 'an Act of War.'
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Standard
5 minutes ago
- Business Standard
How China gained control over the global rare earth minerals supply chain
The alarm has been intensifying in the past few weeks as global automakers, including major German manufacturers, raised concerns over China's export restrictions on rare earth alloys, magnets, and mixtures, warning that the curbs could trigger production delays and operational shutdowns. The latest backlash follows similar complaints from US firms and an Indian electric vehicle producer last week, highlighting the mounting global fallout from Beijing's April decision to suspend outbound shipments of several critical minerals. China has intensified its strategic dominance over the global supply of rare earth elements by adding critical minerals to its export control list, further straining already fragile global supply chains amid rising geopolitical tensions. The move, seen as a direct response to heightened tariffs imposed by the United States, underscores China's decades-long state-led push to monopolise both the mining and, more critically, the processing of rare earth materials—metals that are essential to a range of advanced technologies from electric vehicles to fighter jets. The 1990s strategy that gave China a monopoly Despite being relatively abundant in the Earth's crust, rare earths are rarely found in concentrated deposits and require complex, often environmentally hazardous, refining processes. China's edge lies not only in its 30–36 per cent share of global reserves but in its near-total control of the processing chain, estimated at over 85 per cent of global capacity. Beginning in the 1990s, Beijing classified rare earths as strategic resources, shielding the sector from foreign control and channelling significant state support into extraction and refining. Initiatives like 'Made in China 2025' ensured rare earths remained embedded in the country's high-tech ambitions. Western retreat allowed China to dominate supply chains As the US and other Western nations shut down domestic operations over cost and environmental concerns, China ramped up investment. It perfected the solvent extraction method, a process initially developed in the US but later abandoned due to regulatory and environmental challenges. By the early 2000s, China produced up to 97 per cent of the world's rare earths and began restricting exports, simultaneously driving up global prices and encouraging foreign manufacturers to relocate operations to China to secure uninterrupted supply. Export curbs on 7 key elements spark global concern In April, China extended export restrictions on terbium, yttrium, dysprosium, gadolinium, lutetium, samarium, and scandium—seven of the 17 recognised rare earth elements. Each plays a unique role in modern technologies and defence systems. Why terbium, yttrium and dysprosium matter globally Terbium: Vital for smartphone displays and aircraft magnets. China exports 85 per cent to Japan, just 5 per cent to the US. Yttrium: Used in medical lasers and superconductors. US relies 93 per cent on China. Dysprosium: Key for EV magnets and wind turbines. Majority goes to Japan and South Korea. Gadolinium: Common in MRI scans and reactor cores. Lutetium: Used in oil refining, mainly imported by the US. Samarium: Strategic for military-grade magnets and nuclear use. Scandium: Critical for aerospace; no US production in 50+ years. Japan, US, EU scramble to reduce China dependency China's move is expected to hit countries that are already struggling to build independent rare earth supply chains. According to Chinese customs data, Japan remains the largest buyer of these restricted materials, followed by South Korea and the US. Global supply chain diversification faces uphill battle In response, nations are accelerating efforts to reduce reliance on Chinese supply. Australia's Lynas Rare Earths is expanding its Malaysian plant. The EU is funding scandium production, and the US has revived mining at the Mountain Pass facility in California—though the ore is still sent abroad for processing. Yet such initiatives face formidable challenges. China's low production costs, lenient environmental standards, and strong vertical integration give it a lasting competitive edge.
Economic Times
5 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Viral video: Parle-G packet sells for Rs 2,300 in Gaza, Palestinian father shares post about daughter's favourite treat
A viral social media post featuring a Palestinian girl in Gaza holding a Parle-G biscuit has spotlighted the severe food shortages and inflated prices amid the ongoing conflict. The biscuit, ordinarily inexpensive, was purchased at a drastically increased price due to wartime scarcity. This image has resonated globally, symbolizing both the hardship and resilience of civilians in the crisis. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A biscuit amid the blockade Netizens react with emotion and appeals Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Symbol of hardship and hope A social media post by a Palestinian father showing his daughter receiving a packet of Parle-G has gone viral, drawing attention to the severe food shortage in Gaza and the soaring prices of basic goods amid the ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict. The biscuit, which costs Rs 100 in regular international markets, was reportedly bought for over Rs 2,300 due to wartime Jawad, a resident of Gaza, posted a video on X (formerly Twitter) showing his daughter Rafif holding a Parle-G biscuit packet. In his post, he wrote, 'Even though the price jumped from €1.5 to over €24, I just couldn't deny Rafif her favorite treat.' The post quickly gained traction across social media, especially among Indian users, many of whom were surprised to see the Indian biscuit brand in a conflict-hit poured in, with many Indian users tagging government officials and the Parle company. One user wrote to India's Minister of External Affairs, '@DrSJaishankar that baby is eating India's favourite biscuit. Look I know we are neutral about the war. But can we please send more Parle G to Palestine? These are Glucose Biscuits and will help relieve the civilian population.'Another user tagged the biscuit-maker with a simple plea: '@ParleFamily can you help?' A third user said, 'She's got great taste. Parle-G is a part of my childhood. And my adulthood. And everything in between. I wish I could send you all the Parle-G in the world for Rafif.'The post comes at a time when Gaza is facing acute shortages of food and essential supplies due to the continuing Israeli military blockade. Basic commodities are being sold at steep prices. For many, the image of a child holding a Parle-G biscuit became a symbol of resilience and innocence caught in a humanitarian crisis.'Sad to see people profiteering in such times,' said another user reacting to the inflated price of the biscuit in incident highlights both the emotional power of small gestures in wartime and the role social media plays in connecting global communities during humanitarian emergencies.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
5 minutes ago
- Business Standard
No official Bharat Mata image, cannot be allowed in events: Kerala govt
The Left government in Kerala on Friday made it clear that it was not in agreement with the use of the Bharat Mata portrait at the Environment Day event at the Raj Bhavan here as the picture was not authorised as the official version by the Constitution or the Indian government. Kerala Agriculture Minister P Prasad, who boycotted the event at the Raj Bhavan a day ago over the use of the portrait, said that those in constitutional offices cannot convert government programmes into political events. A similar view was also expressed by state General Education Minister V Sivankutty who said that the Raj Bhavan and the Governor were above politics and said that Arlekar should withdraw from the stand taken by him. The government's stand came a day after Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar asserted that there would be no compromise on Bharat Mata. Prasad, while talking to a TV channel, said that no Bharat Mata portrait has ever been acknowledged as the official or authorised version by the Constitution or any of the governments in power since independence. He further said that the portrait about to be used at the event was not carrying the Indian flag, but that of a political organisation, and therefore, it could not be honoured during a government event. The minister said that the particular political organisation and the Governor were free to pay homage to the portrait at private events, but it cannot be done in state government programmes. "We all have a political view, but those in constitutional positions have restrictions on how they express it," he added. He said that the government view was that such a stand ought not to have been taken by a constitutional establishment and expressed hope that it will be corrected by the concerned persons. "It actually should not be repeated in our country. We cannot accept it in Kerala," he added. The minister also questioned why the Governor was "rigid" on the issue, when none of the earlier Governors in the state and not even the Presidents of the country have carried out such a practice in the past. For the World Environment Day event, the Raj Bhavan came out with a minute-to-minute programme, but it initially did not have anything about paying floral tributes to the portrait of Bharat Mata, he said. On eve of the programme, a new schedule was sent to us and it included the paying of floral tribute to Bharat Mata portrait. "So, I enquired with the Raj Bhavan about the floral tributes and asked them to send me a picture of the portrait. The portrait was the one used by the RSS and was not recognised or authorised as an official version, I informed the Raj Bhavan that we cannot offer floral tributes to it," he said. The minister said that the Raj Bhavan in response said they cannot remove the portrait. On being told that the opposition was criticising the lack of response on the issue by Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, Prasad said that the Congress-led UDF was trying to gain political mileage out of it especially in view of the upcoming bypoll in Nilambur assembly constituency. After knowing Raj Bhavan's stand, the state government relocated the event to the Secretariat's Durbar Hall and the Raj Bhavan went ahead with its programme. Later, in a statement issued by the Raj Bhavan, the Governor said, "Whatever be the pressure, from whichever quarters, there will be no compromise whatsoever on Bharat Mata." In his speech at the Raj Bhavan programme, the Governor said two ministers--state Education Minister and Agriculture Minister--had agreed to attend the function but they did not turn up for the event. While Sangh outfit Bharatiya Vichara Kendram strongly backed the Governor, the ruling CPI(M) and the Congress criticised the Raj Bhavan on the matter.
