Trumps funding pause clouds future of Solar For All Program
Terry L. Jones Floodlight
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's $7 billion Solar For All Program faces an uncertain fate following last week's rollout of executive orders from President Donald Trump putting a freeze on federal financial assistance.
That news came a month after EPA officials from the previous administration told Floodlight that awards tied to the program had already been obligated to nonprofit groups and states and would start trickling down to low-income property owners at the beginning of this year.
But that's not how it's rolling out for Solar for All, which is designed to offer solar power to households in low-income and disadvantaged communities through grants and loans to help ease annual utility costs and meet climate goals.
Sean Gallagher, senior vice president of policy for the Solar Energy Industries Association, confirmed news reports that Solar for All grant recipients received notice from the federal Office of Management and Budget that funding was put on pause with no indication when or if they might receive it. One Solar for All grant recipient set to receive hundreds of millions of dollars confirmed the funding portal to request reimbursement was shut down.
Participants in the program — part of then-President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act — are now scrambling to figure out how to access the money approved by Congress before Trump took office.
Officials with GRID Alternatives — a nonprofit awarded $357 million to add solar panels on homes in 29 states plus Native American households in five states — said the group received form emails announcing the pause of funding for Solar For All. The emails came from federal agencies but not the EPA, which administers the program, Wanda Heard, senior public relations and advocacy manager for GRID Alternatives, said in a prepared statement.
'We understand that all awardees' ability to draw funds has been 'suspended,' but direct communication has been limited,' Heard wrote.
Heard said her organization is worried about not being reimbursed by the EPA 'promptly' or 'at all,' making it hesitant to begin any solar projects.
One of Trump's executive orders, Unleashing American Energy, orders federal agencies to halt climate-related funding under the IRA and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law — which Trump labels as the 'Green New Deal' — while officials analyze whether they conflict with the president's order to maximize U.S. fossil fuel development.
Last week, his administration released an Office of Management and Budget memo directing agencies to halt all 'financial assistance' from the federal government, except assistance to individuals.
Some states and nonprofits responded quickly by suing the Trump administration over the pause. And a federal district court judge issued an administrative stay the day after the freeze memo. OMB withdrew the memo, but the White House said the funding freeze would remain in place.
On Monday, U.S. District Judge Loren L. AliKhan extended her order as nonprofits argued the freeze is illegal and unconstitutional, and the halt in funding could force them to shut down while the case is being litigated.
A second judge in Rhode Island made a similar ruling in a separate case in which 22 attorney generals from Democratic states sued over the freeze. Both claim the administration is violating the Administrative Procedure Act.
It's unclear what that means for Solar for All, Gallagher said, adding, 'We are working to learn more about when or if disbursements will resume.'
Similar sentiments were shared by state leaders in New Mexico.
'The governor and her cabinet secretaries are thoroughly reviewing these orders and their implications for our state,' Michael Coleman, spokesperson for New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, said in an email. 'Our initial assessment indicates serious constitutional concerns that require immediate attention.'
In December, when Floodlight spoke to officials with New Mexico's Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department, they said Trump's previous threats to repeal IRA funds would likely lead to the state canceling their plans. At the time, they said they weren't 'overly concerned' that would happen.
New Mexico is set to receive $156 million to deploy rooftop solar systems on single-family homes and apartment buildings and help local utility companies integrate solar power into the state's electric grid.
'The governor understands that these developments may cause uncertainty and anxiety,' Coleman said. 'She wants New Mexicans to know that she is committed to advocating for them and protecting their interests.'
Legal experts argue grantees should ultimately win their battle to retain the federal funding that has been promised to them, citing court precedent set under Trump's first term.
Romany Webb, deputy director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, and her colleague Amy Turner, director of the the center's Cities Climate Law Initiative, said in a blog that recipients of federal grants tied to the climate and infrastructure initiatives should move forward with fulfilling any federally mandated obligations for their respective programs and maintain comprehensive records to use in potential legal arguments.
'Federal agencies have contractually obligated about 84% of climate funding under the Inflation Reduction Act, which means they are required to disburse the funds as set out in the relevant agreements,' the pair wrote.
They referenced two 2018 decisions during Trump's first term when federal courts in the District of Columbia and Maryland struck down attempts to cancel grants appropriated by Congress based on Trump's desire to halt the spending.
Writing in the D.C. case, then-U.S. District Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson found that a 'federal agency that changes course abruptly without a well-reasoned explanation for its decision or that acts contrary to its own regulations is subject to having a federal court vacate its action as 'arbitrary (and) capricious.' ' Jackson is now a U.S. Supreme Court justice.
In both cases, the courts found those cancellations violated the Administrative Procedure Act — the same federal law at issue in the current litigation.
'There is still much uncertainty, and many potential challenges ahead,' Webb and Turner wrote. 'Perhaps the only sure thing is that the halting of federal financial assistance programs, even temporarily, will have significant implications for climate work at the national, state and community levels.'
Mario Alejandro Ariza contributed to this report. Floodlight is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates the powerful interests stalling climate action.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Protests Spread Beyond Los Angeles over Immigration Raids
Police officers tackle and drag a protestor during a rainy anti-ICE demonstration in New York. Credit - Madison Swart/ Hans Lucas — AFP via Getty Images Anti-ICE demonstrations are expected to spread to more cities this week after days of unrest in Los Angeles, with at least 30 new protests planned across the country in response to the Trump Administration's recent immigration raids. Additional protests have already broken out in San Francisco, Sacramento, Houston, San Antonio, Chicago and New York, where activists rallied over the weekend and into Monday in solidarity with demonstrators in Los Angeles. By Monday afternoon, organizers had scheduled demonstrations in nearly every major city, signaling a growing backlash to the Trump Administration's immigration enforcement tactics and its deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles. Read more: Trump Suggests Arresting Gavin Newsom, Escalating Tensions Over ICE Raids The protests were sparked by a series of workplace immigration raids last week, and escalated after the arrest of David Huerta, the president of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) of California, during a demonstration in Los Angeles on Friday. Huerta, a prominent labor and civil rights leader, was taken into federal custody and hospitalized after what ICE described as interference with a federal operation. His arrest has galvanized organized labor, with SEIU chapters announcing nationwide demonstrations in his defense and in protest of what they called a 'clear attack on our communities.' In Los Angeles, the protests have grown larger and more confrontational since Friday. Hundreds of demonstrators marched downtown and clashed with law enforcement. Some protesters set barricades in the streets, vandalized buildings, and hurled objects at law enforcement. Police fired tear gas and rubber bullets to disperse crowds, and the California Highway Patrol used flash-bang grenades to clear demonstrators after a group blocked traffic. Read more: Can the President Activate a State's National Guard? At least 150 people have been arrested in Los Angeles since the protests began, and city officials warned that further disruptions could continue throughout the week. Trump authorized the deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops to the city over the weekend, bypassing California Governor Gavin Newsom, who called the move 'a violation of state sovereignty' and signaled plans to challenge the decision in court. Trump has described protesters as 'insurrectionists' and 'professional agitators' who 'should be in jail.' A map of anti-ICE demonstrations posted by SEIU showed that events were planned in New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Washington, D.C., Philadelphia, Atlanta, Boston, Denver, Seattle, Las Vegas, New Orleans, Charlotte, Portland, St. Paul, Santa Fe, and more. Additional demonstrations may also take place, though the largest demonstrations remain centered in Los Angeles, where National Guard soldiers in tactical gear continue to patrol areas downtown. 'ICE's brutal, military-style tactics have no place in our communities,' SEIU wrote in a post on X. 'We demand safety. We demand respect. We demand David's release.' Write to Nik Popli at
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mexico's president condemns violence amid protests against ICE raids
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum on Monday denounced acts of violence linked to widespread demonstrations in Los Angeles against the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. Speaking during her regular morning news conference, Sheinbaum called for respect for legal processes in immigration enforcement and asked U.S. officials to uphold the rule of law. 'We condemn violence wherever it comes from,' Sheinbaum said, per Reuters. The protests erupted on Friday after Immigration and Customs Enforcement conducted raids in the city and surrounding communities. Demonstrations were largely peaceful, but tensions flared Saturday and Sunday. Police have reported 42 arrests after Sunday's protests turned violent, including 19 by the California Highway Patrol, who were called to a demonstration that closed the 101 Freeway through DTLA for several hours. Local and state leaders, including California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, have criticized President Donald Trump's use of the National Guard in trying to quell anti-ICE immigration, saying the escalation in force has led and will only lead to further trouble. Newsom also announced plans to sue the Trump administration over the deployment. Trump also indicated that he would be willing to bring in the U.S. Marines if he deemed the situation warranted it. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mom buys product she thought was U.S.-made, but warns of misleading labels
As President Trump's trade war continues, some consumers are searching for products made in the U.S. When Mary Schubart set out to buy bedding for her twins heading off to college, she was looking for products that were safe, provided comfort and, if possible, she wanted to buy American-made. "I like the idea of buying to support the local economy, but my overriding concern was safer," Schubart said. Schubart said she thought she found the perfect mattress pads from Pottery Barn Teen. It was advertised online as "crafted in the USA," but when they arrived, she was surprised to see one of the tags read "made in China." "I knew it is one of the countries that has less stringent regulations pertaining to health and pertaining to final product production, so I was disappointed," she said. Schubart reported her findings to Truth in Advertising, a nonprofit watchdog group that investigates when companies make false claims. Laura Smith, the Truth in Advertising legal director, said they had already flagged false claims by Pottery Barn Teen to the Federal Trade Commission. "We had found 800-plus examples of products marketed as 'made in the USA' or 'crafted in America' when they were actually imported," Smith said, of the merchandise found on seven William Sonoma websites in 2019. Schubart's complaint led to the largest "Made in the USA" civil penalty in history, with more than $3 million against Williams Sonoma, the parent company of Pottery Barn Teen. In a statement, Williams Sonoma apologized for what it called an "administrative mistake," saying, "Last year, we received an FTC fine due to an unintentional administrative mistake associated with the online product descriptions of seven items we sell. We are deeply sorry for any confusion that may have been caused by the inaccurate information that was shared, and we have improved our processes to help prevent similar incidents in the future." "Civil penalties, as long as they're more than a slap on the wrist, they can have a real impact. But it needs to be a fine that's big enough to hurt," Smith said. What qualifies as "Made in the USA?" The Federal Trade Commission requires that products advertised as "Made in the USA" be all or virtually all manufactured domestically. Plus, the ingredients or components must be made and sourced in the United States, which is the issue in a current lawsuit against Reynolds Aluminum foil for its "Made in the USA" label. The suit claims the product's key raw material, Bauxite, is not mined in the U.S. Reynolds says the claims have no merit and it will defend the case. How to know if a product is American-made Amid Mr. Trump's tariffs on certain products, some companies have said they plan to invest more in U.S. manufacturing. To verify if a product is "Made in the USA," check the label for that exact wording. Beware of qualifying language like "Assembled in the USA" or "with imported parts." If you're unsure, consumers can verify with the brand by going to its website or calling directly. Australian reporter covering Los Angeles protests shot with rubber bullet by police officer Kristi Noem says "we are not going to let a repeat of 2020 happen" amid L.A. crackdown Magic in the dark: The fantastical worlds of Lightwire Theater