
Hillsborough disaster: multiple police misconduct claims upheld, families told
Multiple allegations of misconduct against police officers relating to the 1989 Hillsborough disaster have been upheld by the police standards watchdog, bereaved families have been told.
However, none will face disciplinary proceedings because they have all left the police service.
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) said it had upheld complaints against some former South Yorkshire police officers, and some who were serving at the West Midlands force, for misconduct during its original investigation into the disaster.
In letters sent to bereaved family members this week, the IOPC deputy director general Kathie Cashell said almost 100 people had made a total of 354 complaints of misconduct, the investigations into some of which were still being finalised.
'However, to date just over half of complainants have had at least one complaint upheld, or in our opinion there would have been a case to answer for misconduct for one or more officers, had they remained serving,' she wrote. 'I understand that for many it will be disappointing that this number is not higher.'
On 15 April 1989, 97 men, women and children, aged from 10 to 67, were killed in the lethal crush at Sheffield Wednesday's Hillsborough stadium at an FA Cup semi-final between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest.
Even as people were dying, South Yorkshire police mounted a false narrative that the disaster had been caused by Liverpool supporters arriving in large numbers late, drunk and without tickets. Bereaved families, survivors, supporters and campaigners relentlessly fought the case, accusing the force of lying to cover up its responsibility.
Many survivors, including some who were under 18 at the time, have complained about how West Midlands police officers questioned them, and the IOPC said it had upheld some of those complaints.
In April 2016 the jury at new inquests – held after a 1991 inquest verdict of accidental death was quashed in 2012 – determined that those who died had been unlawfully killed due to gross negligence manslaughter by Ch Supt David Duckenfield, the officer in charge of match safety.
The jury also determined that no behaviour of Liverpool supporters contributed to the disaster. Families have long protested that no police officer faced disciplinary proceedings for the mismanagement that caused the disaster or the false narrative. Duckenfield was prosecuted for gross negligence manslaughter and acquitted in 2019.
Cashell informed complainants that the IOPC's investigations had reached the same conclusions as the jury at the new inquests. She said complaints had been upheld against senior South Yorkshire officers for the policing of the match and against a number of other officers for being abusive of supporters at the match and some for 'excessive use of force'.
However, she said most complaints against police officers for seeking 'to deflect the blame' had not been upheld because there was no legal duty at the time for the police to be candid.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Bereaved families and their lawyers have campaigned for a 'Hillsborough law' that would impose a statutory duty of candour on police and public officials. The government has promised to introduce it in some form by next month, the 36th anniversary of the disaster.
Cashell wrote: 'Like the HIP [Hillsborough independent panel] report, our investigations did find evidence to support allegations that in the aftermath of the disaster, South Yorkshire police sought to deflect the blame from themselves. We found no evidence to support claims that the behaviour of supporters was a contributing factor.
'In the majority of cases, we were unable to find the officers had a case to answer for misconduct because the professional standards for policing at the time did not include a specific duty of candour. Despite the wider public interest to gain answers about what happened, South Yorkshire police was entitled, within the law at the time, to present its 'best case' and be selective with the evidence it presented.'
Cashell said the IOPC would inform complainants, who include bereaved families and survivors of the disaster, of the findings regarding individual complaints by 28 March.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
8 hours ago
- Metro
Ex-Premier League star accused of smuggling £48m of cocaine
A former Premier League player and FA Cup winner is facing up to 13 years in prison after being accused of smuggling £48 worth of cocaine. Former Wigan defender Ronnie Stam also faces the prospect of being fined up to £1.5m after he allegedly trafficked two tonnes of drugs. The 40-year-old in on trial in Breda alongside his brother Rudi, accused of smuggling cocaine from South America to the Netherlands. The public prosecutor has suggested Stam be sent to prison until 2038 and pay the £1.5m fine, while his brother Rudi could be imprisoned for six years with the same fine. The ex-Wigan player has been in custody for a year since he was first arrested over the allegations. A prosecutor told a hearing last September: 'This case concerns hundreds of kilos of cocaine each time. I contend that Stam was a major player in the drugs world.' Dutch broadcaster Omroepbrabant reports that when Stam heard of the 13 year sentence being called for, he suggested it was only because of his fame. 'My children had to cry about it,' he said. 'The youngest thinks he will never see me again and the oldest thinks I will miss his entire football career. 'More than for the biggest drug criminals. And that is only because this is a media case, because I was good at football.' The ex-footballer claims he is innocent, telling the judge: 'I am not a major player in the drug world.' The trial continues as the Stam brothers await a verdict, expected in August. The younger Stam signed for Wigan for £2m in 2010 after winning the Eredivisie with FC Twente. The right-back went on to play 62 times in the Premier League for Wigan and won the FA Cup with them in 2013, although he did not play in the final. More Trending He left Wigan in 2013 to sign for Standard Liege in Belgium before returning to NAC Breda, where he had made his professional debut. Stam retired in 2016 at just 32 years old, saying: 'I have thought long and hard about this choice. 'But it is physically better to put an end to my career now. The fact that NAC has not been promoted and is completely rebuilding has made that choice easier.' MORE: Arsenal hold meeting with Viktor Gyokeres' agent as striker makes Manchester United transfer call MORE: Thomas Tuchel says his mum finds Jude Bellingham's attitude 'repulsive' MORE: 'Be careful' – Emile Heskey warns £50m England star over Arsenal or Chelsea transfer


Scottish Sun
11 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Ex-Premier League star facing 13 YEARS in prison after being accused of smuggling TWO TONNES of cocaine
The former defender spent three years in the Premier League CHARGED Ex-Premier League star facing 13 YEARS in prison after being accused of smuggling TWO TONNES of cocaine FORMER Premier League star Ronnie Stam is facing THIRTEEN YEARS in jail - after being accused of smuggling two tonnes of cocaine. And the ex-Wigan defender could also be fined up to £1.5million if found guilty of trafficking the drugs, with a street value of £48m. Advertisement 3 Ex- Premier League ace Ronnie Stam is facing 13 years in jail 3 Ex-Wigan ace Stam is being accused of smuggling two tonnes of cocaine 3 Stam is on trial alongside his brother Rudi Stam, 40, had three top-flight seasons with the Latics - making 73 appearances. He played in their FA Cup-winning campaign of 2013, but missed the final against Manchester City before leaving for Standard Liege that year. But the now-retired player appeared in a Dutch court on Tuesday alongside his brother Rudi, 43. The trial at Breda heard that the brothers transported cocaine from South America to the Netherlands in 2020 and 2021. Advertisement Prosecutors said evidence of drug shipments was found in encrypted phone chats between Ronnie and Rudi. Photos of blocks of cocaine were reportedly seen among the duo's messages. The public prosecutor called for Stam to be imprisoned until 2038, and fined Є1.7m, for his part in the alleged crimes. Meanwhile, brother Rudi is facing over six years in jail, plus an identical fine, if found guilty. Advertisement Stam told the court that he has been involved in a 20 kilo shipment to Germany in 2020, but denied any further involvement in the drug trade. The Breda-born former defender claimed the money in his bank accounts had come from his football career. Stam won the Dutch title with FC Twente in 2010, under ex-England boss Steve McClaren, before landing a £2m move to Wigan that year. He has been in custody since first being arrested last June. Advertisement The trial continues.


The Guardian
14 hours ago
- The Guardian
Natalie Shotter killing: officers face proceedings over alleged safeguarding failures
Two Metropolitan police officers are facing misconduct proceedings over an alleged failure to safeguard a woman raped and killed in a park, after a watchdog overruled a decision not to hold a disciplinary hearing. The family of Natalie Shotter have welcomed the decision by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) as 'another step on the road in the fight for justice for Nat'. Shotter, 37, was found dead on a bench in Southall Park, west London, just before 6am on the morning of 17 July 2021. In October 2024, Mohamed Iidow was convicted of the NHS worker's rape and manslaughter, in a highly significant ruling that found oral rape as a cause of death. He had pleaded not guilty but chose not to give evidence in his defence. It is alleged that the evening before Shotter was found dead, one of the officers now facing disciplinary proceedings was approached by a member of the public who told them that a woman in the park was in a vulnerable situation. The officer and a colleague were nearby dealing with a separate incident. The officer advised the member of the public to call the police for additional support. The IOPC director David Ford said: 'After careful consideration of the evidence, we have decided two Met police officers should face a misconduct meeting for allegedly failing to safeguard Ms Shotter. On the previous evening, one of the officers was notified by a member of the public that a woman was in a vulnerable situation. The following day, Ms Shotter was, sadly, found dead in the park. 'The constables – who were both probationers – are alleged to have failed to properly risk assess, document or to take any real action in relation to the information reported to them.' Shotter's family made a complaint to Scotland Yard about the actions of the two officers. The Met investigated the complaint and concluded that both officers should be subject to unsatisfactory performance procedures rather than face disciplinary proceedings. Ford said: 'We were asked by Ms Shotter's family to review the force's handling of the family's complaint and, in June 2025, we disagreed with the Met's decision. We have directed them to arrange a misconduct meeting for the two officers, who have a case to answer for an alleged breach of the police professional standards of behaviour relating to duties and responsibilities. 'It will now be for the panel to consider the evidence and determine if the case is proven and, if so, decide on the most appropriate outcome.' Shotter's mother, Dr Cas Shotter Weetman, a lead advanced cardiology practitioner for the NHS, welcomed the IOPC decision. 'We are enormously happy about this decision. Common sense has been shown here. I know Nat would be delighted about this. It's another step on the road in our fight for justice for her,' she said. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion In a separate case, PC Adam Aspinall Da Encarnacao, 32, pleaded not guilty to two charges of misconduct in public office at Westminster magistrates court in August 2024. He is due to stand trial at Southwark crown court later this year. The charges relate to the inappropriate possession and sharing of images concerning the alleged rape of one woman and the rape of another. One of the women was Shotter. The officer was suspended from duty after his arrest in September 2022.