logo
Hillsborough disaster: multiple police misconduct claims upheld, families told

Hillsborough disaster: multiple police misconduct claims upheld, families told

The Guardian12-03-2025

Multiple allegations of misconduct against police officers relating to the 1989 Hillsborough disaster have been upheld by the police standards watchdog, bereaved families have been told.
However, none will face disciplinary proceedings because they have all left the police service.
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) said it had upheld complaints against some former South Yorkshire police officers, and some who were serving at the West Midlands force, for misconduct during its original investigation into the disaster.
In letters sent to bereaved family members this week, the IOPC deputy director general Kathie Cashell said almost 100 people had made a total of 354 complaints of misconduct, the investigations into some of which were still being finalised.
'However, to date just over half of complainants have had at least one complaint upheld, or in our opinion there would have been a case to answer for misconduct for one or more officers, had they remained serving,' she wrote. 'I understand that for many it will be disappointing that this number is not higher.'
On 15 April 1989, 97 men, women and children, aged from 10 to 67, were killed in the lethal crush at Sheffield Wednesday's Hillsborough stadium at an FA Cup semi-final between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest.
Even as people were dying, South Yorkshire police mounted a false narrative that the disaster had been caused by Liverpool supporters arriving in large numbers late, drunk and without tickets. Bereaved families, survivors, supporters and campaigners relentlessly fought the case, accusing the force of lying to cover up its responsibility.
Many survivors, including some who were under 18 at the time, have complained about how West Midlands police officers questioned them, and the IOPC said it had upheld some of those complaints.
In April 2016 the jury at new inquests – held after a 1991 inquest verdict of accidental death was quashed in 2012 – determined that those who died had been unlawfully killed due to gross negligence manslaughter by Ch Supt David Duckenfield, the officer in charge of match safety.
The jury also determined that no behaviour of Liverpool supporters contributed to the disaster. Families have long protested that no police officer faced disciplinary proceedings for the mismanagement that caused the disaster or the false narrative. Duckenfield was prosecuted for gross negligence manslaughter and acquitted in 2019.
Cashell informed complainants that the IOPC's investigations had reached the same conclusions as the jury at the new inquests. She said complaints had been upheld against senior South Yorkshire officers for the policing of the match and against a number of other officers for being abusive of supporters at the match and some for 'excessive use of force'.
However, she said most complaints against police officers for seeking 'to deflect the blame' had not been upheld because there was no legal duty at the time for the police to be candid.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Bereaved families and their lawyers have campaigned for a 'Hillsborough law' that would impose a statutory duty of candour on police and public officials. The government has promised to introduce it in some form by next month, the 36th anniversary of the disaster.
Cashell wrote: 'Like the HIP [Hillsborough independent panel] report, our investigations did find evidence to support allegations that in the aftermath of the disaster, South Yorkshire police sought to deflect the blame from themselves. We found no evidence to support claims that the behaviour of supporters was a contributing factor.
'In the majority of cases, we were unable to find the officers had a case to answer for misconduct because the professional standards for policing at the time did not include a specific duty of candour. Despite the wider public interest to gain answers about what happened, South Yorkshire police was entitled, within the law at the time, to present its 'best case' and be selective with the evidence it presented.'
Cashell said the IOPC would inform complainants, who include bereaved families and survivors of the disaster, of the findings regarding individual complaints by 28 March.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Government pledges £5m for renovation project in memory of Southport victims
Government pledges £5m for renovation project in memory of Southport victims

The Independent

time4 hours ago

  • The Independent

Government pledges £5m for renovation project in memory of Southport victims

The Government has pledged £5 million for a renovation project in memory of the three young girls murdered in Southport. Sir Keir Starmer and Angela Rayner met the parents of Elsie Dot Stancombe, Alice da Silva Aguiar and Bebe King in Downing Street on Tuesday. The Town Hall gardens in Southport will be renovated in their memory, a project the families have said is 'rooted in love, resilience and unity'. As well as the £5 million from central government, the work will also be funded by £2.5 million each from Sefton Council and the Liverpool City Region, bringing the total investment to £10million. In a meeting at Number 10 on Tuesday afternoon, Sir Keir thanked the families for their 'continuing courage and resilience'. 'We sit here as Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister, we sit here as human beings with families of our own, and we sit here on behalf of millions of people who would love to see the plans and to say well done for bringing them forward and getting to this point,' he said. He also told them Ms Rayner will 'personally oversee' the implementation of the project. Elsie, Bebe and Alice were murdered by Axel Rudakubana at a Taylor Swift-themed class in Southport in July last year. He was jailed for a minimum of 52 years in January. The families of the young girls said the project is 'a vision we have all shared for some time, which is rooted in love, resilience and unity'. They added: 'We wanted to find a way to thank the people of Southport for standing shoulder to shoulder with us. Your compassion has never wavered and your strength has helped carry us forward. 'The regeneration of the Town Hall Gardens will become a legacy inspired by our three beautiful and amazing girls, and it will be a space that is loved by many generations to come. It will be a place of joy, hope and community. 'A vibrant place where children and families can feel safe, connected and celebrated in the heart of our town.' According to Sefton Council, the regeneration will create a family-friendly and child-oriented space that will also host open-air performances. Ms Rayner said she is 'delighted' ministers are 'able to help with the families' vision to give back to that amazing community' in Southport. 'We are committing £5 million to help create a safe community space for connection, reflection and renewal – a lasting symbol of hope, guided by the strength of the families and wider community.' Steve Rotheram, mayor of the Liverpool City Region, said the gardens 'became a place of reflection' following the killings. 'This regeneration is a powerful opportunity to give something back to that same community; a lasting symbol of hope and joy. 'By putting children, families and the arts at its core, we're creating a space that honours the memory of Elsie, Alice and Bebe in the most meaningful way: by inspiring future generations.' Leader of Sefton Council Marion Atkinson said the space will 'reflect Elsie, Alice, and Bebe's vibrancy in a beautifully positive way'. She added: 'This project is a thank you to the people of Southport — to everyone in the town, in Sefton and beyond who played their part, big or small, in bringing unity and hope to the town. 'We have consistently said that we would be led by the families and Sefton Council is privileged to have the opportunity to support them in fulfilling their shared ambition.'

'El Chapo' brother of ex-Liverpool footballer thinks jail sentence was too long
'El Chapo' brother of ex-Liverpool footballer thinks jail sentence was too long

Daily Mirror

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

'El Chapo' brother of ex-Liverpool footballer thinks jail sentence was too long

A man sentenced with his ex-Liverpool FC footballer brother lost his appeal against the jail term he considered too harsh - Jonathan Cassidy likened himself to drug baron 'El Chapo' A man who likened himself to drug baron 'El Chapo' has lost an appeal against his sentence. Jonathan Cassidy played a leading role in an international drug plot which saw cocaine imported from the Netherlands and used to supply users across north-west England, Birmingham and Leeds. He ran the racket with younger brother Jamie, a former Liverpool FC footballer, and business partner Nasar Ahmed. Together, the operation dealt with 356kg of the drug, worth around £26million, with £10million in cash changing hands in the space of three months, Manchester Crown Court heard last year. In court, prosecutors said Cassidy had sent an associate a picture of the actor who played drug lord Joaquin Guzma, AKA 'El Chapo' in the Netflix TV series Narcos. He also joked they had the same birthday. ‌ ‌ Jonathan Cassidy was slapped with a sentence of 21 years and nine months in March last year. He admitted importing drugs, conspiring to supply drugs and conspiring to transfer criminal property the previous month. His lawyers lodged a claim that the sentencing judge gave him insufficient credit for his guilty pleas and that not enough weight was given to mitigating factors. But three judges dismissed the challenge in a ruling published on Monday. Lord Justice Fraser, Mr Justice Hilliard and Mr Justice Constable said they were 'not persuaded' that the sentence was 'manifestly excessive or reached after an error of principle'. They also dismissed an appeal bid brought by Cassidy's co-defendant, Nasar Ahmed, who admitted the same offences and received the same jail term. Cassidy played a 'leading role' in drugs importation and the buying and selling of class A drugs while Ahmed acted as a middleman and 'facilitator', transferring vast sums of cash to buy and sell on drugs, prosecutor Richard Wright KC told Manchester Crown Court. After the encrypted EncroChat network used by Cassidy and Ahmed was compromised by law enforcement agencies - Cassidy used the name 'WhiskyWasp' - Cassidy travelled to Dubai in July 2020 and inquired with estate agents about purchasing a villa with a budget of £2.3million, including a £22,000 bed. He travelled back to the UK in October that year, but was arrested upon his return. ‌ The EncroChat data showed Cassidy had imported cocaine for the first time in early March 2020. This was a whopping 194kg of the drugs and was imported into the country in blocks embossed with snowmen, Liverpool Echo reports. Cassidy was sentenced alongside his younger brother, Jamie Cassidy, a former Liverpool football prodigy who played alongside Jamie Carragher and Michael Owen in the Liverpool side that won the FA Youth Cup in 1996. Jamie Cassidy received a sentence of 13 years and three months for conspiring to supply drugs and conspiring to transfer criminal property, after prosecutors said he was 'drawn in' to crime by his older brother. Speaking after their initial sentencing in February last year, detective constable Marc Walby from Greater Manchester Police's serious organised crime group said: "Jonathan Cassidy and his colleagues got far too comfortable with their encrypted phones and began bragging about their personal lives, but this just confirmed what we already knew about them. Ironically, it was this bravado and these messages which have landed them in jail for a long time." Dismissing Jonathan Cassidy and Ahmed's appeals, Lord Justice Fraser said that both knew 'what their conduct had been and the degree to which it was unlawful'. He continued that despite defendants in other EncroChat cases being given greater credit for guilty pleas, there was 'no one single 'EncroChat discount'' that should be applied.

Kickboxer, 15, had fought man, 34, week before fatal bout, inquest hears
Kickboxer, 15, had fought man, 34, week before fatal bout, inquest hears

The Independent

time8 hours ago

  • The Independent

Kickboxer, 15, had fought man, 34, week before fatal bout, inquest hears

A coroner has told an inquest he was 'shocked' that a 15-year-old kickboxer who died after a bout had fought a 34-year-old man the week before. Alex Eastwood, from Fazakerley, Liverpool, collapsed after the third and final two-minute round of a 'light contact' kickboxing match against a 17-year-old opponent in a ring at a gym in Platt Bridge, Wigan, on June 29 2024. He was rushed to hospital but had suffered a serious head injury and died three days later. Unusually, Michael Pemberton, assistant coroner for Manchester (West), ahead of Alex's inquest, which started on Monday, had already raised concerns with the Government in March this year about the safety of children in combat sports and the apparent lack of regulation and safeguarding measures. Alex took up kickboxing aged nine, trained five times a week and had a 'meteoric' rise in the sport, having competed at high levels, Bolton Coroner's Court heard. He had grown to 6ft 7in, weighed 80kg and had just finished his GCSEs the week before the fight was arranged with another opponent at the gym in Wigan. The bout was to be the 'main event' but was an unofficial or unsanctioned event as it was a charity fundraiser, not a title fight under the main governing body for the sport in the UK, Kickboxing GB. Ian Hollett, who was Alex's coach and chief instructor at the gym where he trained, Hurricane Combat and Fitness in Liverpool, said his club was not affiliated to Kickboxing GB and there were no rules which stated clubs had to be recognised by governing bodies. Mr Hollett, who said he had more than 30 years' experience in martial arts and was a 16-times world champion, set up his gym in 2011 and currently has around 400 child members. He said they had only had a safeguarding officer in place since 2024 and this is carried out by a member of the club who happens to be a social worker. The coroner then asked about a tournament Alex took part in the previous weekend, where he fought a 34-year-old man in a 'light contact' competition. The event was run by the BCKA (British Chinese Kickboxing Association), a franchise, Mr Hollett said, where Alex fought eight or nine single elimination rounds. Coroner Mr Pemberton said: 'How do you have a situation where a 15-year-old child faces an adult in a contact sport?' Mr Hollett said 'discussions' about Alex competing against adults had started with his father and other coaches the previous year. He continued: 'He had not been beat for two years, he progressed rapidly, it is a customary thing that happens in our sport.' 'That's what worries me,' the coroner replied. 'You have a child fighting an adult. If that happened in the street it would be very serious. How is it acceptable?' Mr Hollett said: 'He was untouchable, pretty much. He was exceptionally developed physically, technically excellent.' He said Alex had fought adult opponents earlier in the year and although his own club and gym no longer allow such bouts, only one national body, the International Combat Organisation (ICO), has outlawed the practice. Mr Hollett added: 'Every other governing body would and has and does allow it.' The coroner replied: 'I'm quite shocked by that, I have to say. I'm not often shocked.' Mr Hollett said he was not present for any pre-bout meeting with the two fighters, referee and any other coaches to set the 'ground rules' for how much contact was to be allowed. The coroner said both Alex and his opponent had won world championship titles, it was the 'main event' of the night and the objective was to win. He continued: 'But no meeting before to put down ground rules, 'This is just an exhibition match, lads, keep that in mind?'' Mr Hollett said: 'At any competition they are trying to win. The framework is, they are not trying to knock each other out.' Dale Bannister, event organiser and owner of the TKMA gym where the bout took place, said the 'ground rules' for the match had been agreed between himself and Alex's other coach Daniel Wigelsworth as a 'light contact' fight. But as Mr Wigelsworth said 'Alex can bang' they agreed to 'let it go a bit' on the understanding neither boxer was allowed to win by a knock-out, or stoppage, that is by fighting the opponent into submission. Adam Korn, legal counsel representing the Eastwood family, suggested the fight was in a 'grey area' between light and heavier contact allowed. Mr Bannister said: 'Some are rougher than others. You can see if a fighter is trying to knock someone out.' Earlier this year the coroner wrote a Prevention of Future Deaths report to the Government about the lack of regulation of contact sports for children, with no minimum standards or risk management. The inquest continues on Wednesday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store