California Schools to Change From August: What to Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
California schools are set to implement a number of changes in the upcoming school year starting August.
Schools will be required to print suicide prevention resources on student identification cards, and start planning for the future of students with special needs as soon as they enter high school.
Newsweek contacted California Governor Gavin Newsom's office and the California Department of Education for comment via email outside of regular working hours.
Governor Gavin Newsom speaking in California in April. Newsom has championed improving access to mental health services for students in the state.
Governor Gavin Newsom speaking in California in April. Newsom has championed improving access to mental health services for students in the state.
Noah Berger/AP
Why It Matters
The measures are part of a legislative agenda championed by Newsom to improve access to mental health services for students, and to support students with special needs.
What To Know
Under Senate Bill 1063, public or private schools that serve students in grades seven to 12 and issue identification cards will be required to print the number for the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline on students' IDs.
This is a change from a previous requirement to have the number for the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline printed on ID cards, according to the bill.
The 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline's three-digit number, which launched in 2022, replaced the National Suicide Prevention Line's 10-digit number, even though that still remains active.
The law also allows schools to print a QR code on ID cards linking to the mental health resources website of the county in which the school is located.
Assembly Bill 438, which was approved last year, requires that individualized education programs, or IEPs, include measurable post-secondary goals and transition services for students with special needs from as early as when they start high school, if determined appropriate by the IEP team.
The change will mean that planning for the student's post-secondary goals could begin up to two years earlier than previously, according to Newsom's office.
What People Are Saying
California State Senator Shannon Grove, a Republican who authored Senate Bill 1063, said in a statement last year: "Updating student ID cards so children have immediate access to mental health resources is smart policy... I am thrilled that students across the state of California will now have essential mental health resources at their fingertips to combat their distress."
The California Department of Education said in a statement in May: "As explained in AB 438, existing law requires IEPs to include appropriate measurable postsecondary goals and transition services, as defined, beginning not later than the first IEP to be in effect when a pupil is 16 years old, or younger if determined appropriate by the IEP team, which are to be updated annually.
"Beginning July 1, 2025, AB 438 requires an IEP to include measurable postsecondary goals and transition services, if determined appropriate by a pupil's IEP team, beginning when an individual with exceptional needs starts their high school experience and not later than the first IEP to be in effect when the pupil is 16 years of age."
What Happens Next
The two laws go into effect on July 1, 2025, and will impact students from the start of the school year beginning in August.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Americans Advised To Avoid the Sun in 15 States This Weekend
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Fifteen states will experience elevated ultraviolet (UV) radiation levels this weekend, according to the National Weather Service (NWS) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Why It Matters The EPA said that elevated UV radiation levels greatly increase the risk of skin burns, eye damage and long-term health problems like skin cancer. What To Know The UV index runs on a scale of one to 11. The levels, and their corresponding advice, are: 1-2: Low (minimal risk from UV rays for the average person) Wear sunglasses on bright days. In winter, snow can reflect UV and nearly double exposure. Use SPF 30+ sunscreen if you burn easily. 3-5: Moderate (moderate risk of harm from unprotected sun exposure) Cover up, wear a hat and sunglasses. Use SPF 30+ sunscreen. Stay in the shade near midday when the sun is strongest. 6-7: High (high risk of harm from unprotected sun exposure) Limit sun time between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. Wear protective clothing, sunglasses, and SPF 30+ sunscreen. 8-10: Very High (very high risk of harm; sun protection is essential) Take extra precautions including wide-brimmed hats and long sleeves. Minimize exposure between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. Be aware: white sand and similar surfaces reflect UV and increase exposure. 11+: Extreme (extreme risk of harm; unprotected skin can burn in minutes) Avoid sun exposure from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Reapply SPF 30+ sunscreen every 2 hours. Seek shade, wear full coverage, and use sun protection. A forecast map shows which areas could see the highest UV levels on Saturday. A forecast map shows which areas could see the highest UV levels on Saturday. EPA According to the EPA's UV index forecast for Saturday, solar noon—when the sun is at its highest point in the sky at a specific location—parts of Nevada, California, Arizona, Utah, New Mexico, Colorado, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Kansas and Wyoming could see levels of at least 11. On Sunday, Florida and Mississippi were expected to see similar UV levels in addition to the other states, while Nebraska and Missouri will experience UV levels below 11. A forecast map shows which areas could see the highest UV levels on Sunday. A forecast map shows which areas could see the highest UV levels on Sunday. EPA What People Are Saying Anthony Young, emeritus professor of experimental photobiology, dermatology, at King's College, London, previously told Newsweek: "The UV index [UVI] is a measure of the sunburning power of higher the UVI, the shorter the time you need in the sun to burn." Richard Weller, professor of medical dermatology, at the U.K.'s University of Edinburgh, previously told Newsweek that sunlight can cause photoaging—premature aging of the skin as a result of prolonged and repeated exposure to UV radiation, adding: "Sunburn is a risk factor for melanoma skin cancer, which is the most serious of the skin cancers." What Happens Next The UV index forecast map is generated each day using data from the NWS.
Miami Herald
4 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Pregnant Women Issued Drinking Water Warning
Pregnant women have been advised to use water filters by experts who spoke to Newsweek after a study found levels of arsenic in water systems considered safe are impacting birth outcomes, A national study led by researchers at Columbia University evaluated risks from 13,998 pregnancies across 35 cohort sites participating in the National Institutes of Health's Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program, and published its findings on the medical journal site JAMA Network last week. The researchers discovered that prenatal exposure to arsenic was associated with a higher likelihood of babies being born preterm with lower birth weights, factors that they said are important "predictors of infant mortality and morbidity across the life span." This was the case even at the level of exposure the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) currently deems safe, 10 micrograms per liter, a regulation that was established in 2001 and has not been changed since. Arsenic is a natural element found in soils, sediments, and groundwater, meaning it can feed into public drinking water systems. While this study highlights concerns of arsenic exposure in relation to pregnancy and birth outcomes in particular, the contaminant poses health risks to any individual. In the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) toxicology report on arsenic, the agency notes, "it is widely accepted that arsenic is carcinogenic," and that "numerous epidemiological studies have examined associations between exposure to arsenic in drinking water and various health outcomes." "Arsenic can cause a variety of cancers, including cancer of the bladder and urothelium, gastrointestinal tract, kidney, liver, lung, pancreas, and skin; as well as cardiovascular effects, and neurologic effects," Brett A. Poulin, a professor in the Department of Environmental Toxicology at the University of California, Davis, told Newsweek via email in response to the study. States also have different exposure levels, the study said, with Michigan, South Dakota, Nevada, and California all having areas with levels of higher than 5 micrograms per liter of arsenic in drinking water systems. "Arsenic levels tend to be higher in drinking water that comes from groundwater sources, such as community wells or private household wells," Poulin said. "In many cases, the arsenic comes from natural minerals in the aquifer—especially in regions with sedimentary rocks or glacial deposits that contain arsenic-bearing materials." He added that people living in areas that depend heavily on groundwater, and have geology rich in arsenic-containing sediments, are more likely to have elevated arsenic in their drinking water. Asked whether the agency believes the level of arsenic exposure considered safe needed to be updated following the release of the study, an EPA spokesperson told Newsweek that determining a safe level of exposure requires a consideration of implementation and cost, as well as public health. "The Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) established under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) is set at zero for arsenic," the spokesperson said. The MCLG is identified in the act as the maximum level of a contaminant in drinking water at which "no known or anticipated adverse effect on the health of persons would occur, allowing an adequate margin of safety," they added. However, MCLGs are "non-enforceable public health goals," the spokesperson said. "MCLGs consider only public health, therefore, they sometimes are set at levels which water systems cannot meet due to technical limitations." The spokesperson said the act requires the EPA to set the enforceable Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) "as close as feasible to the MCLG taking cost into consideration." Therefore, in its determination of a MCL of 10 micrograms per liter of arsenic exposure, the EPA had to evaluate the impact on costs and on public health, in a "health risk reduction and cost analysis." The spokesperson added that the EPA regularly reviews National Primary Drinking Water Regulations and "evaluates whether there are new peer reviewed health assessments for a contaminant." According to the spokesperson, in July 2024 under the Biden administration, the agency "completed the fourth cyclical review of drinking water regulations and determined that arsenic was not a candidate for revision at the time." "The Biden Administration noted that a regulatory revision for arsenic was not appropriate because the reassessment of the health risks resulting from exposure to arsenic was ongoing," the EPA spokesperson said. Although, in light of the study, Poulin said: "One thing the EPA must consider when revising MCLs is feasibility of achieving a more stringent MCL." "There is no such thing as completely safe water, whether it is bottled or tap water," Marc Edwards, a professor in civil and environmental engineering at Virginia Tech, told Newsweek. Although, he added this new research should be "considered in future revisions of the regulated arsenic level." Given the impact of even accepted levels of arsenic exposure on pregnancy and birth, experts have advised expecting mothers at risk of higher exposure to use water filters. "In situations with high risk of lead or arsenic, filters are recommended," Edwards said. "Waters with elevated arsenic are relatively rare compared to the problem of lead, and can be identified by reading your water companies consumer confidence report," he added. "This research underscores our responsibility as a society to protect the health of pregnant women," Marci Lobel, a professor in the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine at Stony Brook University, New York, told Newsweek. "Clearly, we must reduce arsenic levels in public water supplies," she said and advised pregnant women to filter their water if possible. Although, Lobel added that "pregnant women should not be unduly alarmed," as despite the study's findings, which are a "serious concern," the impacts are "not large." "We should consider the results of this important study in the context of what we already know about reducing health risks for pregnant women," she added. "It is well known that pregnancy is a highly vulnerable time for environmental exposures to have an impact on pregnant women and their babies," Natalie Exum, a professor in the Department of Environmental Health and Engineering at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, told Newsweek. She added that she was "concerned" about the findings of the study, and that they indicate that the "current regulation set in the Safe Drinking Water Act may not be protecting maternal and child health." "If you are pregnant and living in an area where there are detectable levels of arsenic in the drinking water, it would be best to use a filter that removes the arsenic to non-detectable levels," she said. Related Articles RFK Jr. Says 'More Cavities' Due to No Fluoride in Water Is 'a Balance'Hidden Danger in Drinking Water Revealed in New StudyUS States Issued Drinking Water WarningMap Shows States Where Drinking Water Contamination is Highest 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Miami Herald
4 hours ago
- Miami Herald
California Schools to Change From August: What to Know
California schools are set to implement a number of changes in the upcoming school year starting August. Schools will be required to print suicide prevention resources on student identification cards, and start planning for the future of students with special needs as soon as they enter high school. Newsweek contacted California Governor Gavin Newsom's office and the California Department of Education for comment via email outside of regular working hours. The measures are part of a legislative agenda championed by Newsom to improve access to mental health services for students, and to support students with special needs. Under Senate Bill 1063, public or private schools that serve students in grades seven to 12 and issue identification cards will be required to print the number for the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline on students' IDs. This is a change from a previous requirement to have the number for the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline printed on ID cards, according to the bill. The 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline's three-digit number, which launched in 2022, replaced the National Suicide Prevention Line's 10-digit number, even though that still remains active. The law also allows schools to print a QR code on ID cards linking to the mental health resources website of the county in which the school is located. Assembly Bill 438, which was approved last year, requires that individualized education programs, or IEPs, include measurable post-secondary goals and transition services for students with special needs from as early as when they start high school, if determined appropriate by the IEP team. The change will mean that planning for the student's post-secondary goals could begin up to two years earlier than previously, according to Newsom's office. California State Senator Shannon Grove, a Republican who authored Senate Bill 1063, said in a statement last year: "Updating student ID cards so children have immediate access to mental health resources is smart policy... I am thrilled that students across the state of California will now have essential mental health resources at their fingertips to combat their distress." The California Department of Education said in a statement in May: "As explained in AB 438, existing law requires IEPs to include appropriate measurable postsecondary goals and transition services, as defined, beginning not later than the first IEP to be in effect when a pupil is 16 years old, or younger if determined appropriate by the IEP team, which are to be updated annually. "Beginning July 1, 2025, AB 438 requires an IEP to include measurable postsecondary goals and transition services, if determined appropriate by a pupil's IEP team, beginning when an individual with exceptional needs starts their high school experience and not later than the first IEP to be in effect when the pupil is 16 years of age." The two laws go into effect on July 1, 2025, and will impact students from the start of the school year beginning in August. Related Articles Map Shows US States With School Phone BansCalifornia Gas Prices to Go Up July 1: What to KnowGay California Lawmaker Blasts 'Inflammatory' Pride resolution 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
