
GE2025: Bot spreading hate on social media
During the general elections, it's easy to get swept up in the excitement — not just at rallies and candidate walkabouts, but on social media too.
At the same time, it is crucial to exercise caution when consuming information.
Anonymous social media profiles have been spotted leaving hate comments on General Election 2025-related posts.
Often times, these are not by real people, but social media bots. According to an article by Microsoft in June 2024, these are automated programmes designed to mimic human users and interact with other accounts.
While there are bots which serve a purpose, such as search engine bots and chat bots, there are also malicious ones designed with ill intent.
On April 22, the Ministry of Digital Development and Information (MDDI) said it is looking into these accounts.
They noted that these accounts were set up recently and appear to target different political parties.
"We will continue to monitor the online space for foreign interference and will act on content that is in breach of our laws. We urge the public to be discerning consumers of information," said MDDI. Differentiating bad actors from real people
While MDDI is trying to put a stop to these bots, we can help ourselves by learning how to differentiate between genuine social media accounts and malicious bots.
In the abovementioned article by Microsoft, the tech company shared that one giveaway is "unhuman-like behaviour", such as automated responses and lack of personal engagement.
These social media accounts may also display a sudden increase in followers and share spam or irrelevant content such as advertisements and suspicious links.
Another indicator is the profile leaving identical posts or comments across multiple accounts. Excessive use of hashtags or promotional links is also a red flag.
AsiaOne's social media pages have also been targeted by suspected bots.
One suspicious profile left similar comments on numerous AsiaOne's Facebook posts asking netizens to vote for the People's Action Party.
Despite its strong opinions about the elections, the account states that it is from Wonderland Forest, Virginia.
Fortunately, some users have caught on to such dubious accounts.
One user said: "Lots of fake accounts popping up."
Another asked: "Oh, and we can trust a profile with only one friend?"
In their own research, CNA discovered over 900 inauthentic accounts posting more than 5,000 comments in an estimated one-day period, shared an article on April 29.
This was after the government first alerted the public to foreigners posting online election advertisements urging Singaporeans to vote along religious lines.
Fifteen of the inauthentic accounts posted between 30 and over 70 comments each, while around 290 of them posted only a single comment.
Additionally, 26.9 per cent of the inauthentic comments were classified as anti-opposition attacks, 23.9 per cent as religious and political controversy, and 19.1 per cent as anti-establishment and conspiracy.
The remaining comments had themes like racial and minority issues, and calls for religious neutrality. How to tell?
Suspect something is not right? Here are a few steps you can take to determine if the account is truly a bot. Examine profile details
Profiles lacking personal information or photos may be bots.
Bots often use generic names and profile pictures. Check activity patterns and review engagement quality
Bot accounts typically have consistent posting frequencies and times, often generating a high volume of content.
When interacting with other profiles, they may leave generic comments or repetitive responses. Analyse content quality
If the content quality is low or irrelevant, it may be a bot.
Excessive use of hashtags and promotional links are a tell-tale sign, too.
[[nid:717478]]
melissateo@asiaone.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Humanitarian workers killed in Gaza bus ambush, food distribution continues
JERUSALEM/CAIRO - At least eight Palestinians who worked for the U.S-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation died in an ambush, the GHF said on Thursday, blaming Hamas militants for the killings that rocked the troubled food distribution operation. A bus carrying about two dozen GHF workers was raked with gunfire on Wednesday night as it headed to an aid centre in southern Gaza, the foundation said, adding that many of its staff were injured and some might have been kidnapped. Separately, the local health authority said 103 Palestinians were killed by Israeli fire and 400 wounded in the past 24 hours across the battered enclave -- including 21 people killed this morning near GHF sites. GHF's interim director John Acree said his organisation had considered closing its centres on Thursday following the bus attack, but opted to remain open. "We decided that the best response to Hamas' cowardly murderers was to keep delivering food for the people of Gaza who are counting on us," he said in a statement. Hamas declined to comment on the shootings. Social media channels in Gaza said Hamas had targeted the bus because it was allegedly carrying GHF workers tied to Yasser Abu Shabab, the leader of a large clan that has challenged Hamas's supremacy in the enclave and is being armed by Israel. Abu Shabab released a statement on his Facebook page denouncing images posted on social media showing Gazans allegedly killed by Hamas and as it seeks to maintain power. "Rumours of executions and killings are being spread by the corrupt, mercenaries, and criminals of Hamas in an attempt to sow fear in the hearts of those who seek change and liberation from terrorism, oppression, and its unjust rule," he said. RECORD MEAL DISTRIBUTION The Israeli military said it was continuing to target Hamas fighters in Gaza, killing three militants who fired an anti-tank missile towards its soldiers, and hitting a building near a medical centre that it said was being used to make weapons. It also said it had arrested several Hamas members in Syria overnight, accusing them of planning to attack Israelis. Israel has fought for more than 20 months to eliminate Hamas after it launched deadly attacks October 7, 2023 that ignited the war. All efforts to end the conflict through negotiations have failed. Despite the bus attack, GHF said it handed out 2.6 million meals on Thursday -- a daily record since it started operations in Gaza at the end of May, overseeing a new model of food distribution that the United Nations says is deeply flawed. "This model will not address the deepening hunger. The dystopian 'Hunger Games' cannot become the new reality," Philippe Lazzarini, the chief of the U.N. Palestinian refugee agency (UNRWA), wrote on X. "The UN including @UNRWA has the knowledge, expertise & community trust to provide dignified & safe assistance. Just let the humanitarians do their jobs," he added. Israel has repeatedly called for UNRWA to be disbanded, accusing it of having ties with Hamas. UNRWA has denied this. Gaza's Hamas-run health ministry says more than 180 people have been killed by Israeli fire near the aid centres over the past three weeks, as the aid effort repeatedly degenerated into chaos and terror with locals scrabbling for limited supplies. Israel has contested the death tally, accusing Hamas of causing much of the mayhem. Besides the GHF distribution effort, Israel is also letting into Gaza trucks carrying flour for the handful of bakeries that are still operating. For the first time in months, Israel allowed humanitarian trucks to enter northern Gaza directly overnight -- with 56 lorries carrying supplies from the U.N.'s World Food Programme crossing into the largely devastated region. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
Bilderberg group meets in Sweden amid US-Europe tensions
Police block off access to the Grand Hotel, where roughly 150 delegates from Europe and the U.S. will debate issues ranging from the transatlantic alliance to AI and national security, at the annual Bilderberg meeting in Stockholm, Sweden, June 11, 2025. REUTERS/Simon Johnson View of Stockholm's Grand Hotel, where the secretive Bilderberg group will hold its annual meeting which starts tomorrow, in Sweden, June 11, 2025. REUTERS/Simon Johnson Police block off access to the Grand Hotel ahead of the annual Bilderberg meeting in Stockholm, Sweden, June 11, 2025. REUTERS/Simon Johnson STOCKHOLM - The annual Bilderberg Meeting kicks off in Sweden on Thursday, providing a private forum for discussion at a time when President Donald Trump has upended security and economic ties between the U.S. and Europe. The high-level networking event was formed in 1954 to foster dialogue between the U.S. and Europe. It does not invite media and delegates rarely speak about what has been discussed, triggering numerous conspiracy theories about their aims. NATO General Secretary Mark Rutte, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and Christopher Donahue, Commander of the U.S. Army Europe and Africa are among those on this year's delegate list, published by the organisers just ahead of the meeting. Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson will give a speech "on Sweden's and the EU's competitiveness and Sweden's support for Ukraine," his spokesperson told Reuters. Transatlantic relations top the agenda, with Ukraine, critical raw materials and AI also on the list, the organisers who also publish the names of the participants, said. Other than that, information is scarce. The organisers say the secrecy is to allow participants to be able to speak freely in an environment of trust. "There is no desired outcome, there is no closing statement, there are no resolutions proposed or votes taken, and the Meeting does not support any political party or viewpoint," the official website says. How much impact groups like Bilderberg actually have is hard to judge, according to Christina Garsten, professor at the Swedish Collegium for Advanced Study, who studies transnational think tanks. They aim to shape the broad political and corporate agenda. But if they are seen as having too much influence, they can be accused of being anti-democratic. "It's there that conspiracy theories can flower," she said. She dismissed the belief held by some that groups like Bilderberg make up a shadowy world government. "I think it's very much exaggerated," she said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.


Singapore Law Watch
12 hours ago
- Singapore Law Watch
Second round of Pofma sanctions for owner of The Online Citizen's website, social media accounts
Second round of Pofma sanctions for owner of The Online Citizen's website, social media accounts Source: Straits Times Article Date: 12 Jun 2025 Author: Aqil Hamzah This is the second time that The Online Citizen has been slapped with the declaration, with its first due to expire in July 2025. The people behind The Online Citizen's (TOC) website and Facebook, Instagram and X pages will continue to be barred from deriving any financial benefits from the running of its platforms till 2027. In a statement on June 11, the Ministry of Digital Development and Information (MDDI) said TOC's website and social media pages – which were labelled as Declared Online Locations (DOLs) – had been declared as such in July 2023, and the designation was due to expire on July 21, 2025. DOLs have to comply with actions under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (Pofma) that would prevent their operator from financially benefiting during the period they are listed as one. However, said MDDI, TOC 'continued to communicate falsehoods through its online platforms over the past two years'. Between July 2023 and June 2025, it received eight correction directions under the fake news law. These included one on Feb 25, after TOC published an article about modification works at the Ridout Road colonial bungalow leased by Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam's wife. In its article, it said the Singapore Land Authority had given Mr Shanmugam assurances of a lease extension beyond its 2027 expiry, and that public funds were used to pay for the earthworks carried out at the bungalow since 2024, among other claims. These are falsehoods, said MDDI. As a result of the eight correction directions, TOC's website and social media pages have again been labelled DOLs, a move necessary 'to ensure Singaporeans continue to be alerted to TOC's record of communicating falsehoods', said the ministry. The new declaration comes into effect immediately after the current direction expires and will remain till July 21, 2027 at 12pm. TOC will be able to continue its operations, but will have to carry a notice on its online platforms to notify its audience that it has been declared a DOL. The notice will also have to state that it had 'communicated multiple falsehoods' and that its viewers should exercise caution when accessing it for information. MDDI added that service providers, including digital advertising agencies, will have to take steps to ensure that their paid content on TOC's platforms is not made available in Singapore. 'Individuals and companies must also not provide financial support to TOC's DOLs to avoid promoting the communication of falsehoods in Singapore on these platforms,' it added. There are three other outlets currently listed as DOLs. They are Transformative Justice Collective's website and social media pages, and Gutzy Asia's website and social media pages, as well as opposition politician Kenneth Jeyaretnam's website and social media pages. A provision under Pofma allows the Government to order an internet intermediary to disable access to a DOL if the owner of the DOL does not comply with the declaration and paid content on the site continues to be displayed to users here. If an internet intermediary fails to comply and is convicted, it can be fined up to $20,000 for each day that the government order is not fully complied with, up to a total of $500,000. The owner or operator of a DOL can however apply to the Minister for Digital Development and Information to suspend, vary or cancel the declaration. If the minister rejects the application, an appeal can be made to the High Court. Aqil Hamzah is a journalist covering breaking news at The Straits Times, with interests in crime and technology. Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Print