
Your rights as a landlord – and how you can still evict a tenant
The Renters' Rights Bill currently in the House of Lords is a more comprehensive version of the Renters' Reform Bill which was brought to parliament under the previous government. The new bill brings an end to 'no fault evictions' leaving landlords worried about removing problem tenants.
But there are still ways to remove troublesome tenants, even after the bill is passed, most likely at some point in 2025.
If you are faced with a rogue tenant, then here is what you need to know in order to legally evict them, once Section 21 has been abolished. In this article, we will cover:
What are the current eviction rules?
Until now landlords have been able to use Section 21 to evict renters at the end of their tenancy without providing justification, as long as they give them two months' notice.
Landlords can still use Section 8 to get rid of tenants who wreck the property or stop paying rent. However, this involves going to court, which can take months.
A problem tenant is any landlord's worst nightmare, costing potentially thousands of pounds in damage or unpaid rent – in the past Telegraph Money has heard of rogue tenants who set up cannabis farms in the loft and others who filled the house with rotting trout.
During the pandemic, the government imposed a ban on evictions. Ever since this was lifted in 2021, there has been a surge in landlord possession claims and evictions, according to the Ministry of Justice.
Almost 20,000 households were served a Section 21 notice last year, more than double the number in 2021, as landlords rushed to regain control over their properties before Section 21 was scrapped.
Evicting problem tenants after the Renters' Rights Bills
There are still ways you can evict problem tenants even after the Renters' Rights Bill comes in. Those include:
Anti-social behaviour
Property damage
Unpaid rent
Anti-social behaviour
The Government recently revealed an action plan to help landlords crack down on anti-social tenants, although no date for new powers has been decided.
Currently, landlords can only end a tenancy over anti-social behaviour if there is a conviction. The new proposals would remove the requirement for a conviction, meaning an eviction could be obtained by a landlord on evidence alone.
James Wood, of the National Residential Landlords Association, said anti-social behaviour is notoriously difficult to prove. 'Most of the victims will be the immediate neighbours or other tenants, who are understandably scared of providing evidence in court.'
If there are reports of anti-social behaviour, give the other tenants and neighbours a channel to report the information confidentially. Ideally, they should keep an evidence log of when and where incidents occur, as this will strengthen your case if it goes to court.
Reporting the behaviour to the police or local authority could also help here. You should warn the tenant that their behaviour is not acceptable, without identifying the informer. If the behaviour persists, then you will have to serve a possession notice. Read more on these below.
Property damage
Some wear and tear is to be expected over the length of the tenancy. But if the tenant has caused damage to the property, the cost can be deducted from the deposit.
There is a clear difference between natural wear and tear and property damage. Scratches on the wall and appliances that have broken down are examples of natural wear and tear, whereas cigarette burns on a carpet, a broken chair, or an overloaded plug socket constitute damage.
Before renting out the property, it is best to complete an inventory report with the items in the property but also the condition of those items. If deducting costs from the deposit, this must be on a like-for-like basis. You cannot charge a tenant for the cost of a new premium mattress if they damaged a cheap one.
Unpaid rent
There has been a rise in the number of landlords chasing unpaid rent from tenants since the pandemic began. Last year instructions for rent debt recovery services surged by 180pc compared to the previous 12 months, according to Landlord Action, an eviction firm.
Paul Shamplina, founder of Landlord Action, said that if a tenant stops paying rent, the landlord should get in touch as soon as possible. Hopefully, the problem is only temporary and you can compromise. Mr Shamplina said: 'A good tenant doesn't turn rogue overnight.'
However, if a compromise cannot be reached, and if the rent goes unpaid for more than two months, the landlord can decide to serve a Section 8 notice. This gives the tenant 14 days' notice to pay.
If the rent still has not been paid, the landlord would have to apply to the courts for a possession order and a money order.
Mr Wood said: 'Alternatively, landlords can apply via Money Claim Online for a judgment for just the arrears if they still want the tenancy to continue.'
Money Claim Online is an online portal, operated by HM Courts & Tribunal Service, which allows claims to be made for up to £100,000. Mr Shamplina added: 'If at this point the tenant still does not pay, the landlord would have to instruct bailiffs.'
If a tenant has been in at least two months' arrears three times in the previous three years, this is grounds for mandatory eviction.
How to legally evict a tenant
You must give your tenant appropriate notice that you wish for them to leave the property. With Section 21 abolished, you must use Section 8 notice under the Housing Act 1988.
How landlords deal with bad tenants
How to use Section 8
Section 8 can be used where the landlord has grounds for eviction including property damage, rent arrears or anti-social behaviour. However, you will need to have evidence to back up your claim if your tenant takes you to court.
Mr Wood said: 'Because of the lack of certainty in this route, most landlords prefer to use Section 21 to deal with cases where the tenant is in arrears or is anti-social.'
You must fill in a 'Notice seeking possession of a property let on an assured tenancy or an assured agricultural occupancy'. On this form you should specify what terms of the tenancy have been breached. You should give between two weeks' and two months' notice, depending upon which terms you are relying.
How to make a possession order
If your tenant refuses to leave after receiving notice then you can serve a possession order. This requires you to fill in a Form N5 claim for possession and N119 particulars of claim for possession.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
12 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE The squalid life of Pheobe's housemate revealed as shocking new images expose the disgusting conditions they were living in
Shocking footage has captured the squalid conditions inside a bus that was being lived in by one of the housemates accused of murdering Pheobe Bishop. An ex-girlfriend of James Wood, 34, previously told Daily Mail Australia his partner Tanika Bromley, 33, had been banished to the rundown bus sitting outside their Gin Gin home, which they shared with Pheobe. Pheobe, 17, was last seen leaving the rental, near Bundaberg in Central Queensland, on May 15 and is assumed dead following the discovery of remains in Good Night Scrub National Park on Friday afternoon. Daily Mail Australia was granted access to the bus, which served as Bromley's room, on Tuesday. The bright exterior of the 1979 Volvo B59 , a staple for Queensland public transport in the 1970s and 80s, was in sharp contrast to the vehicle's dingy interior. Although Wood boasted of the converted motorhome being a 'great rig' in a Facebook Marketplace ad some six months ago, the bus has suffered more than it's share of wear and tear. The bus' narrow entry was littered with shoes, empty bottles and a pile of clothing. Up to 11 deceased dogs were discovered at the Gin Gin share house following Pheobe's disappearance. Wood (left) and Bromley (right) are accused of murdering Pheobe and moving her body Officers are believed to have found the missing teenager's remains on Friday but they will need to undergo significant forensic examination to determine her cause of death. Good Night Scrub, some 40km south of Gin Gin, is known to be filled with wild boars and dogs. Thin curtains were used to block sunlight directly coming into the bus, which was full of dust and water damage. A cabinet and benchtop were littered with broken furniture, empty food packaging and clothing. It's understood Wood and Bromley had been in a relationship since the end of last year, around the same time they moved into the Gin Gin home. Wood and Bromley fronted Bundaberg Magistrates Court on Friday accused of Pheobe's murder, three weeks to the day after she missed a flight and vanished. Police allege the couple moved her body more than once. Pheobe was reported missing after failing to check in and board a flight from Bundaberg to Perth, where she planned to meet up with her boyfriend, who Daily Mail Australia has not named because of his age. Last week during a hearing for firearm charges, a court heard Bromley cared for two children, including one with a disability, as part of a shared custody arrangement. Pheobe's mother, Kylie Johnson, has since urged the Gin Gin community to 'respect' Bromley's family following the charges against her. 'I know Tanika has been charged. I know her family live within our community and I expect them to receive respect... those kids mean the world to us as a family,' Ms Johnson said at a vigil for Pheobe. 'They meant the world to Phoebe as a family as well. It is imperative to us, as a family, that they are supported just as much as us. Pheobe's suspected remains were discovered in Good Night Scrub with pig prints spotted nearby 'They are hurting probably more than us, even though we have lost our child.' Neither Wood nor Bromley appeared in person or by video link for the hearing on Friday. Their matters will return to court on August 11.


Telegraph
13 hours ago
- Telegraph
Early release prison scheme could increase police workload, Government admits
Police could face extra work re-arresting criminals under a new scheme to release offenders early from prison, the Government has admitted. An internal Ministry of Justice (MoJ) document assessing the impact of the policy, revealed on the eve of Rachel Reeves's spending review, also warned it risked leaving victims feeling there had been 'insufficient punishment' of offenders. Under the emergency measures to tackle the prison overcrowding crisis, violent criminals, burglars and robbers recalled to jail will serve just 28 days behind bars. The early re-release scheme will apply to most prisoners originally jailed for between one and four years, even if they were recalled after committing another crime. The document read: 'Should some of the cohort of releases be re-recalled, it could lead to more work for the police service (for arrest and return to custody).' The Home Office is facing some of the biggest cuts in the Chancellor's spending review on Wednesday. While police are expected to receive above-inflation increases in their budgets over the next three years, chiefs have warned that the money will not cover a £1.3 billion funding black hole. Sir Mark Rowley, the Met Police Commissioner, previously warned that fewer criminals serving prison time would ' generate a lot of work for police ' and a 'proportion' of those released early would go on to commit another crime. He also accused ministers of having done 'no analysis whatsoever' of the impact on forces of such policies. Sir Mark further claimed that electronically tagging criminals would not stop them from reoffending. Measures to prevent 'breakdown of law and order' The MoJ admitted in the document that officials could not 'monetise the costs' of the extra time that police officers would face catching and arresting freed prisoners who re-offended. But it added: 'They are expected to be significantly outweighed by the benefits to the police of avoiding a breakdown of law and disorder.' Official projections have previously estimated that, without action, prisons could run out of space by November. The MoJ analysis warned this would mean 'court trials can no longer go ahead, and planned arrests are cancelled.' It added: 'This will threaten a breakdown of law and order, which is expected to result in increased crime, as those with a propensity to commit offences are not deterred from doing so, with no risk of apprehension and subsequent conviction. 'Significant public protection risks would arise from insufficient prison places for the most serious offenders.' But officials also admitted there could be a backlash to the recall measures, warning: 'It is possible that the victims of offenders released from recall may consider a shorter recall term to be an insufficient punishment for breaking licence conditions.' The MoJ document suggested that the 28-day recall scheme would free up 1,400 prison spaces, which ministers hope will see the Government through to the introduction of an overhaul of sentencing. Under the plans, prisoners will be released as little as a third of the way through their sentences for good behaviour and engaging with rehabilitation schemes. Killers and rapists will be freed halfway through their sentences, rather than two-thirds, if they behave well in jail. Last month, Baroness Newlove, the Victims' Commissioner, warned that freeing prisoners early who had already been shown to pose a risk to the public by reoffending would place 'victims and the wider public at an unnecessary risk of harm'. At present, criminals recalled to prison are only re-released after their case has been considered by the Parole Board, which decides if they can be safely freed to serve the rest of their sentence in the community. Last year, the number of recalled prisoners in jail at any one time increased by 10 per cent to 13,583, more than double the 6,000 seven years ago. It represented around one in seven prisoners being held in England and Wales.


BBC News
19 hours ago
- BBC News
Young offenders spend most of their time locked in cells
Most children in young offender institutions (YOIs) spend "most of their time locked alone in their cells", according to an inspection report laid bare the "failure" by the Youth Custody Service to "create environments in which staff and children are able to form positive, appropriate relationships".The findings were based on interviews with children aged 10 to 18, as well as staff, at YOIs in Bridgend in South Wales, Stoke-on-Trent, and the Wetherby and Keppel units in West Ministry of Justice has been contacted for comment. Authored by Chief Inspector of Prisons Charlie Taylor, the report found there was "little that was reliable or consistent about life in [many] YOIs".Campbell Robb, chief executive at social justice charity Nacro, said the report was "more evidence that the environment in our YOIs is profoundly harmful for children, many of whom are already extremely vulnerable".The report found fewer than half of the children in custody felt cared for by staff, while one in three said there was no member of staff they could turn to if they had a problem."This is concerning because staff rely on meaningful, trusting relationships to encourage children to engage with education, health care or offending behaviour programmes, as well as to defuse conflict and violence," it to the report, "there is mounting evidence that relationships between staff and children in custody are a key element in delivering better outcomes".However, children being locked up for most of the day meant "there was very little time for staff to get to know those in their care".As of March, there were 502 young people detained at YOIs in England and Wales."We don't have the power to change a lot and the kids know it," said one YOI staff member. 'Urgent action' At Wetherby YOI, children told inspectors it could take up to 45 minutes to get a response after ringing their cell bell, while most wings did not provide opportunities for exercise, association or time for domestic tasks during the Werrington near Stoke, one child said they had pressed their cell bell five times to get a plastic also said there was "simply no time" to make a positive impact on children's Robb, whose organisation supports people in the criminal justice system, said the report "should prompt the government to take urgent action". "We urge them to ensure that children should only be held in custody as an absolute last resort and to ensure a safe, rehabilitative environment in all YOIs to give young people the best possible chance to change." Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.