logo
The charlatans are clearly here to stay

The charlatans are clearly here to stay

New European2 days ago

We, on the old continent and elsewhere, wondered if the electorate or the candidate were to blame. Are Republican voters especially gullible or is Donald Trump simply inevitable? It's still too early to tell. It is also becoming clear that, regrettably, we can't just point to the other side of the Atlantic and wince anymore. As it turns out, just about enough people on our side of the pond are gluttons for punishment too.
For a little while, it looked like the US were the exception. Americans voted for a hard- right populist and things went about as well as expected, and so he got voted out again. A term later, however, just about enough people decided that, actually, they just hadn't had enough yet, and so they brought the charlatan back into power.
Back in 2023, Poland finally voted to oust the increasingly, worryingly populist Law and Order Party, and make centre-right Donald Tusk Pprime Miminister instead. It felt like good news both for the country and for the European Union, though the former eurocrat struggled to be as effective as he wanted. Andrzej Duda, the president, hailed from Law and Order, and swore to be a thorn in the government's side.
There were hopes that things would change this year, as the country was due to elect a new president last month. In the end, after a nail-biter of an election night, Trump supporter and eurosceptic Karol Nawrocki won against centrist Rafal Trzaskowski. Tusk has said that the election won't change a thing, but is likely to be putting on a brave face. Poland got close, briefly, to entering a new era of politics, but has instead chosen to take a step backwards.
It isn't yet guaranteed that the Czech Republic will follow suit later this year, but things aren't looking great. According to opinion polls, Andrej Babiš is currently the frontrunner and projected to become prime minister again, four years after being booted out of office.
Suggested Reading The hard right will tear itself apart
Alastair Campbell
Another populist, Babiš, is a famous Kremlin sympathiser. His election would spell trouble for Ukraine, which has, so far during the war, been able to rely on the country as a steadfast ally. He has also been investigated multiple times for, among others, fraud, conflict of interest, corruption and intimidation, which may remind you of a certain someone.
It seems remarkable that Czech voters would give him another run at governing the country but, unless something drastic happens between now and the autumn, Babiš is all but certain to become prime minister again.
Both sets of elections are concerning in and of themselves, but also because of what they represent. There was a hope, once upon a time, that most people only ever voted for populist parties because they were fed up with the establishment and wanted to shake things up a bit. They didn't actually want those people in power or, at the very least, would realise they'd made a mistake quickly enough.
Mainstream parties and commentators also assumed, perhaps too smugly, that populists couldn't govern and would end up being their own worst enemies. Give them enough rope and… well, you know the rest. A decade on, it seems worth asking: how's that working out for us, then? Is sunshine the best disinfectant after all, or should we find a better way to deal with populism in our democracies?
These are questions which should be haunting Downing Street. Britain elected a centre- left government last year, but current opinion polls don't make for happy reading in Labour circles. Nigel Farage is once again stalking British politics, and it doesn't seem clear that anyone knows how to stop him before the next election.
That both the traditional left and right are trying to neutralise Reform by aping their language and policy positions hardly feels like a good sign. It's a method that's been tried and tested around the world, and the results speak for themselves. In any case, 2025 ought to be the year when those in power and in the mainstream realise that the populist right cannot be treated as an aberration any longer.
Like it or not, it will not vanish by itself. There is a lot that separates American politics from its equivalents both in Europe and on our shores, but we're all facing similar problems. Neither panic nor pandering have worked to solve them so far, but a way forward must be found, as the charlatans are clearly here to stay.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election'
Musk: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election'

Daily Mail​

time7 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Musk: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election'

By Published: Updated: Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's spectacular falling out quickly turned personal Thursday as the world's richest man claimed the president would have lost the 2024 election without his help. Musk had publicly endorsed Trump on the heels of the July 13th assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania and poured around $290 million of his fortune into the Republican's campaign. The billionaire also joined Trump on the campaign trail when he returned to the site of the Butler shooting in early October, a month before Election Day. Trump said he likely still would have won the key state of Pennsylvania without Musk's assistance, partly because Kamala Harris didn't choose the state's governor, Josh Shapiro, to be her running mate. Even with Shapiro on the Democratic ticket, Trump claimed, 'I would have won Pennsylvania, I would have won by a lot.' Musk said that was laughable. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk claimed. 'Such ingratitude,' the billionaire added on X. Musk's comments came moments after Trump told reporters in the Oval Office, during German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's visit, that his bromance with the DOGE leader was likely over. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will any more, I was surprised,' Trump said. The president suggested that Musk was angry - not over the bill ballooning the deficit - but because the Trump administration has pulled back on electric vehicle mandates, which negatively impacted Tesla. He also indicated that there was a problem when he rejected Musk's preferred nominee to lead NASA because his choice was a Democrat. 'And you know, Elon's upset because we took the EV mandate, which was a lot of money for electric vehicles, and they're having a hard time the electric vehicles and they want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidy,' Trump said. 'I know that disturbed him.' Shares of Tesla dipped 8 percent amid the spat. Over the weekend, Trump pulled the nomination of Jared Isaacman to lead NASA. Isaacman had worked alongside Musk at SpaceX. 'He recommended somebody that I guess he knew very well, I'm sure he respected him, to run NASA and I didn't think it was appropriate and he happened to be a Democrat, like totally Democrat,' Trump continued. 'We won, we get certain privileges and one of the privileges is we don't have to appoint a Democrat.' Musk posted to X repeatedly as Trump's press conference was going on. 'Whatever,' the billionaire wrote, as he continued to criticize what Trump has called his 'big, beautiful' spending bill. 'Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill,' he advised. 'In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that [is] both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this!' Musk continued. 'Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way.' In the Oval Office, Trump insisted that Musk knew the contents of the bill before the House passed it. Trump is now pushing Republican senators to back it so he can sign it before the July 4 holiday. 'He became a little bit different. I can understand that. But he knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left,' Trump protested. Musk immediately pushed back on X - sharing the clip of Trump's comments. 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' Musk said. At the top of Musk's X profile on Thursday, the billionaire had pinned a tweet that said 'Wise words,' highlighting a Trump tweet from 2013 that said, 'I cannot believe the Republicans are extending the debt ceiling—I am a Republican & I am embarrassed!' Trump noted that until recently Musk had 'said the most beautiful things about me.' Trump said Musk's about-face represented a greater trend. 'People leave my administration and they love us and then, at some point, they miss it so badly. And some of them embrace it and some of them actually become hostile. I don't know what it is, it's sort of Trump Derangement Syndrome, I guess they call it,' the president said. 'They leave, they wake up in the morning and the glamour is gone, the whole world is different and they become hostile.' The president's comments come less than a week after he feted Musk in the Oval Office, giving him an official farewell as the billionaire moved out of special government employee status and back into the private sector. Trump noted that he had given Musk a 'wonderful send-off' on Friday before he headed to Pittsburgh to tout a steel deal between Nippon and U.S. Steel. 'Remember, he was here for a long time. You saw a man who was very happy. He stood behind the Oval desk. Even with a black eye,' Trump said. 'I said, "do you want a little makeup?" And he said, "No I don't think so," which was interesting.' 'And very nice,' Trump added. 'He wants to be who he is,' the president shrugged.

As feud escalates, Trump implies government could cut contracts and subsidies to Musk's companies
As feud escalates, Trump implies government could cut contracts and subsidies to Musk's companies

NBC News

time8 minutes ago

  • NBC News

As feud escalates, Trump implies government could cut contracts and subsidies to Musk's companies

President Donald Trump has escalated his sudden rupture with Elon Musk by implying the government could sever ties with the tech titan's businesses. "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it" Trump wrote in a Truth Social post Thursday afternoon. Trump's post comes in the midst of a stunning exchange between Musk and Trump that erupted Thursday when the president told reporters in the Oval Office that he was disappointed with Musk's criticism ofthe Republican policy bill that is making its way through Congress. Musk then launched into a tire on X, where he posted throughout early Thursday a variety of critiques of Trump, the bill and other Republican politicians. In response to another Trump post, Musk said the president was lying. Various estimates have put forward of just how much Musk's firms, primarily SpaceX and Tesla, benefit from government contracts and subsidies. The Washington Post has put the figure at $38 billion. The value of government support to SpaceX, which includes Musk's high-profile space-launch ventures in addition to its Starlink satellite subsidiary — is worth $22 billion alone according to comments made by SpaceX chief Gwynne Shotwell. Tesla has benefited from approximately $11.4 billion in regulatory credits aimed at boosting electric-vehicle purchases, though that figure also includes state subsidies. Reuters has reported that the true figure is classified due to the nature of many of the contracts Musk's firms are under. Shares in Tesla, which had already fallen 8% Thursday as the tit-for-tat escalated on social media, declined as much as 12% following Trump's post.

Massachusetts high school student should be released, US immigration judge rules
Massachusetts high school student should be released, US immigration judge rules

Reuters

time12 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Massachusetts high school student should be released, US immigration judge rules

BOSTON, June 5 (Reuters) - A Massachusetts high school student who was arrested during the weekend by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents on his way to volleyball practice was ordered released on a $2,000 bond on Thursday. A lawyer for Marcelo Gomes Da Silva said the decision by Immigration Judge Jenny Beverly in Chelmsford cleared the way for the 18-year-old to return home to his family in the Boston suburb of Milford and be released from immigration custody following his Saturday arrest during a traffic stop. The detention of the Brazilian, who arrived in the United States when he was 5 on a now-lapsed visa, prompted protests in Massachusetts as the incident became a flashpoint in Republican President Donald Trump's efforts to ramp up immigration arrests and deportations. Classmates gathered outside the immigration court celebrated after word of the judge's decision reached them. "We are thrilled that Marcelo soon will be back home with his family and community," Miriam Conrad, one of his lawyers, said in an email. "But this shows how pointless and cruel the arrest was in the first place." The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Milford High School junior had been driving his father's vehicle when he was arrested by ICE following a traffic stop, the agency's acting director, Todd Lyons, told reporters on Monday. ICE officials said Gomes was not the target of the investigation that led to his arrest, and that authorities instead were seeking his father, who has not been arrested. "He's in this country illegally, and we're not going to walk away from anybody," Lyons told reporters. In response to a lawsuit alleging he was unlawfully detained, U.S. District Judge George O'Toole issued an order, opens new tab barring immigration authorities from transferring Gomes out of Massachusetts without 48 hours' notice. The lawsuit said that Gomes entered the United States on a student visa in 2012. While his visa status has lapsed, the lawsuit said he intends to apply for asylum.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store