Bishop: Church vote a missed chance to show abuse victims their pain is heard
The Church of England cannot hide behind the complexities of moving to fully independent safeguarding and must realise the 'nation is watching', a leading bishop has said.
Bishop Joanne Grenfell, the Church's safeguarding lead, had put forward a motion to the General Synod for a new model which would have seen all Church-employed safeguarding officers transferred to a new independent body.
But members instead voted overwhelmingly for a less independent option, which will see diocesan and cathedral officers remaining with their current Church employers while most national staff move to a new outside body.
Representatives of survivors branded the outcome a 'punch in the gut' for victims of abuse and said it showed the Church had decided to 'keep it in the family'.
Ms Grenfell told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: 'I'm really disappointed, as were many, that Synod missed the opportunity to send an unequivocal message to victims and survivors and the wider nation that we hear their pain and concerns.'
She said the option chosen for the set-up of an independent scrutiny body 'is actually quite a big step forward in itself but we need to do that further work around operational independence, and I'm really committed to doing that'.
Bishop of Blackburn Philip North, who proposed the amendment to endorse the less independent option while work was done to see if the other one was 'legally deliverable', described the latter as 'eye-wateringly complex' and said it could take years to implement.
Ms Grenfell said while she understands concerns some might have had about the complexities of transferring peoples' jobs, that is not something the Church can 'hide behind'.
She told Today: 'I understand that people had concerns about the challenge of bringing staff from 85 different bodies, cathedrals and diocese into one.
'And we knew that that was going to be complex, but we did believe it was possible, and we promised to come back with the further detail on that, which we will now do.
'I don't think we can hide behind those complex structures. That's just not good enough for victims and survivors. So yeah, we're complex, but we need to change, and that means changing our structures.'
The bishop said victims and survivors of abuse – some of whom had gathered outside the venue ahead of Tuesday's debate urging Synod members to vote for fully independent safeguarding – felt they had not been listened to.
She said while members had 'heard the complexity of doing this, and they wanted further assurance about the governance responsibilities around that', they had not 'heard strongly enough that the nation is watching and that victims and survivors say that this is what they need to restore trust and confidence'.
Andrew Graystone, a long-time advocate for abuse survivors, accused the Church of 'shocking arrogance,' and said the Synod had 'voted for a measure that will leave the power of bishops completely unchanged and unchallenged'.
Following the vote, Archbishop of York Stephen Cottrell said he was 'disappointed', having backed the more independent model.
The Church has been plagued by safeguarding controversies over the years, with a damning report into serial abuser and Christian camp leader John Smyth leading to the resignation of Justin Welby as Archbishop of Canterbury.
Mr Cottrell, who has taken on most of that role's responsibilities temporarily, has also faced calls to quit over failures in handling abuse cases, and admitted this week the Church has 'failed greatly' on safeguarding.
The process to find a new Archbishop of Canterbury – the most senior bishop in the Church of England – is under way, with a public consultation launched last week.
The Church has said the consultation 'is an opportunity to gather the views of a wide range of people from across England and the Anglican Communion on the gifts, qualities and skills needed' for the role.
Ms Grenfell said there is 'a huge amount to think through' before the 106th appointment to the role.
She said: 'I think this is a really painful and necessary time of reckoning. I said in a debate earlier in the week that we're ministering as a broken church. I still think that's true. I also see what's improved.
'I mean, I've got really great safeguarding colleagues who I really trust. This isn't about them. Their work is good. It's about the bigger structures around it.
'And I think that there's a huge amount to think through before we appoint a new Archbishop of Canterbury, about what that looks like and about the kind of culture change.'
It is expected there could be an announcement on a new archbishop by autumn.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Shouts for justice at Grenfell anniversary march before tower demolition begins
Grenfell bereaved and survivors shouted for justice in what is likely to be the final anniversary in the shadow of the tower as it stands, ahead of work to begin its demolition. The Government announced earlier this year that the remains of the building will be brought down. It is thought the earliest that demolition will start is September and the process is expected to take around two years. Hundreds walked in silence through west London on Saturday evening before hearing the names of the 72 dead and speeches by campaigners, as the tower overlooked them. Vice chairman of Grenfell United, Karim Mussilhy, who lost his uncle in the blaze, told the crowd: 'Eight years have passed, eight years since the fire – lit by negligence, greed and institutional failure – tore through our homes, our families and our hearts. 'And still no justice has come. The truth is, there's almost nothing new to say because nothing has changed. 'As we stand here eight years on, the only decision this Government has made is to tear down the tower – our home.' The crowd shouted 'shame' and Mr Mussilhy continued: 'Not because justice has been delivered, but despite the fact it hasn't – before a single person has been held accountable, to make what happened disappear. 'The tower has stood not just as a reminder of what happened, but of what must change – a symbol and a truth in the face of denial, of dignity in the face of power, of our resistance, of our 72 loved ones who can't fight for their own justice. 'And now they want it gone, out of sight out of mind, a clear skyline and a forgotten scandal.' The crowd faced the tower and chanted: 'Justice, justice.' At the close of the speeches people filed in through the gates, which are rarely opened, and paid their respects at the base of the tower. Attendees held each other and children wrote tributes on electric candles that were left on a podium between the flowers. What remains of the tower has stood in place in the years since the disaster, with a covering on the building featuring a large green heart accompanied by the words 'forever in our hearts'. The final Grenfell Tower Inquiry report, published in September, concluded victims, bereaved and survivors were 'badly failed' through incompetence, dishonesty and greed. The tower block was covered in combustible products because of the 'systematic dishonesty' of firms who made and sold the cladding and insulation, inquiry chairman Sir Martin Moore-Bick said. News of the Government's demolition decision earlier this year was met with criticism from some bereaved and survivors of the 2017 fire who expressed their upset and shock, saying they felt they had not had their views considered before the decision was taken. Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner later said in an interview that she knew the meeting with those most closely affected was going to be 'really difficult' and that there was 'not a consensus' among everyone over what should happen to the tower. On Saturday, placards read 'this much evidence still no charges' and 'Tories have blood on their hands. Justice for Grenfell'. Large green papier-mache hearts were held aloft, with words including 'hope', 'integrity', 'enough is enough' and 'justice' written across. Around a dozen fire fighters stood to attention on each side of the road outside Ladbroke Grove station, facing the passing crowd with their helmets at their feet. Some members of the Grenfell community walked up to hug them and shake hands. After an hour of walking in silence the crowd gathered for the speeches outside Notting Hill Methodist Church. The Government confirmed in February that engineering advice is that the tower 'is significantly damaged' and will get worse with time. Separately, the Grenfell Tower Memorial Commission has been consulting on plans for a permanent memorial in the area of the tower, with recommendations including a 'sacred space', designed to be a 'peaceful place for remembering and reflecting'. It is expected a planning application for a memorial could be submitted in late 2026. According to the Government's latest figures, published last month, there were 5,052 residential buildings in England which are 11 metres or taller identified as having unsafe cladding as of the end of April. Fewer than half – 2,477 buildings or 49% – had either started or completed remediation works, with just a third – 1,652 buildings or 33% – having had remediation works finished. Labour unveiled its remediation acceleration plan last year, pledging that, by the end of 2029, all buildings more than 59ft (18 metres) tall with unsafe cladding that are on a Government scheme will have been remediated.
Vox
16 hours ago
- Vox
What happens to DOGE without Elon Musk?
Elon Musk holds a news conference with President Donald Trump to mark the end of his tenure as a special government employee overseeing DOGE on May 30 in the Oval Office of the White House. Tom Brenner for Washington Post via Getty Images Elon Musk may be gone from the Trump administration — and his friendship status with President Donald Trump may be at best uncertain — but his whirlwind stint in government certainly left its imprint. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), his pet government-slashing project, remains entrenched in Washington. During his 130-day tenure, Musk led DOGE in eliminating about 260,000 federal employee jobs and gutting agencies supporting scientific research and humanitarian aid. But to date, DOGE claims to have saved the government $180 billion — well short of its ambitious (and frankly never realistic) target of cutting at least $2 trillion from the federal budget. And with Musk's departure still fresh, there are reports that the federal government is trying to rehire federal workers who quit or were let go. For Elaine Kamarck, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, DOGE's tactics will likely end up being disastrous in the long run. 'DOGE came in with these huge cuts, which were not attached to a plan,' she told Today, Explained co-host Sean Rameswaram. Kamarck knows all about making government more efficient. In the 1990s, she ran the Clinton administration's Reinventing Government program. 'I was Elon Musk,' she told Today, Explained. With the benefit of that experience, she assesses Musk's record at DOGE, and what, if anything, the billionaire's loud efforts at cutting government spending added up to. Below is an excerpt of the conversation, edited for length and clarity. There's much more in the full podcast, so listen to Today, Explained wherever you get podcasts, including Apple Podcasts, Pandora, and Spotify. What do you think Elon Musk's legacy is? Well, he will not have totally, radically reshaped the federal government. Absolutely not. In fact, there's a high probability that on January 20, 2029, when the next president takes over, the federal government is about the same size as it is now, and is probably doing the same stuff that it's doing now. What he did manage to do was insert chaos, fear, and loathing into the federal workforce. There was reporting in the Washington Post late last week that these cuts were so ineffective that the White House is actually reaching out to various federal employees who were laid off and asking them to come back, from the FDA to the IRS to even USAID. Which cuts are sticking at this point and which ones aren't? First of all, in a lot of cases, people went to court and the courts have reversed those earlier decisions. So the first thing that happened is, courts said, 'No, no, no, you can't do it this way. You have to bring them back.' The second thing that happened is that Cabinet officers started to get confirmed by the Senate. And remember that a lot of the most spectacular DOGE stuff was happening in February. In February, these Cabinet secretaries were preparing for their Senate hearings. They weren't on the job. Now that their Cabinet secretary's home, what's happening is they're looking at these cuts and they're saying, 'No, no, no! We can't live with these cuts because we have a mission to do.' As the government tries to hire back the people they fired, they're going to have a tough time, and they're going to have a tough time for two reasons. First of all, they treated them like dirt, and they've said a lot of insulting things. Second, most of the people who work for the federal government are highly skilled. They're not paper pushers. We have computers to push our paper, right? They're scientists. They're engineers. They're people with high skills, and guess what? They can get jobs outside the government. So there's going to be real lasting damage to the government from the way they did this. And it's analogous to the lasting damage that they're causing at universities, where we now have top scientists who used to invent great cures for cancer and things like that, deciding to go find jobs in Europe because this culture has gotten so bad. What happens to this agency now? Who's in charge of it? Well, what they've done is DOGE employees have been embedded in each of the organizations in the government, okay? And they basically — and the president himself has said this — they basically report to the Cabinet secretaries. So if you are in the Transportation Department, you have to make sure that Sean Duffy, who's the secretary of transportation, agrees with you on what you want to do. And Sean Duffy has already had a fight during a Cabinet meeting with Elon Musk. You know that he has not been thrilled with the advice he's gotten from DOGE. So from now on, DOGE is going to have to work hand in hand with Donald Trump's appointed leaders. And just to bring this around to what we're here talking about now, they're in this huge fight over wasteful spending with the so-called big, beautiful bill. Does this just look like the government as usual, ultimately? It's actually worse than normal. Because the deficit impacts are bigger than normal. It's adding more to the deficit than previous bills have done. And the second reason it's worse than normal is that everybody is still living in a fantasy world. And the fantasy world says that somehow we can deal with our deficits by cutting waste, fraud, and abuse. That is pure nonsense. Let me say it: pure nonsense. Where does most of the government money go? Does it go to some bureaucrats sitting on Pennsylvania Avenue? It goes to us. It goes to your grandmother and her Social Security and her Medicare. It goes to veterans in veterans benefits. It goes to Americans. That's why it's so hard to cut it. It's so hard to cut it because it's us.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
CRC Synod begins with 34 fewer churches after LGBTQ decision
GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. (WOOD) — As the Christian Reformed Church of North America convenes for its annual assembly, it's doing so with about 34 fewer members in its midst. Delegates and church leaders on Friday began the denomination's annual Synod, meeting at Redeemer University in Ancaster, Ontario in Canada. Through June 19, almost 200 delegates will be working through a packed agenda. 'It's exciting to get together — people from all different backgrounds and walks of life — to talk about the business of the church and make big decisions,' CRCNA General Secretary Zachary King told News 8. 'Even though there can be some tense and difficult moments, it's just really wonderful and cool to see people work together to walk on path together. ….There's a lot of energy and hope in doing this work, even though it can be really difficult sometimes.' Churches prepare to leave CRC following LGBTQ+ decision This year's Synod follows a contentious meeting in 2024, when the denomination determined LGBTQ-affirming churches must repent — or leave. Around 34 churches have since disaffiliated, King said, adding that that number is expected to grow. That includes a number of churches in Grand Rapids. 'We're sad and we're disappointed of course that a significant number of churches … have disaffiliated with our denomination,' he said. 'We pray that somehow in the future, and even in the present, that we might have a good connection. … We hope that they flourish in their communities. … That's heavy, but we feel like it's a necessary moment and we want to navigate it with as much grace and kindness as we can.' After a few years of dialogue around the church's belief that LGBTQ+ relationships are sinful, King said this year, the conversation has 'a different tenor.' 'Obviously we've had a big discussion about human sexuality,' he said. 'I think we completed that discussion. Now we're trying to understand how we can work … better together.' CRC doubles down on forbidding deacon in same-sex marriage at GR church There's now more inner unity, he said, and the direction the denomination is going is more clear. Some items on this year's agenda will work through the impact of last year's decision. A report from CRC-affiliated Calvin University Board of Trustees clarifies how it will approach faculty members who disagree with the denomination's belief on LGBTQ+ relationships and other core beliefs (called confessional issues) of the denomination. Another item will determine the future of its relationship with the Reformed Church of America based on that denomination's stance on LGBTQ relationships, which is to 'live together in the midst of disagreement,' the RCA General Secretary Rev. Eddy Aleman wrote in a letter to the CRC Synod. Also on the agenda is a report from a task force that examined how the church should approach assisted suicide while showing love and support for families and individuals. In its report, the task force affirmed 'that life is precious, so we should not act to end life.' If you or someone you know need help, call the National Suicide Line at 988. Delegates will also discuss questions of funding, church planting and the role of virtual ministry, King said. Many young churches are leaning into using technology like Zoom for worship services, and the CRC is exploring how to leverage that for ministry and connection. 'We also realize that the in-person connection is important too,' King said. 'There's some tension there and we're trying to sort out you know how can we leverage the best of technology while avoiding some of the pitfalls.' Under God, Divisible: Political conflict deepens rift among Christians Overall, the denomination has several churches that are flourishing and growing, King said. 'We have a number of churches that may feel that they're plateaued in terms of their numbers, but they're really impacting their community in a positive way and seeing just a lot of fruit to their ministry,' King said. 'We do have churches that are struggling — as many denominations — but … God is really working through their community connections and some of them are just doing amazing things that only small churches could do.' The CRCNA is streaming Synod proceedings . Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
