Police in Akwesasne Mohawk Territory break up suspected human smuggling operation
The Akwesasne Mohawk Police Service says it disrupted a suspected human smuggling operation in its territory this past weekend.
In a news release, the police service said three people with Brazilian passports were found near Raquette Point, Akwesasne, N.Y., on Saturday. The individuals — a man, a woman, and a child — told police they had been held against their will for several days and were given minimal necessities.
The investigation led police to a home on Cornwall Island, in Ontario, police said.
'While police were actively monitoring the location, two more individuals believed to be migrants were dropped off at the exact location,' the news release said. 'In the interest of public safety, officers entered the residence and located two additional migrants, along with a resident from Akwesasne. All individuals were safely detained. Background checks confirmed that the two additional migrants had active extradition warrants from the United States related to immigration violations.'
The Akwesasne Mohawk Police Service said the investigation remains ongoing and no other information would be made available.
No charges have been announced. Akwesasne police said the operation was carried out with assistance from Saint Regis Mohawk Tribal Police, the RCMP, Sûreté du Québec, and the Canada Border Services Agency.
The Akwesasne Mohawk Police Service has identified persons of interest. Anyone with information is asked to call (613) 575-2340 or submit a secure tip by email at tips@akwesasne.ca. You may also provide an anonymous tip to Seaway Valley Crime Stoppers at 1-800-222-TIPS (8477).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
2 days ago
- CNA
Sean 'Diddy' Combs' lawyer complains about trial secrecy as a famous rapper's name goes unmentioned
A lawyer for Sean 'Diddy' Combs protested the rising tide of secrecy at the hip-hop icon's federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial on Thursday (Jun 12) after Combs and the public were excluded from arguments over whether another famous rapper's name could be disclosed. Defence attorney Marc Agnifilo complained to Judge Arun Subramanian after Combs was excluded from a meeting outside the courtroom between lawyers and the judge. That meeting delayed the final day of weeklong testimony from a woman identified in court only by the pseudonym 'Jane', who dated Combs from 2001 until his September arrest. When her emotional testimony ended, she hugged a prosecutor, Maureen Comey, in front of the jury, which would have drawn an outcry from the defence except she hugged defence attorney Teny Geragos too. Her testimony likely helped both sides. She admitted still loving Combs, but she said she now resents that she felt forced to have sex with strangers to satisfy his sexual fantasies. Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to charges that carry a potential prison sentence of 15 years to life in prison. Prosecutors say he used fame, fortune, violence and threats to manipulate girlfriends into sex with paid sex workers in multi-day events that they later regretted. Defence attorneys say the government is prosecuting consensual sex between adults. Under cross-examination by Geragos, Jane testified Thursday that she flew to Las Vegas in January 2023 with a famous rapper and his girlfriend. Geragos didn't identify the rapper but asked Jane if he had recorded with Combs, 'an individual at the top of the music industry as well ... an icon in the music industry'. She also asked if Combs and the rapper were 'really close'. 'Yes,' Jane replied. Once in Las Vegas, Jane testified, she went with a group including the rapper to dinner, a strip club and a hotel room party, where a sex worker had sex with a woman while a half-dozen others watched. She said there was dancing and the rapper said, 'hey beautiful', and told her he'd always wanted to have sex with her. Jane said she didn't recall exactly when but she flashed her breasts while dancing. The testimony followed the closed-door session Thursday, when lawyers discussed what facts could be disclosed about the hotel room encounter. Agnifilo said the need for a public trial was 'an important issue, a constitutional issue' and objected to so much happening out of the earshot of his client. In response, the judge offered more secrecy, saying 'If your client wishes to be heard ... we can clear this courtroom if need be to address it.' Agnifilo rejected the offer. 'Part of the reason trials are fully public is so if other people realise they know something about an event discussed in a public courtroom, they can come forward and share their recollection of it,' the lawyer said, adding: 'That is kind of the practical side of the constitutional right to a public trial.' A monitor that is used to show exhibits to spectators has been shut off throughout Jane's testimony, although lawyers, the judge, Combs and jurors can view them. Some sidebar conversations between lawyers and the judge have been sealed. The judge also has banned the public from viewing any exhibits containing sexual content, even though the defence has said images from the group sex episodes proves they were consensual acts between adults, and not proof of crimes. And many of the letters to the judge from lawyers each day are filed under seal, preventing the public from quickly knowing, for instance, the details about why prosecutors want a black juror ejected from the jury in mid-trial. The judge has said he'll decide the juror's fate Friday. Defence attorney Alexandra Shapiro has called the prosecution's quest a 'thinly veiled effort to dismiss a black juror'. Jane and Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura, who testified for four days in the trial's first week about her relationship with Combs from 2007 through 2018, both said they participated in the sex marathons for years, with Cassie calling them 'freak-off' nights and Jane referring to them as 'hotel nights'. Agnifilo said the defence consented to Jane testifying with a pseudonym but did not consent to other events related to her testimony and the testimony of other witnesses not being public.
New York Times
2 days ago
- New York Times
Law Enforcement Officers Respond to Reports of Unrest at Migrant Facility
Dozens of law enforcement officials from several policing agencies responded on Thursday to a private immigration detention center in Newark after reports of a disturbance inside. Masked officers carrying plastic handcuffs and pepper spray could be seen entering the facility, known as Delaney Hall, just after 7 p.m., and people standing nearby reported smelling a pungent odor. Earlier on Thursday, Amy Torres, the director of the New Jersey Alliance for Immigrant Justice, said two calls came in on the alliance's emergency hotline from detainees. Relatives with scheduled appointments had not been permitted inside to visit, she said, and detainees were complaining about meager amounts of food and water over the past day. Delaney Hall is run by one of the country's largest private prison companies, the GEO Group, which has a contract with the Trump administration to hold as many as 1,000 migrants at a time. Last month, a clash outside the facility led the Justice Department to charge Representative LaMonica McIver, a New Jersey Democrat, with assault. Ms. McIver, who has maintained her innocence, is scheduled to be arraigned on Monday and has said that she will enter a not-guilty plea. A spokesman for the GEO Group referred questions to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency. Tricia McLaughlin, a spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE, said she was in touch with officials at the facility but was not able to offer an immediate comment. Relatives who had scheduled appointments to visit detainees were gathered outside on Thursday afternoon when a fire truck and then police vehicles from several agencies, including the Newark Police Department and the Essex County Sheriff Department, pulled up. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
CBS News
2 days ago
- CBS News
Abrego Garcia's lawyers ask Maryland judge to fine Trump administration for contempt
Lawyers for Kilmar Abrego Garcia have asked a federal judge in Maryland to impose fines against the Trump administration for contempt, arguing that it flagrantly ignored court orders for several weeks to return him to the U.S. from El Salvador. Abrego Garcia's attorneys said the administration claimed to be powerless to retrieve him, even while it secretly built a human smuggling case against him. The U.S. brought Abrego Garcia to a federal court in Nashville, Tennessee, last week to face those charges. "The Government's defiance has not been subtle," the attorneys said in a filing late Wednesday. "It has been vocal and sustained and flagrant." Request to force the release of federal documents The attorneys are also asking U.S. District Court Judge Paula Xinis to compel the release of documents the federal government withheld by claiming they contain protected state secrets. Or as an alternative, the lawyers suggested a special master to investigate the government's "willful noncompliance" of court orders. "What the Government improperly seeks to hide must be exposed for all to see," Abrego Garcia's attorneys wrote. Their request came a day after the Trump administration said it will ask Xinis to dismiss the case, with U.S. attorneys describing recent accusations by Abrego Garcia's attorneys as baseless, desperate and disappointing. "But the proof is in the pudding — Defendants have returned Abrego Garcia to the United States just as they were ordered to do," they wrote. Contempt was possible, legal experts said Legal experts said last month that the Abrego Garcia case may be headed for contempt. And the request by his attorneys adds to the ongoing friction between the White House and the courts during President Donald Trump's second term. Courts can hold parties to civil litigation or criminal cases in contempt for disobeying their orders. The penalty can take the form of fines or other civil punishments, or even prosecution and jail time, if pursued criminally. But contempt processes are slow and deliberative, and, when the government's involved, there's usually a resolution before penalties kick in. How the Abrego Garcia case got to this point The U.S. mistakenly deported Abrego Garcia to an El Salvador prison in March. The expulsion violated a U.S. immigration judge's order in 2019 that shielded him from deportation to his native country because he likely faced gang persecution there. Abrego Garcia's American wife sued, prompting Xinis to order his return on April 4. The Supreme Court ruled April 10 that the administration must work to bring him back. Arguments ensued over the next several weeks about whether the Trump administration was following those orders or not. Trump also said publicly that he could return Abrego Garcia to the U.S. with a call to El Salvador President Nayib Bukele. Xinis ordered U.S. attorneys to submit documents and testimony to show what the government had done to follow her orders. The Trump administration claimed that much of that information is protected under the state secrets privilege. The judge has not ruled on that matter.
