
Lola Kirke knows she's too young and fame-ish to write a memoir. She did it anyway
When Lola Kirke was a young teen, her 'manny' was a fallen rock musician with boundary issues while a movie star friend of the family she calls Gideon (not his real name) seemed a little too friendly when she got high, as the actor-musician recalls in her collection of essays, 'Wild West Village.' Then there was the time spent visiting a sister in rehab and the day she learned she had a half brother from one of her father's affairs.
So, while Kirke grew up with wealth and privilege (she's the daughter of Bad Company drummer Simon Kirke), and glamorous older siblings (Domino signed to a recording deal in her teens while Jemima became a co-star on 'Girls'), life in her expensive New York brownstone and private school wasn't always easy. She writes about a chaotic family life in a home filled with booze and drugs (Jemima has spoken openly about time in rehab).
Even as Kirke found success on her own, for her prominent role on 'Mozart in the Jungle' among other projects, she was struggling with her sense of who she was, drinking and smoking and sabotaging herself along the way. Now 34, living in Nashville and with a burgeoning country music career and a stable relationship, Kirke has turned to self-reflection, and although the book is subtitled 'Not a Memoir (Unless I Win an Oscar, Die Tragically, or Score a Country #1),' it is very much is a memoir.
Kirke spoke recently with The Times about her unusual upbringing and writing about it. This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
Do you think of yourself now as a country singer or as somebody who sings and acts and now writes?
I think of myself as a person who sings and acts and now writes. I don't think it's wise, at least for me, to identify as anything other than a person. Life's too precarious, and if you're lucky enough to try to make art as your career, it's so volatile that I feel like you have to ground yourself in your personhood first.
Why did you call this not a memoir?
I describe myself as fame-ish, not famous. Writing a memoir at my age, I'm straddling a bizarre line — it's not just a literary memoir, but I'm not fully in the celebrity lane, even though so much of the world in which I grew up was about being somebody. The subtitle is me saying that I know I haven't done the things that you need to do to write a celebrity memoir and poking fun at that idea.
You write about your boyfriend, whom you call The Cowboy, saying that you need to be enough of a 'someone' just to yourself. Have you reached that level of acceptance?
It's taken a lot of work, but I actually feel very grounded in that way now. I'm so grateful because it's just so exhausting to constantly be trying to be somebody to other people. And that's so much of what my book is about.
I know that my parents love me to the best of their ability and very, very deeply, and that I got so much out of those relationships, but I didn't always feel that love. And so my work — whether it's acting or music or writing — is me saying, 'I love you,' and wanting someone to say, 'I love you, too.' Now I'm able to see, I am loved, too, and I don't need to chase something that is very much already there. And that's a relief.
Did you need to find yourself to write the book, or did writing it help you get past your insecurities about your identity?
Writing has helped me discover and articulate who I am in a way that I never knew. So much of great writing when I read it is naming the unnameable. When somebody can put into words things you have felt — whether that's music or prose or poetry or just an advertising slogan — it's incredible. When I began to write about my life, I really did understand it so much better.
I made the mistake of going on Goodreads and the first review, from a woman named Jennifer from Boston, said essentially, 'She sucks and she's not famous enough to write a memoir.'
Then I'd get three good reviews, so I'd keep going back, but the next one would be 'I hate her writing, and who the @#$@ does she think she is?' So I'm getting used to not being liked, and I am grateful to this book and my writing for helping me do that.
Are you naturally funny or were you consciously thinking I need to keep this entertaining so it doesn't feel more weighty than my life really was?
I aspired to be funny my whole life, but it's only recently that people have started to tell me I am funny. Reading my writing, I was able to see how much I use humor both positively and avoidantly, so I learned a lot from editing my own work.
But also when I read my own work during editing I've noticed this distinct voice I have as a writer. People have said, 'Reading your book is just talking to you,' but do you remember Dame Edna? I feel like Dame Edna wrote my book — some delusional grande dame who's so funny. I don't know who that person is, but I guess that's who I am. I think by virtue of the way I grew up, my perspective is going to seem funny in a myriad of ways to other people, whether that's funny or just, 'Oh, she's a little off.'
I have this kind of delusional charm, but that can be a manipulative tactic to survive. I always wanted people to like me and I didn't feel safe in the world for a lot of my life so I had to be very charming to feel secure. And now I'm letting go of that a little bit, and thank God, because it's exhausting. [Switching to a dry, joking tone] It's exhausting being this charming.
You didn't find out you had a half brother until your late teens; he was born with severe brain damage and died at 19; you spent a few years visiting him even though your father never did. How did that impact you?
I do think it softened me and opened me up. As a person who is probably more on the precipice of being a mother myself, it's made me think about what it's like to be a true mother. I think about unconditional love and learning what that is and learning how to give it. I grew up in this world where you being someone is what earns you a place in the world. At least, that was the feeling I had. With him I saw you are worth love no matter who you are. So that will always be with me.
How concerned were you about showing the book to family members?
The rule I tried to implement, and I mostly do, was that I'd only tell stories about other people that they've already revealed themselves in one form or another. But when I shared it with my family, I definitely got feedback of, 'Oh, I've never told anybody that.'
My sisters have been absolutely incredible about the book, which was so heartening to me. I was most scared of their reaction. Their support feels like the sisterly relationship I write about not having so much throughout the book. So that was a real blessing.
My brother asked, 'Why aren't I in the book more?' But he's been very sweet about it — he's 12 years older than me and was pretty much out of the house. But also he just was really good so there isn't enough drama with him.
There have certainly been other people that have been really upset. But some that I thought might be upset have loved it. It's complicated to write about people who are alive and to be written about. [With mock petulance] I have yet to be made into a character in somebody's book…. I'm waiting.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
3 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Scott Wolf and wife Kelley are getting divorced after 3 children and 2 decades of marriage
Actor Scott Wolf and his wife Kelley are getting a divorce. The 'Party of Five' veteran, who currently stars as Dr. Richard Miller on the Fox medical drama 'Doc,' confirmed the split Wednesday, telling The Times in a statement, 'After 21 years of marriage, I have made the most difficult decision of my life, and filed for divorce from my wife Kelley.' Kelley Wolf posted the news of the split on Tuesday on social media. 'This has been a long, quiet journey for me — rooted in hope, patience, and care for our children,' she wrote. 'While I will not speak publicly about the details, I feel peace knowing that I've done everything I can to walk this path with integrity and compassion.' She called Scott Wolf 'one of the best fathers I've ever known and one of the best partners a woman could have the privilege of sharing life with. He is kind, thoughtful, funny, and beautiful in spirit.' Both of them noted that they were focused on their kids, with Scott, 57, saying they were 'the loves of our lives' and Kelley, 48, calling them 'the most extraordinary children.' They share sons Jackson, 16, and Miller, 12, and daughter Lucy, 11. The actor met the veteran of MTV's 'The Real World: New Orleans' through mutual friends in 2002 on a blind date that almost didn't happen. 'We were meeting at a restaurant and she wound up turning up almost a full hour late,' the actor said in 2021 on 'Access Hollywood.' 'I was asking other people at the bar. I was like, 'How long do you wait for a blind date?' And they were like, 'Kind of an hour tops.' So she made it under the wire.' Turns out she was stuck in 'horrible' New York traffic, he said. They married in 2004 in her hometown of Fayetteville, Ark., and honeymooned in Africa.


New York Times
7 hours ago
- New York Times
Meet Our New Restaurant Critics
This morning, The Times announced that Tejal Rao and Ligaya Mishan are our new chief restaurant critics. It's the first time the job is being shared by two people and the first time we're not trying to hide their faces. Also, they will be filing full-length, starred reviews from around the country, not just New York City. You can read more about how it will all work here. Tejal lives in Los Angeles, and joined The Times in 2016 after working as a restaurant critic at The Village Voice and Bloomberg News. Ligaya, who wrote our Hungry City restaurant column from 2012 to 2020 and has been an Eat columnist at the Times Magazine and a writer at large for T Magazine, is in Manhattan. I asked them about their early restaurant memories, how they read menus, what they eat at home and what scares them about the gig. First of all, congratulations! This is both a dream job and very daunting. How's it feel? What are you most looking forward to — and what are you most worried about? Tejal: It's exactly that: dreamy and daunting. I have a running list of all the things I'm worried about, and my therapist is on vacation this week — I'll save it for her! Ligaya: What I've always loved most in writing about restaurants is how much I learn. It's an entry point not only to a particular cuisine, but to a part of New York — and, now, of America — I might not otherwise have a chance to know. As for worries: I want to do justice to every place I visit, and I hope I will. It doesn't matter that I've been a writer for years — the blank page is always slightly terrifying. I'll try to keep in mind what the head of my daughter's school once told me: 'I don't worry. I do the work.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


New York Times
10 hours ago
- New York Times
The Times Has Appointed Two Chief Restaurant Critics. Here's How That Will Work.
On Wednesday, The Times announced that Tejal Rao and Ligaya Mishan are the new chief restaurant critics, filling — and expanding — the role Pete Wells left in 2024. This appointment is one of a few changes we're making as our food criticism becomes more national, and as we bring it to life in new ways. Who Are the Critics? Both Rao and Mishan are longtime reporters and critics for The Times, though this is the first time either has been chief critic. Most recently, Rao has been a California-based critic at large, writing broadly about food culture. Mishan was an Eat columnist for the Times Magazine and a writer at large at T magazine. She also wrote the Hungry City restaurant column from 2012 to 2020. Why Does The Times Need Two Critics? For decades, the restaurant critic for The Times focused almost exclusively on New York City, writing weekly reviews and notebooks and awarding star ratings to individual restaurants. But with subscribers in every state, and great restaurants in each of them, we'll now use two critics to deliver starred reviews of restaurants all over the country. The idea is to expand upon the work we started with the Restaurant List, our annual national roundup of the 50 places our staff is most excited about, and our lists of the best restaurants in cities like Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco, Philadelphia and Austin, Texas. Who Does What? Rao will be dedicated entirely to the national dining scene. Mishan will split her time between reviewing the best and most newsworthy restaurants in New York City and covering the rest of the country with Rao. The goal is to capture particular moments in American dining — the restaurants that are most interesting, exciting and emblematic of our times. With All That Travel, Will There Be Fewer New York Reviews? New York is one of the world's great restaurant cities. It's where The Times built its authority on the subject of where best to eat. We have no plans to back away from that, and in fact will offer even more New York restaurant coverage. In the coming months, we'll start publishing brief, starred reviews from other Times critics. The Where to Eat newsletter will continue to send restaurant recommendations to subscribers' inboxes every week. And, of course, we'll keep producing The Times's annual list of the 100 Best Restaurants in New York City. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.