‘Who would ever have thought it, me and SF working together': Court hears messages allegedly sent by loyalist activist Jamie Bryson
A series of Twitter messages allegedly exchanged between loyalist activist Jamie Bryson and the account of a Sinn Féin member in advance of a Northern Assembly committee meeting were aired in court on Tuesday.
The evidence included a message allegedly sent by Mr Bryson which said 'Who would ever have thought it, me and SF working together as the DUP squirm! Unreal!'
Mr Bryson is one of three men currently on trial at Belfast Crown Court on charges arising from a meeting of the Assembly's Finance and Personnel Committee.
In September 2015, the committee was investigating how Northern Ireland property loans were handled by the National Asset Management Agency (Nama) and on September 23rd of that year, Mr Bryson gave evidence at the meeting.
READ MORE
During the session, he named a number of people, including the DUP's Peter Robinson, who he claimed would benefit financially from the Nama deal.
[
Stormont rules were subverted to cause 'political embarrassment' to Peter Robinson, Nama trial hears
Opens in new window
]
It is the crown's case that the rules of this committee – chaired by Sinn Féin's Daithi McKay – were subverted to cause political embarrassment to Mr Robinson who, in September 2015, had occupied the position of first minister.
The crown also alleges that due to messages exchanged between Mr Bryson and the two Sinn Féin members Mr McKay and Thomas Gerard O'Hara prior to the meeting, there was manipulation of how this evidence was presented.
Mr Bryson (35), of Rosepark, Donaghadee, Co Down, and Mr O'Hara (41), of Lisnahunshin Road, Cullybackey, Co Antrim, have both been charged that on dates between September 1st and 24th, 2015, they 'conspired together and with Daithí McKay to commit an offence of misconduct in a public office'.
Mr McKay (43), of Loughan Road, Dunnamanagh, Co Tyrone, has been charged with misconduct in a public office on September 23rd, 2015.
All three defendants have denied the charges levelled against them.
During today's hearing, a series of messages which the crown say were exchanged between Mr Bryson and Mr McKay, and also between Mr Bryson and the Twitter account of Mr O'Hara, were aired.
The messages were presented in court as screenshots from Twitter that were sent and received before the committee session was held.
In the alleged messages between Mr Bryson and Mr McKay, Mr Bryson talked of the need for 'transparency' when giving his evidence, with Mr McKay reminding Mr Bryson to keep within the committee's terms of reference.
The non-jury trial, now in its second week, also heard of a series of messages allegedly exchanged between Mr Bryson and the Twitter account of Mr O'Hara the day before the committee meeting was held.
Messages from Mr O'Hara's account to Mr Bryson include 'A wee suggestion for you ... when talking about Robinson, refer to him as Person A. Say what you have to say about him, referring to him as Person A, then in your final line say Person A is Peter Robinson, MLA. It means the committee cannot interrupt you and it means that you don't have to say Robbo's name until the very last second then it's job done.'
In a further exchange, a message sent from Mr O'Hara's account told Mr Bryson, 'Read the top table and don't snap back at the DUP. Kill then with kindness. Be professional and courteous.'
Mr Bryson is alleged to have replied, 'Who would ever have thought it, me and SF working together as the DUP squirm! Unreal' to which the account of Mr O'Hara replied, 'You will be trending by teatime, lol.'
The non-jury trial heard evidence from a digital expert who was asked to examine the screenshots.
This expert ruled that while there was no evidence to suggest they were not genuine, he could not rule out that they had been fabricated or modified.
Also called to give evidence was high-profile solicitor Paul Tweed.
Under cross-examination by Mr Bryson's barrister, John Larkin KC, Mr Tweed was questioned about a book written by Mr Bryson on the sale of Nama's property portfolio.
Entitled Cerberus The Three-Headed Dog and sold on Amazon, Mr Tweed was asked about legal correspondence regarding the book and its contents and whether any legal action was ultimately taken.
Declining to answer, Mr Tweed said to do so would breach 'client confidentiality'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
More than 60 officers injured after five nights of disorder in Northern Ireland, says PSNI
Several Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) officers were injured in a fifth consecutive night of unrest in Co Antrim and disorder spreading to Co Derry and elsewhere. More than 60 officers have been injured while protecting the community from 'ongoing disorder' this week, according to the PSNI. Police said three males were arrested overnight. 'Disorder and violence broke out in Portadown with officers coming under sustained attack with heavy masonry and fireworks thrown at them,' a PSNI spokesman said. He said officers used various public order tactics, including a water cannon. READ MORE A 14-year-old male and 20-year-old man were arrested, on suspicion of 'riotous behaviour' and are in police custody, the spokesman said. Police in Co Derry dealt with disorder in the Tullyally area over the course of several hours last night and early this morning. A police vehicle's front window was smashed, the spokesman said. A male arrested at about 2.20am remains in custody. Playing fields and property were damaged in the Killeavey Road area of Newry as a large group set a pitch and bins on fire. Stones were thrown at the windows of a hotel in the Newtownabbey area in Belfast, while a car was set on fire in the Hesketh Gardens area several kilometres away. The PSNI is treating this as a racially motivated hate crime. A group of Filipino nationals have been forced to leave their Ballymena home amid ongoing violence in the town. Video: Reuters Assistant Chief Constable Melanie Jones said it is 'deeply disturbing to see such young members of our communities involved in, and in some areas driving, criminal activity'. She appealed to parents and guardians to 'speak to your children about the impact their behaviour is having on the safety of our local communities and the impact this could have on their lives if arrested, charged and prosecuted'. The assistant chief constable outlined that the PSNI continues to have a 'heightened presence' in local communities to de-escalate violence, is making arrests and will continue to make public appeals with photos of suspects. She said the force is 'investigating' social media posts inciting hate and disorder. The PSNI has released images of four individuals officers want to identify and interview in connection with ongoing investigations. 'I am asking the wider community to step forward and help us. It is in all of our interests, and in the interests of justice, that those responsible are dealt with and I would urge anyone who may have information to bring it forward,' said Ms Jones.
RTÉ News
13 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Did Ireland's 'bad bank' NAMA work?
At the height of the financial crisis in 2009 Ireland set up the National Asset Management Agency, better known as NAMA. Its purpose was to deal with the loans given by banks to developers and builders - many of which would never be repaid. By any measure, it was one of the biggest decisions in the State's history, taken by a Fianna Fáil and Green Party coalition. With unemployment rising, taxes increasing and general loathing of boomtime bankers, there was little surprise it was an unpopular decision. At the time, the Government had guaranteed the Irish banks, which meant that the Irish taxpayer was on the hook for their losses. The financial institutions were highly exposed to the plunging property market. Confidence in the banks steadily ebbed and it became impossible to calculate the losses they faced. As banking was grinding to a halt, loss of confidence fed into the wider economy, which was rapidly contracting. The bond market, which had provided funding to banks, walked away from the Irish financial system. Irish banks had to borrow from the European Central Bank through a mechanism called emergency liquidity assistance. The amounts borrowed from the ECB began to rocket and alarm spread across the euro zone about the unfolding banking crisis in Ireland. The challenge was how to stop the rot in the Irish financial system. One of those involved in designing a mechanism to deal with the banks; bad loans was Professor Alan Ahearne who was advisor to the late Brian Lenihan, Minister for Finance during the crash. Professor Ahearne advocated using an Asset Management Company (AMC) to deal with the problem: "I had seen AMCs used previously when I was at the Federal Reserve in the US. This was a prominent tool used before." It was deployed in South Korea and Malaysia during the Asian crash and in the US to deal with the Savings & Loans crisis in the 1980s and 1990s. The idea was that a State-backed company would buy failing property loans from the banks at market prices. When those borrowings were transferred, confidence in the banks would return and they would be able to access funding again. Professor Ahearne says: "There were two key objectives: stability for the banks and the public finances." NAMA, the so-called bad bank, was designed by officials in the Department of Finance, the National Treasury Management Agency and the Attorney General's office. The figures involved were nothing short of enormous. During the financial crisis, politicians of all hues worried that banks were hopelessly unrealistic about the losses they faced. Many bankers were slow to admit that lending approved by them had become horrible miscalculations which would be paid for by the taxpayer. A day of reckoning came when NAMA bought loans from AIB, Bank of Ireland, EBS, Irish Nationwide and Anglo Irish Bank. The borrowings were valued by the banks at €74 billion. NAMA paid a total of €31.8 billion for them - that left a black hole in excess of €40 billion in the banks' balance sheets. The gap was plugged by the Irish taxpayer. When the loans were transferred to NAMA, some of the writedowns were as large as 70%. That transaction was critical and effectively crystallised the losses of the banks. Professor Ahearne says: "The crash created those losses. You have to recognise those losses one way or another." The fact that the Government had guaranteed the banks meant the losses would have to be paid by taxpayers, regardless of what mechanism was used to clean up the mess. After the loans were transferred, NAMA faced a huge task. Brendan McDonagh became its chief executive, seconded from the NTMA to start NAMA from scratch. His job was to sell off the 60,000 individual assets bought from the banks and repay NAMA's €31.8 billion in borrowings. Hot on the heels of the agency's creation, Ireland entered a bailout in late 2010. The Troika or bailout team, made up of the European Commission, the International Monetary Fund and European Central Bank, provided €67.5 billion to the State. Representatives of that triumvirate took control of Ireland's financial decisions. NAMA was under enormous pressure to sell loans quickly and repay its debts. But it was doing so at a time of depressed property prices. NAMA's decisions were frequently controversial. It had a series of high-profile legal spats with developers who fought the agency in the courts. Some questioned whether better value could be obtained if NAMA waited for property prices to recover. One prominent example was the Battersea Power Station site in central London. It was part-owned by Treasury Holdings and its loans came under NAMA's control, which sold its stake in the asset to a Malaysian consortium in 2011. The sale was criticised by Treasury Holdings' former owner Johnny Ronan who said "a very shortsighted view was taken, especially by NAMA." But Professor Ahearne argues: "The main aim of NAMA was to restore stability to the banking system and financial conditions. Judged by that, it did achieve its aims." The agency will be dissolved at the end of 2025. It has paid back its borrowings and generated a larger than expected surplus to the Exchequer. This week, Brendan McDonagh said: "In the early days people said NAMA was going to lose €8 billion, €10 billion or €12 billion. And today we stand here making €5.5 billion." But some questions remain to be answered and some lessons remain to be learned. Would it have achieved more value if allowed further time as property prices recovered? Was it put under too much pressure to sell quickly? To what extent did its establishment help the Irish banks get back on their feet? And did that allow Ireland to recover faster than expected too? Professor Ahearne believes there is merit in a "look back study" given the scale of the policy intervention. Mr McDonagh said the agency put the taxpayer at the heart of each of its decisions. NAMA's chairman Aidan Williams said: "We have never lost sight of the fact that NAMA, unlike other commercial entities, was designed to disappear." But it won't entirely vanish. Ten legacy legal cases tied to assets worth less than €20m will be taken over by the NTMA next year. Mr McDonagh will return to the NTMA after withdrawing his name for consideration to lead the Government's housing activation office, amid political fallout over his proposed salary. This week he said it had yet to be decided what he would do in the NTMA or if he would retain his €430,000 salary. Did NAMA work? It certainly did what it was charged with doing, and its critics have become notably less vocal.
Irish Times
14 hours ago
- Irish Times
Rent reforms will pull up the drawbridge on future renters
The Government came to power with an urgent mandate to resolve the housing crisis . It's had an inauspicious start. There were fewer than 6,000 new home completions in the first three months of the year, according to Department of Housing figures published last month. While that's up 2 per cent on the year, it leaves a mountain to climb for the Government to hit its target of growing output by more than a third to 41,000 this year – and ratcheting up incrementally to 60,000 in 2030. Recent developments suggest this administration is as short-sighted and flighty as every other in recent times when it comes to housing. Take the plan to set up a housing activation office – one of the better ideas to come from the Department of Housing of late – aimed at getting a crack team of officials to move quickly on addressing barriers to the delivery of critical infrastructure to boost housing development. READ MORE [ John McManus: Government had to choose tenants over investors Opens in new window ] Minister for Housing James Browne's planned appointment of National Asset Management Agency (Nama) chief executive Brendan McDonagh as housing tsar descended into political farce when the Government baulked at Opposition criticism that he would retain his Nama salary of some €430,000. McDonagh, a very credible figure whose bond to public service isn't questioned even by his sharpest critics, had little option but to pull his name on May 1st when Tánaiste Simon Harris let it be known that he was peeved about not being kept in the loop. Appearing on The Late Late Show the following evening, Harris told middle Ireland that he did not think such a salary was a fair one. An effective housing tsar would be worth multiples of the controversial figure. Either way, McDonagh remains an employee of the State on that package. He's due to return to the National Treasury Management Agency (NTMA) once Nama – to which he is seconded – is wound down at the end of this year. Further evidence of political expedience remaining the order of the day is to be found, too, in the fresh stab this week at rent reforms. Currently, rent increases in rent pressure zones (RPZ), which covers about half the land area of the State, cannot be greater than the rate of inflation or 2 per cent – whichever is lower. A planned new nationwide control system – set to fully kick in from March 2026 – would also see rent increases for tenancies capped in most cases by inflation or a maximum cap of 2 per cent. However, landlords would be able to reset rents at the going market rate when a tenant leaves. Smaller landlords with three or fewer units will have to offer rolling six-year tenancies, while large ones will not be able to evict a tenant who has complied with their obligations except in very limited circumstances. [ Rent changes: How will tenants be impacted by the plans for Ireland's rental market? Opens in new window ] Rent control for new apartments constructed following enactment of the legislation would be linked to inflation. This, the Government said, should 'provide certainty, clarity, and encourage investment'. If only. There's a body of academic studies that point to rent controls in general affecting construction. Konstantin Kholodilin, a senior researcher with the German Institute for Economic Research in Berlin, last year reviewed 122 empirical published studies on rent controls internationally, spanning 1967-2023. Two-thirds of those studies that assessed the impact of rent caps on new residential development found they depressed construction, he said. Irish private-rental-sector construction was booming during the phase of RPZ rent controls between 2016 and mid-2021. But that was at a time when increases were limited to 4 per cent and interest rates globally were at ultra-low levels. Since then we have seen the maximum rent cap cut by half, construction costs spiral, and global interest rates spike (though they have since come off their highs). Construction in the private rental sector has all but evaporated. Although Approved Housing Bodies and the Land Development Agency have stepped in to address part of the gap in apartment building, they are focused on social and affordable accommodation. Construction and finance industry figures say uncertainty caused by ever-shifting housing policy is more off-putting for investors than individual tweaks in themselves. With the latest rules delayed until next March, can investors willing to consider new schemes even commit before then? Add in at least another three years before any new supply comes on stream, and you're talking about the end of the decade at the earliest for those brave enough to deliver. There is nothing in the plan that would curtail an ongoing trend of small landlords exiting the market, further tightening supply. Sherry FitzGerald, the largest estate agent in the country, estimates that landlords fleeing the rental market accounted for 30 per cent of all home sales in the first quarter of the year. Allowing owners new builds to link rents to inflation – a volatile index – compounds uncertainty for investors. Consumer price inflation is running at 1.7 per cent. The incoming measures may serve existing tenants well, but effectively pull up the drawbridge on future renters. People are likely to stay put for longer. This, along with a dearth of new builds, will further depress available stock and – all else being equal – push up what are already some the highest open market rental costs in Europe.
