"He played a guy who hadn't played in three months" - Windy says Redick's 'immature' coaching cost the Lakers this season
There's plenty of blame to go around when it comes to the Los Angeles Lakers' failed postseason run. Some pointed to Luka Doncic's matador defense. Some cited LeBron James' fourth-quarter shortcomings, especially in Games 4 and 5, when Bron totaled a mere three points in the final periods of those games.
However, ESPN's Brian Windhorst emphasized that the bulk of the blame must go to the team's head coach, JJ Redick, for the way he led the team this postseason.
Redick's not there yet
While the former NBA sharpshooter-turned-head coach did well in steering the Lakers to the third seed after the regular season, everyone knows the postseason is a different animal. And while the former Duke Blue Devil has experience, it came as a player, not a coach.
Advertisement
Redick's lack of experience in leading a team through the playoffs was evident in his questionable rotations and inability to make adjustments when things weren't going well. This became especially apparent in the series' last two games, wherein Windhorst noted JJ coached "immaturely."
"I don't mean this in a personal way—JJ Redick coached very immaturely in this series. He was still seething and upset about the previous games, to the point where Reggie Miller said on the broadcast last night he had to try to calm him down in the pregame meeting because JJ was acting, you know, frankly, childishly," Windy stated on "Get Up."
Redick looked troubled long before Game 5 even tipped off when JJ stormed off his pre-game presser after being asked whether he would rely on his assistants to help him with his player rotation decisions. This came on the heels of his bizarre decision to play only five players in the entire second half of Game 4.
However, his most head-scratching coaching decision came in the fourth quarter of Game 5. With the Purple & Gold's season hanging in the balance, down by three with only 5:36 left, Redick inserted big man Maxi Kleber — who was playing in his first game back after missing 43 straight games because of foot surgery — into the game.
Advertisement
"And then in this game, he played a guy who hadn't played in three months ahead of centers that he had on his roster. He played Maxi Kleber. He had never even practiced with the Lakers. Maxi Kleber's on the court with five minutes to go in, like, a two-possession game. That is not a rational decision," Windhorst noted.
Related: "Kevin's counter to that was Larry needs to get a life" - Why Kevin McHale never appreciated Larry Bird's outlook on his pre-game approach
Minimal to no adjustments
Kendrick Perkins criticized Redick, accusing him of being stubborn and fixated on proving that his approach was the right one. From failing to formulate a suitable defensive game plan to playing a 40-year-old LeBron at five, it was clear that the rookie head coach wasn't ready for the moment.
Advertisement
"Did JJ Redick make any adjustments in this series to adjust to the Minnesota Timberwolves? No. To the size, the athleticism, the length? No, absolutely not. He was stuck in his ways and harped on playing this small ball lineup and leaving LeBron James, a 40-year-old senior citizen, at the five position to battle with Rudy, Julius Randle, Naz Reid, and Jaden McDaniels," Perk stated.
"At what point are you, as the head coach, going to make adjustments, especially when you're down in the series? But instead, you're trying to prove to the rest of the world that your way is going to work, and it didn't," the former NBA champion added.
Experience is invaluable, especially on a stage as pivotal as the NBA Playoffs. For JJ, his inexperience was evident. Redick's lack of familiarity with high-stakes situations, combined with his stubborn approach, ultimately denied the Lakers the opportunity to advance in the playoffs.
Related: "I didn't play good enough to help us be successful" - Austin Reaves shoulders blame for Lakers' first-round exit

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
ESPN's Stephen A Smith floats hypothetical Ukraine-Russia strategy if he were president
Stephen A. Smith had a tough question put onto his lap during Wednesday's edition of "First Take" – would he rather be president of the United States or the next New York Knicks head coach? Smith had to think about it as he's floated the possibility of running for president and has added his voice to some of the hot-button political issues debated in that particular arena. But the Knicks also fired Tom Thibodeau and have a position open. The ESPN personality didn't necessarily like the idea of working under Knicks team owner James Dolan and said he may like to be president more than the next head coach for the team in orange and blue. "Can you see Stephen A. trying to negotiate the Ukraine-Russia situation?" Chris "Mad Dog" Russo asked. "I wouldn't try to negotiate it. I would work with the European Union. I would work with the United Nations. I would do what I could to empower us. I don't want to give Ukraine unlimited funds, but I know that Russia's ultimate quest is to recapture Europe and I don't want that to happen. Therefore, I would help out Ukraine." Russo applauded Smith but hedged on going any further in the political realm. Smith told ABC News in April that he had no choice but to consider a presidential run. "I have no choice, because I've had elected officials — and I'm not going to give their names — coming up to me. I've had folks who are pundits come up to me. I've had folks that got a lot of money, billionaires and others, that have talked to me about exploratory committees and things of that nature. I'm not a politician. I've never had a desire to be a politician," Smith said. Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
The Mind-Blowing Second Coming of the Oklahoma City Thunder
On the leaderboard of all-time N.B.A. finals appearances — Lakers (32), Celtics (23), Warriors (12) — you will have to scan very far down to find the Oklahoma City Thunder. This week, when the Thunder face the Indiana Pacers for the championship, it will be the team's second trip. That might not sound impressive — until you consider that the franchise has existed for only 17 years. (The Celtics have been around since 1946.) The Thunder was born, chaotically, in 2008, and since then the team has operated at a level of success that puts many older organizations to shame. In its eyeblink of an existence, OKC has made five conference finals and produced three league M.V.P.s. Since 2009, it has won more regular-season games than any team except the Celtics. Thunder players, past and present, have driven a disproportionate amount of the league's recent drama. In a sport where relevance is hard to sustain, OKC seems overdue for a down period — underachieving stars, iffy chemistry, a slow slide into mediocrity. Instead, somehow, the Thunder are better than they have ever been. This season, the team won a shocking 68 games, tied for the fifth-most in N.B.A. history, and smashed the record for a stat called point differential — basically, a measure of how badly you steamroll everything in your path. (OKC outscored opponents by an average of 12.9 points per game, breaking the 1972 Lakers' average of 12.3.) This Thunder team is young, feisty, wild, precise, mean, giddy and overloaded with talent. It enters the finals as heavy favorites to win its first championship. No team, however, reaches the peak of basketball glory without at least one near-death experience. OKC's came a few weeks ago, against the Denver Nuggets, in Game 7 of the second round of the playoffs. The series was an instant classic. The fact that the Thunder survived, and the way they did so, is a perfect illustration of what makes the team so special. For OKC, the first round of the playoffs went exactly according to plan: They annihilated the Memphis Grizzlies, winning the opening game by 51. But that joy didn't last for long. Because in the second round, the Thunder ran into a serious problem — one of the biggest problems in the history of basketball. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
ESPN Anchor Gives Prognosis Before He Undergoes Cancer Surgery
Longtime ESPN anchor Jay Harris said Thursday he has prostate cancer and will undergo surgery next week. (Watch the video below.) The 'SportsCenter' veteran said on 'Good Morning America' he'll be away from work for about a month, 'and then I'm coming back better than ever.' Asked by host Michael Strahan about the prognosis, Harris replied, 'My doctor is quite optimistic. Per my last scan, nothing has spread. So once we take out the prostate, hopefully that'll be it.' Harris said he has been taking advice from 'SportsCenter' colleague Hannah Storm, who recently announced she was diagnosed with breast cancer. Harris also said he has received 'real talk' from another ESPN personality, Brian Custer, a prostate cancer survivor. Harris, 60, has been on the 'SportsCenter' desk since 2003. He said he wanted to share his diagnosis to encourage Black men to get the conversation going about their health issues. 'By not talking about them,' he said, 'we ... sentence ourselves to death by not talking.' ESPN And Anchor Part Ways After 25 Years -- And His Goodbye Is Bittersweet Shannon Sharpe Will 'Step Aside' From ESPN Amid $50 Million Sexual Assault Lawsuit ESPN's Stephen A. Smith Seriously Considering Running For President