logo
New bill seeks to regulate short-term rentals in cities and towns

New bill seeks to regulate short-term rentals in cities and towns

Yahoo18-03-2025

Homeowners in North Carolina could finally get clarity on the rights they have to rent out their homes or rooms on a short-term basis, like through websites such as Airbnb or VRBO. The short-term rental industry has led to lawsuits and divided neighborhoods, and confused local governments trying to navigate the complex legal ramifications of regulating rentals.
North Carolina Senate Bill 291 provides homeowners clear guidance on what local governments can regulate, something the state does not currently have. The bill explicitly prohibits local governments from outright banning short-term rentals (STRs), while laying out what regulations those municipalities can adopt or enforce.
The bill states cities and towns cannot limit the number of nights the property is rented, require the owner to stay at the property at any time, or classify rentals as commercial use.
It does allow the regulation of short-term rentals, letting cities and towns limit the number of renters to two adults per bedroom, require a parking plan with one space per bedroom, restrict short-term rentals to residential zones, and require the host to be within a 50-mile radius while the property is being rented. That provision would make it illegal for someone in Charlotte to rent out their beach or mountain house.
Local ordinances can also require a rental operator to obtain a permit for up to $25, which can be revoked if the rental incurs five health and safety violations within a 12-month period, as long as the host has an opportunity to contest and remedy the violations.
The bill starts by addressing the constitutional rights of homeowners to do what they want to with their own property. It also criticizes the efforts of some local governments to restrict STRs, stating 'Cities often frustrate tourism and infringe on property owners' private property rights by adopting ordinances that inhibit property owners' right to use their property they see fit.'
The bill also notes the positive impact STRs have on the state saying, 'Short-term rentals provide housing options for transitory workers, including nurses, tradespeople, and executives.'
Cities and counties like Charlotte, Cornelius, Matthews, and Iredell have considered and attempted to regulate STRs. This is not the first time lawmakers have attempted to provide guidance through state law, but previous efforts have not come to fruition. The opinions on the legality and attempts the regulate industry continue to cause divide in communities.
Federal judge rules on lawsuit that could decide future of NC short-term rentals
Short-term rentals are not a new concept, but the quick and easy access to rentals through apps like Airbnb and VRBO have put STRs in the spotlight in recent years. The technology and simplicity have made it easier than ever for homeowners to offer their homes to travelers as an alternative to hotels. But unlike hotels, the lack of statutory regulations has opened the door to legal challenges and debates on the rights of homeowners.
In North Carolina, the Vacation Rental Act – written years before the growth in popularity of online platforms like Airbnb – outlines the rights of tenants, but not the rights of homeowners. In the absence of clear requirements from the General Assembly, local governments have attempted to tackle the subject on their own, prompting lawsuits and contentious meetings for city councils and town commissions.
A 2023 lawsuit brought by homeowners in Wilmington, N.C., ended with the court declaring the city's rental restrictions illegal, which has shaped how other cities across the state address regulations. If enacted, the bill would help both homeowners and local governments have uniformity when it comes to rental rights, removing the current patchwork regulations that often vary from community to community.
On Monday, the bill passed its first reading in the N.C. Senate and was referred to the Committee on Rules and Operations of the Senate. Both chambers of the legislature would need to approve three readings of the bill before it could become law.
VIDEO: Neighbors share concerns, criticism for hostel-style Charlotte Airbnb

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Funeral arrangements released for former Kentucky Rep. Charles Miller
Funeral arrangements released for former Kentucky Rep. Charles Miller

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Funeral arrangements released for former Kentucky Rep. Charles Miller

LEXINGTON, Ky. (FOX 56) — Funeral arrangements have been made for a former state representative and longtime educator. The Louisville Democratic Party announced on June 8 that Charles 'Charlie' Miller died. Funeral arrangements released for former Kentucky Rep. Charles Miller Artificial intelligence is getting tougher to spot in Kentucky: Media studies expert helps tell the difference Lexington man who escaped Lee County jail by imitating brother arrested Miller's visitation is Thursday, June 12, from noon to 8 p.m. at the Pleasure Ridge Park Performing Arts Theater. His funeral will be Friday, June 13, at 10 a.m. in the new gym at Pleasure Ridge Park High School. Miller represented District 28 in the Kentucky House of Representatives from January 1998 to January 2023. He also previously served as the principal at Pleasure Ridge Park High School for Jefferson County Public Schools. Bill could make federal minimum wage $15: Kentucky among states paying less than that Kentucky sitting near bottom of rankings in environmental protection: Study Airbnb generates an estimated $590 million in Kentucky in 2024 Ballotpedia said Miller also served as a member of the board of directors for Columbia Hospital, Humana Hospital, and Norton Hospital. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Aldermen advance measure allowing Airbnb bans in Chicago precincts
Aldermen advance measure allowing Airbnb bans in Chicago precincts

Yahoo

time13 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Aldermen advance measure allowing Airbnb bans in Chicago precincts

Aldermen took a step Wednesday toward giving themselves the power to ban Airbnb's and other short-term rentals from opening in their wards. The City Council's License and Consumer Protection Committee advanced the ordinance that would allow aldermen to unilaterally block new short-term rentals one precinct at a time. It could now face a final vote by all aldermen as soon as next week. Sponsor Ald. Anthony Napolitano, 41st, called the city's current ordinance made a decade ago 'extremely sloppy.' The existing law allows short-term rentals to be blocked only when 25% of a precinct's registered voters sign a petition calling for it. 'This is the only ordinance written in the city of Chicago where, when there is a problem in the industry, the onus is put on residents to fix it,' Napolitano said. The Far Northwest Side alderman's ordinance seeks to reverse that, allowing aldermen to block short-term rentals in a precinct on their own. It would then give companies the chance to overturn the ban by collecting signatures from 10% of the precinct's voters. Most aldermen in attendance backed the ordinance in a voice vote. Several cited issues in their ward with disruptive parties at short-term rentals, a problem Ald. Brendan Reilly, 42nd, said is 'on steroids' in dense downtown high rises. 'The guests are taking over common areas, pool decks, lobbies, fitness rooms,' he said. 'With the late night parties and noise complaints, et cetera, God help you if you own a condo next to one of these nightly rental units.' Napolitano argued the ordinance will not hurt short-term rental companies, but instead simply gives aldermen a tool to advocate for residents when issues arise. But Airbnb is strongly opposed to the proposal. 'Alderman Napolitano's ordinance amendment is an over-broad and misguided violation of Chicagoans' property rights, which would punish responsible homeowners and local businesses who rely on the income from travel on short-term rentals — especially in neighborhoods outside of Chicago's traditional tourism hubs,' Airbnb spokesperson Jonathan Buckner said in a statement Wednesday. Mayor Brandon Johnson is continuing to not take a side on the issue. Asked where he stood on the ordinance at a Wednesday morning news conference, he said he wanted to 'continue to ensure that we are building a safe, affordable city.' 'This particular measure, quite frankly, I'll have to look into a little bit deeper,' Johnson said. 'But I know that there are a number of alders who mean well and are trying to show up for their particular pocket of the city.' Several aldermen noted the absence of staff from Johnson's Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection, adding that they wished someone could answer questions about how bans could affect tax revenue. Alds. Matt O'Shea, 19th, and Bill Conway, 34th, voted against the measure, with O'Shea noting taxes on the rentals sent around $4 million to fight domestic violence. 'Have we thought of how we are going to replace that?' O'Shea asked. 'It's been my experience working with Airbnb that when a problem is identified, it's addressed.' Ald. Marty Quinn, 13th, used the city's current process requiring residents' signatures to ban short-term rentals from every precinct in his Southwest Side ward. The whole-ward ban took 12,000 signatures and seven years to complete, he said. The ward is '95% single family dwellings,' and short-term rentals 'would have an adverse impact on our quality of life,' Quinn said. Asked what he thinks of Airbnb's argument that the ban is similar to historic racist efforts to keep Black and Latino people out of certain neighborhoods, Quinn called it a 'desperate statement from a company who got exactly what they wanted' when the original ordinance passed. 'I'm not saying that Airbnb isn't good in some parts of the city,' he said. 'It's just not good in the Bungalow Belt, and I have 12,000 signatures that would suggest that.' Aldermen also Wednesday advanced a measure to crack down on illegal pedicabs with potential impoundments.

Aldermen advance measure allowing Airbnb bans in Chicago precincts
Aldermen advance measure allowing Airbnb bans in Chicago precincts

Chicago Tribune

time16 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Aldermen advance measure allowing Airbnb bans in Chicago precincts

Aldermen took a step Wednesday toward giving themselves the power to ban Airbnb's and other short-term rentals from opening in their wards. The City Council's License and Consumer Protection Committee advanced the ordinance that would allow aldermen to unilaterally block new short-term rentals one precinct at a time. It could now face a final vote by all aldermen as soon as next week. Sponsor Ald. Anthony Napolitano, 41st, called the city's current ordinance made a decade ago 'extremely sloppy.' The existing law allows short-term rentals to be blocked only when 25% of a precinct's registered voters sign a petition calling for it. 'This is the only ordinance written in the city of Chicago where, when there is a problem in the industry, the onus is put on residents to fix it,' Napolitano said. The Far Northwest Side alderman's ordinance seeks to reverse that, allowing aldermen to block short-term rentals in a precinct on their own. It would then give companies the chance to overturn the ban by collecting signatures from 10% of the precinct's voters. Most aldermen in attendance backed the ordinance in a voice vote. Several cited issues in their ward with disruptive parties at short-term rentals, a problem Ald. Brendan Reilly, 42nd, said is 'on steroids' in dense downtown high rises. 'The guests are taking over common areas, pool decks, lobbies, fitness rooms,' he said. 'With the late night parties and noise complaints, et cetera, God help you if you own a condo next to one of these nightly rental units.' Napolitano argued the ordinance will not hurt short-term rental companies, but instead simply gives aldermen a tool to advocate for residents when issues arise. But Airbnb is strongly opposed to the proposal. 'Alderman Napolitano's ordinance amendment is an over-broad and misguided violation of Chicagoans' property rights, which would punish responsible homeowners and local businesses who rely on the income from travel on short-term rentals — especially in neighborhoods outside of Chicago's traditional tourism hubs,' Airbnb spokesperson Jonathan Buckner said in a statement Wednesday. Mayor Brandon Johnson is continuing to not take a side on the issue. Asked where he stood on the ordinance at a Wednesday morning news conference, he said he wanted to 'continue to ensure that we are building a safe, affordable city.' 'This particular measure, quite frankly, I'll have to look into a little bit deeper,' Johnson said. 'But I know that there are a number of alders who mean well and are trying to show up for their particular pocket of the city.' Several aldermen noted the absence of staff from Johnson's Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection, adding that they wished someone could answer questions about how bans could affect tax revenue. Alds. Matt O'Shea, 19th, and Bill Conway, 34th, voted against the measure, with O'Shea noting taxes on the rentals sent around $4 million to fight domestic violence. 'Have we thought of how we are going to replace that?' O'Shea asked. 'It's been my experience working with Airbnb that when a problem is identified, it's addressed.' Ald. Marty Quinn, 13th, used the city's current process requiring residents' signatures to ban short-term rentals from every precinct in his Southwest Side ward. The whole-ward ban took 12,000 signatures and seven years to complete, he said. The ward is '95% single family dwellings,' and short-term rentals 'would have an adverse impact on our quality of life,' Quinn said. Asked what he thinks of Airbnb's argument that the ban is similar to historic racist efforts to keep Black and Latino people out of certain neighborhoods, Quinn called it a 'desperate statement from a company who got exactly what they wanted' when the original ordinance passed. 'I'm not saying that Airbnb isn't good in some parts of the city,' he said. 'It's just not good in the Bungalow Belt, and I have 12,000 signatures that would suggest that.' Aldermen also Wednesday advanced a measure to crack down on illegal pedicabs with potential impoundments.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store