Kilmar Abrego Garcia to be arraigned on human trafficking charges in Tennessee
Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the Salvadoran man who was wrongly deported and then returned to the United States to face federal prosecution, will appear in a Nashville courtroom Friday for his arraignment after he was charged with participating in a yearslong conspiracy to traffic undocumented migrants into the country.
Abrego Garcia faces one count of conspiracy to transport aliens and one count of unlawful transportation of undocumented aliens after a grand jury in Tennessee returned a sealed indictment against him in May.
Those charges were made public last week when Attorney General Pam Bondi announced Abrego Garcia had been returned to the United States to face those charges. If he is convicted, Bondi said he would serve his sentence at a federal prison and be removed to El Salvador after his sentence is completed.
Federal prosecutors have asked a federal judge to detain Abrego Garcia as his court proceedings play out, arguing that he "poses a danger to the community" and is "a serious flight risk."
They continue to allege that Abrego Garcia is a member of the MS-13 gang, an allegation that his attorney and family have denied, and said there is a "serious risk" that Abrego Garcia would intimidate witnesses.
Abrego Garcia's lawyers have accused the Trump administration of abusing its power and engaging in "delay and secrecy" in the process of returning him to the U.S. A judge in Maryland ordered him returned to the U.S. in April, but the Justice Department declined to do so for months, only to bring him back days ago so he can be prosecuted.
Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, one of his attorneys, said Friday that he doesn't believe Abrego Garcia will be convicted.
"There's no way a jury is going to see the evidence and agree that this sheet metal worker is the leader of an international MS-13 smuggling conspiracy," he said.
The indictment unsealed last week alleges that between 2016 and 2025, Abrego Garcia conspired with others to bring migrants from Latin American countries into the U.S., passing through Mexico before crossing the border into Texas.
Prosecutors said that he and an unnamed co-conspirator would pick up the migrants in Houston and transport them to other places in the U.S. They claimed that Abrego Garcia and the co-conspirator devised "cover stories" to provide law enforcement if stopped, like that they were transporting people for construction work.
Abrego Garcia and his co-conspirators "knowingly and unlawfully transported thousands" of migrants who are not legally in the U.S., the indictment alleges.
Abrego Garcia was deported to El Salvador in March after he was arrested by federal immigration authorities in Maryland, where he has lived since arriving in the U.S. in 2011. After the man and his wife sued over his removal, an immigration official with the Trump administration acknowledged that his deportation to El Salvador was an administrative error.
In 2019, an immigration judge granted Abrego Garcia a legal status known as withholding of removal. That protection forbade the Department of Homeland Security from removing him to his country of origin — El Salvador — because he was likely to face persecution from gangs.
The Maryland judge ordered the Trump administration in April to facilitate Abrego Garcia's return to the U.S., and that order was largely affirmed by the Supreme Court. But the administration resisted bringing him back to the U.S., arguing that the judge lacked the authority to demand it do so.
Abrego Garcia had initially been held at El Salvador's supermax prison, the Terrorism Confinement Center, also known as CECOT. But he was transferred to a lower-security facility in April, the State Department said.
Bondi said the Salvadoran government agreed to release Abrego Garcia to face the criminal charges in the U.S. after it was presented with a warrant for his release.
Abrego Garcia's attorneys have also moved to keep the civil case seeking his return active, rebuking a Justice Department filing after his return to the United States last week claiming that a judge's order mandating his return has now been fulfilled and the case is now moot, calling the Trump administration's handling of his case "pure farce" in a court filing Monday.
"Instead of facilitating Abrego Garcia's return, for the past two months Defendants have engaged in an elaborate, all-of-government effort to defy court orders, deny due process, and disparage Abrego Garcia," the attorneys wrote, asking the Maryland federal judge overseeing the case to start contempt proceedings and impose sanctions on the government.
In response, the Justice Department said that it has "done exactly what plaintiffs asked for and what this court ordered them to do," in facilitating his return to the US," and said it would file a motion to dismiss the case next week.
"The proof is in the pudding—Defendants have returned Abrego Garcia to the United States just as they were ordered to do. None of Plaintiffs' hyperbolic arguments change that or justify further proceedings in this matter," Justice Department attorneys wrote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
2 hours ago
- Associated Press
What's left for the Supreme Court to decide? 21 cases, including state bans on transgender care
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is in the homestretch of a term that has lately been dominated by the Trump administration's emergency appeals of lower court orders seeking to slow President Donald Trump's efforts to remake the federal government. But the justices also have 21 cases to resolve that were argued between December and mid-May, including a push by Republican-led states to ban gender-affirming care for transgender minors. One of the argued cases was an emergency appeal, the administration's bid to be allowed to enforce Trump's executive order denying birthright citizenship to U.S.-born children of parents who are in the country illegally. The court typically aims to finish its work by the end of June. Here are some of the biggest remaining cases: Tennessee and 26 other states have enacted bans on certain treatment for transgender youth The oldest unresolved case, and arguably the term's biggest, stems from a challenge to Tennessee's law from transgender minors and their parents who argue that it is unconstitutional sex discrimination aimed at a vulnerable population. At arguments in December, the court's conservative majority seemed inclined to uphold the law, voicing skepticism of claims that it violates the 14th amendment's equal protection clause. The post-Civil War provision requires the government to treat similarly situated people the same. The court is weighing the case amid a range of other federal and state efforts to regulate the lives of transgender people, including which sports competitions they can join and which bathrooms they can use. In April, Trump's administration sued Maine for not complying with the government's push to ban transgender athletes in girls sports. Trump also has sought to block federal spending on gender-affirming care for those under 19 and a conservative majority of justices allowed him to move forward with plans to oust transgender people from the U.S. military. Trump's birthright citizenship order has been blocked by lower courts The court rarely hears arguments over emergency appeals, but it took up the administration's plea to narrow orders that have prevented the citizenship changes from taking effect anywhere in the U.S. The issue before the justices is whether to limit the authority of judges to issue nationwide injunctions, which have plagued both Republican and Democratic administrations in the past 10 years. These nationwide court orders have emerged as an important check on Trump's efforts and a source of mounting frustration to the Republican president and his allies. At arguments last month, the court seemed intent on keeping a block on the citizenship restrictions while still looking for a way to scale back nationwide court orders. It was not clear what such a decision might look like, but a majority of the court expressed concerns about what would happen if the administration were allowed, even temporarily, to deny citizenship to children born to parents who are in the country illegally. Democratic-led states, immigrants and rights groups who sued over Trump's executive order argued that it would upset the settled understanding of birthright citizenship that has existed for more than 125 years. The court seems likely to side with Maryland parents in a religious rights case over LGBTQ storybooks in public schools Parents in the Montgomery County school system, in suburban Washington, want to be able to pull their children out of lessons that use the storybooks, which the county added to the curriculum to better reflect the district's diversity. The school system at one point allowed parents to remove their children from those lessons, but then reversed course because it found the opt-out policy to be disruptive. Sex education is the only area of instruction with an opt-out provision in the county's schools. The school district introduced the storybooks in 2022, with such titles as 'Prince and Knight' and 'Uncle Bobby's Wedding.' The case is one of several religious rights cases at the court this term. The justices have repeatedly endorsed claims of religious discrimination in recent years. The decision also comes amid increases in recent years in books being banned from public school and public libraries. A three-year battle over congressional districts in Louisiana is making its second trip to the Supreme Court Lower courts have struck down two Louisiana congressional maps since 2022 and the justices are weighing whether to send state lawmakers back to the map-drawing board for a third time. The case involves the interplay between race and politics in drawing political boundaries in front of a conservative-led court that has been skeptical of considerations of race in public life. At arguments in March, several of the court's conservative justices suggested they could vote to throw out the map and make it harder, if not impossible, to bring redistricting lawsuits under the Voting Rights Act. Before the court now is a map that created a second Black majority congressional district among Louisiana's six seats in the House of Representatives. The district elected a Black Democrat in 2024. A three-judge court found that the state relied too heavily on race in drawing the district, rejecting Louisiana's arguments that politics predominated, specifically the preservation of the seats of influential members of Congress, including Speaker Mike Johnson. The Supreme Court ordered the challenged map to be used last year while the case went on. Lawmakers only drew that map after civil rights advocates won a court ruling that a map with one Black majority district likely violated the landmark voting rights law. The justices are weighing a Texas law aimed at blocking kids from seeing online pornography Texas is among more than a dozen states with age verification laws. The states argue the laws are necessary as smartphones have made access to online porn, including hardcore obscene material, almost instantaneous. The question for the court is whether the measure infringes on the constitutional rights of adults as well. The Free Speech Coalition, an adult-entertainment industry trade group, agrees that children shouldn't be seeing pornography. But it says the Texas law is written too broadly and wrongly affects adults by requiring them to submit personal identifying information online that is vulnerable to hacking or tracking. The justices appeared open to upholding the law, though they also could return it to a lower court for additional work. Some justices worried the lower court hadn't applied a strict enough legal standard in determining whether the Texas law and others like that could run afoul of the First Amendment.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Our next police officers' Pigeon Forge Police Department launches first-ever junior police academy
PIGEON FORGE, Tenn. (WATE) — The Pigeon Forge Police Department wrapped up its first-ever junior police academy for children between 12 and 16 years old. The class serves as a way to get the children involved with law enforcement early. The group of 24 learned everything from de-escalation tactics to how to properly put on handcuffs. East Tennessee food pantries brace for potential SNAP cuts amidst rising food costs 'What we're doing right here is we are looking at these young men and women in our community, and it's a recruitment tool,' Detective Donnie Mashburn said. 'We are getting them prepped, getting them started, and an honest look at what we do every day, so we are excited about that, and hopefully, maybe they'll be some of our next police officers.' The Junior Cadets went through training exercises that simulated what police officers have to do often. Some of that included hand-to-hand combat, which in this case served as a lesson in self-defense, clearing rooms, and taking a written test that went over everything they learned this week. Mashburn was right in the middle of a lot of the training that went on. He said it was great seeing the children be able to have fun while learning. Remainder of Bonnaroo cancelled due to weather 'Just teaching them so many things. They love the defensive tactics, and that's near and dear to my heart,' Mashburn said. 'In talking to them, it's not about fighting, it's about taking care of yourself and defending yourself, but if you have to, you know how to defend yourself properly. That's been a special topic for me.' Mashburn said he put his body on the line for one of the taser learning sessions today, hoping the children, seeing what happened instill a respect for law enforcement and show them not to run from the law. 'That tazing does not feel good,' Mashburn explained. 'They saw that, so they know not to run from the law, do what we tell you, it was neat to see that.' Honoring Charlie: Knoxville community tees off to remember young golfer's selfless spirit The week-long academy ended with an obstacle course and awards for those involved. Mashburn told 6 News he's grateful they were able to put on an event like this and thankful for the help of Sevier County Cares and the Sevier County Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs for helping with the academy. We are told the police department hopes to put on more of these academies in the future. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
CT-based Otis Elevator agrees to pay $616K to resolve False Claims Act allegation in Tennessee
Otis Elevator Company has agreed to pay more than $500,000 to resolve allegations tied to the False Claims Act. The settlement was announced Friday by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Tennessee. Under the terms of the settlement, Otis will pay the government $616,987, federal officials said. Otis, which is headquartered in Farmington, agreed to the settlement to resolve allegations related to invoices for preventive maintenance services submitted to the Tennessee Valley Authority 'that were not rendered pursuant to the terms of a contract,' federal authorities said. 'A contractor, like Otis, has an obligation to submit invoices and seek reimbursement solely for work and services that have been performed as claimed,' U.S. Attorney Francis M. Hamilton III for the Eastern District of Tennessee said in a statement. 'This settlement with Otis demonstrates that the United States Attorney's Office and federal partners like TVA's Office of the Inspector General are using all tools available to address fraud, waste and abuse and protect public funds.' The investigation focused on an August 2017 contract between Otis and TVA. Authorities contend that the contract required Otis to provide turnkey modernization and specified monthly preventative maintenance services related to certain elevators in the TVA Knoxville Office Complex. Federal officials said 'certain civil claims' against Otis arose from its performance of the contract. 'Specifically, the United States contended that Otis submitted false claims for payment to TVA for preventive maintenance services that were not rendered,' the U.S. Attorney's Office wrote in a statement The settlement was the result of a coordinated effort between the U.S. Attorney's Office and the TVA Office of the Inspector General – Office of Investigations (TVA-OIG). 'The TVA Office of the Inspector General is committed to identifying and investigating instances where vendors fail to fulfill contractual obligations as well as false claims and overpayments that negatively impact ratepayers throughout the Tennessee Valley. We would like to thank the United States Attorney's Office for their dedicated support of such efforts,' Assistant Inspector General, Investigations D. Eric Beals of the Tennessee Valley Authority Office of Inspector General, said in a statement.
