Rishi Sunak ‘refused to pay people more to self-isolate during Covid'
refused to pay people more to self-isolate during the pandemic, the inquiry into the crisis has heard.
Baroness Harding, the former head of NHS Test and Trace, said the then chancellor rejected proposals to pay people more to isolate 'at every opportunity' while he was chancellor.
'There was an intransigence to that, that I think was very sad,' she told the Covid Inquiry.
In September 2020, the government announced that people would be required to self-isolate by law.
A £500 package of support was put in place for people on low incomes who could not work from home and would lose pay as a result.
But in her witness statement to the inquiry, Baroness Harding said: 'The UK spent proportionally much less than other developed countries enabling disadvantaged people to self-isolate.
'If we had allocated more of the NHS Test and Trace budget to isolation support, I strongly suspect that fewer would have died and infection rates would have been lower, with all the benefits that would have brought.'
Asked whether she felt she held any responsibility for the way the Test and Trace budget unfolded, she replied: 'It's certainly the thing that I wish I had succeeded in persuading ministers to do.
'We had the money in the budget, we didn't spend all of our budget, and I also think that spending more on self-isolation would have reduced the need for testing.
'But I wasn't the decision-maker – the decision-maker in this was the chancellor and at every opportunity, from June onwards, the chancellor rejected the proposals. And, in the end, that was not in my control.'
Summarising her written evidence, Sophie Cartwright KC, the counsel to the inquiry, told the hearing that, amid low take-up of self-isolation when the support system came into place in September 2020, the Baroness 'continued to champion for more to be done' but felt on occasion like she was 'banging her head against a brick wall'.
Baroness Harding said: 'The modelling showed that the best way to get an operationally effective test and trace system that would reduce the rate of infection and enable us to get back to a more normal life was to encourage more people to come forward for testing.
'And that the data told us that people weren't coming forward for testing because they were scared of the consequences of isolation. To be honest, it was intensely frustrating.
'And what you see through the paper trail – I found it quite distressing reading it, to be honest – because we did try really hard to persuade ministers that this would be a good thing, not just for the individual wellbeing of those disadvantaged people, but also economically – this was one of the ways you could have had less economic harm for the country as a whole.
'And I think that the chancellor, particularly, this was a point of principle for him.
'I don't think there was any amount of data and analysis that I could have put that would have changed his mind – it was a point of principle that he didn't want to create an additional welfare benefit.
'Now I do appreciate this is a complex thing... there is a policy conundrum there, but what I was unable to achieve was any substantive engagement in how to mitigate that policy problem and to recognise that actually, the policy problem of not supporting the vulnerable to isolate was a much bigger one.
'You can hear my frustration as I say it now, there was an intransigence to that that I think was very sad.'
Meanwhile, Baroness Harding was asked about Test and Trace needing to put all communications out through Downing Street.
She said that, in a future pandemic, a public health agency should be able to have deep expertise 'but also permission to speak', adding: 'Trust in a system like this is its most important quality and I would be first to say that we could have done better at building society's trust in this.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Threat to wild salmon as sea lice show resistance to chemical used to protect fish
The threat to wild salmon from sea lice could be worse than feared as a new study shows the parasite is building up resistance to the chemical used in fish farming pens to tackle it. Campaigners also believe emamectin benzoate – known as Slice – is leaking out and causing environmental damage and want the toxic compound banned. However, despite these concerns, the Scottish Government last year extended its use in Scottish waters to 2028. Now the Irish government has sounded a warning that Slice is becoming less effective in killing the lice that infest fish farms. New research shows young wild salmon passing coastal fish farms on their migratory routes are increasingly falling prey to lice coming out of pens. The report by the Inland Fisheries Ireland agency is based on almost 20 years of tagging wild salmon. It concludes: 'Results of the present analysis provide clear evidence of significantly reduced return of adult salmon linked to salmon lice infestation from salmon farms. Data also suggests the effects of lice from salmon farms on wild stocks are underestimated because of growing resistance to Slice.' Slice can damage human DNA, and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa) has found it leaking from fish farm pens and harming sea life. Campaign group WildFish Scotland said the latest study's conclusions are 'exactly what we have been saying for years'. Interim director Andrew Graham-Stewart added: 'Successive Scottish Governments have enabled the salmon farming industry to expand rapidly without meaningful safeguards to protect the environment and wild salmon. It is permitted to use a host of highly toxic chemicals, including Slice, for the treatment of parasites and diseases. 'However, regulatory change has seen substantial watering down and delay, in response to heavy lobbying of Scottish ministers by the major salmon farming companies in Scotland. 'Make no mistake, this industry, as it is currently run, is driving many wild Atlantic salmon sub-populations inexorably towards extinction.' The ruling allowing the industry to continue using Slice came shortly after industry body Salmon Scotland treated Rural Affairs Secretary Mairi Gougeon and her husband Baptiste to hospitality worth £1,500 as guests of chief executive Tavish Scott at Scotland's Six Nations rugby clash against France in February last year. There is no note of what was discussed but the Scottish Government has repeatedly stated that the Slice decision was not Ms Gougeon's to make and it was not discussed at Murrayfield. The industry is worth £760 million to the Scottish economy and employs 2,500 people, but in 2023 a total of 17.4 million fish died prematurely in captivity amid enduring concerns over animal welfare. A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'To protect wild fish, Sepa introduced a new framework to manage the risk of sea lice from fish farms in February 2024.' Salmon Scotland said: 'Fish farmers use Slice as a fully-licensed product, approved by vets and regulators.'
Daily Mirror
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Reeves to splash billions of pounds on NHS and schools - but other cuts loom
Chancellor Rachel Reeves admitted that some vital public services will lose out on funding in next week's Spending Review - 'I'm not able to say yes to everything' Rachel Reeves will pour cash into the NHS, schools, security and firing up the economy as she hit back at fears of fresh austerity for cash-strapped public services. The health service is expected to be the big winner in Wednesday's Spending Review, with a 2.8% hike to the Department of Health's annual budget - amounting to around £30billion in additional funding by 2028/29. The Mirror understands schools will also get a major boost to per pupil funding, with £4.5billion extra for the core schools budget. But other vital services will feel the squeeze, with painful cuts expected in areas like local government and policing. On Wednesday, the Chancellor will spell out how much cash will be allocated for day-to-day budgets over the next three years. Speaking to the Sunday Mirror in her Leeds West and Pudsey constituency, she said: "This is a far cry from what you would have had if you'd had another five years of the Conservatives - £300billion above that. Under our plan, spending will increase every year in this Parliament. "I tell you what austerity is, it's what George Osborne did, where spending fell by 2% every year when he was Chancellor and [David] Cameron was Prime Minister. Spending will grow at close to 2% every year under the plans that I will lay out." There will be a £190billion increase in funding for day-to-day spending over the period, funded partly by tax hikes in the Budget in the autumn. A shake-up of borrowing rules has also freed up around £113billion for capital investment for big ticket items like homes, transport and energy projects. Security will be top of the agenda as "we live in a changed world, everyone can see that," the Chancellor said. "The first duty of any government is to keep its people safe." The Government has already promised to hike defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2027/28, funded through a raid on the foreign aid budget. The NHS will get a big cash injection to help the Government meet its commitment to slash waiting lists currently around 7.4million. Her other focus will be growing the economy to drive up living standards for ordinary Brits. But Ms Reeves admitted some areas will lose out. "I'm not able to say yes to everything, and there are things that I would like to do, but we don't have the money to do them," she said. "But your readers will remember two and a half years ago when a Conservative Prime Minister and Chancellor crashed the economy. "As a result, they paid more for their mortgages and more in their rents, and readers who run their own business, particularly small businesses, found that the cost of running their business went up as inflation and borrowing rates went through the roof. "So we have to say no to some things, because we've got to make sure that that stability is returned to the economy." This week, the Chancellor confirmed plans to rip up Treasury rules blamed for favouring investment in prosperous areas in the South of England. Instead, some £15.6billion will be handed to mayors to improve trams, trains and buses outside of London. Ms Reeves said: "It means that people can be able to stay in the place where they grew up, the place they want to live, where their families are, but still be able to access some of those great jobs paying decent wages in the city, and they will be able to commute in easily and affordably in a way that isn't possible today. "That narrows down the options for lots of people about the jobs they do. Also for young people, it narrows down the options about where to go to college, what apprenticeship to take up. "And I don't want people's options to be narrowed. I want people's options and opportunities to be broadened and their aspirations to know no limits." But she acknowledged that voters are sceptical and said there was "no time to waste" in delivering for parts of the country betrayed by Boris Johnson's levelling up boasts. "We've got to get on with [it]", she said. "I don't want people waiting for another decade before they see improvements in their area. "We've spoken about a decade of national renewal, but there's no time to waste. We're getting started." Pressed on whether she would deliver where the Tories failed, she said: "Yes, and the reason that I can say that to Mirror readers is because I know that there's a lot of cynicism that things have been promised in the past." She added: "I'm as cynical as the next person when it comes to these promises, but we've set out five years worth of funding this week." Ms Reeves admitted she'd had to take tough decisions, including hiking national insurance contributions for businesses in the autumn Budget and plans to slash £5 billion from the welfare bill. Labour MPs are in revolt over the decision to make up most of the welfare savings from cuts to Personal Independence Payments (Pip), which help disabled people with the added costs of daily life. Ms Reeves said that difficult decision had allowed her to plough cash into public services and invest in the future. She said: "We are choosing investment rather than decline. The previous government chose decline. That is not the path that we're choosing. We're going to renew Britain and make working people better off in the process." Ms Reeves said she recognised the last few years had been tough for ordinary Brits but added: "We're beginning to turn the corner because of the choices that we've made." 'We will reduce child poverty' Rachel Reeves said driving down child poverty is a "moral mission" and insisted Labour would lift more kids out of hardship. The Chancellor said the decision this week to extend free school meals to more than 500,000 additional pupils next year was a statement of intent. From next September, all children in families receiving Universal Credit will get a free school lunch - in a major victory for the Mirror's campaign to end hunger in the classroom. But the Government is under intense pressure to commit to more drastic action to end the scourge of child poverty. A long-awaited strategy has been delayed to the autumn amid mounting calls from Labour MPs for an end to the Tory two-child benefit limit, which has been blamed for pushing families into poverty. Asked if she was listening to these calls, Ms Reeves told the Sunday Mirror: "I joined the Labour Party when I was 17 years old, because my experience at my local state school was that my sixth form was two prefab huts in the playground joined together. "Our school library was turned into a classroom because there were more students than space and never enough textbooks to go around." She added: "There were loads of girls that I was at school with who did not have the opportunities. They went to school every day and probably felt that the government didn't care very much about communities like ours and families like theirs. "When Tony Blair talked about 'education, education, education', that really resonated with me, because I strongly believe that whatever your parents do, whatever income your family's got coming in, whatever your background, you deserve a really good start in life. "And I know that kids who are going to school in empty bellies, who don't have a space at home to do their homework, who don't have the opportunities of books at home, and where the mums and dads don't have the security of a job that pays a decent wage, that they just don't have the opportunities that other kids do. And that's what I came into politics to do something about." She added: "We will lift more children out of poverty. We will reduce child poverty. That is a moral mission for all of us."
BBC News
42 minutes ago
- BBC News
Doctors use poo pills to flush out dangerous superbugs
UK doctors are attempting to clear dangerous superbug infections using "poo pills" containing freeze-dried stool samples come from healthy donors and are packed with good data suggests superbugs can be flushed out of the dark murky depths of the bowel and replaced with a mix of healthy gut is a new approach to tackling infections that resist antibiotics, which are thought to kill a million people each year. The focus is on the bowels which are "the biggest reservoir of antibiotic resistance in humans" says Dr Blair Merrick, who has been testing the pills at Guys and St Thomas' superbugs can escape their intestinal home and cause trouble elsewhere in the body – such as urinary tract or bloodstream infections."So there's a lot of interest in 'can you get rid of them from the gut?'," says Dr idea of poo-pills isn't as far-fetched as it might seem. Faecal transplants – also known as a trans-poo-tion - are already approved for treating severe diarrhoea caused by Clostridium difficile scientists noticed hints that faecal transplants for C. difficile also seemed to get rid of superbugs. New research has focused on patients who had an infection caused by drug-resistant bacteria in the past six were given pills made from faeces which people had donated to a stool stool sample is tested to ensure it does not contain any harmful bugs, undigested food is removed and then it is freeze dried into a is stored inside a pill that can pass through the stomach unscathed and reach the intestines where it dissolves to release its poopy powdery payload. The trial has taken place on 41 patients at Guy's and St Thomas' hospitals in London to lay the groundwork for a large-scale study. It showed patients were up for taking a poo pill and the donated bacteria were still being detected in the bowels at least a month Merrick says there are "really promising signals" that poo pills could help tackle the rising scourge of superbugs and that donor bacteria could be going to microbial war with the superbugs as they compete over food and space on the lining of the gut and either rid the body of them completely or "reduce them down to a level that doesn't cause problems".The study also suggests the array of gut bacteria becomes more varied after the therapy. This is a sign of good health and "may well be promoting colonisation resistance" so it is harder for new infectious bugs to get in."It's very exciting. There's a real shift from 20 years ago where all bacteria and viruses were assumed to do you harm; to now where we realise they are completely necessary to our overall health," says Dr this week scientists showed the good bacteria our bodies meet – in the hours after we are born – seem to halve the risk of young children being admitted to hospital with lung infections. Our body's own human cells are outnumbered by the bacteria, fungi and others that live inside us - known as the has led to research implicating the microbiome in everything from Crohn's disease to cancer to mental health. If poo pills are proven to work against superbugs in larger studies then the researchers think they could be used for both treatment and prevention in people at risk. Medical procedures that suppress the immune system - including cancer therapies and organ transplants - can make the body more vulnerable."A lot of these individuals come to a lot of harm from drug resistant organisms," Dr UK's drugs regulator – the Medicines and Healthcare Products Agency – said there were more than 450 microbiome medicines currently in development."Some of them will success, so I do think we will seem them coming through quite soon," said Dr Chrysi Sergaki, the head of microbiome research at the MHRA."We could potentially, in the future, replace antibiotics with microbiome [therapies] - that's the big picture, so there's a lot of potential."
