
New Olympics chief faces stiff challenge
The transfer of the key is more than symbolic as it indicates that the two-time Olympic gold medallist from Zimbabwe now holds the most powerful position in all of sport. A lot is expected of her. During the last three months of the initiation period, she has shown glimpses of what is to come while saying she would prefer more consultation among members and that she would prefer to listen first. Her first step towards that was a two-day 'Pause and Reflect' session with members. Yet, the world she is walking into is more politically charged and divided than ever before. Amid persisting geopolitical tensions, Russian athletes are still not allowed to participate under their national flag. It needs to be seen how she and her team react to a world where global leaders are increasingly using sport to further their political ambitions. Then there is the Trump factor facing the sporting community, with two of the biggest events—the men's football World Cup and the Olympics—to be held in the US in the next three years. Coventry will be directly associated with LA 2028's organising committee.
India would be looking towards Coventry with hope, especially with the country's intention to host the 2036 Olympic Games. The Indian Olympic Association has sent the letter of intent and there has been buzz on the ground as well. Given the new IOC president's roots in a developing country, India would be hoping for a closer association. The mental strength she exhibited while winning Olympic medals will be put to test again—this time as the IOC chief.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Supreme Court lifts limits on Trump deporting migrants to countries not their own
By Andrew Chung Supreme Court lifts limits on Trump deporting migrants to countries not their own -The U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way on Monday for President Donald Trump's administration to resume deporting migrants to countries other than their own without offering them a chance to show the harms they could face, handing him another victory in his aggressive pursuit of mass deportations. In an action that prompted a sharp dissent from its three liberal justices, the court granted the administration's request to lift a judicial order requiring that migrants set for deportation to so-called "third countries" get a "meaningful opportunity" to tell U.S. officials they are at risk of torture at their new destination, while a legal challenge plays out. Boston-based U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy had issued the order on April 18. The Supreme Court's brief order was unsigned and offered no reasoning, as is common when it decides emergency requests. The court has a 6-3 conservative majority. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by the two other liberal justices, called the decision a "gross abuse" of the court's power. "Apparently, the court finds the idea that thousands will suffer violence in far-flung locales more palatable than the remote possibility that a district court exceeded its remedial powers when it ordered the government to provide notice and process to which the plaintiffs are constitutionally and statutorily entitled," Sotomayor wrote. Sotomayor called the court's action "as incomprehensible as it is inexcusable." Murphy had found that the administration's policy of "executing third-country removals without providing notice and a meaningful opportunity to present fear-based claims" likely violates the U.S. Constitution's due process protections. Due process generally requires the government to provide notice and an opportunity for a hearing before taking certain adverse actions. After the Department of Homeland Security moved in February to step up rapid deportations to third countries, immigrant rights groups filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of a group of migrants seeking to prevent their removal to such places without notice and a chance to assert the harms they could face. Murphy on May 21 found that Trump's administration had violated his order mandating further procedures in trying to send a group of migrants to politically unstable South Sudan, a country that the U.S. State Department has warned against any travel "due to crime, kidnapping and armed conflict." The judge's intervention prompted the U.S. government to keep the migrants at a military base in Djibouti, although American officials later said one of the deportees, a man from Myanmar, would instead be deported to his home country. Of the other passengers who were on the flight, one is South Sudanese, while the others are from Cuba, Mexico, Laos and Vietnam. Trina Realmuto, executive director of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, which helps represent the plaintiffs, called the ramifications of the court's action "horrifying," stripping away "critical due process protections that have been protecting our class members from torture and death." The administration told the Supreme Court that its third-country policy already complied with due process and is critical for removing migrants who commit crimes because their countries of origin are often unwilling to take them back. It said that all the South Sudan-destined migrants had committed "heinous crimes" in the United States including murder, arson and armed robbery. "The Supreme Court's stay of a left-wing district judge's injunction reaffirms the president's authority to remove criminal illegal aliens from our country and Make America Safe Again," White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said after Monday's decision. "Fire up the deportation planes," said Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. A FLOOD OF CASES The dispute is one of many legal challenges to Trump policies to have reached the nation's highest judicial body since he returned to office in January. The Supreme Court in May let Trump end humanitarian programs for hundreds of thousands of migrants to live and work in the United States temporarily. The justices, however, faulted the administration's treatment of some migrants who Trump targeted for removal under the Alien Enemies Act - a 1798 law that historically has been employed only in wartime - as inadequate under constitutional due process protections. Sotomayor said that in sending migrants to South Sudan, and in another instance four others to the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and on to El Salvador, the administration "openly flouted two court orders" issued by Murphy. Sotomayor also pointed to the separate Alien Enemies Act litigation in which questions were raised about the administration's compliance with an order issued by a judge in that case. "This is not the first time the court closes its eyes to noncompliance, nor, I fear, will it be the last," Sotomayor wrote. "Yet each time this court rewards noncompliance with discretionary relief, it further erodes respect for courts and for the rule of law." The administration asked the Supreme Court to intervene after the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on May 16 declined to put Murphy's decision on hold. Reuters has also reported that U.S. officials had been considering sending migrants to Libya, another politically unstable country, despite previous U.S. condemnation of Libya's harsh treatment of detainees. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Donald Trump Claims Israel-Iran Ceasefire Agreed, Truce To Begin In Six Hours
Last Updated: However, neither Israel nor Iran has immediately confirmed the cease-fire agreement or the terms of the truce. President Donald Trump announced on Monday evening via Truth Social that Israel and Iran have agreed in principle to a cease-fire that will end the ongoing conflict he dubbed the '12 Day War." 'CONGRATULATIONS TO EVERYONE! It has been fully agreed by and between Israel and Iran that there will be a Complete and Total CEASEFIRE (in approximately 6 hours from now, when Israel and Iran have wound down and completed their in progress, final missions!), for 12 hours, at which point the War will be considered, ENDED!" Trump wrote. According to his post, Iran will initiate the cease-fire, followed by Israel after 12 hours, and after 24 hours the war will be officially declared over. Trump said that during each cease-fire period, both sides will remain 'PEACEFUL and RESPECTFUL." 'On the assumption that everything works as it should, which it will, I would like to congratulate both Countries, Israel and Iran, on having the Stamina, Courage, and Intelligence to end, what should be called, 'THE 12 DAY WAR.' This is a War that could have gone on for years, and destroyed the entire Middle East, but it didn't, and never will!" Trump added. However, neither Israel nor Iran has immediately confirmed the cease-fire agreement or the terms of the truce. Meanwhile, tensions escalated earlier Monday when Iran retaliated against recent US air strikes on its nuclear facilities by firing missiles towards the military bases of the United States in Qatar and Iraq. Iran launched six missiles towards the US troops in Qatar, Axios reported, citing an Israeli official. Iran's National Security Council confirmed the missile attack on a US base in Qatar. All Iranian missiles were successfully intercepted with no reports of casualties, Qatar said. However, Iran's Mehr News Agency claimed that at least three Iranian missiles struck the Al-Udeid base in Qatar. According to a New York Times report, Iran had given advance notice to Qatar about the strike on the US base to minimise casualties. First Published: June 24, 2025, 04:26 IST


Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
'Want to thank Iran…,' Trump reacts to Iranian strikes on US Air Bases in Doha; No Americans harmed
US President Trump on June 23 responded to Iranian strikes on US' Air Base in Middle East nations. Taking to social media site Truth Social, Prez Trump informed 14 missiles fired from Iran out of which 13 were knocked down & 1 was 'set free.' He further added that, 'NO Americans were harmed, and hardly any damage was done.' Shockingly, US President also thanked Iran for providing 'early notice to US regarding attack.' Later, US President Trump, on social media platform 'Truth Social', thanked Qatar's Emir. Show more 02:08 05:40 03:03 05:40 10:05 02:40 05:35 16:41 03:06 11:56 11:55 08:55 03:42 04:45 03:48 05:02 14:09 04:01 05:27 10:12 12:00 02:40 05:29 01:29 07:17 03:27 08:03 08:07 10:23 01:11 02:59