logo
Can Artifical Intelligence Save America From Its Debt Spiral?

Can Artifical Intelligence Save America From Its Debt Spiral?

Forbes2 days ago

Jamie Dimon isn't one to cry wolf.
So when the JPMorgan CEO says 'you are going to see a crack in the bond market,' it's worth listening. And he's not alone. Ray Dalio, Peter Orszag, and Paul Tudor Jones are all sounding the alarm on America's fiscal trajectory.
The math is getting hard to ignore. Interest on the debt just crossed $1 trillion annually — more than the U.S. spends on defense, Medicaid, disability insurance, and food stamps combined. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), if passed without offsets, could add $5 trillion to the debt over the next decade.
According to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, that pushes total public debt to nearly $57 trillion by 2034 — a number so large it's bordering on abstract.
US Debt-to-GDP Ratio; Historical & projected
If 10-year bond yields simply hold at today's ~4.4%, the CRFB estimates we add another $1.8 trillion in interest cost. And if rates rise further, a debt spiral isn't a tail risk — it's the baseline.
But here's the problem: everyone agrees on the diagnosis. No one agrees on the cure.
Raising taxes? Politically impossible.
Cutting entitlements? Untouchable.
Both parties have proven incapable of fiscal restraint — even in peacetime.
So what's left?
If the U.S. is going to escape its debt doom loop, we'll need to grow through it — not tighten into it. And the most credible engine for that growth isn't austerity. It's artificial intelligence.
We are standing at the front end of a once-in-a-century platform shift. AI isn't just another tech cycle — it's a horizontal capability that will transform every sector of the economy, from finance and logistics to energy, healthcare, and defense.
AI isn't just another tech cycle. It's a general-purpose capability that could rewire the productivity backbone of every sector — from private credit and logistics to defense, software, and healthcare.
Already, we're seeing AI reduce due diligence cycles from weeks to hours, compress legal reviews by 80%, and deliver spreadsheet analysis with near-perfect accuracy. AI-powered copilots aren't replacing humans — they're multiplying the throughput of every knowledge worker.
If this productivity surge lifts U.S. real GDP from ~2% to 3–4%, and inflation stays modest, we could see nominal GDP growth exceed 5% annually — fast enough to outgrow the debt even if rates remain elevated.
That's not wishful thinking — it's historical precedent. After WWII, the U.S. carried debt loads above 100% of GDP. We didn't cut our way out. We grew — averaging nearly 4% real GDP growth for two decades through innovation, infrastructure, and industrial scaling.
This isn't an argument to ignore the wolf. It's a call to outrun it.
Yes, 3–4% real growth is aggressive. But it's not impossible. It happened before — and it could again if AI unlocks true economy-wide productivity gains. The U.S. has unique advantages: it leads the world in foundational models, semiconductors, cloud infrastructure, and startup formation (yes, we still need more energy to power this expansion). If AI is going to remake the modern economy, it will start here.
Done right, AI can unleash the kind of broad-based productivity boom that defined the post-WWII economic miracle. Between 1947 and 1973, U.S. real GDP grew nearly 4% annually, driven by industrial innovation, global leadership, and a rising middle class. We've been chasing that growth rate ever since.
And the numbers back it up. Vanguard projects that AI adoption could boost labor productivity by 20% by 2035, lifting U.S. GDP growth to 3%+ annually — the fastest pace since the 1990s. JPMorgan Private Bank sees productivity gains materializing as early as the late 2020s, lifting growth above 2.5%. And according to the AI Coalition, AI could raise long-run productivity growth by 0.8 to 1.5 percentage points per year — a massive unlock in a mature $27 trillion economy.
Yes, even 3–4% might not be enough if interest rates spiral. But today's 4.4% Treasury yield isn't permanent — it's a reflection of uncertainty, not inevitability. If AI stabilizes growth expectations, that could anchor yields and restore fiscal confidence. The spread between nominal growth and average borrowing costs is the most important line on the chart — and AI could flip it back in our favor.
Yes, productivity gains may be uneven or delayed. That's true of any general-purpose technology. Electricity and the internet took years to show up in the data. But early results are already promising — especially in high-leverage sectors like finance, law, and logistics.
And no, growth alone won't fix Medicare or solve Social Security. But it will buy time — and make eventual reforms more politically and economically feasible. AI is not a substitute for tough decisions. It's the only viable bridge to a sustainable future.
The original Marshall Plan powered postwar recovery through investment and innovation. AI can do the ... More same for America today.
Post-WWII America didn't just survive high debt. It flourished — building a dominant economy powered by innovation, infrastructure, and productivity. We now face a similar inflection point.
This time, AI is the catalyst.
We have a choice: treat AI like a regulatory threat, or embrace it as a national growth strategy. Because the truth is, America doesn't have a debt problem — it has a growth problem. And the longer we delay confronting that reality, the more constrained our options become.
If AI can unlock a new era of economic abundance, it won't just be good for business. It may be the only way to save the Republic's balance sheet.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla Stock Plunges: Here's What Daniel Ives Predicts Next
Tesla Stock Plunges: Here's What Daniel Ives Predicts Next

Business Insider

time3 hours ago

  • Business Insider

Tesla Stock Plunges: Here's What Daniel Ives Predicts Next

Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) shares plunged 14% today, marking their worst single-day drop since 2020. But the selloff had less to do with electric cars and everything to do with electric egos. What began as a policy disagreement quickly escalated into a high-stakes feud between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump. Confident Investing Starts Here: The fallout began with the administration's newly proposed 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' which aims to slash clean energy incentives, including the $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicles and solar subsidies. Musk called the bill a 'disgusting abomination,' warning it would set back American innovation. Trump fired back by threatening to cut off all federal contracts and subsidies for Musk's companies, including Tesla and SpaceX, claiming the move would save 'Billions and Billions of Dollars.' Musk responded by accusing Trump of betrayal and asserting that his prior support helped Trump win the presidency. He went even further, alleging that Trump's name appears in classified Epstein-related documents. But beyond the personal barbs, the proposed legislation poses real financial consequences for Tesla. Analysts estimate that eliminating the $7,500 EV tax credit could shave roughly $1.2 billion from Tesla's annual profits, nearly 19% of its earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT). On top of that, Tesla's $2.76 billion in revenue from selling regulatory credits in 2024 is also at risk, as the bill's rollback of clean energy incentives threatens this income stream. Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives, who's been bullish on Tesla for years, chimed in with his take on the situation, and offered a glimpse of where he thinks the stock could be headed next. 'The quickly deteriorating friendship and now 'major beef' between Musk and Trump is jaw dropping and a shock to the market and putting major fear for Tesla investors on what is ahead. This situation between Musk and Trump could start to settle down and the friendship continues but this must start to be calmed down on the Musk and Trump fronts and it's not good for either side. This feud does not change our bullish view of Tesla and the autonomous view but clearly does put a fly in the ointment of the Trump regulatory framework going forward. It's another Twilight Zone moment in this Musk/Trump relationship which now is quickly moving downhill,' Ives noted. That 'bullish view' comes with an Outperform (i.e., Buy) rating, and a $500 price target, which implies about 76% upside from TSLA's current levels. (To watch Ives' track record, click here) Generally speaking, however, the Wall Street analysts have a different idea. TSLA stock only claims a Hold (i.e. neutral) consensus rating, based on 16 Buy recommendations, 10 Holds and 11 Sells. Going by the $282.70 average price target, the shares will stay rangebound for the time being. (See TSLA stock forecast) To find good ideas for stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks' Best Stocks to Buy, a tool that unites all of TipRanks' equity insights.

What A-list economists are saying about Trump's tax bill as Musk rebels against it
What A-list economists are saying about Trump's tax bill as Musk rebels against it

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

What A-list economists are saying about Trump's tax bill as Musk rebels against it

Elon Musk has emerged as a highly vocal critic of Trump's "big beautiful bill." The sweeping budget proposal could add $2.4 trillion to the US deficit, the the CBO said this week. Here's what top economists have been saying about the legislation. Elon Musk has departed his role as a "special government employee" in Trump's White House — and he's using his time outside the administration to hammer the GOP spending bill that's a cornerstone of the president's agenda. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination," Musk wrote on X earlier this week. Trump responded by saying Musk's criticism of the legislation is "disappointing." President Trump's tax bill will likely face a vote in the Senate in the coming weeks after passing the House in May. It would reduce the tax rates of lower-income workers, particularly those earning less than $107,200, and eliminate taxes on tips, social security, and overtime. The bill would also cut spending on social programs like Medicaid and SNAP benefits, which provide food assistance to low-income Americans. Like Musk, investors and economists are seemingly concerned that the bill will cause the national debt to balloon and further widen the US budget deficit. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office said this week that it would grow the deficit by $2.4 trillion over the next decade . Trump and his allies have pushed back, arguing that higher economic growth from lower taxes would help boost government revenue. Here's what top economists are saying about the bill. Despite the lower tax rates for low earners, Swagel said in a May 20 letter that the bill would negatively impact poorer Americans. "CBO estimates that household resources would decrease by an amount equal to about 2 percent of income in the lowest decile (tenth) of the income distribution in 2027 and 4 percent in 2033, mainly as a result of losses of in-kind transfers, such as Medicaid and SNAP," he wrote. "By contrast, resources would increase by an amount equal to 4 percent for households in the highest decile in 2027 and 2 percent in 2033, mainly because of reductions in the taxes they owe." McBride, along with several colleagues at the non-partisan Tax Foundation think tank, said in a May 23 report that while the bill would support economic growth, it wouldn't be enough to offset the revenue loss from tax cuts. "Our preliminary analysis finds the tax provisions included in the House-passed bill would increase long-run GDP by 0.8 percent," the report said. "The bill's tax and spending changes would increase the 10-year budget deficit by $2.6 trillion from 2025 through 2034 on a conventional basis before added interest costs. On a dynamic basis, accounting for economic growth, the deficit would increase by $1.7 trillion over ten years before interest costs." It continued: "The bill's tax provisions alone would reduce federal tax revenue by $4.1 trillion from 2025 through 2034 on a conventional basis before added interest costs. On a dynamic basis, accounting for economic growth, the revenue reduction would fall by nearly 22 percent to $3.2 trillion over 10 years before added interest costs." Six Nobel Prize-winning economists — including Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, Peter Diamond, Paul Krugman, Oliver Hart, and Joseph Stiglitz — said in a June 2 letter that the bill would worsen wealth inequality in the US. "The combination of cuts to key safety net programs like Medicaid and SNAP and tax cuts disproportionately benefiting higher-income households means that the House budget constitutes an extremely large upward redistribution of income. Given how much this bill adds to the U.S. debt, it is shocking that it still imposes absolute losses on the bottom 40% of U.S households," the letter said. "The House bill addresses none of the nation's key economic challenges usefully and exacerbates many of them," it added. Rogoff, former chief economist at the IMF, cast doubt on the notion that the bill would boost growth in a piece for Project Syndicate this week. "Trump and his acolytes argue that his "big, beautiful bill" will supercharge economic growth, generating enough revenue to make up for sweeping tax cuts. But history offers little support for such claims," he wrote. "While both Democratic-led spending sprees and Republican-backed tax cuts have fueled the growth of US debt over the past two decades, tax reductions have accounted for the lion's share of the increase. Moreover, the notion that tax cuts pay for themselves was already discredited in the 1980s, when President Ronald Reagan's tax cuts led to soaring deficits rather than self-sustaining growth." He added: "Will America's rising debt ultimately trigger a full-blown crisis? Perhaps, but a continued upward drift in long-term interest rates is more likely." Lachman, a former IMF official who currently works for a conservative-leaning think tank, said in a June 4 post that rising bond yields, a declining dollar, and appreciating gold prices could be harbingers of an economic crisis brought on by Trump-driven policy volatility. Trump's tax bill is adding to investors' fears due to its inflationary implications. But one of its clauses undermines confidence in the reliability of the returns on Treasurys, he said. "That bill includes a clause that has to be sending shivers down foreign investors' spines. According to Section 899, the US Treasury can impose additional taxes of up to 20 percent on income earned by foreign entities from countries that enact taxes deemed 'unfair' to US interests." Read the original article on Business Insider Sign in to access your portfolio

Dr. Oz on Medicaid cuts: People should ‘prove that you matter'
Dr. Oz on Medicaid cuts: People should ‘prove that you matter'

The Hill

time3 hours ago

  • The Hill

Dr. Oz on Medicaid cuts: People should ‘prove that you matter'

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz defended President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' over criticism that millions of people could lose health coverage, saying those who would face new work requirements should 'prove that you matter.' Oz made the comments during an interview Wednesday on Fox Business, arguing that when Medicaid was created in the 1960s lawmakers did not include work requirements because it 'never dawned on anybody that able-bodied people who work would be on Medicaid.' 'We're asking that able-bodied individuals who are able to go back to work at least try to get a job or at least volunteer or take care of loved-one who needs help or go back to school,' he said. 'Do something that shows you have agency over your future.' If Americans are willing to do that, he added, they should be able to be enrolled or stay enrolled in Medicaid. 'But if you are not willing to do those things, we are going to ask you to do something else. Go on the exchange, or get a job and get onto regular commercial insurance. But we are not going to continue to pay for Medicaid for those audiences.' 'Go out there, do entry-level jobs, get into the workforce, prove that you matter. Get agency into your own life,' he added. 'It's a much more enjoyable experience if you go through life thinking you are in control of your destiny and you will get better insurance at the same time.' Close to 11 million people would lose health insurance coverage if the House Republican tax bill passes in the Senate, mainly due to cuts to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act, according to analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Trump's sprawling agenda bill calls for trillions of dollars' worth of tax cuts, with offsets from sweeping cuts to federal benefit programs, primarily Medicaid. The bill would reduce federal Medicaid spending by $793 billion, according to an analysis from health care policy nonprofit KFF. Most of those savings stem from new work requirements for adults trying to enroll in the public health insurance program and more frequent eligibility checks. The bill calls for states to impose work requirements for childless adults between the ages of 19 and 64, with some exceptions, to be eligible for Medicaid. Adults would be required to work or volunteer at least 80 hours a month beginning in December 2026 to qualify for the public health insurance program. Many Trump allies in Congress have sought to downplay the impact of the Medicaid reforms, denying it will reduce access to the program. Meanwhile, several Senate Republicans have raised alarm over Medicaid cuts. Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought recently told CNN's Dana Bash that concerns over the bill are 'ridiculous.' 'This bill will preserve and protect the programs, the social safety net, but it will make it much more common sense,' he said. 'No one will lose coverage as a result of the bill.' Democrats have pushed hard against the proposed cuts, while GOP senators such as Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Susan Collins (Maine) and Josh Hawley (Mo.) have pushed for changes to the bill passed by the House last month.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store