logo
OS Benefit of Melanoma Adjuvant Therapy Unclear

OS Benefit of Melanoma Adjuvant Therapy Unclear

Medscape14-05-2025

This transcript has been edited for clarity.
Welcome back, everybody. My name is Teresa Amaral, and it's really a pleasure to have you back for this Medscape melanoma series. We are going to continue with our second part on what's next in terms of immunotherapy in the adjuvant setting for patients diagnosed with melanoma.
In the first episode, we discussed the current status of adjuvant therapy reimbursement and utilization — who are the patients that are candidates to receive adjuvant therapy but not neoadjuvant therapy, why we have these therapies approved, and what was the benefit of these therapies. We mentioned that the benefit was in terms of relapse-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival.
Today we are going to discuss whether there is an overall survival benefit, which is probably the question that you are asking yourself.
Indeed, there is no evidence in terms of overall survival benefit coming from phase 3 trials evaluating immunotherapy in the adjuvant setting. There might be a benefit that is lost in terms of adjuvant benefit from these therapies because we have therapies that are quite effective in stage IV, or in advanced stage for patients diagnosed with melanoma, that are able to 'rescue' the patients who did not benefit from this adjuvant therapy as we expected.
We have been waiting for the final results from KEYNOTE-054, a trial that evaluated the use of adjuvant pembrolizumab in stage III, that was specifically designed to address the question of whether there was an overall survival benefit in this setting by using this therapy.
Initially, the results for the overall survival benefit were planned for 2023, but they have been delayed to 2027, based on the information that is available on the EMA site, which means that until that time point, we most likely will not be able to determine whether there is an overall survival benefit from this therapy used in the adjuvant setting.
There is also another trial, CheckMate 238, that evaluated the use of adjuvant ipilimumab vs nivolumab. We saw after 7 years of follow-up that there was no benefit in terms of overall survival, despite seeing a benefit in terms of relapse-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival, w hich questions whether there is really a link in terms of this benefit that we see, in terms of relapse and overall survival in the long run.
Two other trials also evaluated adjuvant therapy and showed that there was no benefit in terms of overall survival in this setting. The first trial is the SWOG trial, S1404, which evaluated pembrolizumab vs standard of care, which was at the time either interferon or ipilimumab.The other trial is the IMMUNED trial, which was evaluating adjuvant therapy in resected stage IV.
In both trials we saw that there was a benefit, again, in terms of relapse-free survival, but we didn't see any overall survival benefit. This raises the question of whether we will ever see this overall survival benefit in patients treated with adjuvant immunotherapy.
There is also evidence from real-world data, specifically from a Swedish registry study, that showed that the patients treated with adjuvant therapy after this therapy becoming available didn't have a benefit in terms of overall survival compared with the patients who were diagnosed in the era pre-adjuvant therapy approval, which again raises the question of whether we will see this overall survival benefit at all.
We also have real-world data from an analysis in the US that looked into patients treated in clinical practice and receiving adjuvant therapy, where we did see a benefit in terms of overall survival. Again, with all of the conflicting data, it is difficult to understand if this overall survival r eally exists.
Finally, we need to consider that the absence or presence of overall survival benefit might be conditioned by the access to therapies that could or could not be available when the patients have a recurrence in an advanced setting after receiving adjuvant therapy.
You may question, what is the problem of not having overall survival benefit?Why is this important and why are we discussing this? This will be the topic of our next episode.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Regenxbio's Gene Therapy Helps Kids with Deadly Muscle Disease
Regenxbio's Gene Therapy Helps Kids with Deadly Muscle Disease

Bloomberg

time9 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

Regenxbio's Gene Therapy Helps Kids with Deadly Muscle Disease

Children with a deadly muscle disorder had more control of their bodies after getting an experimental gene therapy from Regenxbio Inc. in a small study. The results foreshadow a potential rivalry with Sarepta Therapeutics Inc. and a critical test for the Trump administration's new drug regulators. The first five children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy to receive a higher dose of Regenxbio's treatment showed 'consistent benefit' after nine months, with improvements in motor function and the time it took to stand, walk and climb, the company said Thursday. It's conducting a larger study involving about 30 patients that it expects to be in full swing by the end of the year, with the potential to file for approval by mid-2026.

Local Pride center: ‘We need to move from pride flags to policy change'
Local Pride center: ‘We need to move from pride flags to policy change'

Yahoo

time20 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Local Pride center: ‘We need to move from pride flags to policy change'

SAVANNAH, Ga. (WSAV)– The Savannah Pride Center offers year-round therapy, support groups and help with medical care for their community. The center's executive director Micheal Bell told WSAV that pride is all about becoming stronger as a community but he said this year there is more work than ever. 'We have the fastest growing new HIV cases in the country,' Bell said. 'We are one of the lowest in health care and we have a huge, vibrant, diverse LGBTQ+ population. The work is there to do but we also have to remember to celebrate that diversity.' Recently the Savannah Pride Center announced a new partnership with the Savannah Police Department. The police and the center developed a relationship after one of the Savannah Pride Center volunteers was murdered. 'With the police department, we have an opportunity to train the police on pronouns, history and culture with the LGBTQ+ community,' Bell Said 'This is the biggest step forward that our community has taken to protect our LGBTQ+ community here in Savannah.' The Savannah Pride Center will host an event on June 28 at Starland Yard to honor the history of the Stonewall Uprising. They emphasize that pride is ultimately about coming together and being stronger as a community. The city of Savannah recognizes June and October as Pride Months due to June being the start of hurricane season. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Puma Biotechnology Reports Inducement Awards Under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(c)(4)
Puma Biotechnology Reports Inducement Awards Under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(c)(4)

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Puma Biotechnology Reports Inducement Awards Under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(c)(4)

LOS ANGELES, June 04, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Puma Biotechnology, Inc. (NASDAQ: PBYI), a biopharmaceutical company, announced that on June 2, 2025, the Compensation Committee of Puma's Board of Directors approved the grant of inducement restricted stock unit awards covering 18,250 shares of Puma common stock to three new non-executive employees. The awards were granted under Puma's 2017 Employment Inducement Incentive Award Plan, which was adopted on April 27, 2017 and provides for the granting of equity awards to new employees of Puma. The restricted stock unit awards vest over a three-year period, with one-third of the shares underlying the award vesting on the first anniversary of the award's vesting commencement date, June 1, 2025, and one-sixth of the shares underlying the award vesting on each six-month anniversary of the vesting commencement date thereafter, subject to continued service. The awards were granted as an inducement material to the new employees entering into employment with Puma, in accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(c)(4). About Puma Biotechnology Puma Biotechnology, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company with a focus on the development and commercialization of innovative products to enhance cancer care. Puma in-licensed the global development and commercialization rights to PB272 (neratinib, oral) in 2011. Neratinib, oral was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2017 for the extended adjuvant treatment of adult patients with early stage HER2-overexpressed/amplified breast cancer, following adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy, and is marketed in the United States as NERLYNX® (neratinib) tablets. In February 2020, NERLYNX was also approved by the FDA in combination with capecitabine for the treatment of adult patients with advanced or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer who have received two or more prior anti-HER2-based regimens in the metastatic setting. NERLYNX was granted marketing authorization by the European Commission in 2018 for the extended adjuvant treatment of adult patients with early stage hormone receptor-positive HER2-overexpressed/amplified breast cancer and who are less than one year from completion of prior adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy. NERLYNX® is a registered trademark of Puma Biotechnology, Inc. In September 2022, Puma entered into an exclusive license agreement for the development and commercialization of the anti-cancer drug alisertib, a selective, small molecule, orally administered inhibitor of aurora kinase A. Initially, Puma intends to focus the development of alisertib on the treatment of small cell lung cancer and breast cancer. In February 2024, Puma initiated ALISCA™-Lung1, a Phase II clinical trial of alisertib monotherapy for the treatment of patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. In November 2024, Puma initiated ALISCA™-Breast1, a Phase II clinical trial of alisertib in combination with endocrine therapy for the treatment of patients with HER2-negative, HR-positive metastatic breast cancer. View source version on Contacts Alan H. Auerbach or Mariann Ohanesian, Puma Biotechnology, Inc., +1 424 248 6500info@ ir@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store