
Hanes: If Quebec wants to improve relations with anglophones, it must be careful when defining them
There was much talk about how to turn English-speaking Quebecers' generalized mistrust of the Coalition Avenir Québec government into trust during the recent study of the budgetary credits at the National Assembly.
Under questioning by Liberal MNA Gregory Kelley, Eric Girard, who is responsible for relations with the anglophone community, as well as being finance minister, even conceded a recent flashpoint was 'not our finest moment.' Girard's mea culpa was a reference to last summer's imbroglio over a government directive that suggested an eligibility certificate for English education would be required to access English health care. The government eventually rewrote the directive.
While it's positive that Girard said he wants to hit reset with often skeptical English-speaking Quebecers, there is another contentious issue percolating behind the scenes that could boil over.
Kelley asked Girard about a new methodology to define the English-speaking community the government is studying that could reduce its demographic weight, which was measured in the last census at about 13 per cent of the Quebec population. He warned that any such recalculation that diminishes the number of anglophones could compromise funding and the delivery of services, whether it be health care or employment assistance.
'Often the plans are based on the numbers. And it's where the numbers warrant,' Kelley noted during the exchange. 'So if the services are based on numbers, that's the way hospitals in Quebec determine what services.'
Girard seemed caught off guard, saying he was 'not particularly' aware of this review by the Ministry of the French Language. But he did try to be reassuring.
'Services are based on need. For example, access to health services. Where there are anglophone institutions, it's clear there are services and even in Montreal, francophone institutions are able to provide services. And in the regions, that's why we have regional access plans,' Girard said. 'Just to be clear, the objective is to offer the services, not to manipulate the numbers to not provide the services. We have regional access plans specifically because we want to ensure the services are available in English where there is a demand for the services.'
Nevertheless, Kelley said in an interview later that he wanted to put this issue on Girard's radar, both as minister responsible for relations with the English-speaking community and minister in charge of the Institut de la statistique du Québec, to head off any new friction.
'I think we could easily look at the track record and say that there's no reason for us to be optimistic,' he said. 'I hope the fact this intervention was a bit pre-emptive results in a positive decision for the community.'
The Ministry of the French Language confirmed that the current indicators on the number of people needing health services in English date from 2018 and are under review by the Health Ministry with its input. But it said no one who qualifies for care in English under the Health Act will be refused, regardless of the methodology used.
As for what alternatives are under consideration and when they might be unveiled, the Ministry of the French Language said the reflection is still underway.
Defining who is an anglophone is a fraught endeavour for a government that has often been antagonistic toward anglophones. And it's a sensitive matter for English-speaking Quebecers who often feel scapegoated, ignored and disrespected.
One source, speaking on background, said it's not illegitimate for the government to tweak its formula, but that it's still touchy.
'It's a political question for sure, but there's an administrative necessity underlying the political question,' said the source.
The Quebec government currently relies on Statistics Canada's 'first official language spoken' formula. That essentially boils down to counting all the Quebecers who answer English to that question on the census, plus adding about half of those who answer both English and French. This totals about 1.3 million Quebecers.
This measure is imperfect, but it is considered the gold standard because it's the most inclusive.
Sylvia Martin-Laforge, director general of the Quebec Community Groups Network, an umbrella organization for the English-speaking community, said she's been hearing for years that the provincial government has been looking for a new methodology that would effectively winnow down who qualifies as an anglophone. She said changing the variables would mean leaving someone out.
The QCGN favours the current model of calculating.
'We've always used the 'first official language spoken' number, and that's the most generous,' Martin-Laforge said.
Some of the CAQ government's past attempts to redefine the community have been ham-fisted, while others are unworkable. It has introduced the concepts of 'historic anglophones' and 'ayant droits,' which roughly translates as rights-holders. Both are extremely vague.
Last summer's eligibility certificate fiasco hit a nerve because relying on documents children with grandfathered access to English schools have had to obtain since Bill 101 was adopted in the 1970s neglects the fact that many seniors, babies or Canadian adults from other provinces don't have one. On top of this, since Bill 96 was passed, children who qualified for English education but attended French schools have been denied their eligibility certificate if they already graduated.
(Ironically, in many regions of Quebec, students who qualify for English schooling are actually francophones with inherited rights.)
Bill 96 also put a limit of six months during which new immigrants to Quebec can receive public services in a language other than French (English included), which also constrains need.
At the very least, the Secretariat for Relations With English-Speaking Quebecers, a branch of the Quebec government, should be involved in the methodology review process with the Ministry of the French Language, Kelley said.
It may be a highly technical matter, but proceeding with caution would show Girard is serious when it comes to wanting to improve relations with anglophones.
'It's great that Minister Girard says he wants to go from mistrust to trust,' Kelley said. 'So the ball is really in his court. I don't think this is a massive thing, since we more or less have an accepted definition that's out there. I don't think it's necessary to really change things or rock the boat too much, and (it's) a good chance for the government to work with the community to make sure we don't have any issues going forward.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Winnipeg Free Press
a day ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Travel ban may shut door for Afghan family to bring niece to US for a better life
IRMO, S.C. (AP) — Mohammad Sharafoddin, his wife and young son walked at times for 36 hours in a row over mountain passes as they left Afghanistan as refugees to end up less than a decade later talking about their journey on a plush love seat in the family's three-bedroom suburban American home. He and his wife dreamed of bringing her niece to the U.S. to share in that bounty. Maybe she could study to become a doctor and then decide her own path. But that door slams shut on Monday as America put in place a travel ban for people from Afghanistan and a dozen other countries. 'It's kind of shock for us when we hear about Afghanistan, especially right now for ladies who are affected more than others with the new government,' Mohammad Sharafoddin said. 'We didn't think about this travel ban.' President Donald Trump signed the ban Wednesday. It is similar to one in place during his first administration but covers more countries. Along with Afghanistan, travel to the U.S. is banned from Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Trump said visitors who overstay visas, like the man charged in an attack that injured dozens of demonstrators in Boulder, Colorado, earlier this month, are a danger to the country. The suspect in the attack is from Egypt, which isn't included in the ban. The countries chosen for the ban have deficient screening of their citizens, often refuse to take them back and have a high percentage of people who stay in the U.S. after their visas expire, Trump said. The ban makes exceptions for people from Afghanistan on Special Immigrant Visas who generally worked most closely with the U.S. government during the two-decade war there. Thousands of refugees came from Afghanistan Afghanistan was also one of the largest sources of resettled refugees, with about 14,000 arrivals in a 12-month period through September 2024. Trump suspended refugee resettlement on his first day in office. It is a path Sharafoddin took with his wife and son out of Afghanistan walking on those mountain roads in the dark then through Pakistan, Iran and into Turkey. He worked in a factory for years in Turkey, listening to YouTube videos on headphones to learn English before he was resettled in Irmo, South Carolina, a suburb of Columbia. His son is now 11, and he and his wife had a daughter in the U.S. who is now 3. There is a job at a jewelry maker that allows him to afford a two-story, three-bedroom house. Food was laid out on two tables Saturday for a celebration of the Muslim Eid al-Adha holiday. Sharafoddin's wife, Nuriya, said she is learning English and driving — two things she couldn't do in Afghanistan under Taliban rule. 'I'm very happy to be here now, because my son is very good at school and my daughter also. I think after 18 years they are going to work, and my daughter is going to be able to go to college,' she said. Family wants to help niece It is a life she wanted for her niece too. The couple show videos from their cellphones of her drawing and painting. When the Taliban returned to power in 2021, their niece could no longer study. So they started to plan to get her to the U.S. at least to further her education. Nuriya Sharafoddin doesn't know if her niece has heard the news from America yet. She hasn't had the heart to call and tell her. 'I'm not ready to call her. This is not good news. This is very sad news because she is worried and wants to come,' Nuriya Sharafoddin said. While the couple spoke, Jim Ray came by. He has helped a number of refugee families settle in Columbia and helped the Sharafoddins navigate questions in their second language. Ray said Afghans in Columbia know the return of the Taliban changed how the U.S. deals with their native country. But while the ban allows spouses, children or parents to travel to America, other family members aren't included. Many Afghans know their extended families are starving or suffering, and suddenly a path to help is closed, Ray said. 'We'll have to wait and see how the travel ban and the specifics of it actually play out,' Ray said. 'This kind of thing that they're experiencing where family cannot be reunited is actually where it hurts the most.' Taliban criticizes the travel ban The Taliban itself criticized Trump for the ban, with leader Hibatullah Akhundzada saying the U.S. was now the oppressor of the world. 'Citizens from 12 countries are barred from entering their land — and Afghans are not allowed either,' he said on a recording shared on social media. 'Why? Because they claim the Afghan government has no control over its people and that people are leaving the country. So, oppressor! Is this what you call friendship with humanity?'
.png&w=3840&q=100)
Montreal Gazette
2 days ago
- Montreal Gazette
Karl Blackburn on how Quebec Liberals can beat the CAQ
The Corner Booth Before the Quebec Liberals can have any hope of unseating the CAQ government in the 2026 provincial election, first they need to elect a new leader. Party members will choose one on June 14 in Quebec City. A late entry into the contest is Karl Blackburn, former MNA for Roberval from 2003 to 2007, and a chief organizer for the party. Blackburn also served as the president and CEO of the Conseil du patronat du Québec (CPQ), the province's largest employers' group. The Quebec Liberal leadership candidate joined hosts Bill Brownstein and Aaron Rand on this week's episode of The Corner Booth at Snowdon Deli to lay out his vision for uniting the Liberal base in Montreal with the vote-rich regions of the province. Blackburn feels his Lac-St-Jean bonafides will serve the party well outside of the 514-416. 'Mr. Legault in 2022 showed to everybody that he can form a government without Montreal, but we can't form a government without the regions,' Blackburn said. He added appealing to the regions doesn't have to come at the expense of alienating the province's English-speakers. 'It's interesting to see the guy from Saguenay–Lac-St-Jean defend the anglophone community,' Blackburn said. 'This is exactly what I'm doing. I don't want the closed leadership of Mr. Legault, dividing francophones against anglophones.' Blackburn talked about his opposition to the CAQ government's language, education and health-care bills. He also commented on the 'anyone but Rodriguez' sentiment brewing in the race against the early front-runner, former Montreal-area federal minister Pablo Rodriguez. 'The PLQ are not going to be a government anymore if we're not able to reconnect with the regions, and this is my strength,' Blackburn said in response to what would make him a more attractive candidate than Rodriguez. The trio also paid tribute to astronaut and politician Marc Garneau, who passed away this week at the age of 76. Garneau most recently appeared on The Corner Booth in January.
Montreal Gazette
2 days ago
- Montreal Gazette
Libman: On death, taxes and the future of minority rights in Quebec
Benjamin Franklin famously wrote: 'In this world nothing can be certain, except death and taxes.' Section 23 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, however, comes pretty close. It is the ironclad constitutional protection of minority-language education rights in this country. It has consistently been interpreted by Quebec courts to uphold the right of the English-speaking minority to control and manage its school system. And it's exempt from the application of the notwithstanding clause. After the Coalition Avenir Québec government adopted Bill 40 in 2020, abolishing and replacing school boards with service centres under greater government control, the province's English boards challenged the law as unconstitutional. In 2023 Quebec Superior Court Judge Sylvain Lussier agreed, ruling in no uncertain terms that much of Bill 40 infringes on the English-speaking community's constitutional rights to govern and control its educational institutions. The CAQ government, however, appealed the judgment. In April of this year, Quebec Court of Appeal judges Robert Mainville, Christine Baudouin and Judith Harvie handed down their ruling. They also concluded that parts of Bill 40 infringe on the section of the Charter of Rights that guarantees minority-language education rights and couldn't be demonstrably justified as a reasonable limit on charter rights in a free and democratic society. Another slam dunk for minority education rights. Yet this week, the Legault government went ahead anyways to request leave to appeal this judgment by Quebec's highest court to the Supreme Court of Canada. The irony here shouldn't be lost: Quebec's nationalist government is asking Canada's highest court to overturn rulings from the two Quebec courts. I have little doubt Quebec's lawyers have advised the government they cannot possibly win this case at the Supreme Court. This appeal seems purely political. No one would expect the CAQ to dare show any surrender in assailing minority language rights at the risk of giving a drumstick to their more nationalist rivals, the separatist Parti Québécois. The Supreme Court should refuse to hear the appeal considering how categorically the two Quebec courts unanimously ruled in what seems an open-and-shut case. For several reasons, the ideal scenario would be for the Supreme Court to say the Quebec courts composed of Lussier, Mainville, Baudouin and Harvie have already made an irreproachable decision. Case closed. This, in fact, could even benefit the CAQ (which they might be secretly hoping for) because if the Supreme Court does take the case and inevitably invalidates sections of the law sometime next year, around Quebec election time, it would help provide ripe fodder for the PQ to condemn Canada for 'again' crushing Quebec's aspirations and ignoring its 'distinctiveness' — while conveniently glossing over the fact that Quebec francophone judges had also unanimously struck it down. But watch out for another concern. Within days of the appeal court's ruling, coincidentally or not, Quebec Justice Minister Simon Jolin-Barrette announced his intention to launch negotiations with Ottawa about amending the Constitution so that Quebec judges are chosen from among members of the Quebec Bar, recommended by the Quebec government. Currently, superior and appeal court judges are appointed by the federal government. Judges in this country act as a check and balance for government legislation, if challenged. They are impartial arbiters, interpreting the charters of rights to balance individual or minority rights against political objectives. In Quebec, where an important linguistic minority relies on constitutional protections, the courts are their only redress at times, often against the backdrop of a highly charged language environment. We need only look across the border at the U.S. to see what can happen when the court system becomes politicized. If certain Quebec governments started to exert influence on the courts by appointing judges known for favouring collective rights over individual rights, or harbouring secessionist sympathies, for example, the last vestiges of protection for minority communities, including the certainty of Section 23, could vanish.