logo
To combat the housing crisis, Cambridge allows apartment buildings up to six stories everywhere in the city

To combat the housing crisis, Cambridge allows apartment buildings up to six stories everywhere in the city

Boston Globe11-02-2025

Advertisement
'I think that this will be a landmark moment, where the zoning map of Cambridge doesn't exactly look like a copy... of a redlining map, where the [most] affordable housing is not only in areas which also have more people of color and more multi-family housing in general, but our whole city is growing together as one with a unified residential district,' said Councilor Burhan Azeem, who authored the proposal with Councilor Sumbul Siddiqui.
The proposal comes as cities and towns across Eastern Massachusetts are
Related
:
With Monday's vote, Cambridge went the opposite direction. While the zoning plan is controversial, particularly among residents of some of the city's less dense neighborhoods, it represents the most sweeping attempt by a city in this state to find a solution to the housing problem.
And it also puts Cambridge on the forefront of the national YIMBY — or Yes in My Back Yard — movement, which supports looser zoning rules to boost the production of housing. The six-story policy is perhaps the broadest YIMBY policy passed in a US city to date.
The nine-member council passed the plan 8-1
Advertisement
Still, it was not without controversy. Over two hours of public comment
Monday night, some residents worried that the proposal was too much, too fast — that it would lead to overcrowding in lower-slung neighborhoods, and promote the development of expensive luxury housing instead of homes that are affordable to residents with lower- and middle-class incomes. Some also complained that the proposal was too simplistic, and that it had come together too quickly.
'I believe this proposal will produce mostly luxury units, raise real estate values, taxes, and rents, displace residents and raise both physical and psychological havoc in our neighborhoods,' said Catherine Zusy, the lone councilor who voted against the plan. 'It is not a recipe for urban planning. It is a recipe for random development at the whim of developers.'
Cambridge City Councilors Burhan Azeem, left, and Sumbul Siddiqui led the push for new zoning that will allow six-story buildings by right citywide.
Erin Clark/Globe Staff
The proposal that passed Monday was a slightly reduced compromise of the original plan, which simply would have allowed six-stories, by-right,
everywhere in Cambridge, meaning projects could be permitted without the special approval of a city board if they meet the city's zoning parameters, citywide.
But after persistent pushback, including from within the council, Azeem and other supporters negotiated a compromise. Instead, the proposal allows for four stories by-right citywide, and developers can add two additional stories, getting up to six,
if they set aside 20 percent of the units in a project as affordable.
Related
:
That means that if the proposal yields significant market-rate housing, it will also bring an influx of new affordable homes.
In the end, almost every councilor agreed that it was time to get rid of single-family zoning, sometimes referred to as exclusionary zoning, which rose to prominence in the early 20th century as a policy tool for keeping some neighborhoods exclusive along racial boundaries by preventing the construction of apartments.
Advertisement
Six stories is the necessary scale for a city like Cambridge, said Azeem, because is little open land on which to build new housing. The city is so dense already, he said, that if they want to build more, the only way to do so is to build higher.
By some measures, Cambridge has the worst localized housing crisis in Massachusetts and some of the highest housing costs in the United States. The median rent for a one-bedroom apartment is $2,612 a month, according to
Cambridge has become something of a laboratory for housing reform in recent years. First it passed
The council also passed a policy that
Each of those policies was controversial in their own right, but as the council has continued to push on housing policy, old political lines have begun to fade away. That six-story zoning passed with only one opposing vote would have been unthinkable even a couple of years ago. In fact, a much lesser multifamily housing plan that was proposed a few years ago never even made it to a vote.
Advertisement
'For too long, exclusionary zoning has put up barriers, barriers that have kept people out, that have restricted growth, that have made it harder for families to put down roots,' Mayor Denise Simmons said ahead of the vote Monday. 'And so tonight, we have the chance to take down some of those barriers and make good on the commitment of being a welcoming and accessible city.'
Andrew Brinker can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How to win friends and influence climate policy
How to win friends and influence climate policy

Politico

time21 hours ago

  • Politico

How to win friends and influence climate policy

With help from Josh Siegel MAKING LIMONADE: Senate Democrats elevated one of their most progressive environmental champions when they picked Sen. Monique Limón as their next chamber leader Monday — showing it's still very possible to win friends and influence climate policy even in an era when the zeitgeist seems to have moved on to basic cost-of-living concerns. The Santa Barbara Democrat, elected to the state Assembly in 2016 and state Senate in 2020, will take on her new role in early 2026 before being termed out in 2028. Her path to the top has gone straight through the upper chamber's negotiations on the biggest climate bills of recent years, where she's gained a reputation as a detail-oriented policymaker who seeks wide input while remaining a staunch environmental justice ally. In a brief interview Tuesday, Limón signaled a willingness to follow the larger body's consensus even if it strays from her progressive leanings, bringing up her vote for a bill last year that sought to regulate warehouses despite opposition from community and environmental justice groups who saw it as greenwashing. 'I felt that moving something forward, even if it wasn't to the liking of those that I typically side with, was much more important for the state than waiting another year to be able to do it,' she said. 'There's these big things I've done, but at the end of the day, the leader of the house is really the vehicle to try to get to where the state wants, and that I think is important.' Her balancing of her environmental bona fides with wider political demands will perhaps most be put to the test on housing, which the Senate has remained divided on despite a push by the Assembly to waive environmental rules to spur more building. Limón has declined to support several measures aimed at boosting housing in recent years, in contrast to other lawmakers seen as pro tem contenders, Sens. Lena Gonzalez and Angelique Ashby — leaving YIMBY groups quiet or openly skeptical of her new role Monday. Most immediately, she'll have to exercise her newfound influence in the upper chamber's deliberations on the extension of the state's cap-and-trade program. She's seen as one of the most likely to push for reforms to the program, having been one of the sole Democrat votes against a 2017 deal on cap and trade in line with criticism from environmental justice groups. But her new role supercharges already-delicate negotiations with her counterparts in the Assembly and the governor's office. She has a track record of bringing together broad climate coalitions: Last year, she co-authored Prop 4, last year's $10 billion climate bond, which had the support of dozens of water, agriculture, energy and environment groups. But she's also not afraid of rocking the boat, including by authoring a bill to rein in the voluntary carbon offset market that drew opposition from everyone from the California Air Resources Board to the California Chamber of Commerce. She also has a track record of making enemies of oil and gas groups, including an early-career bill to ban new offshore oil drilling in state waters and pending legislation this year to slow a Texas-based oil company's restart of offshore oil drilling. She co-authored a bill to phase out neighborhood oil drilling in 2022, which became final in 2024 after oil groups agreed to pull a referendum on the bill from the ballot. Limón's new reach came through Tuesday morning, when she presided over her first Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee meeting since the vote. From her position as chair, she got farming and tribal groups to promise to negotiate over a bill to regulate flows on the Scott and Shasta rivers — and got called out by Republican Sen. Shannon Grove, who asked her to use her newfound influence to pressure the State Water Resources Control Board to act more quickly on the rivers. — CvK Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here! DAYS NUMBERED: President Donald Trump is about to kill California's electric vehicle rules. Trump plans to sign a trio of resolutions Thursday to revoke the state's zero-emission sales mandates for cars and heavy-duty trucks, Sen. Shelley Moore Capito ( and Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.) confirmed. The signings will finalize his administration's months-long effort to thwart California's nation-leading vehicle emissions standards through an unprecedented congressional maneuver that triggered pushback from the Senate parliamentarian. We know what's going to happen next: California Attorney General Rob Bonta has already vowed to sue once Trump signs the resolutions. Daniel Villaseñor, a spokesperson for California Gov. Gavin Newsom, said the state is ready. 'If it's a day ending in 'y,' it's another day of Trump's war on California. We're fighting back,' Villaseñor said in a statement. — AN WHAT'S THAT SMELL?: The fight over a purple San Diego congressional seat could come down to raw sewage. Jim Desmond, a San Diego County supervisor, has become a regular on Fox News and other conservative outlets about sewage flowing from Mexico through the Tijuana River and into California — just as he's mounting a campaign to replace Democratic Rep. Mike Levin, Timothy Cama reports for POLITICO's E&E News. Desmond has framed Levin's efforts to raise funds for infrastructure upgrades to a major sewage treatment plant that straddles the border as letting Mexican officials off the hook. 'My opponent is proud of the strategy of throwing more money into the processing of the sewage,' Desmond said. Levin countered that Desmond has only recently started talking about the issue and has proposed a dam along the river that's criticized by air and water experts. 'What he's done since then is talk in the media and point fingers, and frankly, offer a ridiculous, counterproductive idea,' Levin said. — AN CASH PROBLEMS: Pacific Gas & Electric is among the growing chorus of utilities, consumer advocates and environmentalists pleading with the Trump administration to finalize $23 billion in loans for energy infrastructure projects. The funding awarded in the waning days of the Biden administration — much of which would go to Midwest states that voted for Trump — could help finance investments in transmission lines, batteries, renewable energy and natural gas infrastructure, Brian Dabbs and Jason Plautz report for POLITICO's E&E News. But they still need approval from Trump's Department of Energy. A DOE spokesperson said it's 'conducting a department-wide review to ensure all activities follow the law, comply with applicable court orders and align with the Trump administration's priorities.' The stakes are high for PG&E customers. Jennifer Robison, a spokesperson for the utility, said that leveraging a low-cost $15 billion loan guarantee could save ratepayers $1 billion in interest costs over the life of the loan. The utility cited 'uncertainty' around the loan alongside tariffs and wildfires in a recent filing among the reasons it was asking for a slight rate increase. — AN — Opponents of Sen. Josh Becker's SB 540, to set up a Westwide electric grid, are circulating this New York Times story on the unpopularity of the Northeast's grid manager. — Tech giants like Google and Meta are fighting to save renewable energy subsidies in the tax and spending bill winding its way through Congress. — Listen to our editor Debra Kahn discuss why carbon capture could survive the GOP megabill on the POLITICO energy podcast.

SpaceX's New Company Town Considers Adopting NIMBY Zoning Code
SpaceX's New Company Town Considers Adopting NIMBY Zoning Code

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

SpaceX's New Company Town Considers Adopting NIMBY Zoning Code

Happy Tuesday, and welcome to another edition of Rent Free. To start with a brief programming note, I'll be off the rest of this week and early next week for some YIMBY-adjacent travel. That means there will not be a Rent Free newsletter next Tuesday. Please accept my sincerest apologies for the coming lack of housing and urbanism content in your inbox. Perhaps readers could use the missed newsletter to reflect on all the homes, businesses, economic growth, and social opportunities we're all missing out on because of modern zoning codes. With that said, we still have this week's newsletter, which takes an in-depth look at cutting-edge SpaceX's efforts to impose a stodgy old zoning code onto its new company town. Early last month, residents of the unincorporated villages near SpaceX's launch facility in Southern Texas, right along the U.S.-Mexico border, voted to incorporate as the new city of Starbase, Texas. With most of the area's 218 voting residents being SpaceX employees, the vote was overwhelmingly in favor of incorporation, which the company says will make it easier to shut down nearby beaches during its rocket launches. Regrettably, one of the first priorities of the futuristically named town is to adopt a very old-fashioned zoning code. As news outlets have covered, the Starbase City Commission has begun notifying residents that they potentially stand to lose the property rights they've enjoyed on their heretofore unzoned land under a draft zoning code. As The Washington Post reported, Texas law does guarantee landowners' rights to continue with legal uses of their land after the imposition of a zoning code, even if the new code would otherwise prohibit those existing uses. Nevertheless, longtime residents have every reason to fear that the imposition of a zoning code will restrict future, potential uses of their property and reduce their property values in the process. A close look at Starbase's 52-page draft zoning code suggests that it's better than some zoning regimes. But it will still do a lot to weigh down development with layers of red tape, restrictions, and process. The zoning maps for most major American cities, and more than a few suburban communities, are a rich mosaic of multicolored districts. That's a bad thing. Each color on a zoning map corresponds to a zoning district, with its own set of rules about how big buildings can be and what they can be used for. In this respect, Starbase's proposed zoning code calls for a simpler regulatory regime. The draft code divides the small city into just three zoning districts: heavy industrial, open space, and mixed use. The heavy industrial district will allow, naturally, industrial uses as well as office space and retail businesses dedicated to servicing industrial uses. The open space zoning prohibits almost all development to preserve recreational space within the town. The mixed-use district will meanwhile allow for a range of residential, light commercial, and office uses. This is a major improvement on the standard zoning code's strict separation of residential and commercial uses. Allowing easier intermingling of homes and businesses goes a long way toward allowing much-prized "mixed-use walkable urbanism" where convenience stores can actually be allowed in convenient walkable locations. Starbase's proposed code does one better by not imposing single-family zoning, where only one residential unit per property is allowed. Instead, the city would permit single-family homes, duplexes, and townhomes anywhere in its mixed-use district by right—meaning these forms of "light-touch" density wouldn't need to obtain discretionary permits from the city government. As an added bonus, the code would not impose any minimum lot sizes on townhome developments. Barring any health or safety rules about minimum unit size, developers can use as much or as little land as they think is necessary when building rows of row houses. (Townhome blocks could only be 220 feet long.) Starbase's mixed-use district would also allow property owners to operate home-based businesses out of their residences. Unlike the most restrictive home-based business ordinances, it would allow on-site sales and permit up to four clients to visit a home-based business at one time. The draft code would still prohibit home-based businesses from having employees on-site or physically altering the exterior of the home. Starbase's mixed-use district would also allow a range of commercial uses. Property owners could set up a convenience store, grocery store, bar, restaurant, or even a dance hall by right anywhere in the mixed-use zone. Better yet, unlike most zoning ordinances, Starbase's draft code includes no explicit parking minimums requiring builders to include so many off-street parking spaces per bedroom, square foot of commercial floor space, or linear foot of church pew. For by-right uses, it would generally be up to the property owner to decide how much off-street parking their business needs, or even whether it needs parking at all. For all its relative simplicity and permissiveness, Starbase's draft code still includes many restrictions typical of modern zoning regimes. It would require a 4,000 square foot minimum lot size for single-family homes and duplexes. That's quite large. It's notably bigger than the 3,000 square foot minimum lot size cap that the Texas Legislature voted to impose on new subdivision developments in larger cities. Starbase's draft code would also create maximum lot coverage rules, which would limit duplexes and single-family homes from covering no more than 50 percent of an individual lot. Townhomes could cover no more than 75 percent of an individual lot. These requirements would potentially make residential development on smaller lots infeasible. Builders also couldn't make up for these lot coverage rules by building up. Single-family homes, duplexes, and townhomes could be no more than three stories tall. Where Starbase's zoning code is more permissive than the average code on smaller homes, it is arguably more restrictive than the average code when it comes to regulating multifamily housing. While multifamily housing developments, defined as projects of three or more units, are not expressly prohibited in the mixed-use zone, they're not allowed by right either. Building a triplex or a small apartment building would require obtaining a special-use permit from the City Commission. That would be no small order. Under the draft code, the Commission will only sign off on these permits after holding a public hearing and finding that the proposed project is "compatible with surrounding land uses," that anticipated impacts are adequately mitigated, and that the development promotes "the public interest, health, safety, and general welfare." Those requirements would give the City Commission ample opportunity to say no to a new development. The power to just say no in turn gives the City Commission a lot of leverage to force changes and alterations onto developers' projects. Per the draft code, the City Commission is explicitly given the power to condition a special-use permit on adherence to ad hoc density limits, parking regulations, landscaping requirements, and a development's "compatibility of appearance." This all opens the door to the city micromanaging the aesthetic appearances of multifamily housing. In the service of mitigating parking impacts, the city would seem to have the power to force developers to add parking on a project-by-project basis—undercutting the code's general forswearing of mandatory parking minimums. Starbase's mixed-use district would require some businesses, including hotels, liquor stores, and smoke shops, to get special-use permits, too. The code would also ban food trucks from parking on the street. While many people might not care for its founder or his politics, Elon Musk's SpaceX is undeniably one of the most dynamic, innovative companies in the world. It's done a miraculous job of revolutionizing the stodgy, state-dominated business of space launches. It's unfortunate, then, that a company known for disrupting old ways of doing things is proposing to regulate land use in its newly founded city via outmoded zoning regulations that have turned the rest of the country into a property rights–free museum. It's sadly ironic, too, that Starbase is considering adopting a zoning code, given that SpaceX is no stranger to burdensome land-use regulations. The company's launch operations at Vandenberg Space Force Base in California are under threat from the state's Coastal Commission, the state body that governs development along the California coast. Federal environmental review laws have hampered SpaceX's Texas launch operations as well. Despite SpaceX's tangles with red tape, Starbase can't resist zoning's gravitational pull, and all the awesome powers it creates to say "no" to land uses both benign and beneficial. In so much of the rest of the country, states and cities are slowly walking away from parking minimums, minimum lot sizes, and discretionary approval processes. Lawmakers in Starbase's home state of Texas just passed a slew of zoning reforms that peel back some local restrictions on property rights. The state's newest city is moving in the opposite direction. It'll end up costing the company town some of the dynamism its corporate patron is justly famous for. Connecticut Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont is considering whether to veto a housing bill that would require cities to upzone land in order to meet state-set affordable housing goals. The Washington Post reports on the out-of-control costs of subsidized affordable housing in Washington, D.C., which costs far more to build than nearby market-rate housing. Read my own investigation into the country's most expensive affordable housing project from 2019. The California Senate passes a major transit-oriented development bill. The post SpaceX's New Company Town Considers Adopting NIMBY Zoning Code appeared first on

‘It's a net positive for us.' For some US manufacturers, Trump tariffs pay off
‘It's a net positive for us.' For some US manufacturers, Trump tariffs pay off

Boston Globe

timea day ago

  • Boston Globe

‘It's a net positive for us.' For some US manufacturers, Trump tariffs pay off

AccuRounds is exactly the kind of high-end manufacturing company that's supposed to benefit from the Trump tariffs —and right now the plan seems to be working. After a sluggish 2024, AccuRounds workers are putting in overtime as they transform steel rods into hundreds of highly specialized industrial gadgets, and the company is looking to hire. Revenues were up by 20 percent in the first quarter of 2025 and Tamasi expects the same for the current quarter. Revenues last year came to about $20 million, he said. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up AccuRounds makes precisely machined pieces of metal that mostly go inside bigger machines, ranging from commercial aircraft to industrial robots to drug manufacturing systems. For instance, one component goes into a pump that excretes the glue used to assemble iPhones. Another is a driveshaft that's found in most of the machines used worldwide to make influenza vaccines. Advertisement AccuRounds also makes surgical tools such as trephenes, the razor-sharp cookie cutters used to extract diseased corneas from human eyes during transplant procedures. AccuRounds even makes components for high-end flutes played by professional musicians. Advertisement AccuRounds is nothing like the grimy machine shops of old. It's clean and well-lit, with a multitude of computer-guided milling machines, each costing hundreds of thousands of dollars. The Plexiglass windows on each machine are splashed by a constant spray of cutting oil, which cools and lubricates the cutting tools and washes away metal debris. Twelve-foot steel rods are fed into the mill, where they're automatically shaped, drilled and cut into the proper shape, then dropped into a finished-parts bin. Lately the company's installed robotic arms at some of the milling machines. Made by Universal Robots, a Danish company owned by North Reading-based That doesn't mean fewer jobs, Tamasi said, just different ones. 'It's a commitment that we've made to our team here, that technology, The company's recent revenue surge began right after the re-election of Donald Trump, who'd campaigned on a promise to revive US manufacturing by levying high tariffs on imports. 'It was the end of November, early December,' said Tamasi. 'That's when we started to see things turn.' One customer who had been purchasing from machine shops in Singapore and China told Tamasi that the impending tariffs had cause a change of heart. 'They mentioned they spent a couple of years farming work out,' Tamasi said. 'Now they're looking at bringing that work back.' Advertisement Mark Curtin inspected a finished product at AccuRounds. Matthew J. Lee/Globe Staff It's a reminder that tariffs aren't all bad. And AccuRounds isn't the only local manufacturer to benefit. Canton-based Company president Brian Buyea said that even before Trump took office, he was hearing from customers looking to 'reshore' their supply chain with US-made circuit boards. 'Now you start to add the tariffs on top of that, it's started to give us a little more of a positive boost,' Buyea said. Because the Trump administration has so frequently raised and lowered its proposed tariff rates, Buyea couldn't predict their effect on Remtec's revenues. 'It could be anything from a 10 percent pickup for us, to, we could double our business,' he said. Even skeptics concede that import taxes can benefit domestic manufacturers by driving up the cost of products made by foreign competitors. 'These types of polices inevitably have some winners, at least in the short term,' said Scott Lincicome, economist at the To Lincicome. tariffs produce far more losers than winners, as businesses and consumers throughout the economy end up paying more for products. Either they keep buying imports, and pay the tariff, or they switch to more expensive US sources. Many domestic companies use higher tariffs as an opportunity to raise their own prices. And as domestic orders surge, some companies must invest in new plant and equipment, and their new customers will pay for it. 'Over time, you're getting slower growth and a less efficient, less productive economy,' said Lincicome. Advertisement AccuRounds derives only about 5 percent of its revenue from exports, so the company won't suffer much if foreign nations aim retaliatory tariffs at US goods. But the Trump tariffs make it more expensive for manufacturers to purchase the supplies and equipment they need. Steel tariffs are a problem, Tamasi admitted. He'd happily buy US-made steel but 'the quality and the consistency is not there,' he said. 'We've tried everyone.' So he'll keep importing the steel despite the administration's 50 percent tariff. However, AccuRounds' sales contracts stipulate that the company can pass on any increases in steel costs to the end user, shielding AccuRounds from the tariff burden. There's no way around it, said Tamasi. 'If we had to absorb all price increases,' he said, 'we wouldn't be able to compete.' An even bigger hit could come from purchasing new milling machines, priced at half a million dollars or more even before the tariffs. The only ones worth buying, Tamasi said, are made in Switzerland, Germany and Japan. No US company makes the machines he needs, Tamasi said there's no way he can pass this tariff bill directly to customers, but in the long run it could well push his prices higher. Still, if Tamasi's customers are willing to pick up the tab, AccuRounds is a likely victor of the tariff wars. AccuRounds makes specialized metal parts. Matthew J. Lee/Globe Staff Hiawatha Bray can be reached at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store