logo
British lawmakers vote to decriminalise abortion in England and Wales

British lawmakers vote to decriminalise abortion in England and Wales

Euronews6 hours ago

British lawmakers have voted to decriminalise abortion in England and Wales, following concerns about the number of women who are investigated for terminated pregnancies.
The House of Commons approved an amendment — it passed 379-317 — to a broader crime bill that would prevent women from being criminally punished under an antiquated law dating back to the mid-19th century.
Abortion has been legal in England and Wales for almost six decades but only up to 24 weeks and with the approval of two doctors.
The amendment means that women who terminate their pregnancy after 24 weeks will no longer be investigated by the police. Medical professionals or anybody assisting a woman with an abortion outside outside the 24-week limit could still face prosecution.
Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi, the Labour member of Parliament who introduced one of the amendments, said the change was needed because police have investigated more than 100 women for suspected illegal abortions over the past five years, including some who suffered natural miscarriages and stillbirths.
'This piece of legislation will only take women out of the criminal justice system because they are vulnerable and they need our help,' she said. 'Just what public interest is this serving? This is not justice, it is cruelty and it has got to end.'
The House of Commons will now need to pass the crime bill, which is expected, before it goes to the House of Lords, where it can be delayed but not blocked.
Under current law, doctors can legally carry out abortions in England, Scotland and Wales up to 24 weeks, and beyond that under special circumstances, such as when the life of the mother is in danger. Abortion in Northern Ireland was decriminalised in 2019.
Changes in the law implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic allow women to receive abortion pills through the mail and terminate their own pregnancies at home within 10 weeks of conception.
That has led to a handful of widely publicised cases in which women were prosecuted for illegally obtaining abortion pills and using them to end their own pregnancies after 24 weeks or more.
Anti-abortion groups opposed the measures, arguing it would open the door to abortion on demand at any stage of pregnancy.
'Unborn babies will have any remaining protection stripped away, and women will be left at the mercy of abusers,' said Alithea Williams, public policy manager for the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, which describes itself as the UK's biggest pro-life campaign group.
The debate came after recent prosecutions have galvanised support to repeal parts of the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act.
In one case, a mother of three was sentenced to more than two years in prison in 2023 for medically inducing an abortion about eight months into her pregnancy.
Carla Foster, 45, was released about a month later by an appeals court that reduced her sentence. Judge Victoria Sharp said that case called for 'compassion, not punishment' and there was no useful purpose in jailing her.
Last month, a jury acquitted Nicola Packer on a charge of unlawfully self-administering poison or a noxious thing with intent to procure a miscarriage. Packer, who took abortion medicine when she was about 26 weeks pregnant, testified that she did not know she had been pregnant more than 10 weeks.
Supporters of the bill said it was a landmark reform that would keep women from going to prison for ending their pregnancy.
'At a time when we're seeing rollbacks on reproductive rights, most notably in the United States, this crucial milestone in the fight for reproductive rights sends a powerful message that our lawmakers are standing up for women,' said Louise McCudden of MSI Reproductive Choices.
Smokers in the Netherlands pay more for cigarettes than almost anywhere else in the European Union – and the country hiked taxes again last year, to the delight of public health and anti-smoking advocates.
But new research indicates that raising tobacco taxes may no longer work in small, wealthy countries where people can easily cross borders to load up on cheaper products abroad.
After the Netherlands increased prices by 24 per cent on cigarettes and 45 per cent on rolling tobacco in 2024, about 7 per cent of smokers quit, according to the analysis from the Dutch public health agency.
Meanwhile, 22 per cent of smokers cut down on cigarettes and 14 per cent switched to a cheaper brand.
But many smokers simply looked across the border to get their fix. Dutch smokers bought an estimated 60 per cent of their tobacco products in other countries after the tax was introduced, the study found, up from 40 per cent in 2023 and 30 per cent in 2020.
'Policy must focus on reducing purchases of tobacco products made abroad,' the agency said.
It recommended restrictions on the number of cigarettes and other tobacco products that can be brought into the country. The health agency also wants excise taxes on e-cigarettes to make it less likely that young people will become addicted to vaping before switching to traditional cigarettes.
The World Health Organization (WHO) says raising tobacco taxes is one of the fastest ways to curb smoking and other tobacco use, which kill more than eight million people worldwide every year.
The WHO recommends a minimum tax rate of 75 per cent.
Price controls appear to be more effective in lower-income countries, where tobacco taxes were associated with a 9 per cent reduction in cigarette smoking between 2014 and 2020, according to a study published last year. In wealthy countries, taxes were tied to a 6 per cent decline.
The latest data from the Netherlands indicates that 'given the availability of cheap tobacco from abroad, the price policy is becoming less and less effective,' the Dutch health agency said.
'As long as tobacco prices in neighbouring countries do not increase, the [agency] expects that the share of people who quit or attempt to quit will decrease'.
That could soon change. The European Commission, the EU's executive body, is reportedly considering raising taxes on rolling tobacco by 258 per cent and on cigarettes by 139 per cent, amid pressure from member states to tackle tobacco consumption.
Last year, the Netherlands and 15 other countries urged the Commission to act on an EU-wide basis, saying the wide variation in tax rates across the bloc is undermining its single market.
Across the EU, taxes on a 20-pack of cigarettes range from €1.92 in Bulgaria to €9.92 in Ireland, according to a 2024 analysis from the Tax Foundation.
The Netherlands has the second-highest tax rate, at €7.66.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cannabis use doubles the risk of dying from heart disease, study finds
Cannabis use doubles the risk of dying from heart disease, study finds

Euronews

time23 minutes ago

  • Euronews

Cannabis use doubles the risk of dying from heart disease, study finds

People who use cannabis or its synthetic cousin, cannabinoids, are twice as likely to die from heart problems as those who abstain from the drugs, new research has found. Recreational cannabis use remains illegal in most of Europe, but it is the region's most commonly used drug. An estimated 8.4 per cent of adults – 24 million people – used cannabis in the past year, according to the European Union Drugs Agency (EUDA). Cannabis is generally stronger and more diverse than in past decades, with users having a choice between smoking marijuana, edibles, cannabis concentrates, and cannabinoids, which are synthetic psychoactive drugs with a high concentration of Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the active ingredient in cannabis that makes people feel high. That has prompted concern about the potential health consequences of modern cannabis – and the new study, published in the journal Heart, is the latest to show they carry weight. In addition to the doubled mortality risks, cannabis use is tied to a 20 per cent higher risk of stroke and a 29 per cent higher risk of heart attacks or other types of acute coronary syndrome, which is when blood flow to the heart is severely restricted, the study found. The findings raise 'serious questions about the assumption that cannabis imposes little cardiovascular risk,' Stanton Glantz and Dr Lynn Silver, researchers at the University of California at San Francisco who were not involved with the study, said in a written comment. For the analysis, a French research team assessed real-world data from 24 studies conducted between 2016 and 2023. Most participants were between the ages of 19 and 59, and cannabis users were more likely to be younger and male compared with people who did not use the drug. Notably, most of the studies were observational, meaning researchers can't say that cannabis use causes heart problems directly. There was also a high risk of bias in most of the studies. More research is needed to understand exactly how cannabis is linked to heart problems, and whether the risks differ based on the type of cannabis someone uses. Despite the limitations, the study authors said their analysis is among the most comprehensive yet to probe the possible link between cannabis and heart problems in the real world. Glantz and Silver pushed for health warnings on cannabis products and protections against secondhand smoke exposure, particularly as countries relax their cannabis laws and the drug becomes more easily available. 'Cannabis needs to be incorporated into the framework for prevention of clinical cardiovascular disease,' they said. British lawmakers have voted to decriminalise abortion in England and Wales, following concerns about the number of women who are investigated for terminated pregnancies. The House of Commons approved an amendment — it passed 379-317 — to a broader crime bill that would prevent women from being criminally punished under an antiquated law dating back to the mid-19th century. Abortion has been legal in England and Wales for almost six decades but only up to 24 weeks and with the approval of two doctors. The amendment means that women who terminate their pregnancy after 24 weeks will no longer be investigated by the police. Medical professionals or anybody assisting a woman with an abortion outside outside the 24-week limit could still face prosecution. Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi, the Labour member of Parliament who introduced one of the amendments, said the change was needed because police have investigated more than 100 women for suspected illegal abortions over the past five years, including some who suffered natural miscarriages and stillbirths. 'This piece of legislation will only take women out of the criminal justice system because they are vulnerable and they need our help,' she said. 'Just what public interest is this serving? This is not justice, it is cruelty and it has got to end.' The House of Commons will now need to pass the crime bill, which is expected, before it goes to the House of Lords, where it can be delayed but not blocked. Under current law, doctors can legally carry out abortions in England, Scotland and Wales up to 24 weeks, and beyond that under special circumstances, such as when the life of the mother is in danger. Abortion in Northern Ireland was decriminalised in 2019. Changes in the law implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic allow women to receive abortion pills through the mail and terminate their own pregnancies at home within 10 weeks of conception. That has led to a handful of widely publicised cases in which women were prosecuted for illegally obtaining abortion pills and using them to end their own pregnancies after 24 weeks or more. Anti-abortion groups opposed the measures, arguing it would open the door to abortion on demand at any stage of pregnancy. 'Unborn babies will have any remaining protection stripped away, and women will be left at the mercy of abusers,' said Alithea Williams, public policy manager for the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, which describes itself as the UK's biggest pro-life campaign group. The debate came after recent prosecutions have galvanised support to repeal parts of the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act. In one case, a mother of three was sentenced to more than two years in prison in 2023 for medically inducing an abortion about eight months into her pregnancy. Carla Foster, 45, was released about a month later by an appeals court that reduced her sentence. Judge Victoria Sharp said that case called for 'compassion, not punishment' and there was no useful purpose in jailing her. Last month, a jury acquitted Nicola Packer on a charge of unlawfully self-administering poison or a noxious thing with intent to procure a miscarriage. Packer, who took abortion medicine when she was about 26 weeks pregnant, testified that she did not know she had been pregnant more than 10 weeks. Supporters of the bill said it was a landmark reform that would keep women from going to prison for ending their pregnancy. 'At a time when we're seeing rollbacks on reproductive rights, most notably in the United States, this crucial milestone in the fight for reproductive rights sends a powerful message that our lawmakers are standing up for women,' said Louise McCudden of MSI Reproductive Choices.

Kneecap debut London billboards ahead of terror court appearance
Kneecap debut London billboards ahead of terror court appearance

Euronews

time4 hours ago

  • Euronews

Kneecap debut London billboards ahead of terror court appearance

Belfast rap group Kneecap have a scheduled appearance today at Westminster Magistrates Court in London, UK, over terror charges. How to prep for such a situation? Billboards, of course. The trio, known for satirical lyrics and on-stage provocations, have put billboards up all over London that read 'More Blacks, More Dogs, More Irish, Mo Chara', in reference to a discriminatory slogan used in the mid-twentieth century that read 'No Blacks, No Irish, No Dogs'. These discriminatory signs were commonplace in London in the 50s, plastered on homes and businesses. Kneecap announced their version of the sign on social media, ahead of what they have referred to as a 'witch-hunt'. Indeed, Mo Chara – real name Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh – was charged over an alleged incident where he reportedly displayed a Hezbollah flag during a UK concert last November. Hezbollah is listed as a proscribed terrorist organisation by the UK Government. The group said that they 'deny' the offence and will 'vehemently defend ourselves'. 'This is political policing,' they wrote. 'This is a carnival of distraction. We are not the story. Genocide is.' 'British courts have long charged people from the North of Ireland with 'terrorism' for crimes never committed. We will fight them. We will win.' Une publication partagée par KNEECAP (@kneecap32) Kneecap have repeatedly denied supporting Hamas or Hezbollah, and argued that they are facing a "co-ordinated smear campaign" after speaking out about "the ongoing genocide against the Palestinian people". "Let us be unequivocal: we do not, and have never, supported Hamas or Hezbollah. We condemn all attacks on civilians, always. It is never okay. We know this more than anyone, given our nation's history", they said in a statement. "Kneecap's message has always been - and remains - one of love, inclusion, and hope. This is why our music resonates across generations, countries, classes and cultures and has brought hundreds of thousands of people to our gigs." Many Kneecap fans made their way to Westminster Magistrates Court to show their support. Several days after the terror charges were made, the band addressed them by saying during their set at Wide Awake festival that the charges were a way of silencing Kneecap and preventing them from 'speaking on stage at Glastonbury the way we did at Coachella'. Several artists have supported Kneecap, including Brian Eno, Fontaines D.C. and Pulp. They signed an open letter criticizing a 'clear, concerted attempt to censor and ultimately deplatform' Kneecap and opposing 'political repression of artistic freedom.' The letter reads: "As artists, we feel the need to register our opposition to any political repression of artistic freedom.' "In a democracy, no political figures or political parties should have the right to dictate who does and does not play at music festivals or gigs that will be enjoyed by thousands of people." Similarly, Love Music Hate Racism shared a statement saying that the charity organisation 'stands with Kneecap'. 'Love Music Hate Racism stands with Kneecap against the attempts to silence them for speaking out for Gaza,' the statement read. 'Anyone trying to silence them, or get them pulled from shows, is on the wrong side of history. 'LMHR has always attempted to use the power of music to unite people against hate and division. We stand with Kneecap against those directing hate towards the movement for Palestine. We call on all to stand with Kneecap and defend Mo Chara on June 18 outside Westminster Magistrates Court in London.' There has been pushback from several UK politicians regarding the appearance of Kneecap at various music festivals this summer. The band are still listed as performing at Glastonbury on Saturday 28 June. Whether or not the BBC - Glastonbury's broadcaster – decide to televise Kneecap's performance remains to be seen. Alfred Brendel, a classical pianist and writer renowned for his refined playing of Beethoven and Schubert, died Tuesday at his home in London. He was 94. Born on 5 January 1931 in Moravia, now the Czech Republic, Brendel spent most of his childhood in Croatia and Austria. 'I grew up in a family that was not musically inclined, not artistically inclined and not intellectual, so I had to find out a lot of things for myself', he said in a 2012 interview for the Verbier Festival. As a child and teenager, he studied piano and composition but considered himself largely self-taught. 'I did attend master classes in Austria by Edwin Fischer and Eduard Steuermann, but I never had a regular teacher after the age of 16', he told the New York Times in 1981. 'Self-discovery is a slower process but a more natural one.' Brendel gave his first recital in Graz, Austria, in 1948 at age 17, marking the beginning of a six-decade career. Throughout his life, he became especially associated with the music of Beethoven. He recorded the composer's 32 piano sonatas three times, and he played them over a month at New York's Carnegie Hall in 1983. He repeated the sonatas again at Carnegie over three seasons in the 1990s. 'Working on Beethoven takes a lifetime; the more you study him, the more you play him, the more you discover other avenues to explore and try', he told Le Monde in 1999. He was also praised for his interpretations of Mozart, Schubert, Liszt and Haydn. He was widely regarded as a mentor and as the 'musicians' musician' by his colleagues. Brendel had lived in London since 1971. He received 10 Grammy nominations and 23 honorary degrees from universities including, Cambridge, Oxford, Yale and The Juilliard School. Brendel gave his final concert with the Vienna Philharmonic in December 2008. An amateur painter and poet in his early years, he devoted most of his retirement to writing and published several books, including a 2004 collection of poems called 'Cursing Bagels.' 'I used to live a double life', he said in a 2012 interview with the Verbier Festival. 'I'm also a literary person lecturing, giving readings of my poems and teaching.'

Exclusive: EU visa rule change set to target Israeli citizens
Exclusive: EU visa rule change set to target Israeli citizens

Euronews

time6 hours ago

  • Euronews

Exclusive: EU visa rule change set to target Israeli citizens

Police officers in England and Wales will be required to collect ethnicity and nationality data in cases of child sexual abuse and exploitation after a review found the issue had been 'shied away' from. The UK Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced that this would become a mandatory requirement as she accepted all 12 recommendations made by Louise Casey in her audit on group-based child sexual abuse on Monday. Casey noted that the term 'group-based child sexual exploitation' sanitised what the victims – some as young as 11 – had suffered, with abused children suffering beatings, gang rapes, being impregnated by their abusers and having children removed from them at birth. The perpetrators targeted girls from vulnerable backgrounds, including children in care, children with physical and mental disabilities, and children who had suffered neglect or abuse. The recommendation to collect targeted information was made after the review found that there was a paucity of data nationally concerning the ethnicity of perpetrators of group-based child sexual abuse – sometimes known as 'grooming gangs' – and their victims. It stated that this meant there was insufficient information to draw conclusions on the national level. However, Casey found that in three local policing areas – Greater Manchester, West and South Yorkshire – there was sufficient evidence to show that there were 'disproportionate numbers of men from Asian ethnic backgrounds amongst suspects for group-based child sexual exploitation'. This is the case for group-based child sexual exploitation in the local data examined, the review noted, while more broadly across child sexual exploitation cases, the ethnicity profile is much closer to that of the local population. The issue of ethnicity is the most sensitive and controversial aspect of the audit, and Cooper said she had requested that this be the focus of the analysis. 'While much more robust national data is needed, we cannot and must not shy away from these findings, because, as Baroness Casey says, ignoring the issues, not examining and exposing them to the light, allows the criminality and depravity of a minority of men to be used to marginalise whole communities,' Cooper said. 'The vast majority of people in our British, Asian and Pakistani heritage communities continue to be appalled by these terrible crimes and agree that the criminal minority of sick predators and perpetrators in every community must be dealt with robustly by a criminal law.' As well as failing victims, neglecting the possible role of the factor of ethnicity 'plays into the hands of groups with divisive political agendas not to examine or deal with these issues conclusively,' Casey wrote in the review. Perpetrators groomed vulnerable girls with gifts and attention before passing them to other men to rape and using alcohol, drugs and violence to keep them compliant and control them. The audit noted that 'the grooming process is now as likely to start online, and hotspots might have moved from parks to vape shops and the use of hotels with anonymous check-in facilities'. Too often, child victims were blamed for their own abuse and 'criminalised for offences they committed while being groomed,' Casey said. She recommended that the law be tightened to clarify that children cannot consent when they have been raped, so that adults who penetrate a child under 16 (the UK age of consent) receive mandatory charges of rape. While this already is the case for children below 13, she noted that cases are sometimes dropped or charges downgraded if the 13 to 15-year-old is said to have been 'in love with' or 'had consented to' sex with the perpetrator. Among other recommendations, Casey also called for the gathering of ethnicity and nationality data in child sexual abuse cases be made mandatory, and the review of criminal convictions of victims of child sexual exploitation. The scandal from more than a decade ago returned to the political agenda after Elon Musk made a series of social media posts about it in January, wading in after it emerged that the UK safeguarding minister, Jess Phillips, rejected a request for a government-led inquiry, instead saying it should be commissioned locally. It is an issue that has been examined before, with a report by Professor Alexis Jay in 2014 estimating that some 1,400 children were sexually exploited in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013, predominantly by men of Pakistani descent. That report identifies failings by authorities and the police, and also cites local authority officials describing their 'nervousness' at identifying the 'ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought racist.' Labour initially rejected calls for another inquiry, as successive Conservative governments had implemented none of the recommendations made in the last national inquiry. The government has now bowed to pressure to launch another national inquiry, despite Jay saying in January that victims "want action" rather than another inquiry. Israel is set to be one of the first countries targeted by a reform of the mechanism to suspend short-stay visa-free travel into the EU and Schengen countries agreed on Tuesday by the European Parliament and the Council according to European Parliament sources. The new rules amend the grounds for suspending visa free schemes to include violations of human rights, which could lead to the imposition of mandatory visas for Israeli citizens, among others, sources from the Parliament familiar with the dossier told Euronews. Currently nationals from 61 countries - including the Australia, Brazil, Israel, Japan, UK, Ukraine and the Western Balkan states - may travel to the Schengen area for short stays of up to 90 days in any 180-day period. The EU can suspend the visa-free regime under specific conditions. So far this has happened only once — with the Republic of Vanuatu — due to its citizenship-by-investment scheme, which granted wealthy Russians Vanuatan passports allowing free travel into the EU. Under the new agreement between EU lawmakers and member states, the suspension mechanism will now be easier to trigger however, as the thresholds have been lowered and new criteria added. For example, violations of the United Nations Charter, severe breaches of international human rights or humanitarian law, and non-compliance with international court decisions will now be valid grounds for suspending a country's visa-free status. 'This tool helps us deliver the values that have built our community and allows us to enforce human rights and respect for international law,' Slovenian MEP Matjaž Nemec, the rapporteur for the bill in Parliament, told Euronews. 'No specific country is being targeted,' he added. However, Israel's status is among countries most at risk of having its status challenged under the new procedure, Parliament sources told Euronews, due to accusations of war crimes and crimes against humanity in its war on Gaza — allegations that have been raised by the UN. Serbia is another likely to be targeted, due to human rights concerns highlighted by the UN, the sources said. Under the procedure, the European Commission has to issue an implementing act to suspend the visa-free scheme for a particular country for one year. This decision only requires approval by the member states, and can be blocked by a qualified majority. To extend the suspension, the Commission must issue a delegated act, which can instead be blocked by either the Council or the Parliament. Countries in the Schengen area — which includes all EU states except Cyprus, Ireland, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland — may also push the Commission to start the procedure, by notifying that they believe the conditions for triggering the mechanism are met. The Parliament may also propose a non-binding resolution recommending suspension of a country's visa-free status. 'It is more likely that an EU member state would raise the issue of Israel, rather than the Parliament,' a source familiar with the matter told Euronews, adding that several political groups in the Parliament pushed for the inclusion of human rights violations with Israel in mind. Among other legislative changes included in the bill are new provisions related to migration. Currently, a substantial increase in the number of people of a specific nationality staying irregularly in the Schengen area or a rise in asylum seekers from a country with a low recognition rate can justify suspending the visa-free regime. Under the reform, the threshold for assessing an increase in irregular stays will be lowered from 50% to 30% of the previous period's number. Meanwhile, the threshold for a "low recognition rate" of asylum applications will be raised from the current 4% to 20%. This would broaden the spectrum of the countries involved and would ease triggering the mechanism. Indeed the changes aim to send a message to countries benefiting from visa-free access, encouraging them to reduce migration to the EU. 'The Polish presidency, which leads the Council, pushed hard for this reform because of strong ambitions among member states. That's why we were able to reach an agreement today,' said Matjaž Nemec. The deal reached on Tuesday still needs to be formally adopted by both the Parliament and the Council before becoming EU law. The Israeli weapons company Rafael has announced plans to sue the French government after its stand at the Paris Air Show was abruptly shut down due to Israel's campaign in Gaza. Since Monday morning, four Israeli stands, including Rafael, Elbit Systems, Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI), and UVision, have been hidden behind black wooden panels. French authorities determined that 'offensive weapons equipment marketed by the firms could not be exhibited, given the situation in Gaza.' Rafael, Elbit, and IAI produce guided bombs and missiles while UVision manufactures drones. Faced with the companies' refusal to remove the equipment, the booths were fenced off during the night from Sunday to Monday. 'This morning, an official from the fair came over and told me that if I would remove some of the equipment, then he would tear down these walls. And I told him, I will not remove anything. You had enough time to make the decision, but you decided to act in the dark of night,' said Shlomo Toaff, Executive Vice President at Rafael. Technicians were seen on Tuesday morning adding further barricades to seal off the entrance to one of the booths, as no agreement was reached between Israeli manufacturers and the show's organisers. Meanwhile, a heavy security presence was seen patrolling the cordoned-off area on Tuesday. 'I assure you that we will sue the French government for what they have done to us,' Toaff told Euronews. 'We are going to sue them for causing financial damage, for not giving us access to the property that we had rented. We think this is an unjust decision. We're not getting equal rights like the other exhibitors," he said. The Rafael representative told Euronews they rented the booth a year in advance and submitted blueprints months ago. Their equipment cleared French customs about a month prior to the exhibition, they claim. 'We invested a lot of money in getting this booth and a lot of effort in preparing for it. I can't tell you the exact cost, but we're talking millions of euros," said Toaff. French authorities say the firms displayed 'offensive' weapons in violation of the pre-agreed framework with the Israeli government. 'France considers that this is a terrible situation for the Gazans, a situation from a human and humanitarian point of view, from a security point of view, extremely heavy,' French Prime Minister François Bayrou told reporters on Monday after inaugurating the show. 'France wanted to demonstrate that offensive weapons should not be present in this show.' The Israeli Ministry of Defence condemned 'this scandalous and unprecedented decision' in a press release published on Monday. 'I was totally disappointed,' said Sasson Meshar, Senior VP for Airborne Electro-Optics Systems at Elbit. 'We invested a lot of money in the exhibition.' 'We don't understand the logic of the decision, because from our perspective, it's discrimination, because everybody around is showing the same systems. It's a defence, military system, and that's what we are showing. We are not all here for some kind of flower exhibition.' 'We will consult with legal advisors, and we will follow their advice, and we'll consider our next stages later on,' Meshar said, evading the question of whether Elbit is considering following Rafael in the lawsuit. This isn't the first time Israeli arms manufacturers have faced restrictions at French defence shows. After initially being banned from the Eurosatory exhibition in spring 2024, they were later allowed to attend Euronaval last fall following a court ruling. On June 10, a Paris court rejected a request by several associations to ban Israeli companies from this year's Paris Air Show. The 2025 edition is taking place against the backdrop of intensifying diplomatic tensions between Paris and Tel Aviv. Israel is facing intense criticism over its military campaign in the Gaza Strip, launched in response to the 2023 Hamas attack. The death toll in Gaza is estimated to exceed 55,000 according to the Hamas-run Gazan Health Ministry. More than 1,800 Israelis have been killed as a result of the fighting.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store