HRCP, KUJ unite against PECA 2025
KARACHI:
Journalists, academics, and human rights and civil society organisations have condemned the PECA Act 2025, denouncing it as a draconian law aimed at curbing the globally recognised right to freedom of expression. This right is enshrined in Pakistan's Constitution.
During a roundtable discussion hosted by the HRCP and the Union of Journalists at the Press Club on Thursday, representatives vowed to intensify efforts to have the PECA withdrawn.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Selection of CEC chief, ECP members: PTI nominates members for parliamentary body
ISLAMABAD: The opposition Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) on Thursday formally nominated its members for the parliamentary committee tasked with selecting the new chief election commissioner (CEC) and two members of the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP). In a statement on X, the opposition leader in National Assembly Omar Ayub posted a June 2 letter addressed to National Assembly Speaker Ayaz Sadiq, in which PTI nominated four National Assembly members and two senators for the committee. The nominees include MNAs Asad Qaiser, Gohar Ali Khan, Sahibzada Hamid Raza, Latif Khosa, along with senators Shibli Faraz and Allama Raja Nasir. The move comes after Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif invited the opposition leader for consultations on appointing a new CEC, following the expiration of the terms of the current CEC Sikandar Sultan Raja and two ECP members from Sindh and Balochistan on January 26, 2025. The premier's letter highlighted that despite their terms ending, the incumbents have continued to perform duties under Article 215 of the Constitution. According to Article 213 of the Constitution, the prime minister and opposition leader must send three names for each position to the president by mutual consensus. If no consensus is reached, names are submitted to a 12-member parliamentary committee equally representing the treasury and opposition benches, which then recommends a name to the president. The PTI's nominations follow procedural consultations within the party and were announced a day after the prime minister's invitation for dialogue with the opposition. The nominations are part of the constitutionally mandated process under Article 213(2B) for appointing the CEC and members from Sindh and Balochistan. The appointments are pending amid deep political polarisation in the country, with little prior engagement reported between government and opposition leaders on the matter. PTI had earlier filed a petition with the Islamabad High Court (IHC) in March, challenging the delay in appointing a new CEC. The petition named the federal government, Senate chairman, National Assembly speaker, and ECP as respondents, alleging constitutional violations due to the delay. It requested the court to compel relevant authorities to form the parliamentary committee and hold meaningful consultations under Article 213. Meanwhile, two other ECP members from Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa continue their terms until 2027, ensuring partial continuity within the commission. The selection process remains critical as the ECP is responsible for overseeing the transparency and conduct of elections in Pakistan. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
3 days ago
- Express Tribune
PM writes to opp to confer on new CEC
After months of dead air and no movement on key electoral appointments, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Wednesday extended an olive branch to National Assembly Opposition Leader Omar Ayub, inviting him for consultations on the appointment of a new Chief Election Commissioner (CEC). In a letter, the premier stated that the term of the CEC, as well as that of two other members of the ECP, ended on January 26. However, all three have continued their duties under Article 215 of the Constitution. He stated that, according to Article 218, proposals for the CEC and its members must be submitted to the parliamentary committee. The letter comes as the constitutional logjam has been festering since January, as the five-year terms of CEC Sikandar Sultan Raja, Sindh Member Nisar Durrani and Balochistan Member Shah Muhammad Jatoi ended on January 26. The process, laid out clearly in Article 213, requires a consensus between the prime minister and the opposition leader. In the event of no agreement, both sides are supposed to send separate lists of three names to a 12-member bipartisan committee, which would then pick one and send it to the president for formal appointment. However, the process has been gathering dust. Though the seats of the CEC and two members expired in January, the government allowed the 45-day constitutional deadline for new appointments, which lapsed on March 12, to come and go without resolution. The impasse now rests at the feet of both the treasury and opposition, with neither side making serious contact until the PM's letter. On the other hand, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has already taken the government to court in March. A petition filed in the Islamabad High Court by Ayub and Senate Opposition Leader Shibli Faraz lambasts the inaction as a constitutional violation. It names the federal government, Senate chairman, National Assembly speaker and the ECP as respondents. The petition urges the court to compel the National Assembly speaker to constitute the required parliamentary committee and calls on the Senate chairman to provide names of senators for the same. It further asks the court to order the prime minister to hold meaningful consultations with Ayub, as required under Article 213, and to declare the continued presence of the CEC and two expired members as illegal. Constitutional experts point to the 26th Amendment, which altered Article 215(4) to allow officeholders to continue "till successors are appointed". Both opposition and observers allege the amendment is a legislative patch over executive indecision, especially when key posts meant to guarantee fair elections remain in limbo. Of the four members of the ECP, only the Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa representatives - Babar Hassan Bharwana and Justice (retd) Ikramullah Khan - still have valid tenures, both stretching till mid-2027. It is worth noting that CEC Sikandar Sultan Raja's tenure has been full of political minefields. Opposition parties, particularly the PTI, have accused him of everything from election mismanagement to open partisanship. He has been criticised for failing to ensure timely general elections and for stripping the PTI of its iconic 'bat' symbol ahead of the 2024 polls. The ECP has also come under fire for failing to implement the Supreme Court's verdict on reserved seats and for not holding Senate elections in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, a delay denounced by critics as undermining federal parliamentary integrity.
Business Recorder
3 days ago
- Business Recorder
PECA Act: Respondents asked to submit comments
ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) gave a deadline to the respondents to submit comments in the petitions challenging amendments in the PECA Act. A single bench of Justice Inaam Ameen Minhas on Wednesday heard the petitions of Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ), anchors association and Islamabad High Court Journalists Association (IHCJA). In the petition, counsel of the journalist body adopted the stance that the PECA (Amendment) Act is unconstitutional and illegal; hence, the court should conduct judicial review on it. The petition said the PECA (Amendment) 2025 increased the government control and restrictions on freedom of speech. It said the PECA law violated Article 19 and 19(A) of the Constitution as well. Therefore, it pleaded, the law should be suspended. PECA amendments challenged in SC During the hearing, Advocate Imran Shafiq and other lawyers appeared in the court on behalf of the petitioners. Advocate Shafiq said the federal government has filed its reply only through the Ministry of Interior and the Ministry of Information while the Ministry of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs and the PTA have not submitted any response yet. He informed the bench that the federal government has raised a question on the jurisdiction of this court. He added that the federation has stated that after the 26th Constitutional Amendment, only the Constitutional Bench of the High Court can hear this case. The lawyer said the second objection was raised while giving a reference of a Quranic verse that before spreading the words, do research. The lawyer said the FIRs are being registered against people and the court should hear this case soon. The IHC bench asked whether there is no news going on? Is someone preventing news from being given or published? Riasat Ali Azad advocate prayed the court to issue a stay order that there will be no FIR or arrest against the journalist for reporting the news. He said that the parties are not submitting a response and are taking time from the court. Journalist Mazhar Abbas said that an atmosphere of harassment has been created in the media industry and the journalists are being summoned and harassed by the FIA. The petitioner's lawyer said the parties should be directed to file their replies and provide a copy of the replies to the petitioners in advance before the next hearing. Justice Inaam remarked that even if the response is not filed, the hearing will still be continued. He said that this case would take a long time and therefore, it will be scheduled after Eid. Later, the court deferred hearing of the case till the second week of July. The PFUJ said in the petition that the law infringed international human rights as well as digital rights in Pakistan. The petition read: '…a writ may be issued declaring that the Prevention of Electronic Crimes (Amendment) Act, 2025 is unconstitutional, being violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution, due process, fair trial, and the concept of regulatory independence, as well as the doctrines of fairness, proportionality, reasonableness, and constitutional limitations or restrictions, hence void, and liable to be struck down.' Therefore, the PFUJ prayed that the respondents may be restrained and prevented from employing the coercive powers under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes (Amendment) Act, 2025, in general, and against the journalist community, in particular till final disposal of the instant petition. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
