
Arab Writers: The Arabs And The Resistance Axis Must Acknowledge Their Defeat In The War With Israel; We Must Strive For An Era Without War
With the conclusion of the fighting between Israel and Hamas, Hizbullah and other members of the resistance axis, articles in the Arab media condemned the rhetoric regarding the historic victory over Israel promoted by spokespeople for these organizations. [1] The articles argued that these organizations, far from defeating Israel, actually suffered a crushing defeat in the war, as evident from the heavy damage and losses sustained by them and by and the local populations. They also stated that the outcomes of the war proved that the doctrine of 'unity of the fronts' formulated by the Iran-led resistance axis – whereby all the axis members would assist each other in the event of a war against Israel – had collapsed.
The writers described this defeat as another link in the chain of defeats suffered by the Arabs in the wars they have waged against Israel since its establishment under the banner of the "Palestinian cause." They argued that these defeats are the final nail in the coffin of the Palestinian issue as the foremost cause of the Arab world and are a reflection of Israel's power in the region. The writers therefore called on those who fought against Israel and on the entire Arab nation to recognize their defeat and dedicate their efforts to developing their countries instead of engaging in futile wars.
The following are translated excerpts from these articles:
Hamas And Hizbullah Were Defeated; The Doctrine Of The "Unity Of The Fronts" Has Collapsed
One of the major arguments presented in the articles against Hamas and Hizbullah's claims of victory is the extent of the damage and losses sustained by them and their environment. This, the writers said, not only represents a defeat for these two central members of the resistance axis, but also shows that the "unity of the fronts," a key doctrine of this axis, has completely collapsed.
Lebanese journalist Jean Al-Feghali, chief editor at the LBCI News channel, wrote in the Lebanese daily Nidaa Al-Watan: "...Hamas, which started this war... was defeated in it, and anyone who wants to contest this should examine the balance of gains and losses: the part of Gaza that is aboveground no longer exists; it is completely destroyed; [Hamas'] leaders have been eliminated, from Yahya Sinwar [the architect of the October 7 attack] to Isma'il Haniya... So how can this be considered a victory?
"What is true for Hamas and its 'victory' in Gaza is also true for Hizbullah and its 'victory' in Lebanon: more than 20 towns and villages on the southern "front" [i.e., on the border with Israel] have been destroyed... Most of Hizbullah's leaders, from Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah, through field commanders, to Radwan Force fighters have been killed, not to mention the [destruction of] the ammunition and missile depots. So how can this be considered a victory?
"The outcome is 'a unity of defeats,' stemming from 'the unity of the fronts': Hizbullah has been defeated in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza… The collapse of the 'unity of the fronts' is patently evident from the fact that Hizbullah agreed to a ceasefire without conditioning it on a ceasefire in Gaza… So where is the unity of the fronts?" [2]
The 'Victory' Of The Resistance Axis Is Imaginary
Khalid bin Hamad Al-Malik, the chief editor of the Saudi government daily Al-Jazirah, likewise came out against the rhetoric of the resistance axis and called on it to acknowledge its defeat. He wrote: "Hamas talks about defeating Israel in [Israel's] war of extermination. Hizbullah also claims to have defeated Israel in the war, and so do Iran and the Houthis. They [all] deny the blows they have sustained, which have weakened them, and deny their failure to respond in kind. This shallow perception of the outcomes of the war against the Israeli enemy means that the victories are imaginary and have no connection to the course of the war and the results of the Israeli offensive… How did Hamas win if all its commanders in Gaza have been killed, as well as the ones who stayed in Lebanon and Iran[?] Where is the victory, if tens of thousands of Palestinians are dead, wounded or missing[?] How can anyone believe Hamas has won when Israel occupied all of the Gaza Strip after destroying 80 percent of it[?] It is not the weapons of Hamas and the [Palestinian Islamic] Jihad that will force [Israel] to withdraw [from Gaza]. [It will withdraw] in an agreement that will include an arrangement preventing Hamas from returning to its condition before the war.
"The same is true for Hizbullah, which claims to have defeated the Israeli aggression against Lebanon even though Israel has killed all of its leaders, including Secretary-General [Nasrallah], occupied South [Lebanon], destroyed buildings and eliminated [Hizbullah's] weapons, which were the source of its power. It has [also] prevented future [arms] deliveries from Iran via Syria or via the sea, and now this organization [too] has been forced to accept an agreement that will [preclude it] from returning to its past condition.
"As for Iran, which claims to have withstood the Israeli attacks… we did not see it retaliating in a way that compares with the killing of its leaders and of a guest who was staying in its territory [i.e., Hamas leader Isma'il Haniya, who was killed in Tehran].
"The imaginary victories persist [only] in the minds of those who allow themselves to lie and lie until they eventually believe their own lies, like the Houthis, who launched drones and missiles at Israel that did no significant damage to Israeli [military] bases." [3]
Syrian cartoonist Dijwar Ibrahim mocks Hamas' and Hizbullah's claims of victory: the Hamas fighter, walking with a crutch, says, "You won too??," and the Hizbullah fighter in a wheelchair replies "Yes, we won" (X.com/dijwar123123121, January 28, 2025)
The Era Of Arab Wars Against Israel Has Ended In Another Arab Defeat; The Palestinian Cause Has Declined
Some of the writers pointed to the damage and destruction caused to societies and countries in the Arab world by the wars waged over the decades against Israel in the name of the Palestinian cause. Some even argued that these wars not only failed to further the Palestinian issue but actually harmed it and caused it to be marginalized, while Israel managed to establish its legitimacy. The writers called on the Arab countries to recognize their defeat against Israel and focus on internal development.
Dr. Hani Anouti, a lecturer on Middle East policy, wrote in the Lebanese daily Al-Nahhar: "There is a long history of struggles and victims for the sake of Palestine. Tens of thousands of dead are buried in the ground, and millions of wounded are suffering in ruined cities that have been denied development and peace as a direct or indirect result of the Palestinian and Arab conflict with Israel. This conflict, which is approaching its 100th year, has had negative political, military and security effects on all the countries and peoples of the region…
"In practice, the Palestinians waged only one war against Israel, in 1948… As for the Arab countries, they have jointly waged three wars against Israel. Some of them fought with armies, fire and blood, and others by providing financial, political and diplomatic support. But the result was catastrophic for these countries and their societies, so much so that Egypt [decided to] end the cycle of violence and the erosion of its capabilities and signed the peace agreement with Israel, bravely defying the Arab and Islamic consensus. It [thereby] established the legitimacy of Israel's existence for the first time in the history of the conflict…
"Unfortunately, the Palestinians are unable to approach this conflict realistically, unlike Israel, which has established its legitimacy and existence through force and diplomacy... No country has managed to achieve in a century what Israel has achieved, transforming from an ostracized and illegitimate state surrounded by powerful enemies into a legitimate and strong state that, along with several other countries, has the power to change the fate of the Middle East.
"Anyone who examines the history of the [Arab] conflict with Israel cannot ignore an important fact, namely the gradual disappearance of the Palestinian cause on both the political and practical levels, and even among the public, in many countries, both Arab and non-Arab. Despite its importance, this cause has lost its momentum and vitality for many unfortunate reasons... As for Israel, it has succeeded in eliminating all its enemies... There is no longer any military power in the region, legitimate or illegitimate, capable of effectively fighting and defeating it, and thus it has put an end to the era of Arab wars against it.
"Now that the era of conventional and direct wars against Israel is over, the discourse on the future of the region and its countries and on their role in the world has reemerged… Are we really at the dawn of a new era of growth, development and innovation in the region, an era without wars against Israel?" [4]
Arab Regimes Have Exploited The Palestinian Cause To Commit Crimes And Silence Dissidents
Falah Al-Mash'al wrote in his column on the Saudi website Elaph: "The Arabs were defeated in all the wars they waged against Israel. Regardless of the many reasons for these defeats, the result on the ground proves the enemy's superior strength...
"The Arab regimes must internalize the reality of the past 75 years, namely defeat in the war means harming our relations with the West and also losing in terms of technological progress, science and economy. The regimes lose [the support of] their peoples, and the peoples lose their future. Ignoring these facts perpetuates the defeat in all the wars, not just the military ones. The same applies to the perception of Palestine as the foremost Arab cause, when the Arab peoples have come to despise Palestine, because it has become a talisman for the continued existence of the corrupt and oppressive regimes, and [because] horrible crimes have been committed in the name of liberating Palestine and of resistance, [crimes of] silencing rivals and dissenting voices...
"I listened to the speech of [Hamas political bureau member] Khalil Al-Hayya… after the announcement of the ceasefire agreement. [5] It was a very long speech, full of flowery sentences, boring rhetoric, words of congratulation, slogans and so forth. However, he ignored the real reason for the war waged by the Muslim Brotherhood in Gaza, [6] and [ignored] the complete destruction of the city of Gaza, its facilities and its services – which is the only thing Hamas achieved with over 200,000 dead and wounded!
"The Gaza war and its outcomes exposed the full scope and depth of the reality, as well as the deception of the countries that brandished the slogans of [liberating] Jerusalem so that Gaza and its people would pay the price for the continued existence of their regimes… Another discovery was the deception of the resistance axis, which proved to be a mercenary axis of international made-to-order deals.
"The Gaza war will be the last Arab war and the last [Arab] defeat if the Arabs learn a lesson from its outcomes and its hidden motives, after they have not bothered to internalize [the lesson of] 75 years of defeat!" [7]
Victory Is Achieved By Admitting Defeat, Even At The Hands Of The Criminal Israel
Khalid bin Hamad Al-Malik, chief editor of the Saudi government daily Al-Jazirah, urged the Arabs and the resistance axis to acknowledge their defeat in order to better prepare for the next war. He stressed that he opposes Israel and yearns for its defeat, but that "the reality is different. [The reality is that Israel] has neutralized Iran, occupied the Gaza Strip and South Lebanon and carried out painful attacks against Iran and the Houthis…"
He added: "Victory comes once you acknowledge defeat, even at the hands of a criminal like Israel. Victory comes after you address the reasons for the defeat and prepare for victory with action rather than words, by planning and not by means of escapades with unpredictable results.
"The outcome of the Al-Aqsa Flood [i.e., Hamas' October 7 attack] was more Palestinian and Lebanese prisoners incarcerated in Israel's jails, the destruction of Gaza and South Lebanon, the death of Hamas and Hizbullah's leaders and of Iranian commanders, the occupation of Gaza and South Lebanon, thousands of people dead, wounded, displaced and missing in the Gaza Strip, and the return of the Israeli hostages held by Hamas in return for a limited number of Palestinian prisoners held by Israel…
"Victory is not achieved by means of talk and rhetoric or by drugging people with misinformation and lies. We should have eliminated that culture after the 1967 war, whose outcomes shocked people in light of the information that had been spread and proved to be false." [8]
[1] For example, in a speech he delivered on the Qatari Al-Jazeera channel after the January 15, 2025 announcement of the ceasefire agreement between Hamas and Israel, Khalil Al-Hayya, a member of the organization's political bureau, said that "the Al-Aqsa Flood war was an important turning point in the history of the Palestinian people," and described Hamas' October 7 attack as "a security and military miracle… that will remain a source of pride for our people and our resistance, and will be passed down from generation to generation." He added that Israel had failed to achieve its objectives in the war, including the defeat of Hamas, and promised that the jihad against it would continue. Aljazeera.net, t.me/hamaswestbank, January 15, 2025. Hizbullah Secretary-General Na'im Qassem said that his organization had achieved "a victory greater than the one in 2006." See MEMRI TV Clip No. 11605, Hizbullah Secretary-General Naim Qassem: I Ocially Declare The War To Be A Victory Greater Than The One We Had In 2006; The Enemy Failed To Destroy Hizbullah, November 29, 2024.
[2] Nidaa Al-Watan (Lebanon), January 28, 2025.
[3] Al-Jazirah (Saudi Arabia), January 29, 2025.
[4] Al-Nahhar (Lebanon), January 23, 2025.
[6] Hamas is the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood movement.
[7] Elaph.com, January 17, 2025.
[8] Al-Jazirah (Saudi Arabia), January 29, 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Shafaq News
2 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Lebanese Army threatens to freeze ceasefire cooperation
Shafaq News/ On Friday, Lebanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced intensified diplomatic efforts with countries involved in the ceasefire agreement with Israel. In a statement, the ministry condemned the 'aggressions by Israeli forces,' emphasizing the need to uphold UN Security Council Resolution 1701. Meanwhile, the Lebanese Army warned it may suspend cooperation with the Tripartite Ceasefire Monitoring Committee, citing Israel's ' persistent violations ' of the agreement and its refusal to engage with the committee's mechanisms. A military statement revealed that Lebanese units deployed to inspect sites Israel had threatened to target, despite 'Israeli objections.' The army stressed it had immediately coordinated with the monitoring committee to prevent further escalation. 'Israel's ongoing refusal to engage not only weakens the committee's role, but also undermines the army's ability to fulfill its mandate,' the statement read, while reaffirming the military's commitment to its duties 'regardless of the challenges.' دأب العدو الإسرائيلي في المرحلة الأخيرة على تصعيد اعتداءاته ضد لبنان مستهدفًا مواطنين وأبنية سكنية ومنشآت في مناطق مختلفة، وآخرها استهداف مواقع في ضاحية بيروت الجنوبية والجنوب ليل أمس، بالتوازي مع احتلاله أراضيَ لبنانية ومواصلته خروقاته التي تحولت إلى عدوان يومي على سيادة لبنان،… — الجيش اللبناني (@LebarmyOfficial) June 6, 2025 Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz warned that Tel Aviv would continue military operations 'forcefully' if Lebanon failed to comply with agreements, calling on the Lebanese government to disarm Hezbollah and 'prevent it from producing drones that could threaten Israeli civilians'. 'There will be no calm in Beirut and no stability in Lebanon without security in Israel.' Earlier, Israel launched more than 20 airstrikes on Beirut's southern suburb (Dahieh), targeting alleged Hezbollah drone facilities. Since the truce took effect on November 27, 2024, Lebanese authorities have recorded more than 3,000 Israeli violations and over 200 fatalities.


Shafaq News
14 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Israeli airstrikes target Beirut's southern suburbs
Shafaq News/ On Thursday, Israel launched a wave of airstrikes on Beirut's southern, targeting alleged Hezbollah drone facilities. Around 20 drone and fighter jet strikes were launched on the Dahieh area, alleging the sites were used for manufacturing and storing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). 'Hezbollah is expanding its drone production capabilities in preparation for future conflict,' the army stated. #عاجل جيش الدفاع سيستهدف على المدى الزمني القريب عدة بنى تحتية تقع تحت الأرض والمخصصة لانتاج مسيرات والتي أقيمت في قلب السكان المدنيين في الضاحية الجنوبية في بيروت🔸رغم تفاهمات الاتفاق بين إسرائيل ولبنان رصد جيش الدفاع قيام الوحدة الجوية في حزب الله الارهابي (127) بالعمل لانتاج… — افيخاي ادرعي (@AvichayAdraee) June 5, 2025 Foreign Minister Israel Katz said the operation followed direct orders from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. 'We have attacked buildings used by Hezbollah for UAV activity. We will enforce the ceasefire terms without concessions and will not allow threats to northern Israel.' He also held Lebanon's government accountable for 'preventing violations and all terrorist activity' emanating from its territory. Lebanese Army units, acting in coordination with the UN-monitored ceasefire committee, entered several buildings in Dahieh to verify the Israeli allegations. However, the strikes began mid-inspection, forcing the units to withdraw. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun condemned the raid as a 'flagrant breach of international law' on the eve of a religious holiday. 'This message, delivered through Beirut and the blood of its civilians, is aimed at the United States and its policies. Lebanon will not yield.' الرئيس عون يدين بشدة العدوان الاسرائيلي على محيط العاصمة:رسالة يوجّهها مرتكب هذه الفظاعات، الى الولايات المتحدة الاميركية وسياساتها ومبادراتها أولاً، عبر صندوق بريد بيروت ودماء أبريائها ومدنييها، وهو ما لن يرضخ له لبنان أبداً — Lebanese Presidency (@LBpresidency) June 5, 2025 Later, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam echoed the condemnation as a 'deliberate and systematic assault on Lebanon's sovereignty,' calling it a violation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701, urging the international community to intervene and 'hold Israel accountable.'


Memri
17 hours ago
- Memri
Article On Emirati News Site: The D.C. Terror Attack In In Which Two Israel Embassy Staffers Were Murdered Is A Mini-Version Of 9/11 And A Direct Result Of The West Ignoring The Danger Of The Muslim B
In a May 23, 2025 article on the Emirati news site Al Ain, Yemeni columnist Hani Salem Mashour responded to the May 21, 2025 murderous attack in Washington D.C. in which two staff members of the Israeli embassy in Washington were shot dead. Hani wrote that the shooting was a "mini-version" of the September 11, 2001 attacks in the U.S. and a direct continuation of them, since both attacks sprang from the same ideological root and were perpetrated under the same political pretext. Moreover, both were a direct result of the Western policy that allows political Islam organizations, in particular the Muslim Brotherhood (MB), to operate in the West in the name of liberties and the freedom of expression while ignoring its discourse of incitement and hatred. Mashour added that, despite the time that has elapsed since the September 11 attacks, no meaningful action has been taken to constrain the incitement of political Islam: the Arab world has not purged its religious discourse of extremism, and the West continues to permit the activity of these extremist organizations within its borders, along with their inciting discourse. Furthermore. the West disregarded the warning of Emirati Foreign Minister Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Aal Nahyan in 2017 that "the MB is more dangerous than Al-Qaeda and ISIS," and that tolerating political Islam in Western countries would turn them into incubators of terrorist and hate-filled discourse.[1] In these circumstances, he said, the terrorist attack in Washington comes as no surprise. Mashour urged the Arab countries and the West to join forces in a comprehensive campaign against political Islam, and warned that hesitation in this matter would only lead to more attacks. Sarah Milgrim and Yaron Lischinsky, the two Israel Embassy staffers murdered in Washington D.C. (Source: May 22, 2025) The following are translated excerpts from Mashour's article:[2] "What happened in Washington [i.e. the murder of the two Israeli Embassy staffers] did not take place in a vacuum. It was a distant echo of a larger explosion that occurred more than two decades ago in New York. The equation has not changed since September 11, only the façade has changed: from planes to guns, and from Al-Qaeda to lone wolves nourished by the discourse of political Islam dressed up in slogans about discrimination. Between the former terrorist attack [i.e., 9/11] and the recent bullet, the Arab world missed the opportunity to renew its religious discourse, and the West hesitated in its struggle against organizations that despise its democracy yet are nourished by its laws. "What took place in Washington is just a replica, albeit in miniature, of the September 11, 2001 [attacks] – the same ideological root, the same political justification wrapped in slogans, and the same fatal Western disregard of those who lead the hate-filled discourse, [disregard] under the banner of 'rights and freedoms.' Between these two dates there was sufficient time to learn lessons, but the Arabs did not renew their religious discourse and the West did not dry up the wellsprings of terrorism. "On the contrary, at their conferences, Arab [Islamists] began to refer to Western cities – from London to Amsterdam and from Paris to Washington – as 'London-stan,' 'Amsterdam-stan,' 'Paris-stan' and 'Washington-stan.' [These] cities started to produce a discourse of hatred in the name of Islam, [discourse that emerged] not from the caves of Kandahar and Tora Bora in Afghanistan but from the heart of licensed mosques, non-governmental organizations and university classes. "The murderer in Washington [D.C.] needed no orders from any leadership [to perpetrate the attack]. It's enough that he was raised in an ideological atmosphere that enabled [the name] Palestine to be mixed up with terrorism and [the demand for] liberty to be mixed up with slaughter. The words he uttered before firing [his weapon, i.e., "Free Palestine!"] were no slip of the tongue, but the essence of the incitement that has been ongoing for decades in the name of the just [Palestinian] cause, which was long ago highjacked by political Islam. "In this context precisely came the courageous early warning of Emirati Foreign Minister Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Aal Nahyan, who said what many hadn't dared to say, [namely that] the Muslim Brotherhood is more dangerous than Al-Qaeda and ISIS. This was no exaggeration but a prescient truth, [precisely] because the [MB] organization does not knock on doors with explosives but rather with legal documents and media platforms. It infiltrates [societies] as a [charitable] association and spreads as an ideology, and when the times comes it produces from its ranks the one who squeezes the trigger. "Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al-Nahyan did not just warn about the [MB] ideology, but explicitly noted that hosting political Islam organizations in the West under the slogan of freedom of expression and democracy would turn these [Western] countries into incubators of terrorist, hate-filled discourse. This is exactly what we are seeing today, when shots are fired in the heart of the American capital in the name of a highjacked cause and a polluted ideology. "The West did not take this warning seriously. It counted on the 'moderation' of the [MB's] discourse, while [the latter] built its networks within [the West's] institutions. The biggest mistake was and remains the false distinction between the 'moderate MB' and the 'extremist Islamists' – [for] they are all products of the same text, even if [their] executive mechanisms are different. "The event in Washington was not surprising. On the contrary, it was only a matter of time. The failure to pass deterrent laws that prohibit the activity of the MB and of the [other] streams of political Islam is the biggest problem, not only in the U.S. but in all the countries that have yet to acknowledge that the battle is not only against armed terrorism but [also] against the soft terrorism that starts with incitement and ends in bloodshed. "France began to comprehend this too late, but today it understands and sees the MB as a key threat to its security. It monitors its financing, limits its activity in its low-income neighborhoods and realizes that permitting its presence in the name of democracy means the systematic dismantling of the Republic itself. As for Washington, it is still in a state of shock: it suffices with condemnations following every [violent] event and then goes back to nurturing these groups that preach violence under the cover of freedom [of expression]. "During his first term in office, president [Donald] Trump came close to designating the MB as a terrorist organization, but the decision was held up by the red tape of the deep state and the opposition of pressure groups and media circles. Today, with his return to the White House, the opportunity is back. "This is where the true role of the moderate Arab countries comes in, and we must not miss this opportunity again. The coordination with the Trump administration must go far beyond a security alliance or the exchange of information. We are at a political juncture that allows [us] to incriminate the MB on a global scale, dry up its ideological wellsprings and expose its continent-spanning financing network. "[Today], after the shooting in Washington, the situation must change. There is no longer any justification for legal tolerance or political leniency toward the lighthouses of inciting ideology. There is choice but to wage an ideological, legal, security and media struggle against all those who claim a monopoly on Islam in order to establish their caliphate over the [spilled] blood of Jews, Christians and the Muslims themselves. "This article is not a cry of fury but a repeated warning for those who have not yet woken up. Whoever fails to see that the threat of political Islam has become tangible, deadly and present in the streets of the Western capitals must be blind or in collusion [with the MB]. The shooting at the Jewish Museum will not be the last. It is just a reminder that the fire is still burning and that we are living with a ticking bomb that does not explode only when its sound is heard but when we are silent for too long and fail to prevent it [from exploding]."