Drop the Arizona 'fake electors' case? Do we excuse the bank robber?
Letter writer Jim McManus thinks the case against the fake Arizona electors should be dropped. In fact, he claimed, charges never should have been brought. He gave a myriad of reasons why:
They were just joking. They didn't really think it would work. Nobody got hurt. His vote still counted.
So, no harm, no foul?
Do we let off the bank robber whose robbery attempt was foiled, because after all, nobody lost any money, and he probably didn't think he'd get away with it anyway?
I would argue that the fake electors were dead serious, thought they could pull it off, and participated in a scheme that contributed to a lot of people getting hurt. Minimizing its seriousness by calling it some 'Republican prank' does nothing to prevent it from happening again.
These people were conspirators in an elaborate illegal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Their part was to have available fake Trump electors to be put in place once Trump disrupted the certification process, either by convincing (VP) Mike Pence to postpone the process or by doing so through brute force.
(AG) Kris Mayes should continue to try to bring these people to justice. Their actions were no joke.
Dan Peel, Scottsdale
So, letter writer Jim McManus of Phoenix believes that "Arizona's 'alternate' slate of electors was a dumb stunt. But no one was hurt'. Therefore, he asserts, that since it was four years ago, we should all just drop it and forget about it.
Seriously?
By that logic, if I got drunk and tried to shoot someone, but missed, it should be considered a "dumb stunt' and swept under the carpet since no one got hurt.
That is some twisted "logic.'
I'll remind Mr. McManus that actual elected officials at the highest levels of our government made a conscious attempt to subvert our democratic institutions.
Yeah, "dumb,' but also criminal.
I, and millions of other Americans served in the military to defend those institutions and take them very seriously.
Eliot Gross, Chandler
I was disappointed in reading that one of our patrons thought it was a wrong idea by our state attorney general to bring the "fake electors' scheme back to the grand jury. They were attempting to overturn a free and fair election, which is the foundation of our democracy.
Joe Decerbo, Scottsdale
I appreciated Laurie Robert's column on the deceptive and cruel methods ICE used this week to arrest people as they showed up for their scheduled immigration hearings.
As Ms. Roberts highlighted, these individuals followed our laws and represent no threat to the U.S.
Many U.S. voters seem to dislike our asylum laws, yet they haven't pressured their representatives to enact comprehensive immigration reform.
And many voted for President Trump who objected to and fought hard against the bi-partisan immigration reforms drafted last year.
The tough proposals would have strengthened border security, however Mr. Trump prefers to rail against immigrants rather than fix gaps in our laws. We need to follow our laws and honor them until we actually do the work to change them.
Clearly the administration is wasting millions of tax dollars rounding up non-violent, hard-working individuals rather than going after dangerous people who shouldn't be in the country.
I wish those dollars could be used to bolster social security and Medicaid for needy Americans. We are better than this.
Carol Mathis, Scottsdale
Two stories in The Arizona Republic | azcentral.com on Wednesday described the tragic outcome of men with depression, suicidal thoughts and guns. Once again, neither story will likely advance any discussion of keeping guns out of the hands of troubled people.
In one story, a Scottsdale man is accused of shooting and killing a friend who was trying to help him.
In the other story, a Scottsdale man described as depressed and manic shot and killed his wife and daughter before turning the gun on himself.
The Scottsdale police described the man who killed his friend as having previously been considered a danger to himself and others and had a large arsenal of weapons. Can anybody spot what's wrong with that last sentence.
The unfortunate friend clearly knew his buddy was in crisis, or he wouldn't have gone to see him. Reports are that the family of the man who killed his wife and daughter were fully aware of the problems he was having.
Intervention of some kind likely could have saved multiple lives here.
Yet we continue to tiptoe around the issue of mental illness and guns. Before my Republican friends try to tell me this is a mental health issue, let me ask them, why is your party cutting funding for mental health services?
Dan Peel, Scottsdale
This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Drop the Arizona 'fake electors' case? No | Letters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
42 minutes ago
- The Hill
China blasts US for its computer chip moves and for threatening student visas
TAIPEI, Taiwan (AP) — China blasted the U.S. on Monday over moves it alleged harmed Chinese interests, including issuing AI chip export control guidelines, stopping the sale of chip design software to China, and planning to revoke Chinese student visas. 'These practices seriously violate the consensus' reached during trade discussions in Geneva last month, the Commerce Ministry said in a statement. That referred to a China-U.S. joint statement in which the United States and China agreed to slash their massive recent tariffs, restarting stalled trade between the world's two biggest economies. But last month's de-escalation in President Donald Trump's trade wars did nothing to resolve underlying differences between Beijing and Washington and Monday's statement showed how easily such agreements can lead to further turbulence. The deal lasts 90 days, creating time for U.S. and Chinese negotiators to reach a more substantive agreement. But the pause also leaves tariffs higher than before Trump started ramping them up last month. And businesses and investors must contend with uncertainty about whether the truce will last. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the U.S. agreed to drop the 145% tax Trump imposed last month to 30%. China agreed to lower its tariff rate on U.S. goods to 10% from 125%. The Commerce Ministry said China held up its end of the deal, canceling or suspending tariffs and non-tariff measures taken against the U.S. 'reciprocal tariffs' following the agreement. 'The United States has unilaterally provoked new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating the uncertainty and instability of bilateral economic and trade relations,' while China has stood by its commitments, the statement said. It also threatened unspecified retaliation, saying China will 'continue to take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests.' And in response to recent comments by Trump, it said of the U.S.: 'Instead of reflecting on itself, it has turned the tables and unreasonably accused China of violating the consensus, which is seriously contrary to the facts.' Trump stirred further controversy Friday, saying he will no longer be nice with China on trade, declaring in a social media post that the country had broken an agreement with the United States. Hours later, Trump said in the Oval Office that he will speak with Chinese President Xi Jinping and 'hopefully we'll work that out,' while still insisting China had violated the agreement. 'The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' Trump posted. 'So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!' The Trump administration also stepped up the clash with China in other ways last week, announcing that it would start revoking visas for Chinese students studying in the U.S. U.S. campuses host more than 275,000 students from China. Both countries are in a race to develop advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, with Washington seeking to curb China's access to the most advanced computer chips. China is also seeking to displace the U.S. as the leading power in the Asia-Pacific, including through gaining control over close U.S. partner and leading tech giant Taiwan.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Asian shares slide as Russia-Ukraine conflict, OPEC+ output plan push oil prices higher
HONG KONG (AP) — Asian shares sank on Monday and oil prices jumped as trade tensions and the Russian-Ukraine conflict ratcheted up geopolitical uncertainty. Hong Kong's Hang Seng plunged more than 2% as Beijing and Washington traded harsh words over trade. U.S. President Donald Trump's announcement that he will double tariffs on steel and aluminum to 50% layered on still more worries for investors. A report over the weekend that China's factory activity contracted in May, although the decline slowed from April as the country reached a deal with the U.S. to slash President Donald Trump's sky-high tariffs, further undermined market sentiment. Markets in mainland China were closed for a holiday. Oil prices rallied after OPEC+ decided on a modest increase in output beginning in July. It was the third monthly increase in a row. U.S. benchmark crude oil gained $1.60 to $62.39 per barrel, while Brent crude, the international standard, was up $1.41 at $64.19 per barrel. Moscow pounded Ukraine with missiles and drones just hours before a new round of direct peace talks in Istanbul and a Ukrainian drone attack destroyed more than 40 Russian planes deep in Russia's territory, Ukraine's Security Service said on Sunday. Hong Kong's Hang Seng dropped 2.2% to 22,778.45 as China and the U.S. accused each other of breaching their tariff agreement reached in Geneva last month. Tokyo's Nikkei 225 lost 1.6% to 37,356.97, while the Kospi in Seoul fell 0.4% to 2,686.17. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 retreated 0.2% to 8,416.00. On Friday, Wall Street closed its best month since 2023. The S&P 500 retreated less than 0.1% to end at 5,911.69 and the Dow industrials Jones Industrial Average edged 0.1% higher to 42,270.07. The Nasdaq composite fell 0.3% to 19,113.77. Gap weighed on the market even though the retailer reported stronger profit and revenue for the latest quarter than analysts expected. The company behind Banana Republic and Old Navy fell 20.2% after saying tariffs on imports from China and other countries could add up to $300 million to its costs this fiscal year. It has strategies set to mitigate up to half of that before it hits its profits. Hopes had largely been rising that the worst of such worries had passed, which in turn sent stocks rallying, after Trump paused his tariffs on both China and the European Union. A U.S. court then on Wednesday blocked many of Trump's sweeping tariffs. That all sent the S&P 500 in May to its first winning month in four and its best since November. But the tariffs remain in place while the White House appeals the ruling by the U.S. Court of International Trade, and the ultimate outcome is still uncertain. Friday's most influential losses came from several Big Tech stocks. Nvidia fell 2.9% to give back some of its gain from earlier in the week after it topped analysts' expectations for profit in the latest quarter. It was the single heaviest weight by far on the S&P 500. On the winning side of Wall Street was Ulta Beauty, which rose 11.8% after the retailer reported stronger sales and profit than analysts forecast. It also raised the top end of its forecasted range for revenue this fiscal year even though CEO Kecia Steelman called the operating environment 'fluid.' In the bond market, Treasury yields eased after a report showed that the measure of inflation that the Federal Reserve likes to use was slightly lower in April than economists expected. A separate report from the University of Michigan said that sentiment among U.S. consumers was better in May than economists expected. Sentiment improved in the back half of the month after Trump paused many of his tariffs on China. In currency trading early Monday, the U.S. dollar fell to 143.55 Japanese yen from 143.87 yen. The euro inched up to $1.1364 from $1.1351.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
China blasts US for its computer chip moves and for threatening student visas
TAIPEI, Taiwan (AP) — China blasted the U.S. on Monday over moves it alleged harmed Chinese interests, including issuing AI chip export control guidelines, stopping the sale of chip design software to China, and planning to revoke Chinese student visas. 'These practices seriously violate the consensus' reached during trade discussions in Geneva last month, the Commerce Ministry said in a statement. That referred to a China-U.S. joint statement in which the United States and China agreed to slash their massive recent tariffs, restarting stalled trade between the world's two biggest economies. But last month's de-escalation in President Donald Trump's trade wars did nothing to resolve underlying differences between Beijing and Washington and Monday's statement showed how easily such agreements can lead to further turbulence. The deal lasts 90 days, creating time for U.S. and Chinese negotiators to reach a more substantive agreement. But the pause also leaves tariffs higher than before Trump started ramping them up last month. And businesses and investors must contend with uncertainty about whether the truce will last. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the U.S. agreed to drop the 145% tax Trump imposed last month to 30%. China agreed to lower its tariff rate on U.S. goods to 10% from 125%. The Commerce Ministry said China held up its end of the deal, canceling or suspending tariffs and non-tariff measures taken against the U.S. 'reciprocal tariffs' following the agreement. "The United States has unilaterally provoked new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating the uncertainty and instability of bilateral economic and trade relations,' while China has stood by its commitments, the statement said. It also threatened unspecified retaliation, saying China will 'continue to take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests.' And in response to recent comments by Trump, it said of the U.S.: 'Instead of reflecting on itself, it has turned the tables and unreasonably accused China of violating the consensus, which is seriously contrary to the facts.' Trump stirred further controversy Friday, saying he will no longer be nice with China on trade, declaring in a social media post that the country had broken an agreement with the United States. Hours later, Trump said in the Oval Office that he will speak with Chinese President Xi Jinping and 'hopefully we'll work that out,' while still insisting China had violated the agreement. The Trump administration also stepped up the clash with China in other ways last week, announcing that it would start revoking visas for Chinese students studying in the U.S. U.S. campuses host more than 275,000 students from China. Both countries are in a race to develop advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, with Washington seeking to curb China's access to the most advanced computer chips. China is also seeking to displace the U.S. as the leading power in the Asia-Pacific, including through gaining control over close U.S. partner and leading tech giant Taiwan.
