Is New Zealand's multiculturalism under threat? Destiny Church's anti-immigration rally poses a challenge to national values
Live Events
What is Destiny Church?
Is New Zealand losing its multiculturalism?
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Hundreds of supporters of Destiny Church marched down Queen Street in central Auckland on Saturday, June 21, led by Brian Tamaki , protesting against non-Christian religions and calling for stricter immigration policies. The rally began at Aotea Square, where flags representing Islam , Buddhism, Sikhism, the LGBTQ+ rainbow, and mainstream media were torn, stomped on, and in some cases, set on fire. His followers performed a haka after each ritualistic destruction of a flag.Tamaki denounced the 'spread of non-Christian religions' and said 'uncontrolled immigration' threatened New Zealand's identity. He led chants of 'no immigration without assimilation' and described the march as a 'bold public stand for Christian values, Kiwi identity and the future of this nation'.Temporary clashes with counter‑protesters occurred. The protesters walked down Queen Street holding a large banner that read, 'NZ's official religion: Christianity.'They chanted 'Faith, flag, family' before announcing, 'No assimilation, no immigration'.Police were present throughout and confirmed no arrests were made. Fire and Emergency crews responded after flags were set alight, but protesters extinguished them before further action was needed.The demonstrators are affiliated with Destiny Church, a Christian movement known for its conservative, nationalist, and, critics say, fundamentalist views and linked political groups like the Freedoms & Rights Coalition and Vision NZ.Brian Tamaki is its outspoken founder, and his daughter Hannah leads Vision NZ, a small far-right political party that opposes abortion, homosexuality, mosque construction, and promotes Christian nationalism Tamaki and Destiny Church are known for previous confrontations, including protests targeting library Drag Queen Story Hour events and blocking motorways under slogans like 'Make New Zealand Great Again'. They also disrupted children's events in libraries earlier this year, drawing widespread condemnation from authorities.The weekend's protest has reignited debate over whether New Zealand's multicultural identity is under threat. Tamaki and his followers frame their cause as a defense of 'Christian values' and 'Kiwi identity,' but critics argue these protests chip away at the nation's commitment to inclusivity and diversity.Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour strongly denounced the rally's anti-immigration themes as 'un‑Kiwi,' saying that New Zealand welcomes diverse backgrounds and faiths.He affirmed that immigration remains open to those 'committed to building a better society with tolerance of others.'.Immigration restrictions put forward by Tamaki , especially his demand to repeal the country's stance that New Zealand has no official religion, were widely rejected.While Seymour reiterated the church's right to protest, he defended all New Zealanders' right to practice their faiths unimpeded.Tamaki has previously sent letters to Prime Minister Christopher Luxon demanding changes to the official religion policy and tougher assimilation rules.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
29 minutes ago
- Hans India
Iran launches fresh missile attacks on Israel following US action
Tel Aviv: Iran launched more than 30 ballistic missiles at Israel early Sunday, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) announced. This came just hours after the United States carried out a military strike on three of Iran's nuclear facilities. According to emergency service Magen David Adom (MDA), at least 16 people have been injured in the latest missile barrage. One man in his 30s sustained moderate shrapnel wounds, while 15 others were lightly injured. Among them are two children who were admitted with minor injuries at Ichilov Medical Center in Tel Aviv. The missiles struck several locations across central Israel. Notably, one hit Haifa without any prior warning sirens, raising alarm over possible gaps in the missile alert system. Sirens did sound in other parts of the country, prompting civilians to rush into bomb shelters as instructed by the Home Front Command. MDA CEO Eli Bin confirmed that emergency teams are currently responding to over 10 impact sites, assisting casualties and assessing damage caused by missile strikes and shrapnel. This Iranian retaliation came after US President Donald Trump confirmed that American forces had bombed Iran's nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. Trump described the strikes as the most "challenging and lethal" operation in recent decades. In a strongly worded media briefing shortly after the strikes, Trump said, "I want to congratulate the great American patriots who flew those magnificent machines tonight and all of the United States military on an operation the likes of which the world has not seen in many, many decades. Hopefully, we no longer need their services in this capacity. I hope so." "This cannot continue. There will either be peace or tragedy for Iran, far greater than what we have witnessed over the last eight days. Remember, there are many targets left," he warned, hinting at further military action if Tehran does not de-escalate. The US President said the strikes aimed to cripple Iran's "nuclear enrichment capacity and put a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror." Following this, Iran warned of "everlasting consequences." Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi on Sunday issued a scathing condemnation of the United States, accusing it of committing a "grave violation" of the UN Charter, international law, and the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) after American forces, in coordination with Israel, carried out precision military strikes on three of Iran's nuclear facilities. "The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences. Each and every member of the UN must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behaviour," he posted on X. Invoking Iran's right under international law, Araghchi warned, "In accordance with the UN Charter and its provisions allowing a legitimate response in self-defence, Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest, and people."
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
Nuclear-Armed Iran Could Sponsor Nuclear Terrorism, Strike Through Proxies Hiding Behind Atomic Arsenal
By hiding behind nuclear capability, Iran would fundamentally alter the balance of global power, rendering US military dominance ineffective, collapsing the fragile Middle East security architecture, and emboldening hostile actors around the world. The United States and its allies fear this possibility not just for security reasons, but because of the strategic and ideological threat it poses, a regime with extremist ambitions backed by a nuclear umbrella. The US strikes on Iran's key nuclear sites reflect the urgency of this threat. The attack targeted Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan — facilities central to Iran's uranium enrichment and nuclear research operations — marking a pivotal move to prevent the regime from crossing the nuclear threshold. Iran's Network Of Proxies Iran's network of proxies adds another layer of danger. Hezbollah alone is armed with an estimated 150,000 rockets, capable of overwhelming Israel's Iron Dome defense system. Hamas and the Houthis give Iran the ability to strike U.S. and Israeli interests without facing direct retaliation. Iran spends $16 billion annually on these groups, equipping them with cheap drones and missiles that can bypass advanced defense systems and challenge U.S. technological superiority. The regime's influence extends far beyond the Middle East. Hezbollah has operatives in Europe and Latin America, while the Iranian Quds Force has been linked to international assassination plots, including the 2011 attempt on the Saudi ambassador in Washington, D.C. Tehran's long-standing calls for Israel's destruction add to the urgency—just one nuclear warhead could kill millions in Tel Aviv or Jerusalem. Consequences Of Nuclear-Armed Iran The consequences of a nuclear Iran wouldn't be limited to the region. A nuclear-armed Iran would trigger a regional arms race, with Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Egypt likely to pursue their own nuclear programs — effectively collapsing the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Iran could then openly arm Hezbollah or Hamas with weapons of mass destruction, knowing that the threat of nuclear retaliation would deter U.S. or Israeli counterattacks.
Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
Trump keeps world guessing on Iran strategy amid sudden shift to military action
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel President Donald Trump's handling of the Iran crisis is drawing scrutiny from diplomats and foreign policy analysts, following a pattern of conflicting public statements and unannounced strategic shifts that culminated in US airstrikes on Iran 's nuclear airstrikes, which targeted Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan on Saturday, June 21, came just two days after reports suggested Trump had given Iran a two-week window for further nuclear negotiations. That followed earlier signals from the White House indicating that Israel would hold back from unilateral strikes, messages that were swiftly upended when Israel launched Operation Rising Lion on June 13, targeting Iranian nuclear and military read: US President Donald Trump's step back on Iran pacifies nervous market The sequence of events has left global observers questioning whether the US president's diplomatic posturing is deliberately opaque or lacking internal a Truth Social post early Saturday morning, June 21, just hours before the airstrikes, Trump promoted his record of brokering peace across global conflicts, including efforts between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda, and cited his work on the Abraham Accords, India-Pakistan tensions, and Egypt-Ethiopia disputes. He suggested that his peace efforts have gone unrecognized by international within hours, US B-2 stealth bombers launched attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, signaling a sharp escalation. In the same post-strike update, Trump claimed the Fordow facility was 'gone' and called the attack 'very successful,' while also asserting that 'now is the time for peace.'The abrupt shift has raised doubts about whether Trump's administration is pursuing a coherent strategy or simply reacting to events on the ground. Diplomatic sources say there had been ongoing communication between US and Iranian intermediaries in Geneva as recently as Friday, June read: Trump weighs military action on Iran, to make a decision within two weeks, says White House 'This strategy of calculated unpredictability may serve short-term tactical goals,' said one European diplomat on condition of anonymity, 'but it erodes long-term trust in US commitments.'This is not the first instance in which Trump's statements have contradicted unfolding realities. Prior to Israel's Operation Rising Lion, Trump officials had suggested that Israeli strikes were unlikely in the near term. Instead, the operation began on June 13, catching several allies off the pattern appears to have repeated with the US itself. After hinting at diplomatic off-ramps and timelines for talks, the administration moved to a full kinetic strike with little public Iran signals possible retaliation, allies and adversaries alike are left navigating a volatile situation shaped as much by unpredictability as policy.
