Stephen A. Smith warns Newsom's possible run for presidency may be jeopardized by LA riots
Political and sports commentator Stephen A. Smith warned Democrats, including California Gov. Gavin Newsom, against opposing President Donald Trump's efforts to deport illegal immigrants on Monday, saying the issue could be "the latest derailment for the Democratic Party."
The National Guard was deployed to Los Angeles County as anti-ICE protests continued to escalate Saturday. The unrest is centered in the city of Paramount, California, where protesters clashed with federal authorities, including ICE officers who were allegedly trying to conduct a raid at a local business. As Trump cracks down on the violent protests that have erupted, some Democrats have gone so far as to blame him for the violent unrest.
Smith spoke about Newsom's state-level lawsuit against the Trump administration for federalizing the National Guard and using it in California without the consent of local government, asking, "Why the hell are you playing right into the hands of Donald Trump? Because I've got news for you, it involved migrants, immigrants, those who are undocumented, dare we say illegal in the United States of America. He's winning on this issue. There's a reason he won the popular vote."
Smith warned that this is a losing issue for the Democratic Party, and that resisting Trump on this provides him an opportunity to condemn his opposition.
Rioters Smash Windows At Lapd Headquarters As Anti-ice Agitators Clash With Authorities
"When you see Gavin Newsom speaking about it, when you see Mayor Bass speaking about it, when you hear Democrats speaking against Donald Trump ultimately - he's going to be able to say, 'They're speaking against me on this issue,' which he knows he has the support of the American people on. And as a result, it's going to be yet the latest derailment for the Democratic Party if they're not careful," Smith warned.
Read On The Fox News App
He also said people are looking at Newsom "as a presidential candidate in 2028" and warned, "This ain't going to win it for him. Not when we look at the state of California and its state income taxes. Not when we look at the cost of living. Not when we look at crime in the streets. Not when we look at homelessness. Not when we look at the border issue. Not when we look at a whole bunch of things. This ain't the issue for him to fall on his sword over, in my opinion, nevertheless he seems hellbent on doing so."
Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture
He added further, "I don't know if he can win this issue. I don't know if Gavin Newsom has won any issue lately and to be so smart and to be so sharp, but to find himself on the wrong side of issues time and time again, when it comes to the state of California in the eyes of people, it's hard to imagine what's going on."
Fox News Digital reached out to Newsom's office and did not receive an immediate response.
Smith appeared on "The Daily Show" on Monday and said he was not interested in running for political office, saying he didn't want to give up his wealth and essentially be owned by political donors.
Smith, who has mostly voted for Democrats but has been critical of its hard-left flank, had previously floated the idea of running for president.Original article source: Stephen A. Smith warns Newsom's possible run for presidency may be jeopardized by LA riots
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
19 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump approves U.S. Steel merger with Japan's Nippon after companies sign national security agreement
President Donald Trump issued an executive order on Friday approving U.S. Steel's merger with Japan's Nippon Steel, after the companies signed a national security agreement with the U.S. government. Trump opposed U.S. Steel's controversial sale to Nippon in the runup to the 2024 president election, as Republicans and Democrats have leaned into protecting U.S. companies against foreign competitors. But Trump started softening his opposition to the takeover after assuming office, ordering a new review of the deal in April. President Joe Biden had blocked U.S. Steel's sale to Nippon during his final days in office, citing national security concerns, despite Japan being a close ally. Trump has avoided calling the deal an acquisition or merger, describing it as a "partnership" in a May 23 post on his social media platform Truth Social. He insisted that U.S. Steel will remain "controlled by the USA" during a speech to workers at one of the company's plants outside Pittsburgh on May 30. U.S. Steel made clear it would become a "wholly owned subsidiary" of Nippon North America under the terms of the merger agreement in an April 8 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Trump's description of the deal as a "partnership" caused confusion among investors and union leadership. The president told U.S. Steel workers that Nippon will be a "great partner." The Trump administration is currently engaged in trade talks with Japan as investors eagerly await signs that the U.S. will strike deals with key partners that avoid steep tariffs. Trump told the steelworkers that Nippon had agreed to keep U.S. Steel's blast furnaces operating at full capacity for a minimum of 10 years. The president said the deal would not result in layoffs and promised there would be "no outsourcing whatsoever." He said workers will receive a $5,000 bonus. Trump announced that he was doubling U.S. tariffs on steel imports to 50% during his remarks to U.S. Steel workers. Those tariffs went into effect on June 4.
New York Times
19 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump's Decision to Send Troops to California Is His Do-Over of 2020
In 2020, as racial justice protests swept through the country over the murder of George Floyd, President Trump was itching to deploy the military to crush the unrest. He was talked out of it by his top national security advisers, who feared that such a decision would be viewed as moving toward martial law. Five years later, as protests against his immigration policies began to swell in Los Angeles, Mr. Trump said he had learned his lesson. 'I'll never do that again,' Mr. Trump said on Thursday, about waiting to send in the National Guard in 2020. 'If I see problems brewing,' he added, 'I'm not going to wait two weeks.' With the Los Angeles protests, Mr. Trump has seized the chance to make up for his first-term regret. His decision to send in federal troops right away, taking the extraordinary step of deploying active-duty military to deal with domestic unrest, fits into the larger pattern of Mr. Trump operating without any significant pushback from the people around him in his second term. 'He saw the military as his reactionary arm,' said Olivia Troye, a former homeland security official and aide to former Vice President Mike Pence. Ms. Troye said she witnessed multiple national security officials explain to Mr. Trump in 2020 that the military takes an oath to the Constitution — not Mr. Trump — and that it should not be turned against American citizens, even protesters. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Chicago Tribune
21 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Editorial: The sad application of justice in the Michael Madigan saga
In the end, U.S. District Judge John Robert Blakey chose to send a stern message with his 7.5-year prison sentence of Michael J. Madigan, former speaker of the Illinois House of Representatives. Madigan — for decades the most powerful politician in Illinois, the state that gave this nation its greatest president — will have to spend more than six years of that term at a minimum under federal rules, even assuming good behavior. The former Illinois House speaker is 83, so the likelihood of his dying while in confinement is considerable. A human tragedy is self-evident. But that doesn't make Blakey's sentence unjust. Madigan admitted no wrongdoing in his own short statement before the judge handed down the sentence. The closest he came was saying, 'I'm not perfect.' We wonder whether there was a legal strategy behind such obstinance given near-certain appeals of the verdict as to how federal law was applied to Madigan's conduct. A tactical reasoning may have been behind Madigan's rejection of the courtroom contrition that might otherwise have trimmed his sentence. We'll find out in due course. Speaking of the 16th president of the United States, Blakey referenced Abraham Lincoln before he sentenced Madigan: 'It's really hard to be Honest Abe right? He's a unicorn in our American history. Being great is hard. But being honest is not. Being honest is actually very easy. It's hard to commit crimes.' And the evidence showed that Madigan did indeed work hard in hatching and executing the schemes that a jury of Madigan's peers concluded were felonies. The justice behind this sentence reflects how Madigan ran this state for so long, his unprincipled grip on power, and the price we all will pay for many years to come for the financial malpractice he left in his expansive wake. The former House speaker was convicted on multiple corruption-related counts based mainly on his brazenly corrupt dealings with Commonwealth Edison in the 2010s, but there's little doubt the modus operandi he used to help ComEd and parent Exelon rake in billions from ratepayers was in place for far longer than the eight years on which federal prosecutors focused. Those eight years were just the period wherein the FBI and the U.S. attorney's office pressured former Ald. Danny Solis to wear a wire and capture damning interactions with Madigan (and powerhouse Ald. Edward Burke, who is serving time as we write) and tapped the cellphone of Madigan confidant and right-hand man Michael McClain, for years ComEd's lead outside lobbyist. Even people inside ComEd would refer to McClain as a 'double agent,' serving Madigan as much or more than the company that was paying him. McClain was caught on wiretaps saying that Madigan was his one, true client. The corruption caught on those intercepted calls and in a few videos taken by cooperating co-conspirators was just as ugly as those who battled Madigan politically (and usually lost) and those who criticized his stranglehold on state government (such as this page) always had imagined it would be. The plotting. The fixation on rewarding political soldiers with no-work arrangements. The frequent demands on a compromised and beholden company to perform the patronage function local government used to provide before courts put the kibosh on the practice. The public was made privy to all. And who paid to keep the Madigan machine running? Anyone paying taxes. Anyone paying an electric bill. That is, just about everyone in this state. Judge Blakey's agreement with prosecutors that Madigan lied when he took the witness stand in his own defense suggested there would be no mercy forthcoming. Blakey even went so far as to call Madigan's lies 'a nauseating display.' We marveled in January, witnessing Madigan's testimony, how he depicted McClain as just one friend among a sizable coterie of loyalists when anyone who'd sat through Madigan's trial (and the 2023 'ComEd Four' trial in which McClain was convicted) knew full well that McClain and Madigan were extremely close. Madigan had a strategic reason to distance himself from his supremely loyal friend, who evidence showed acted as Madigan's agent in his dealings with ComEd and others in Springfield, even the Democratic lawmakers who typically followed Madigan's orders. Once he was convicted, Madigan's betrayal of McClain served to exacerbate his crimes in the judge's eyes. After a jury convicted Madigan in February on 10 of 23 counts (on the remainder he was acquitted or jurors couldn't agree), we held out hope that the former speaker's downfall would spell the end of corruption on the scale that he practiced in Illinois. We still hold fast to that hope and belief, while of course acknowledging that graft and corruption, albeit on a less ambitious scale always will be a part of our politics and governance as long as human nature exists. But this prison sentence should serve as a clear deterrent for any future political Svengali wanting to follow in Madigan's footsteps. Michael J. Madigan had myriad political skills, as a parade of governors whom he watched come and go all would attest. To the very end, Madigan ran the playbook of his mentor, Mayor Richard J. Daley, written in an era when the Democratic machine was the accepted way of political life in Chicago and Illinois. We feel sorry for Madigan and his family. But we applaud this firm and final repudiation of the 'Velvet Hammer's' brand of politics.
