PM's constituency lit up with messages over DWP cuts - 'Tax super rich instead'
One of the messages on the clocktower at St Pancras Station in Keir Starmer's constituency said 'Tax The Super Rich Instead' while another added 'Being Sick Or Disabled Isn't A Choice'
Campaigners against planned disability cuts have projected messages on a key landmark in Keir Starmer's London constituency.
One of them on the clocktower at St Pancras Station said "Tax The Super Rich Instead" while another added "Being Sick Or Disabled Isn't A Choice". The campaign group 38 Degrees, who organised the stunt on Wednesday evening, said it was sending the Prime Minister a message he cannot ignore.
It comes after the government unveiled around £5billion in cuts to disability benefits in March - largely by restricting eligibility to Personal Independence Payments (PIP).
Charities have expressed alarm at the changes which could lose to hundreds of thousands of people losing eligibility to the key disability benefit. CEO of the campaign group 38 Degrees, Matthew McGregor, described the cuts as "heartless" and said sick and disabled people across the country "are terrified".
"None of us know when we might need a safety net, so it's no wonder that hundreds of thousands of people have spoken out against these plans, and thousands more have chipped in to bring a message to Holborn and St Pancras that Keir Starmer can't ignore: stop these cruel cuts, protect the sick and vulnerable, and tax the super rich instead," he said.
The PM is also facing the biggest revolt of his premiership so far when the reforms to PIP are voted on in the Commons in June. Over 100 Labour MPs have written to the Chief Whip saying they cannot support the measures and have urged the government to pause.
They have expressed concern over an official government analysis suggesting the reforms could result in extra 250,000 - including 50,000 kids - falling into poverty.
And just last week the cross-party Work and Pensions Committee - led by the senior Labour MP Debbie Abrahams - also wrote to the Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall urging her to delay the reforms. They said MPs are being asked to vote on the changes "without the benefit of a full impact assessment" and costing from the economic watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility.
But speaking to The Mirror, Ms Kendall said: "I understand people's concern and I understand people are anxious. But we are consulting with disabled people and the organisations that represent them on our PIP review, to look at the assessment process. I believe the task of helping people who can work, get work, is urgent."
She added: "I am listening. I have great respect for Debbie Abrahams and members of the Committee. I am talking in detail with MPs... we want to get this right. I think the task of overhauling the system that has written off and denied people support for too long - there has been failure of the last government to deal with these problems - and I want to make a start."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
Defence review is ‘message to Moscow'
The Government has pledged £1.5 billion to set up at least six factories, and will support the procurement of up to 7,000 UK-built long-range weapons in response to the strategic defence review (SDR) to be published on Monday. The new funding will see UK munitions spend hit £6 billion during this parliament and support around 1,800 jobs throughout the country. Sir Keir Starmer has called the review a 'radical blueprint' and pledged a 'wave of investments' in shipbuilding, drone technology and cyber defences. Defence Secretary John Healey said the £6 billion of investment would 'equip our forces for the future' and 'create the jobs in every part of the UK'. 'This is a message to Moscow as well. This is Britain standing behind, making our armed forces stronger but making our industrial base stronger, and this is part of our readiness to fight, if required,' he told the BBC's Sunday Morning With Laura Kuenssberg programme. He said Russia is 'attacking the UK daily' as part of some 90,000 cyber attacks from state-linked sources were directed at the UK's defence over the last two years. A cyber command to counter such threats is being set up as part of the review. Asked if he expected a form of real-world attack by Russia on the UK in the coming years, he said: 'We have to be prepared. Nato has to be prepared. We see Putin in Ukraine trying to redraw international boundaries by force … it's part of the growing Russian aggression.' He added that is why Nato and the UK are 'stepping up our ability to deter as well as to defend in the future'. 'The world is more uncertain. The tensions are greater but we prepare for war in order to secure the peace. If you're strong enough to defeat an enemy you deter them from attacking in the first place,' Mr Healey said. He said plans to reach 2.5% of GDP spending on defence by 2027 and an 'ambition' to hit 3% in the next parliament were 'enough to deliver the SDR's vision that sets out tomorrow, and that vision is a transformation of Britain's armed forces.' He said there was 'no doubt' the Government would reach 3% in the next parliament. But he said he does not expect to make progress towards raising the number of soldiers to 73,000 until the next parliament. 'We've narrowed the gap, but we've still got more people leaving than joining. 'The first job is to reverse that trend and then I want to see in the next parliament our ability to start to increase the number,' he said. Defence minister Alistair Cairns, writing in The Mirror, said there were plans to increase cadet numbers by 30% with new opportunities for young people to get into the armed forces. And more than £1.5 billion in extra funding will go to military homes for urgent repairs such as fixing boilers and roofs, and other issues including tackling damp. Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick welcomed the Government's pledge to increase defence spending but said he was 'sceptical' as to whether the Chancellor would make good on the plans. Mr Jenrick said the UK should reach 3% of GDP spending on defence 'within this parliament'. 'We think that 2034 is a long time to wait given the gravity of the situation,' he told the Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme on Sky News.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Farage's 'leftwing' pose is flimsy – but so are Labour's own governing fantasies
In a much-publicised press conference last week in London, Nigel Farage invited Keir Starmer to a one-to-one debate at 'a working man's club' anywhere 'in the red wall'. The suggested location was more noteworthy than the debate-me machismo. Its message was clear: having trampled over the Tories in the recent local elections, Reform UK is coming for Labour and nowhere is safe. 'Let's go to one of the former mining communities, let's go somewhere that Labour has held the seat pretty much consistently since 1918,' Farage said, and then let's 'test' whether Labour or Reform is the real 'party of the workers'. If Starmer felt brave enough, they could even 'enjoy a few beers with the lads' – a nod to what has always been Farage's favourite interpretation of what 'standing with workers' entails. Farage's speech made waves for, among other things, calling for the two-child benefit cap to be overhauled and for Starmer's restrictions to the winter fuel allowance to be reversed. For the Thatcherite fanboy and former City trader, these were unusual positions, and the Westminster lobby lapped up the controversy – suggesting that, for parts of the Tory press, deviations from austerity will only be permissible when delivered with Farageist chutzpah. 'How Farage's fiery speech signals a seismic shift in UK politics – and the end for Starmer,' the Daily Express declared. 'Nigel leans left and hits the bullseye,' Tim Stanley cooed in the Daily Telegraph. The Sun wondered whether they should now call Farage 'Red Nigel'. But in reality, rather than represent an unprecedented reconfiguration of British politics, the speech was a typically opportunistic and cynical intervention from Farage: he noisily supported two policies that mounting reports suggested Labour were set to implement anyway, within a broader message that was far more George Osborne than Jeremy Corbyn. 'The great divide that is opening up in British society,' Farage claimed, was between those who wake up early and go to work and those who stay in bed and enjoy a similar quality of life. Workers and shirkers, in other words – same as it ever was. How worried should Labour be by Reform's overtures to the left? Farage's star is clearly rising and Reform has already surpassed Ukip's electoral achievements. After triumphing in the recent local elections, with more than 670 new council seats and a third of the vote, Reform now leads the pack in many national opinion polls. But Labour should first and foremost be worried by itself. Starmer's government appears to be in a permanently defensive state, commanding an enormous majority in parliament and yet rarely seeming to do more than react to events around it – sometimes left, often right. The prime minister's personal approval rating has suffered the consequences of this hapless strategy, reaching record lows with 38-point drop since last year's election. Meanwhile Red Nigel circles like a vulture. The two-child cap is illustrative. Since entering government with the promise of 'change', Labour maintained it would have to keep the policy – a transparently cruel inheritance from Osborne that made child poverty levels soar. Now the party appears increasingly likely to lift the cap, but what could have been a historic moment of rupture with Cruel Britannia – a move that will lift half a million children out of poverty, according to the Resolution Foundation – may easily be seen by the public as a reluctant concession to various Labour MPs and now Farage: not an empowered rebuttal of Tory austerity and the dawn of a new era, but yet more flip-flopping and an affirmation of Farage's influence. In his speech, Farage claimed that Reform represented the biggest revolution in British politics since Labour overtook the Liberal party in the 1920s – and there are some parallels. Back then, the Tories saw Labour as both an existential threat and an opportunity: Labour was a foreboding movement, but the Tories could take fleeting comfort in the knowledge that it was the Liberals who would suffer the severest blow. Labour now treats Reform with a similar ambivalence: worried yet reassured that the Tories will be the main victim. But an irreverent and vengeful Farage, powered by grievances and resentment from both deindustrialised Britain and the elite will have a far more corrosive effect on British politics and wider society than Labour ever threatened. For now, after the fallout of his 'island of strangers' speech, Starmer's strategy to deal with Reform will be to call out its economics as a fantasy. Farage's economic programme – binning net zero, waging war on asylum seekers and abolishing inheritance tax – is indeed reminiscent of Liz Truss. But it is not enough for Labour to play the role of the miserly Tories, saying to Reform what the Tories have historically said to them: we can't afford that, we must live within our means, and so on. Labour needs its own positive vision of the country. For now, the party indulges its own set of fantasies: that it can outflank the Tories and even Reform on the right without being outflanked on the left; that it is enough to be the least unpopular party, no matter how uninspiring one is; and that you can break with the harsh inequities of Tory Britain, as promised, without upsetting anyone important. Before Starmer's podiums were emblazoned with dispiriting slogans like 'fixing the foundations' and 'securing Britain's future' they carried various versions of a more optimistic one: 'it's time for change.' A major reason for its massive majority in 2024 was that, after 14 years of joyless Conservative misrule, Labour better embodied that spirit of feeling than any other party. But unless Labour can show they are that change from the Tories – and that will involve taking Britain beyond its overfed interests in tightening immigration controls and the welfare state – this spirit of feeling will only endure and deepen, and the answer to it will no longer be Labour. Samuel Earle is the author of Tory Nation: How One Party Took Over
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Starmer's unpopularity in Scotland fuels support for independence
Disillusionment with Sir Keir Starmer's administration has helped push support for Scottish independence to a record high, a new poll has suggested. The survey found that support for separation from the UK is at 54 per cent when undecided voters are excluded, according to pollster Norstat. It found that fewer than one in five Scots plan to vote Labour in next year's Holyrood election, following a calamitous decline in support for the party during Sir Keir's first 11 months as Prime Minister. Labour routed the SNP in last year's general election, winning 37 of Scotland's 57 seats, but a series of controversial decisions, including the removal of the winter fuel payment, has led to a remarkable reversal of fortunes. The poll also found that support for independence would rise to 58 per cent if Nigel Farage were to become prime minister, giving the nationalists a 16-point lead over the Unionists. This would put John Swinney within touching distance of the support he has said would be required to force Westminster to allow another independence referendum. The Scottish First Minister said he would make the issue of Scottish separation 'central' to the SNP's Holyrood election campaign over the year leading up to the contest. He has argued that the Government would have to drop its block on holding an independence vote if support reached similar levels to those achieved ahead of the 1997 referendum on devolution. This saw 74 per cent of Scots voting in favour of creating a Holyrood parliament and 63 per cent for it to have tax powers. Mr Swinney has said he wanted to open a debate about independence as Scots were feeling 'disaffected and alienated' with Sir Keir's performance in government and the rise of Reform UK. The poll was published ahead of a Scottish Parliament by-election this Thursday, which is being viewed as a bellwether for next year's Holyrood contest. Mr Swinney has claimed the contest in Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse is a straight fight between the SNP and Reform after Labour's campaign 'collapsed'. The poll, commissioned by The Sunday Times, found support for the SNP in both Holyrood's constituency and regional votes had fallen by two points to 33 per cent and 28 per cent respectively. Labour's support rose slightly to 19 per cent and 18 per cent respectively. However, Reform support has increased four points to 18 per cent in the constituency vote and three points to 16 per cent in the regional list. Mr Farage's party remained ahead of the Scottish Tories, who dropped to only 13 per cent in the constituency vote and remained at 15 per cent in the regions. Prof Sir John Curtice, the eminent psephologist, projected the results would mean the SNP winning 54 seats, with Labour dropping to 20 seats and Reform gaining its first 18 seats in the Scottish Parliament. Meanwhile, the Tories would drop from being the second biggest party to the fourth, with just 17 MSPs, followed by the Lib Dems on 11 and the Greens on nine. The poll also gave Mr Swinney a minus seven net approval rating – the difference between the percentages of people who think he is doing a good and a bad job. Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar's rating was -25, Mr Farage's -26, Scottish Tory leader Russell Findlay's -32, Sir Keir's -39 and Kemi Badenoch's -44. 'Farage is breathing down Labour's neck' Sir John said the results showed that Mr Farage was 'not as toxic in the eyes of Scots as many of his rivals believe'. He added: 'John Swinney is in pole position to remain Scotland's first minister after next year's Holyrood election, but his party is still struggling to recover from its sharp reversal of fortune last year. 'Key to the SNP's lead is the rise of Reform. Nigel Farage's party is now breathing down Labour's neck in the race for second place at Holyrood.' Keith Brown, SNP deputy leader, said his party has 'momentum' and Labour had lost the by-election. Dame Jackie Baillie, Scottish Labour's deputy leader, said: 'This week the people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse will get a chance to call time on SNP failure and choose a new direction with Scottish Labour. 'It's clear the SNP does not deserve to win this by-election and only Scottish Labour can beat them.'
