Pennsylvania teacher accused of calling Muslim student a 'terrorist' is put on leave
A Pennsylvania middle school teacher has been placed on administrative leave, accused of calling a Muslim seventh grader a 'terrorist.'
The incident is alleged to have taken place Jan. 16 at Central Dauphin Middle School in Harrisburg after the student asked the teacher to change seats, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, a civil rights group, said in a news release.
'I do not negotiate with terrorists,' the teacher told the student, according to CAIR, which described the student as Palestinian Lebanese American.
Adam Rahman, the boy's father, said at a news conference Monday evening that his son is doing 'OK' but that the incident will 'always resonate in his head' and he'll 'wonder if the next teacher will say the same thing.'
'He felt like the room was spinning and he was the only one and there was nobody to help him,' Rahman said. 'These teachers are supposed to be the mentors, the people who you look up to, and if that fails, there's nothing.'
The Central Dauphin School District said it was aware of the allegations that the teacher 'made a derogatory comment' to the student during an after-school program at the middle school. It did not identify the educator.
The district said the allegation incident goes against the district's values and the policies set for staff members.
'Central Dauphin School District has zero tolerance for hateful and racist speech, and we have launched an internal investigation into this matter,' it said in a statement. 'While we cannot comment publicly on personnel matters, the teacher involved in the alleged incident is on administrative leave pending our investigation.'
Rahman said that it is not the first time his family has experienced 'red flags' in the school district but that this was the 'tipping point.'
'When teachers say it, that's when I have to go to the school and confront this,' he said.
Rahman called for more education in geopolitics in the district so students can 'learn more about different backgrounds, especially in the Middle East.'
Community leaders demanded cultural sensitivity and anti-bias curriculum and training at Monday's news conference.
In a statement, the Harrisburg Palestine Coalition said what it described as the teacher's "deeply embedded racism" may stem partly from "exposure to misinformation and war propaganda by mainstream news coverage of Palestine."
"Central Dauphin School District must do more to ensure that education on Palestine is correctly taught in its classrooms," the coalition said.
In a statement, CAIR's Philadelphia branch called the incident a 'racist, anti-Palestinian verbal assault' that made the teacher 'unfit to teach any students.'
The district's superintendent, Eric Turman, said Sunday that there was no update on the investigation to share.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
37 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
Indiana University changes rule about overnight protests on campus
The Indiana University board of trustees voted to change a policy intended to tighten restrictions on campus protests after a federal judge found it was likely to violate the First Amendment. Nearly a year ago, IU's board passed its "expressive activity" policy to ban overnight camping and the use of unapproved structures in response to a pro-Palestinian solidarity encampment that stood on campus for months during the spring 2024 semester. Violators faced a range of possible disciplinary actions, including suspension, expulsion, loss of university employment and a responsibility to pay for damages. However, the policy was paused after a judge ruled two weeks ago that it likely violates the campus community's First Amendment rights. Time, place and manner restrictions on free expression are legal as long as they are narrowly tailored; the judge's order said IU's policy was not. During its June 12 meeting, the board unanimously agreed to end the prohibition on overnight protesting and other expressive activities. It also added language saying the policy should be "interpreted in favor of free speech rights." While the overnight restriction is removed, protests stretching after hours, like the pro-Palestinian encampment, may still prove difficult. Camping is not permitted, and protesters must still obtain prior approval for structures. The trustees voted to amend the policy at their June 12 meeting without explicitly detailing the changes before the vote. The policy was updated online about 15 minutes after the vote. General Counsel Anthony Prather said he and other administrators were evaluating changes to the policy prior to the court's decision. The new version is a combination of stakeholder feedback and takeaways from the preliminary injunction, he said. Newly sworn-in trustee James Bopp Jr., a longtime conservative First Amendment lawyer, said he agreed that the previous policy overstepped constitutional rights. The new version, he said, adequately weighs guardrails and rights to on-campus speech. "This issue, not only in my general practice but for the purposes of the university, is of critical importance that we get this right," Bopp said. "I really want to compliment the general counsel, in my opinion, as having done that now." Trustees were also set to discuss resident undergraduate tuition, the budget and President Pamela Whitten's compensation during the June 12 meeting. Last year, trustees crafted an update to IU's "expressive activities" policy after a Dunn Meadow encampment resulted in several clashes with police and dozens of arrests. The university fenced off the area last school year to make pricey repairs it said the encampment caused. Three of the nine trustees voted against it during its initial passage last summer. Indiana Gov. Mike Braun has since removed three of the board's members, including two of the dissenting trustees, under his new appointment powers, codified last legislative session. The campus community widely decried the policy as unconstitutional, and protesters staged midnight candlelight vigils throughout the fall 2024 semester to test and challenge IU's enforcement of the policy. The Indiana Chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit challenging the policy on First Amendment grounds last August, which resulted in the policy's temporary halt this May. The USA TODAY Network - Indiana's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners.
USA Today
42 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump's throwing himself a parade while red and blue states join LA in protest
Trump's throwing himself a parade while red and blue states join LA in protest | Opinion I don't know whether June 14 will mark an inflection point, but it will offer a staggering contrast between the power-drunk despotism of Trump and the 'Aw, hell no' attitude of many Americans. Show Caption Hide Caption Armored tanks arrive in DC for Trump's military birthday parade As Washington, D.C. prepares for the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, armored tanks have begun to arrive ahead of Saturday's celebration. The false narrative, since President Donald Trump's administration provoked protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Los Angeles, has been that it's a blue-city problem in a blue state with a liberal governor who can't control his citizens. But when protests over Trump's draconian immigrant crackdown and his authoritarian presidency spread across the country, as they will likely do on June 14 with "No Kings" protests expected in more than 2,000 cities and towns, the California narrative will swiftly go 'Poof!' We've already seen anti-ICE protests bubble up in the deep-red state of Texas, with more to follow June 14. Will the No Kings protest in Abilene, Texas, prompt Trump to send in U.S. Marines, as he has done in Los Angeles? Trump won't send the Marines into red states to deal with protesters Neither will the protests planned for Tupelo, Mississippi, or Eureka Springs, Arkansas, or Sebring, Florida, or Worland, Wyoming. But what they will do is show the president, who will be plunked in Washington, DC, watching an entirely unnecessary $45 million military parade that just so happens to coincide with his 79th birthday, that Americans are angry, and not just the ones in those disreputable blue states. Opinion: After LA, Trump hard launches new First Amendment – only MAGA can protest I don't know whether June 14 will mark an inflection point, but it will certainly offer a staggering contrast between the power-drunk despotism of President Trump and the 'Aw, hell no' attitude of a growing swath of the U.S. population. Sen. Padilla in handcuffs was the latest sign of Trump's authoritarianism On June 12, Americans saw video of a U.S. senator, Alex Padilla, being grabbed and dragged out of an LA news conference featuring Kristi Noem, head of the Department of Homeland Security. Padilla was asking a pointed question before being hauled off and then, in the hallway outside, pushed face first to the ground and handcuffed. That's a good way to boost turnout at this weekend's protests. DHS head Kristi Noem says feds are there to 'liberate' LA Almost as chilling as the administration's manhandling of a sitting U.S. senator was what Noem said during the press conference about the U.S. military presence in Los Angeles: 'We are not going away. We are staying here to liberate the city from the socialists and the burdensome leadership that this governor and that this mayor have placed on this country and what they have tried to insert into the city.' Opinion: Trump's military show of force in LA and DC camouflage his failing presidency That kind of gives away the whole game: Trump administration officials think they can send federal troops into a city and indulge in some causal 'regime change' under the pretense of a bunch of made-up nonsense. That's wildly un-American. Yet U.S. soldiers on June 14 will be forced to take part in a sprawling parade that's at least partially in homage to a man who thinks that's how America is supposed to work? What are we even doing here, folks? 'No Kings' protests will give voice to nationwide disapproval of Trump What has transpired in LA has nothing to do with it being a blue city in a blue state with a Democratic governor. It has to do with the American people, most of whom don't like masked federal goons grabbing their neighbors off the streets and not giving them due process. It has to do with many voters who were promised that President Trump would only target 'dangerous' immigrants, not friends and neighbors, or people who've been part of a community for years. It has to do with Americans who see the handcuffing of a U.S. senator for no justifiable reason as anti-democratic and a dangerous escalation. The big and small protests that will soon envelop small towns and big cities in all 50 states will show Trump and his 'lie first, then lie some more' administration that many Americans reject government-sponsored cruelty. The No Kings events will show the president and his people they can't fool all the people all of the time ‒ not even close. The booing of Trump will only get louder Trump and first lady Melania Trump were booed, rightfully, at the Kennedy Center when they arrived for a musical on June 11. The president's approval rating stinks, and a new Quinnipiac poll found him underwater on every issue, from immigration to trade to the economy. A recent poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found that 60% of Americans don't think Trump's military parade is a good use of taxpayer money. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. So here's what's going to happen Saturday. Trump's narrative that liberal strongholds like Los Angeles are bastions of radical protesters will be soundly derailed by the appearance of protesters in states red, blue and purple. The hypocrisy of his calling out California Gov. Gavin Newsom and claiming the state is out of control will be highlighted by the fact that Trump says the same thing about red-state governors dealing with widespread protests. Trump himself will be scowling, hopefully in the rain if the weather forecast holds, as the soldiers he forced to march in front of him go by, their tanks and other vehicles needlessly tearing up the streets of the nation's capital. That mandated, wildly expensive parade to satisfy one small man's ego will be drowned out by myriad protests that will collectively deliver to Trump a message from a growing number of Americans: 'You stink.' Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at
The Intercept
an hour ago
- The Intercept
Some Republicans Opposed Using Troops Against Protests in 2020. Now They're Marching in Lockstep.
When President Donald Trump threatened to send troops against the Black Lives Matter movement five years ago, some members of his own party offered guarded criticisms. Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., then serving as the majority whip, said he opposed using the military. 'I would prefer that these things be handled by the state and local authorities,' he said. 'You want to de-escalate, rather than escalate.' Over the past week, however, Thune has been one of many Republican leaders endorsing Trump's call to send U.S. Marines to Los Angeles amid the anti-ICE protests as deportation operations expanded. The near-unanimous chorus is a sign of how thoroughly Trump has consolidated his grip on Republicans — and how fiercely the party's base turned against protests after George Floyd's murder in 2020. Although the party was split five years ago, some Republicans at the time rejected Trump's inflammatory calls for military force. 'When the looting starts, the shooting starts,' Trump tweeted on May 29, 2020. Days later, as federal police tear-gassed protesters outside the White House, Trump said in a Rose Garden address that governors should 'dominate the streets' with the National Guard — or he would 'deploy the United States military and quickly solve the problem for them.' The tear-gassing episode — where Trump was accused of using force so that he could stage a photo op in the area — drew condemnations from several Republicans in the Senate, including then-Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb., and Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C. 'If your question is, 'Should you use tear gas to clear a path so the president can go have a photo op?' the answer is no,' Scott said soon after. (An Interior Department probe later cleared Trump of using tear gas to set up his photo op.) The caution was far from unanimous among Republicans: There were always supporters of Trump's military talk, including Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas. 'The military has been called up a number of times to defend the nation. The natural route is to use the National Guard. That is appropriate. If necessary, the military should be used and there is a long tradition of that,' Cruz said in June 2020. Now, five months into his second term, Trump has a far firmer grip on the Republican Party, and the critiques of his tough talk have been harder to find. Thune, now the Senate majority leader, gave unequivocal support for Trump's decision to send in troops. 'At the end of the day, it's about preventing chaos and preserving law and order,' Thune said Wednesday. Other Republicans have used Trump's decision to declare they were right all along about deploying troops on protesters. Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., who wrote a controversial New York Times op-ed in 2020 calling for Trump to 'Send in the Troops,' wrote a follow-up this week in the Wall Street Journal titled 'Send In the Troops, for Real.' Read our complete coverage Against Trump's nearly unprecedented decision to take over the California National Guard, and then send in Marines, only a handful of prominent Republicans have expressed reservations. One of them was Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine. Sometimes thought of as a centrist, but rarely breaking with her party on votes, Collins said she opposed using the Marines against protests — but was fine with sending in the National Guard. 'I would draw a distinction between the use of the National Guard and the use of the Marines,' she said earlier this week. 'Active-duty forces are generally not to be involved in domestic law enforcement operations.'
