Mum's travel hack helps beat £59 Ryanair baggage charges
A mum boarded her Ryanair flight despite refusing to pay the baggage charge - by ditching her suitcase and using a bin bag in front of a gobsmacked 'jobsworth'.
Natalie Sadler was boarding her flight from Palma de Mallorca to Leeds Bradford last month and claims she was asked by a member of staff to place her suitcase in the baggage sizer.
She had purchased priority boarding for her family holiday to Magaluf and was entitled to a small personal bag (40x20x25cm) and a 10kg bag (55x40x20cm).
The 43-year-old caterer admitted her 10kg suitcase was a 'thumbnail' too big and that one of the wheels was sticking out.
Natalie Sadler was boarding her flight from Palma de Mallorca to Leeds Bradford on 20 May (Image: Kennedy News and Media) She claims a Ryanair staff member then said she would need to pay Euro 70 [£59] to take the bag on the flight.
The mum-of-three claims a Ryanair staff member told her she had to pay the money or she would not be able to board the aircraft.
Natalie said she refused to pay the fee because the staff member was 'rude'.
Thinking on her feet, she headed towards a nearby bar at the boarding gate and asked them for a bin bag.
When she returned to the gate she emptied all of the clothes from her suitcase into the blue bin bag, leaving her case behind.
A triumphant Natalie said she boarded the plane with the bin bag and placed it in the overhead locker while on-lookers applauded.
Footage shows Natalie talking about her experience and the blue bin bag with her possessions in it.
Ryanair, who claim the worker involved was from a third party assigned to deal with baggage, said 'our bag policy is simple - if the bag fits in our bag sizer, it gets on free of charge'.
(Image: Kennedy News and Media)
Natalie said: "It [the suitcase] was literally a thumbnail too wide and the wheel was slightly out so I'm not going to dispute that.
"She [a Ryanair staff member] was like, 'if you don't pay Euro 70 you'll get a new flight home. I'll send the flight without you.'
"It wasn't the money, it was the principle at this point because she was so rude.
"But I said to my husband, 'open the case' and I ran over to where the bar was near the boarding gate and I went, 'have you got a bin bag?'
"I opened the case at the door for boarding and she [the Ryanair staff member] was stood next to me and I filled the bag with everything out of the case.
"I flung it over my shoulder like Santa and I just went 'there you go, you can keep that'.
"And off I went onto the plane. When I got on everyone was clapping, it was hilarious, it was so funny.
"Everyone was just laughing. They were clapping as I walked on with this bag.
"I couldn't get down the aisle because it was so big. Everyone found it highly amusing.
"I told them [the passengers on the plane] there was no way after the way she spoke to me was I giving her any of my money. Not a chance."
Natalie claims she had flown out to Palma de Mallorca on Ryanair just seven days prior with the same suitcase and experienced no problems.
Natalie said: "The suitcase is only £45 new so I wasn't going to pay £59.
"I needed to solve my problem. I'm a fixer and I fixed the problem.
"I was fuming. I just had to laugh it off, as much as I was annoyed, it's a suitcase, no one died.
"They [Ryanair staff] just kept looking but said nothing despite the bag being bigger than the case at that point.
"It is absolutely ridiculous but I'm glad I stood my ground. There's so many people who would have just gone, 'get the card out, pay them.'"
A spokesperson for Ryanair said: "Ryanair's bag policy is simple; if the bag fits in our bag sizer, which is bigger than our agreed dimensions, it gets on free of charge. If the bag doesn't fit within our sizer, it will get charged for.
"This passenger's bag exceeded the permitted dimensions, and they chose to repack their items in an alternative bag that would fit the sizer instead.
"There is a very simple solution to this, which is that passengers simply comply with their agreement at the time of booking and travel with bags that fit or are smaller than our agreed bag dimensions."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
7 hours ago
- Bloomberg
ECB's Schnabel Says Now Is Right Time to Boost Role of Euro
European Central Bank Executive Board member Isabel Schnabel sees a favorable moment now to strengthen euro's global role as investors turn to Europe. There's a 'window of opportunity' to increase the international role of the euro, she said in a question to a panel at the 31st Dubrovnik Economic Conference on Saturday.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
British holidaymakers to miss out on compensation after EU rule change
Britons will miss out on compensation for delayed flights after Brussels adopted a rule change following complaints from airlines. Payouts that were previously triggered by delays exceeding three hours will now only be made after four hours of holdups, European transport ministers agreed. The new regulation, hammered out following a decade of discussions and bargaining over passenger compensation, will apply to all services from EU countries to the UK. For the time being, travellers headed from Britain to the Continent will still qualify for a refund when flight delays hit the three-hour mark, unless they are flying with an EU-registered airline. While raising the compensation threshold, ministers also agreed to increase the minimum level of payment from €250 (£210) to €300 for shorter journeys and to €500 for those above 3,500km (2,175 miles). The original regulation, known as EU261, was passed in 2004 with the aim of ensuring that passengers received money and assistance in the event of flights being cancelled at short notice. Following Brexit, the UK adopted it into law so that the rights of travellers remained unchanged. However, the Government will now have to decide whether to adopt the amendments for outbound flights or stick with the original version. Taking no action might be welcomed by consumer groups but would have consequences for UK airlines, which would be at a disadvantage to their European rivals. It could also affect fares, with Ryanair having claimed that EU261 costs passengers £7 per ticket. Airlines for Europe, an industry group, had pressed for a higher compensation threshold, arguing that extending it to five hours – as originally proposed by the European Commission – would allow 70pc of flights that are cancelled to be rescued. It argued said that airlines inevitably scrapped flights once compensation was triggered, especially since the payouts involved were often higher than the ticket prices charged. It said a five-hour threshold would have made it more practical for carriers to fly in replacement aircraft so that more flights would get away, potentially benefiting 10m passengers a year. A spokesman said: 'Getting to their destination is the primary concern of passengers, even if it means getting to bed or arriving at their holiday resort late. But with a low cancellation threshold it makes more sense to call off the flight and take that hit.' Airlines have also railed against the fact that the compensation applies whether delays are caused by a crew shortage or technical issue that might be laid at their door, or by severe weather or air traffic control issues beyond their control. A number of extraordinary circumstances are expected to be added as part of revisions to 31 different air passenger rights. The revisions must still clear the European Parliament but are expected to become law in the bloc by the end of the year. The Department for Transport said the UK did not have to amend its legislation in line with any changes from the EU, and that any potential future reforms would require careful consideration on their merits, and be subject to public consultation. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
British holidaymakers to miss out on compensation after EU rule change
Britons will miss out on compensation for delayed flights after Brussels adopted a rule change following complaints from airlines. Payouts that were previously triggered by delays exceeding three hours will now only be made after four hours of holdups, European transport ministers agreed. The new regulation, hammered out following a decade of discussions and bargaining over passenger compensation, will apply to all services from EU countries to the UK. For the time being, travellers headed from Britain to the Continent will still qualify for a refund when flight delays hit the three-hour mark, unless they are flying with an EU-registered airline. While raising the compensation threshold, ministers also agreed to increase the minimum level of payment from €250 (£210) to €300 for shorter journeys and to €500 for those above 3,500km (2,175 miles). The original regulation, known as EU261, was passed in 2004 with the aim of ensuring that passengers received money and assistance in the event of flights being cancelled at short notice. Following Brexit, the UK adopted it into law so that the rights of travellers remained unchanged. However, the Government will now have to decide whether to adopt the amendments for outbound flights or stick with the original version. Taking no action might be welcomed by consumer groups but would have consequences for UK airlines, which would be at a disadvantage to their European rivals. It could also affect fares, with Ryanair having claimed that EU261 costs passengers £7 per ticket. Airlines for Europe, an industry group, had pressed for a higher compensation threshold, arguing that extending it to five hours – as originally proposed by the European Commission – would allow 70pc of flights that are cancelled to be rescued. It argued said that airlines inevitably scrapped flights once compensation was triggered, especially since the payouts involved were often higher than the ticket prices charged. It said a five-hour threshold would have made it more practical for carriers to fly in replacement aircraft so that more flights would get away, potentially benefiting 10m passengers a year. A spokesman said: 'Getting to their destination is the primary concern of passengers, even if it means getting to bed or arriving at their holiday resort late. But with a low cancellation threshold it makes more sense to call off the flight and take that hit.' Airlines have also railed against the fact that the compensation applies whether delays are caused by a crew shortage or technical issue that might be laid at their door, or by severe weather or air traffic control issues beyond their control. A number of extraordinary circumstances are expected to be added as part of revisions to 31 different air passenger rights. The revisions must still clear the European Parliament but are expected to become law in the bloc by the end of the year. The Department for Transport said the UK did not have to amend its legislation in line with any changes from the EU, and that any potential future reforms would require careful consideration on their merits, and be subject to public consultation.
