&w=3840&q=100)
South Korea presidential election: Candidates, big issues, controversies… A complete guide
South Koreans are turning out in record numbers for early voting today in the country's snap presidential election set to take place on 3 June. The election comes in the aftermath of the worst political turmoil in decades. Here's everything you need to know about the South Korean election read more
Lee Jae-myung (2nd R), the presidential candidate for South Korea's Democratic Party, casts his early vote for the upcoming presidential election at a polling station in Seoul as the Presedential elections on May 29, 2025. AFP
South Koreans are turning out in record numbers for early voting today
The country is set to hold a snap presidential election on June 3.
The development comes in the aftermath of the country witnessing its worst political turmoil in decades.
South Korea's former president Yoon Suk Yeol was removed from office in June .
That came after the country's Constitutional Court upheld his impeachment by parliament for attempting to impose martial law.
It also comes in the backdrop of the tumultuous relationship between South Korea and the United States under the presidency of Donald Trump.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
But what do we know about the South Korean election? Who are the candidates?
What are the big issues? What about the controversies?
Let's take a closer look
What do we know?
South Korea's election is quite straightforward.
There is just one round of voting. The person who gets the most votes is declared the winner.
Unlike India, which has a British-style parliamentary system, South Korea has a presidential system – the voters directly elect the president.
The country of 51.7 million people has 44.39 million eligible voters.
Women comprise just over half, 50.05 per cent, of the eligible voters.
South Korea is one of the world's fastest aging societies.
Little surprise than that voters over 60 comprise around a third of the electorate.
That's far higher than those in the 20s and 30s who comprise just a 28 per cent share.
Most voters hail from Gyeonggi Province (26.4 per cent,) followed by Seoul at (18.7 per cent) and Busan at (6.5 per cent).
A total of 205,268 people overseas voted between May 20 and 25 in 118 countries, according to the National Election Commission (NEC).
There are six candidates left – all of whom are men.
The three main candidates are Lee Jae-myung of the opposition Democratic Party, Kim Moon-soo of the ruling People Power Party and New Reform Party's Lee Jun-seok.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
As per BBC, Lee and Yoon previously collided in the 2022 election in which the latter prevailed in a close-run contest.
Lee's supporters consider him a working-class hero. Lee previously worked in a factory before switching to becoming a human rights and then taking a plunge into politics.
Lee has vowed to create a 'real Republic of Korea' – promising jobs and a fair society.
According to CNA, while Lee earlier compared himself to Bernie Sanders in the US, he has become a much more centrist candidate since the last election.
Lee is a strident opponent of Yoon.
Lee used his parliamentary majorities to stymie Yoon's agenda.
He also let the impeachment charge against Yoon after he attempted to impose martial law.
As per BBC, Kim is a former labour minister.
While he too has vowed to boost the economy – pitching himself as good for business – he may be hampered by the fact that he belongs to the same party as Yoon.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
As per CNA, Kim won the support from the PPP base after opposing Yoon's impeachment.
Former labour minister Kim Moon-soo (R) celebrates next to ex-party chief Han Dong-hoon after winning the final race to choose South Korea's conservative People Power Party's (PPP) candidate for the upcoming presidential election. AFP
This, even as the power brokers would have preferred a more centrist alternative.
Kim will need to expand his voter base if he stands any shot.
However, Yoon's departure from the party will no doubt help matters for Kim.
Kim was jailed in the 1980s for leading a pro-democracy movement – which may play in his favour.
While Kim has sought to distance himself from Yoon, he has kept those close to Yoon on his campaign team.
He has also reached out to Park for support.
As per CNA, Lee Jun-seok is a former PPP leader.
The New Reform Party is a relatively new right-wing outfit.
Lee Jun-seok could hurt the chances of the PPP candidate.
He has been far more strident on Yoon's actions – and more importantly has refused to make an alliance with Kim.
Lee Jun-seok has consistently sought to paint his opponents as establishment men who unqualified to lead South Korea.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
He has made his pitch to younger voters.
But even Kim and Lee Jun-seok joining hands may not be enough to stymie Lee.
Data show Lee is the clear frontrunner followed by Kim, while Lee Jun-seok is a distant third.
A recent gall Gallup poll shows Lee being supported by 49 per cent of respondents.
Kim had the backing of 35 per cent, while Lee Jun-seok was at just 11 per cent.
Kwon Young-guk of the Democratic Labor Party and two Independents Hwang Kyo-ahn and Song Jin- ho are also running.
However, they have virtually no chance of winning.
According to the country's election commission, this is the first time since 2007 that there are no women candidates for president.
As per BBC, South Korea got its first woman candidate for president in 1987.
However, the woman, Hong Suk-Ja dropped out before the vote.
Four women candidates contested for president in 2012.
But South Korea has had just one woman president in its history – Park Geun-hye.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Park's reign did not end well.
According to BBC, Park was ousted from office over a corruption scandal.
What are the big issues?
The economy, the birth rate, Donald Trump's tariffs and with North Korea remain the major issues.
According to CNA, South Korea's economy dipped in the first quarter of 2025.
Increasing growth and spurring consumer sentiments will be on the top of the agenda for whomever succeeds Yoon.
Then there is the matter of dealing with Trump's tariffs – which would involve reaching a bilateral trade deal with the US.
The US President has imposed a 25 per cent levy on South Korea.
South Korea is uniquely manageable to Trump's tariffs given that exports account for 40 per cent of its GDP.
A man uses his phone as he looks at a monitor displaying the benchmark Kospi index in Seoul on April 7. South Korean stocks tumbled over five per cent as Asian markets sank and US futures signaled steep Wall Street losses, driven by Donald Trump's harsh tariffs. AFP
Affordable housing and creating more jobs are also top of the list.
Polls show that people also want a shared sense of national unity restored.
Foreign policy is also important to voters – given the fact that North Korea is the belligerent next door neighbour and getting even closer to Russia.
Constitutional reform is also another issue voters are concerned about – however, this may prove to be a tall order for whomever succeeds Yoon.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The country's birth rate of .75, among the lowest in the world, also continues to be cause for alarm.
What about the controversies?
According to The Conversation, Lee is facing legal troubles.
Lee in 2024 was convicted for violating election law – and thus from competing for the presidency for five years.
However, in March, an appeals court overturned the lower court's decision.
This allowed Lee to campaign for the presidency.
The country Supreme Court has overturned the verdict and sent it back down to the appeal's court.
Lee's campaign has said that there should be no problem if he wins given that South Korea's presidents are legally immune from prosecution – unless the charge is treason.
However, experts say South Korea's Constitution is vague when it comes to such a matter.
Experts say South Korea is currently pervaded by a climate of distrust.
The spectre of Yoon continues to hangover the election.
Yoon Suk Yeol attends his impeachment trial at the Constitutional Court in Seoul, South Korea. Reuters
According to BBC, well the PPP has apologised to the public for the attempted coup, Yoon remains defiant.
Yoon has continued to insist that communist forces have pervaded through South Korea's institutions and that he is a victim of a witch hunt.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
His claims have found an audience with thousands of people taking to the streets to protest Yoon's treatment.
A recent poll showed more than a third of people did not trust the Constitution Court's judgment on Yoon.
Yoon is facing a charge of insurrection for declaring martial law.
He has quit his party in order to boost its candidate's chances, as per BBC.
South Korea's acting President Lee Ju-ho said on Monday the government was 'transparently disclosing the entire process of the presidential election', according to his office.
The National Election Commission will air CCTV surveillance footage of rooms storing ballots from early voting, with their entrances sealed before counting starts and transported ballots given police escorts, Lee said.
What happens after the votes are cast?
After votes are cast, ballots will be initially sorted by machines and then election workers will count them, the NEC said.
The official election campaign is relatively short in South Korea in a bid to contain costs. It started on May 12.
There are 3,568 polling stations across the country open for early voting that will be allowed between May 29-30.
Election day on June 3 is a public holiday.
Voting will run from 6 am until 8 pm with an indication of the results likely to start emerging that evening or early the next day.
On June 4, the National Election Commission is expected to verify the results and the inauguration of the new president will be held.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
19 minutes ago
- India Today
Russian lawmaker says can offer political asylum to Elon Musk amid Trump feud
A senior Russian lawmaker on Friday said that Russia could offer political asylum to tech billionaire Elon Musk amid his ongoing public feud with US President Donald Trump, though the Kremlin has distanced itself from the dispute, saying that 'this is an internal matter of the United States. We are in no way going to interfere in this, or comment on it in any way.'advertisementThe rift between Musk and Trump, who were seen as close allies during and after the 2024 US presidential election, intensified this week, on June 5, as they traded accusations in a huge public spat on social media. The move followed the Tesla and SpaceX founder's harsh criticism of Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill', which Musk claimed would deepen the US national debt.'If he did [need political asylum], of course, Russia could offer it,' Dmitry Novikov, first deputy chairman of the State Duma's International Affairs Committee, told state-run TASS. However, Novikov added that Musk is 'playing a completely different game' and likely wouldn't seek asylum. On the other hand, Russian Presidential Spokesman Dmitry Peskov yesterday declined to weigh in on the spat when asked for a comment, saying, 'This is a domestic issue of the United States, and we don't intend to interfere.'advertisement'We're confident the US president will handle this situation on his own,' Peskov added. The asylum offer, though largely symbolic, recalls previous cases such as NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, who was granted asylum in Russia in 2013, and British blogger Graham Phillips, who also received protection from resigned last week as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a controversial federal agency created to rein in government spending. His departure followed escalating clashes with the White House over fiscal policy and budget split quickly turned public and personal. Musk accused President Trump of reckless spending and claimed that without his $300 million campaign donation and support, Trump would never have won re-election in 2024. In a series of sharp online posts, Musk backed efforts to impeach the president, criticised Trump's import tariffs and warned that the US economy was headed for a recession in the second half of 2025. Trump hit back, accusing Musk of abandoning his duties at DOGE and saying the billionaire 'went crazy.' The president also threatened to revoke all federal contracts and subsidies linked to Musk's fallout has already sent shockwaves through financial markets, with Tesla shares tumbling sharply on Friday and Musk's threat to pull out of a key US space program has heightened tensions further. IN THIS STORY#Russia#United States of America#Donald Trump#Elon Musk


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
State to seek DP workaround for redevelopment of Arthur Road Jail
MUMBAI: The plan to redevelop Arthur Road jail, Mumbai's main prison, has inched forward, with the state deciding to urge the civic administration to ease a provision that would force it to surrender a sizable portion of its property. Minister of state for home Yogesh Kadam told officials of his department and the jails department of the city police on Thursday to prepare a plan for a new ground-plus-four storey prison that would accommodate 5,000 prisoners. The present British-era jail has a capacity for 800 inmates although it houses as many as 3,500. The challenge to building a new structure comes from a provision in the city's Development Plan (DP), which mandates that the jail give up a significant portion of its property when it redevelops the prison. The land thus surrendered would add 15 metres to the width of the road outside, converting it into a 35-metre-wide stretch. The portion in question currently houses the jail's staff quarters. 'The government is working on plans to redevelop Arthur Road Jail as well as Byculla Jail, which is for women. For the Arthur Road Jail redevelopment, I have directed officials to submit a fresh proposal with a request for concessions from the provisions in the DP, to construct a ground-plus-four storey structure. We will request the BMC commissioner for the concession,' said Kadam. He has directed officials from the home department and prisons department to visit the Singapore jail before preparing the plan. He has also asked officials to work on plot reservations on 22 acres of land in Mankhurd for the construction of a new jail. A home department official said the new Arthur Road Jail would be built in phases and four temporary barracks would be constructed inside the premises, to accommodate the inmates. Kadam also said the new jail would have three courtrooms. This would save time and money as inmates would not have to be transported for court hearings outside. It would also ease the pressure to provide security to the inmates while transporting them. 'During the trial of Ajmal Kasab, who had led the attack on Mumbai in 2008, a court was set up inside the Arthur Road Jail. Adding two more courtrooms would ease the pressure on the police to provide security and other arrangements to inmates for travel to court,' said Kadam. .


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
For a $5 trillion economy, India must embrace cutting-edge tech
The Indian economy is on the threshold of crossing another milestone and becoming the fourth-largest in the world. It is a commendable achievement for a country that began its journey as an independent nation in 1947 with a meagre $33-billion economy. Decades of British exploitation left it significantly weakened and poor. The Jawaharlal Nehru government's Soviet-style central planning, while promoting heavy industries and the public sector, led to low economic growth of 3-4 per cent, pejoratively described as the 'Hindu rate of growth'. In 40 years, it could only reach the $266 billion mark. The first major leap came in 1991 when the Narasimha Rao government introduced economic liberalisation and unleashed the potential of Indian entrepreneurs. The opportunity offered by the digital revolution with the introduction of the internet was quickly seized by some of India's brightest tech entrepreneurs. The Indian economy grew manifold in the next two decades on the strength of its services economy, which contributed 60 per cent of the nation's GDP. The economy crossed $2 trillion by the time the Narendra Modi government came to power. The last 10 years have seen the Modi government giving greater emphasis to faster economic growth through programmes like Stand-Up India, Start-Up India and Make in India. The results are there to see. IMF data from May has projected that the Indian economy will overtake Japan this year, reaching the $4.19 trillion mark. Japan was once a $5.8 trillion economy but has shrunk to $ 4.18 trillion due to stagnation and slow growth rates since the 1990s. As India demonstrated promising growth, naysayers rushed forward to raise the hollow bogey of per capita income. Per capita income is determined by factors like the size of the population. India is the world's most populous country. As a result, whatever may be the size of GDP, its per capita figures are bound to remain low. No country's growth can be measured on the criterion of per capita income alone. Although the US is the world's largest economy with a $28 trillion GDP, it ranks seventh in per capita. China, the second-largest economy with $18 trillion, ranks 69. The per capita argument is worthless because even if India becomes the world's largest economy with $30 trillion, it will still be ranked 55th in terms of per capita. The only merit of this argument is that the country should be able to provide better living standards to all its citizens. In democracies, the fruits of economic growth percolate to all sections of society. This is reflected in the consumption patterns. Surveys indicate that the monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE) has increased in India by more than 2.5 times in the last 10 years. Interestingly, most of this expenditure was on travel, health and education, indicating healthy growth parameters. Tourism has seen remarkable growth in the last 10 years. China still occupies the first rank in the number of domestic and international travellers. India lagged in this sector for decades due to a lack of disposable income and tourism infrastructure. But today, with the incomes of the middle class growing substantially, Indians have started travelling more. Data indicates about 2.5 billion domestic tourist visits last year. Figures for 2024 indicate that almost 29 million Indians travelled abroad marking a 30 per cent growth. All this indicates healthy economic growth, which has led to the near eradication of baseline poverty and the creation of a strong middle class with disposable income. The Modi government aspires to take the economy to further heights with targets ranging from $ 5 trillion in 2027 to $10 trillion in 2035. The current impressive growth is a result of corrective measures taken by the government. It removed parallel economy, allowed proper distribution of wealth and encouraged greater consumption. But the path from here needs to be calibrated carefully. Economies grow on the strength not just of consumption but also trade and technology. Quality, quantity and speed are the main determining factors. India and China were leading economies until the middle of the 18th century. But when the industrial revolution occurred first in England and later in America, those two countries surged ahead and became leading economic powers by the dawn of the 20th century. When automation and digitisation progressed in the last decades of the last century, China moved ahead of the curve, emerging as the second-largest economy by 2008. We are now in the post-manufacturing and post-digital era. Growth in frontier technologies will determine a country's economic future. A country of India's size and capability cannot just think perpetually in terms of catching up with the developed West and the rest. It has to, instead, think in terms of moving ahead of the curve. We missed the first two industrial revolutions as we were a slave nation at that time. We benefitted partially from the third, digital revolution of the 1980s and '90s and became a leader in sectors like IT services. But the Fourth Industrial Revolution, led by Artificial Intelligence (AI), quantum technologies, robotics, space, defence, crypto and bio-engineering calls for new thinking and new priorities. The impressive growth of the Indian economy in the last decade was largely due to the unleashing of its basic potential. The trajectory from here should be more strategic, with greater emphasis on deep-tech R&D, an area in which we lag. It is important to create a climate of hassle-free access to investments in these areas. Only then can India aspire to achieve its goal of becoming a $10 trillion economy in the next 10 years. The writer, president, India Foundation, is with the BJP