logo
A Michelin-starred chef shares the menu-building strategies he uses to navigate rising food costs

A Michelin-starred chef shares the menu-building strategies he uses to navigate rising food costs

Behind the plush seats and pastel-pink interior of Chicago's first Michelin-starred Indian restaurant — and one of the rare Indian fine-dining tasting menus in the US — was a risk.
While restaurants continued to shutter or pivot in 2022 because of COVID-19, Indienne opened its doors.
"That was, I think, the biggest risk I've taken," said Sujan Sarkar, Indienne's chef and co-owner, who has more than 22 years of experience opening and managing restaurants around the world.
Sarkar told Business Insider that throughout the pandemic, the restaurant's vision — to spread a new Indian-food movement backed by high-end, flavorful dishes — stayed the same. "It can be profitable," he said. "We can build a successful business if we are consistent."
But today's turbulent market, while different from the pandemic's, presents fresh challenges. The Economic Research Service's Food Price Outlook predicts that food costs will increase by 3.5% in 2025, and supply chains show no sign of easing up anytime soon.
As inflation continues to grip the US and tariff negotiations remain in flux, causing companies to hike their prices, restaurant owners are preparing to face the brunt of the economic pressures. And while the industry has been battle-tested in the past, fine-dining leaders are perhaps at a crossroads: Shut down, pivot, or stay the course?
For Sarkar, it's all about sticking to what's worked in the past. "We have to be sensible about everything, because the diners who are coming to dine in our restaurant are coming for something that we are known for," Sarkar said. "We are seeing that people are really appreciating what we do, and that's why the business is also sustainable, even though the cost is rising."
BI spoke with Sarkar about his plans for navigating economic pressures and how fine dining could adapt to stay ahead.
Sujan Sarkar: We run four different tasting menus. We have nonvegetatian, vegetarian, vegan, and pescatarian. With the vegan menu, my cost is lower than the nonvegetarian menu because of no protein.
Our vegetarian and vegan menus do not include caviar, scallops, or lamb. When diners choose these menus, the price is only a $10 or $15 difference from the nonvegetarian menu. But when they opt for this, my profitability goes up because the food costs are lower. We also always offer a supplement course that people can add to their tasting for $15 to $24 extra.
I don't do last-minute makeshift dishes. So if you read a menu before you come, it's much easier for you and for me as a business. When we have the planning in place, we can control the cost. If my restaurant is full, I can manage because I know how much business we'll do, and my forecasting is much easier. I also have four other restaurants in the city. We share a lot of resources, and that also helps us cut costs.
How does simplicity and seasonality play into how adaptable you've been as a restaurant?
An example is how we work with farmers to get baby corn. I purchase a guaranteed minimum quantity of baby corn every week so I can get better pricing and farmers can have secure revenue. It's local and seasonal, which keeps my costs down and also gives the farmers business.
We don't grow a lot of vegetables here in the winter, so I have to rely on people from California who can get them.
But I can't only give them business in the winter — there isn't a written contract, but there's an understanding that I will give them yearlong business. So they are also doing things for us, like sourcing baby vegetables, micro herbs, and edible flowers. That way, the menu can be consistent, and we can set its cost.
Restaurants are going from highly priced menus to something affordable. We did just the opposite. We used to do a tasting and an à la carte menu when we started, but now we are only a tasting restaurant.
We are not creating a lower-priced menu to attract more diners. But almost a month ago, I opened a new restaurant called Nadu, where you can get food that is only à la carte.
We just took a different route at Indienne, but the people going appreciate that more because they know exactly what they're coming and paying for. We're getting an overwhelming response. It's still Indian food, but a much simpler version. Still, everything is cooked in-house, everything is flavorful, but now it's as close to our traditional Indian dishes as possible.
What advice would you give to emerging chefs or restaurateurs trying to build something ambitious in a time when margins may be tighter than ever?
I've waited almost 21 years to open Indienne. I could have opened before — I opened restaurants in so many different countries and all over America — but you have to be sure about what you're doing. It's not only about you when you open a restaurant. There are a lot of people who are going to trust you. If you fail, they fail as well.
You may be good at cooking, but that's only 30% of any restaurant. You have to learn so many other things. Your people-management skills, your accounting skills, your interpersonal skills, your PR — everything comes into play.
The restaurant business is very volatile, and the profit margin is getting limited every day. It's not easy, but just wait for the right time and get the right people by your side: investors, teammates, your mentor — everyone.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How to keep DQ files audit-ready
How to keep DQ files audit-ready

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How to keep DQ files audit-ready

Qualifying drivers requires navigating complex Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs). Doing this correctly is critical, as non-compliant driver qualification files can result in substantial audit fines and serve as a basis for negligence claims in post-crash litigation. Maintaining audit-ready DQ files isn't just about regulatory compliance—it's essential for protecting your business from financial and reputational damage. Since COVID restrictions have been lifted, FMCSA has prioritized face-to-face audits. After almost two years of increased remote evaluations, on-site screenings have skyrocketed. These comprehensive audits have more than doubled, jumping from nearly 2,000 in 2020 to over 4,400 in 2024. Additionally, FMCSA has increased record-keeping penalties to $1,544 per day, with a maximum penalty of $15,445. This shift is important for carriers to be aware of, as onsite audits are typically more thorough and detailed. Some violations detected during audits are so severe that even a single instance requires immediate corrective action. According to FMCSA's Analysis and Information Online, the most common acute violations regarding driver qualification include: Using a driver with a suspended CDL, disqualified status or multiple CDLs Allowing a driver with more than one CDL to operate a CMV Driving a CMV while disqualified Using an unqualified driver showing as Prohibited on the MVR Using a physically unqualified driver While these acute violations require immediate and specific action, critical violations represent broader issues with the company's recordkeeping and compliance efforts. These violations can add up to create liability issues and downgraded safety ratings. Common critical violations include: Driver applications that are missing, incomplete or non-compliant Lacking documentation of safety performance history from all DOT-regulated employers from the previous three years Motor vehicle records (MVRs) showing drivers not properly licensed for assigned vehicles (wrong class, missing endorsements, restricted/suspended/revoked licenses) When accidents happen, plaintiff attorneys will immediately look into the involved company's safety record. Hiring drivers with questionable safety histories or failing to follow FMCSRs will become the focus of litigation, stacking the deck against the carrier. In order to avoid this outcome, carriers must fulfill their duty to employ qualified and safe drivers. The American Transportation Research Institute's 2022 study, 'Understanding the Impact of Nuclear Verdicts on the Trucking Industry,' found that both defense and plaintiffs' attorneys agree on three key factors for protecting carriers from nuclear verdicts: Crash avoidance is paramount, meeting and exceeding regulations is essential and strict adherence to company policies is critical. 'Don't make it easy for plaintiff's attorneys. They are experts in every aspect of DQ files or they hire experts to find inconsistent execution of policies or blatant non-compliance. Carriers need their own experts to stay defendable,' says Mark Schedler, J. J. Keller's Senior Editor of Transport Management. Headline-making crashes can severely damage a company's reputation and ability to secure future business. Details about what contributed to a crash often become public knowledge. Media coverage of poor hiring practices can result in customers losing trust and wanting to avoid vicarious liability, including being sued because of a carrier's crash while hauling their goods. A comprehensive DQ Checklist should focus on keeping only FMCSA-required driver qualification documents in the file whenever possible. Files are easier to audit when they contain only necessary documentation. Non-required or 'nice to have' documents only add clutter and should be stored elsewhere with appropriate security protocols. 'Nice to have' documents include qualification checklists, documents certifying the driver agrees to follow certain rules, statements of on-duty time and training records for non-required training. While these documents may provide additional information, they should be stored separately from the official DQ file to maintain clarity and compliance focus. 'I am a backpacker with 25 plus years of experience who goes into the wilderness with everything I need to stay safe. I use a checklist for every trip, and I recommend that carriers do the same for every DQ file,' noted Schedler. This checklist created by J. J. Keller includes permanent FMCSA-required items for all drivers, recurring items and those applicable only to drivers operating vehicles requiring a CDL, as well as optional best practices. 'If you are looking at using a third-party expert, J. J. Keller's Managed Services team has an over 160-item checklist that they use to keep DQ files audit ready. That goes a long way to staying defendable,' according to Schedler. While FMCSA allows an acquiring company to accept DQ files from the acquired company, a company won't know what violations they are inheriting without conducting a full audit of these files. Missing or incomplete records could also lead to penalties or legal consequences. The acquiring company assumes responsibility for any deficiencies—even if the violations occurred under previous ownership. Being unaware of compliance gaps creates significant risk if an unqualified driver operates a CMV and becomes involved in a crash, regardless of fault. When moving employees from warehouse or other non-DOT regulated positions to CMV driving roles, companies often miss critical requirements like obtaining a DOT-compliant application per 391.21. These oversights can lead to serious violations and potential liability. Drivers with breaks in employment require new DQ files with updated documentation, though some existing documents may be reused. Carriers must accurately determine whether a driver is a rehire or simply returning from extended time off to ensure proper documentation is maintained. By understanding these common risk scenarios and implementing thorough checklist procedures, carriers can maintain audit-ready DQ files that not only satisfy regulatory requirements but also provide protection against costly fines, litigation and reputational damage. Investing in proper driver qualification management today prevents significant problems tomorrow. The post How to keep DQ files audit-ready appeared first on FreightWaves.

Granola is yummy. This AI version is pretty good, too.
Granola is yummy. This AI version is pretty good, too.

Business Insider

time20 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Granola is yummy. This AI version is pretty good, too.

Each week in Business Insider's Tech Memo newsletter, I try an AI tool. What do you think of this one? What should I do, or use, next week? Let me know. This week, I tested Granola, an AI notetaking assistant. I fired it up for an interview with Raj Sharma, a bigwig at consulting giant EY. Coincidentally, he said his wife uses Granola to transcribe her interactions with patients. Installing it on my MacBook was easy. It synced with my Google work calendar, launched a Microsoft Teams video call, and prompted me to start recording — all smooth and fast. My prepared questions were saved in the app, but I couldn't easily access them during the call. I defaulted to a Google Doc, wishing the notes had appeared more intuitively as the interview began. Granola's post-interview features impressed me. It provided a thematic summary with expandable sections and action items, based partly on my prepared questions and any notes I jotted down while Raj was speaking. I asked it to find a quote from Raj about AI being a "welcome relief," and it delivered. I made sure to go back and check the exact phrasing. For that, I needed the full transcript. This was pretty good, although Raj's comments and my questions were sometimes misattributed to the wrong speaker. What shocked me: Granola doesn't record audio of meetings. This is a dealbreaker for journalists who need to verify quotes precisely. I used Apple's Voice Memos app alongside Granola for the essential raw audio backup. Granola is sleek, smart, and promising. But for now, it's missing one essential thing for me: the truth in someone's own voice. Postscript After sending out the Tech Memo newsletter this morning, I tracked down emails from Vicky Firth, who leads customer experience at Granola. She kindly answered my annoying questions! Here's what she said on the lack of I asked why Granola doesn't provide audio recordings. "We never store the audio recordings and that's a deliberate decision for a few reasons. Firstly, we're aware that whatever platform you're on for your call already does this, and we don't feel the need to duplicate this functionality — we've optimised Granola to be able to make great summaries of meetings, so that's what we're laser-focused on, and the transcripts are enough to allow it to do that well. We want to make sure Granola can stay simple and great at what it does best." "Another set of reasons is around data security: we want to make sure we're only capturing what's necessary to make those great notes, such that we're not holding on to more sensitive information than is necessary. We hear feedback on both sides — some users would love us to store the recordings, but others email us wanting to make sure we don't! The transcripts again feel like enough here." I suggested that this is kind of a dealkiller for those who need to verify exactly what people say. I also asked why Granola doesn't just offer this as a default feature but add a clear button to switch audio recording off when users want that? Firth's reply makes good sense, and it's a real window into how startups operate and the hard product decisions they must make while building efficiently. "It's probably not the best solution if you're someone who needs very specific quotes on a regular basis, and another product is probably more suited if that's what you're after as your primary output. We do get requests for it, but at the moment (especially while we're such a small team and have to be ruthless with prioritising!) we're trying to focus on functionality that helps make great summarised notes, helps you share those notes with your team, and help you all get insights to do your work better on a higher level. It means we sadly have a long, long list of things that we have to park for now!"

Trump is considering selling his Tesla after feuding with Elon Musk
Trump is considering selling his Tesla after feuding with Elon Musk

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump is considering selling his Tesla after feuding with Elon Musk

President Donald Trump bought a red Tesla Model S in a show of support for Elon Musk in March. After an explosive bust-up with the Tesla CEO, he's considering selling it, per a White House official. The dramatic disintegration of Trump and Musk's relationship sent Tesla stock plunging on Thursday. Just under three months ago, President Donald Trump stood next to Elon Musk outside the White House to choose a new Tesla. Following his explosive feud with the Tesla CEO, Trump may be about to ditch his shiny EV too. A senior White House official confirmed to Business Insider that Trump was considering selling or giving away the red Model S, which has a list price of about $80,000. The Wall Street Journal first reported the news. Trump picked out the Model S from a lineup of Tesla vehicles during a sales pitch-like event with Musk at the White House in March. At the time, it was a show of support from Trump to his biggest financial backer, with Tesla stock plunging and the company becoming a target for protests due to Musk's efforts to slash the government workforce at DOGE. At the event, Trump said he was buying a Tesla because "it's a great product, as good as it gets," and because Musk had "devoted his energy and his life to doing this, and I think he's been treated very unfairly by a very small group of people." Since then, the relationship between the president and the world's richest person has taken a dramatic turn for the worst. A high-profile spat began on Thursday with Musk criticising Trump's "big, beautiful" tax bill in a series of posts on X. Trump then called the billionaire "crazy" and suggested that "the easiest way to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon's governmental subsidies and contracts." The feud damaged Tesla's stock price, closing down 14% on Thursday and wiping $138 billion off the company's valuation. Shares staged a recovery on Friday, rising nearly 5% in morning trading and remain down by a fifth this year. If Trump does decide to sell his Model S, he should probably get a move on. A study by used car site iSeeCars in April found that used Model S prices had dropped more than any other model over the past year, as the resale value of used Teslas continues to slide. Musk did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store